Bond strength and interactions of machined titanium-based alloy with dental cements

Bond durability and surface states of titanium, Ti-6Al-4V alloy, and zirconia for implant materials

PURPOSE

Screw-retained implant crowns used as dental implants comprise a zirconia coping and titanium base bonded using resin cement. These devices are prone to debonding failures. This study investigated the bond characteristics of implant materials based on shear bond strength (SBS) and surface characteristics.

METHODS

Chemically pure (CP) titanium grade-4 (Ti), Ti-6Al-4V alloy (Ti-6Al-4V), and tetragonal polycrystalline zirconia (zirconia) were evaluated as adherent materials. Plates of each material were polished, primed for the respective resin cements, and cemented using either methyl methacrylate-based resin cement (Super-Bond) or composite-based resin cement (Panavia). The cemented samples were subjected to 10,000 thermocycles alternating between 5 and 55 °C, and the SBS were obtained before and after thermocycling. The sample surfaces were characterized based on surface observations, roughness, and free energy (SFE).

RESULTS

The SBSs of all materials bonded using Panavia were significantly compromised during thermocycling and reached zero. Although the SBSs of Ti and Ti-6Al-4V bonded using Super-Bond were not significantly affected by thermocycling, those of zirconia decreased significantly. The bond durability between zirconia and Super-Bond was improved via alumina air-abrasion, which caused no significant loss of SBS after thermocycling. Surface analyses of the air-abraded zirconia validated these results and confirmed that its surface roughness and SFE were significantly increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The bond durability between resin cement and zirconia was lower than that between Ti and Ti-6Al-4V. The alumina air-abrasion pretreatment of zirconia improved the SFE and surface roughness, thereby enhancing bond durability.

Comparison of the shear bond strength of composite resins with zirconia and titanium using different resin cements

PURPOSE

The shear bond strength of conventional zirconia (3Y-TZP), translucent zirconia (5Y-PSZ), and titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) thermocycled using different phosphate monomer resin cements were investigated.

METHODS

In this study, 120 specimens of 3Y-TZP, 5Y-PSZ, and Ti6Al4V were cemented to nanocomposite resin cylinders using PANAVIA™ V5 and Rely X™ U200. The bond area and resin cement thickness were controlled as per ISO 29022:2013 and 4049:2009. Each resin cement group was used with/without the Clearfil ceramic primer plus. The shear bond strength of the 12 groups was statistically analyzed using two and one-way ANOVA to determine the properties of the different materials and resin cements (α = 0.05). The mode of failure was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).

RESULTS

The titanium alloy groups showed better shear bond strength than the zirconia groups (p < 0.05). PANAVIA™ V5 without primer showed significantly lower shear bond strength than other cements in zirconia and titanium alloy specimens (p < 0.05). Titanium alloy with Rely X™ U200 with a Clearfil ceramic primer plus showed the highest shear bond strength (6.37 ± 1.60 MPa). SEM images showed mixed failures in zirconia groups and cohesive failures in titanium alloy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The titanium alloy showed better shear bond strength than zirconia when the Clearfil ceramic primer plus was used. The primer solution containing MDP and resin cement with phosphoric methacrylate ester showed similar shear bond strength with 3Y-TZP and 5Y-PSZ. The resin cement without phosphate monomers demonstrated the least shear bond strength.

Graphene oxide-coated porous titanium for pulp sealing: an antibacterial and dentino-inductive restorative material

