Postfatigue fracture resistance of modified prefabricated zirconia implant abutments

Retention of hybrid-abutment-crowns with offset implant placement: influence of Crown materials and Ti-base height

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the current study was to assess the impact of three esthetic CAD/CAM material, titanium base height and their interaction on the retention strength of a hybrid-abutment-crown.

METHODS

A total of 42 hybrid-abutment crowns with identical external geometries were designed in CAD software to fit two different Ti-Base abutment heights (n = 42/abutment height): either short (S) with 4 mm (n = 21) or long (L) 7 mm (n = 21) height. Each main group was divided into 3 subgroups (n = 7), according to esthetic crown material, Zirconia (Z), Lithium disilicate (L) and Hybrid ceramic (V). A universal primer and an adhesive resin cement were used for bonding according to the manufacturer instructions. Artificial aging in form of water storage (30 days), chewing simulation (50,000-cycles, 49 N, 1.67 Hz) and thermal cyclic (5000 cycles at 5-55 °C) were applied, specimens were pulled-out under tension load in (N) using a universal testing machine. Two and one-way ANOVA and Post Hoc Tukey test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Long lithium disilicate (LL) group showed the highest retention (738.7 ± 178.5) followed by short lithium disilicate (LS) group (688.6 ± 169.9). Meanwhile, short zirconia (ZS) showed the lowest retention strength (231.1 ± 86.9).

CONCLUSION

CAD/CAM fabricated lithium disilicate hybrid-abutment-crown can be used instead of conventional crowns over implant abutment. Etchable ceramics are recommended as a material of choice for CAD/CAM fabricated hybrid-abutment-crowns instead of zirconia in terms of retention durability.

Hybrid abutment during prosthetic planning and oral rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

The present study aims to describe through a literature review, the characteristics and properties of hybrid abutments, as well as their proper use as a new rehabilitation strategy.

METHODS

A bibliographic search was conducted in the main health databases Pubmed (www.pubmed.gov) and Google Scholar (www.scholar.google.com.br), in which studies published from 2001 to 2020 were collected. Laboratory studies, case reports, systematic and literature reviews were included. Therefore, articles that do not adress the characteristics and properties of hybrid abutments were excluded. In addition, studies that did not report the use of hybrid abutments as a new rehabilitation strategy.

RESULTS

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 80 research articles were selected and 20 were excluded, while 25 in vitro, 17 in vivo and 9 in silico studies were reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature demonstrates that hybrid abutments are an excellent alternative in cases of implant-supported rehabilitation, presenting high esthetic results, associated with good soft tissue response, periimplant marginal bone stability and adequate stress distribution during the masticatory loads dissipation.

Optimizing the esthetic outcome by using screw-retained implant abutment crowns: A 3-year clinical follow-up

This clinical report describes a ceramic complete-mouth rehabilitation with screw-retained implant abutment crowns, optimizing esthetics by combining the properties of ceramic materials. The abutments connected a titanium insert to a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) monolithic zirconia framework, offering improved esthetics and biologic response without negatively affecting the implant abutment interface. Lithium disilicate crowns were cemented extraorally on the abutments, resulting in a screw-retained restoration.

Effect of different grinding protocols on surface characteristics and fatigue behavior of yttria-stabilized zirconia polycrystalline: An in vitro study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Zirconia frameworks milled by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) often require clinical adjustments. In addition, zirconia prefabricated abutments can also require customization to achieve an adequate emergence profile. However, the influence of grinding adjustment on the surface characteristics and mechanical behavior of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) and the best grinding protocol is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different grinding protocols on the surface characteristics, phase transformation, and mechanical behavior of Y-TZP for frameworks and implant abutments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Bar-shaped specimens were fabricated according to ISO 6872-2016 and divided into 3 groups: GC (control, untreated), GA (grinding and finishing with medium and fine diamond rotary instruments using high-speed handpiece under constant water cooling), and GB (grinding and finishing with coarse and medium diamond rotary instruments, respectively, using slow-speed handpiece without water cooling). After specimen grinding, the topography and surface roughness were evaluated by using a laser confocal microscope, the Young modulus was measured by the impulse excitation technique, and crystallographic phase transformation was analyzed by X-ray diffraction. Specimens were then submitted to step-stress accelerated life testing (n=18). The surface roughness and Young modulus results were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey honestly significant difference test (α=.05). The data of step-stress accelerated life testing were analyzed by the survival probability considering the number of cycles and force until fracture.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were found among groups considering surface roughness (GA>GB>GC) (P<.05) and Young modulus (GB>GA=GC) (P=.003). X-ray diffraction showed that grinding leads to phase transformation, GC showed only tetragonal phase, while GA and GB showed tetragonal and monoclinic phases. No statistically significant difference (P<.05) was found among groups submitted to the same loading profile when the survival probability was compared, but significant difference was found between the light and moderate loading (P=.002) and light and severe loading (P=.014) of GB when different loading profiles in each group were compared.

CONCLUSIONS

Although grinding protocols affected surface characteristics and promoted phase transformation, the mechanical behavior of Y-TZP was not impaired. Therefore, both the grinding protocols tested can be safely used based on the evaluated properties.

Effect of Different Implant-Abutment Connection Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments

The aim of the present in vitro study was to assess the modes of failures under static load among titanium (Ti) and 1- and 2-piece zirconia abutments. The 1- and 2-piece zirconia abutment specimens were fabricated from prescanned Ti abutments. Twenty-one implant abutments and 21 implant replicas were equally divided into 3 groups as follows: (a) Group 1 (Titanium group); (b) Group 2 (1-piece zirconia abutment group); and (c) Group 3: 2-piece zirconia abutment group). A 250 000-cycle linear fatigue load ranging between 10 N and 210 N was applied to all specimens using an all-electric dynamic test instrument. The specimens were loaded until they fractured. In all groups, assessment of mode of fracture was done on visual assessment by a trained and calibrated investigator. Prior sample-size estimation was performed; and sample distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov and Shapiro tests. Screw fracture (n = 7) and abutment bending at the apical part (n = 7) occurred in the Ti group. In the 1-piece zirconia group, screw and abutment fractures occurred in 7 and 7 cases, respectively. In the 2-piece zirconia screw fracture (n = 7) above the Ti zirconia junction (transgingival segment) and abutment fracture (n = 7) were determined as the failure modes. In vitro, the 1-piece zirconia abutments are more fracture resistant than titanium and 2-piece zirconia abutments. From a clinical perspective, further studies are needed to determine the minimum static load value required to induce fracture of the 1- and 2-piece zirconia abutments.

In Vitro Comparison of Modes of Failures among Titanium and One- and Two-piece Zirconia Abutment under Static Load

Objectives  The objective was to assess modes of failures under static load (SL) among titanium (Ti) and one- and two-piece zirconia abutment (ZA) in vitro .

Materials and Methods  The Ti abutments were digitally scanned for the fabrication of the one- and two-piece zirconia abutment specimens. This was done to standardize the design of the one-piece abutment and make it the blueprint of the Ti abutment. Twenty-one implant abutments and 21 implant replicas were categorized into three groups as follows: group 1 (Titanium group), group 2 (one-piece ZA group), and group 3 (two-piece ZA group). A 250K-cycle, linear fatigue-load, reaching 10 to 210 Newton (N), was put on all specimens using an all-electric dynamic test instrument and the specimens were loaded until fracture.

Statistical Analysis  Assessment of mode of fracture among the groups was done visually. Significance was based below 0.05.

Results  Screw fracture ( n = 7) and abutment bending at the apical part ( n = 7) occurred in the Ti group. In the one-piece zirconia group, screw and abutment fractures occurred in seven and seven cases, respectively. In the two-piece zirconia group, screw fracture ( n = 7) above the Ti zirconia junction (transgingival segment) and abutment fracture ( n = 7) were determined as the failure modes.

Conclusion  In conclusion, all abutments underwent failures under SL in vitro ; and the mode of failure modes varied among the different abutment designs used.

Implant Angulation Effect on the Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Custom Abutments: An In Vitro Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the fracture resistance and performance of zirconia when employed for the fabrication of implant abutments with different angulations, simulating anterior maxillary oral rehabilitation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five monolithic zirconia custom abutments of internal conical implant connection were CAD/CAM designed and fabricated. The specimens were divided into three groups (n = 15/group) according to implant-to-abutment angulation. The angulations used were; 0°, 15°, and 25°. The abutments were loaded until failure at 135° using the Universal Testing Machine (Instron, Canton, MA). Collected data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test.

RESULTS

Mean (±standard deviation) load at fracture of the zirconia abutments for the three groups were 962.37 ± 93.81 N (Gr15) > 718.25 ± 93.71 N (Gr25) > 534.05 ±133.77 N (Gr0). Statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) was found between all groups; Gr0 vs. Gr15, Gr0 vs. Gr25, Gr15 vs. Gr25.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to expectations, the non-angulated monolithic zirconia abutments presented the lowest fracture resistance values. Angulating the abutments 15 or 25 degrees, following the palatal resorption pattern of the premaxilla, significantly increased the in vitro fracture resistance.

Fatigue survival and failure resistance of titanium versus zirconia implant abutments with various connection designs

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Data regarding the effect of connection design and abutment material on the fatigue survival and failure resistance of implant abutments are scarce.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of connection design and abutment material on the fatigue survival and failure resistance of implant abutment assemblies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three types of implants (n=18, N=54) and 6 groups of abutments (n=9, N=54) with different connection designs-internal conical (IC), internal tri-channel (IT), and external hexagonal (EH)-and abutment materials-titanium (T) and zirconia (Z)-were investigated. All the abutments were restored with identical central incisor crowns. Fatigue testing, including thermal and mechanical aging, was performed in a mastication simulator (Esetron Smart Robotechnologies) for up to 1.2×10⁶ cycles with a load of 50 N at an angle of 45 degrees. Then, the surviving specimens were subjected to failure resistance testing in a universal testing machine (Shimadzu AG-IS; Shimadzu Corp) at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. The maximum loads to failure (N) were recorded. Survival performance of the specimens throughout the fatigue testing was examined by the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The failure loads were analyzed by using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction (α=.05).

RESULTS

All the specimens of groups ICT, ITT, ITZ, and EHT survived fatigue testing, whereas 2 specimens from group ICZ and 3 specimens from EHZ failed. Statistically significant differences were found among the groups, based on the results of maximum failure loads (P<.05). The highest mean failure load was obtained in the ICT group (1069 ±182 N), followed by the ITT (926 ±197 N), EHT (873 ±126 N), ITZ (568 ±81 N), EHZ (311 ±45 N), and ICZ (287 ±63 N) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Abutment material and connection design affected the fatigue survival of implant abutment assemblies. Implant abutment assemblies with a titanium-titanium interface revealed higher failure resistance than the implant abutment assemblies with a titanium-zirconia interface.

Complete mechanical characterization of an external hexagonal implant connection: in vitro study, 3D FEM, and probabilistic fatigue

The aim of this study was to fully characterize the mechanical behavior of an external hexagonal implant connection (ø3.5 mm, 10-mm length) with an in vitro study, a three-dimensional finite element analysis, and a probabilistic fatigue study. Ten implant-abutment assemblies were randomly divided into two groups, five were subjected to a fracture test to obtain the maximum fracture load, and the remaining were exposed to a fatigue test with 360,000 cycles of 150 ± 10 N. After mechanical cycling, all samples were attached to the torque-testing machine and the removal torque was measured in Newton centimeters. A finite element analysis (FEA) was then executed in ANSYS® to verify all results obtained in the mechanical tests. Finally, due to the randomness of the fatigue phenomenon, a probabilistic fatigue model was computed to obtain the probability of failure associated with each cycle load. FEA demonstrated that the fracture corresponded with a maximum stress of 2454 MPa obtained in the in vitro fracture test. Mean life was verified by the three methods. Results obtained by the FEA, the in vitro test, and the probabilistic approaches were in accordance. Under these conditions, no mechanical etiology failure is expected to occur up to 100,000 cycles. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

Dislodgement Resistance of Zirconia Copings Cemented onto Zirconia and Titanium Abutments

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of the cement type and abutment material on the tensile strength required to dislodge zirconia copings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two experimental groups of abutments were prepared: (1) titanium abutments (n = 30) and (2) zirconia abutments (n = 30). Sixty zirconia copings (custom designed) were fabricated using 3-dimensional computer-assisted design to have a 6-mm projection above the abutment to accommodate a hole, through which a wire was inserted to attach the zirconia coping to a universal testing machine. Each abutment was placed onto an implant analog embedded in acrylic resin blocks to fit onto the universal testing machine. The zirconia copings were cemented onto the abutments with a provisional luting agent, zinc phosphate (ZP) cement, and adhesive resin cement, and after 5500 thermocycles, a tensile force was applied at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The removal force was recorded for each specimen. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and 1-way ANOVA were used for the statistical analysis (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

The mean forces necessary to remove the zirconia copings from titanium abutments were 6.52, 83.09, and 251.18 N for temporary cement, ZP cement, and resin cement, respectively. For zirconia abutments, the required forces were 17.82, 116.41, and 248.72 N.

CONCLUSIONS

The abutment material had no effect on retention, but the cement type affected the retention of the zirconia copings.

Fracture loads and failure modes of customized and non-customized zirconia abutments

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the fracture load and pattern of customized and non-customized zirconia abutments with Morse-taper connection.

METHODS

18 implants were divided into 3 groups according to the abutments used: Zr - with non-customized zirconia abutments; Zrc - with customized zirconia abutments; and Ti - with titanium abutments. To test their load capacity, a universal test machine with a 500-kgf load cell and a 0.5-mm/min speed were used. After, one implant-abutment assembly from each group was analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). For fractographic analysis, the specimens were transversely sectioned above the threads of the abutment screw in order to examine their fracture surfaces using SEM.

RESULTS

A significant difference was noted between the groups (Zr=573.7±11.66N, Zrc=768.0±8.72N and Ti=659.1±7.70N). Also, the zirconia abutments fractured while the titanium abutments deformed plastically. Zrc presented fracture loads significantly higher than Zr (p=0.009). All the zirconia abutments fractured below the implant platform, starting from the area of contact between the abutment and implant and propagating to the internal surface of the abutment. All the zirconia abutments presented complete cleavage in the mechanical test. Fractography detected differences in the position and pattern of fracture between the two groups with zirconia abutments, probably because of the different diameters in the transmucosal region.

SIGNIFICANCE

Customization of zirconia abutments did not affect their fracture loads, which were comparable to that of titanium and much higher than the maximum physiological limit for the anterior region of the maxilla.

Fracture Resistance of Implant Abutments Following Abutment Alterations by Milling the Margins: An In Vitro Study

This in vitro study evaluated the effect of different levels of preparation of an implant abutment on its fracture resistance. The study evaluated abutments that incorporated a platform switch (Myriad Plus Abutments, Morse Taper Connection) and Standard abutments (BioHorizons Standard Abutment, BioHorizons Inc). Each abutment was connected to an appropriate implant and mounted in a self-cured resin base. Based on the abutment preparation depths, 3 groups were created for each abutment type: as manufactured, abutment prepared 1 mm apical to the original margin, and abutment prepared 1.5 mm to the original margin. All the abutments were prepared in a standardized manner to incorporate a 0.5 mm chamfer margin uniformly. All the abutments were torqued to 30 Ncm on their respective implants. They were then subjected to loading until failure in a universal testing machine. Abutments with no preparation showed the maximum resistance to fracture for both groups. As the preparation depth increased, the fracture resistance decreased. The fracture resistance of implant abutment junction decreases as the preparation depth increases.