Pulp treatment techniques such as pulp capping, pulpotomy and pulp regeneration are all based on the principle of preserving vital pulp. However, specific dental restorative materials that can simultaneously protect pulp vitality and repair occlusal morphology have not been developed thus far. Traditional pulp capping materials cannot be used as dental restorative materials due to their long-term solubility and poor mechanical behavior. Titanium (Ti) is used extensively in dentistry and is regarded as a promising material for pulp sealing because of its favorable biocompatibility, processability and mechanical properties. Originally, we proposed the concept of "odontointegration", which represents direct dentin-like mineralization contact between pulp and the surface of the pulp sealing material; herein, we report the fabrication of a novel antibacterial and dentino-inductive material via micro-arc oxidation (MAO), incorporating self-assembled graphene oxide (GO) for Ti surface modification. The hierarchical micro/nanoporous structure of the MAO coating provides a suitable microenvironment for odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells, and GO loading contributes to antibacterial activity. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy were employed for structure and elemental analysis. In vitro studies, including cell adhesion, Live/Dead and CCK-8 assays, alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium deposition assay, real-time polymerase chain reaction, western blot analysis and immunofluorescence staining were used to examine cell adhesion, viability, proliferation, mineralization, and odontogenic differentiation ability. Antibacterial properties against Streptococcus mutans were analyzed by SEM, spread plate, Live/Dead and Alamar blue tests. The Ti-MAO-1.0 mg mL-1 GO group exhibited excellent cell adhesion, odontoblast differentiation, mineralization, and antibacterial ability, which are beneficial to odontointegration.

Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant-supported prosthesis: An in vitro study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant retained restorations on to titanium specimens after different surface treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty disc shaped specimens were used. They were divided into three groups considering the surface treatments (no treatment, sandblasting, and oxygen plasma treatment). Water contact angle of specimens were determined. The specimens were further divided into four subgroups (n=10) according to applied cement types: polycarboxylate cement (Adhesor Carbofine-AC), temporary zinc oxide free cement (Temporary Cement-ZOC), non eugenol provisional cement for implant retained prosthesis (Premier Implant Cement-PI), and non eugenol acrylic-urethane polymer based provisional cement for implant luting (Cem Implant Cement-CI). Shear bond strength values were evaluated. Two-way ANOVA test and Regression analysis were used to statistical analyze the results.

RESULTS

Overall shear bond strength values of luting cements defined in sandblasting groups were considerably higher than other surfaces (P<.05). The cements can be ranked as AC > CI > PI > ZOC according to shear bond strength values for all surface treatment groups (P<.05). Water contact angles of surface treatments (control, sandblasting, and plasma treatment group) were 76.17° ± 3.99, 110.45° ± 1.41, and 73.80° ± 4.79, respectively. Regression analysis revealed that correlation between the contact angle of different surfaces and shear bond strength was not strong (P>.05).

CONCLUSION

The retentive strength findings of all luting cements were higher in sandblasting and oxygen plasma groups than in control groups. Oxygen plasma treatment can improve the adhesion ability of titanium surfaces without any mechanical damage to titanium structure.

Evaluation of the Effect of Fluoride-containing Luting Cements on Titanium and Its Effect on the Shear Bond Strength

Context:

The most appropriate luting agent for titanium crowns is yet to be determined. Commonly used cements for luting titanium restorations give off leachable ions which may cause surface interaction with the titanium.

Aims:

The purpose of this study was to determine the shear bond strength of four grades of commercially pure titanium and Ti 6Al 4V with different cements and to examine for any surface physical changes.

Settings and Design:

The three luting cements, i.e., zinc polycarboxylate cement, glass ionomer cement, and zinc phosphate cement, were used to evaluate their effect on titanium. Ni Cr was used as a control.

Methods and Material:

The metal rods were milled to discs of 6 mm diameter and 4 mm height. Freshly extracted maxillary first molars, mounted in resin blocks, were sliced horizontally at occlusal third of the tooth. The discs were cemented to the sliced surface of the tooth with the three luting cements. The models were subjected to the shear bond strength test. Statistical analysis used: The data collected were analyzed statistically with one way ANOVA. A representative specimen of each group was observed under a scanning electron microscope.

Results:

The mean values ranged from 0.31 to 15.6 MPa. The shear bond strength values of the zinc polycarboxylate cement group were significantly high (P < 0.05). Corrosion of the titanium alloy luted with zinc polycarboxylate cement was observed.

Conclusions:

Cementation with zinc polycarboxylate cement provided high shear bond strength, but showed corrosion on titanium.

What is the Best Available Luting Agent for Implant Prosthesis?

Cement-retention is a viable option in restoring dental implants. A wide range of dental cements with different properties are commercially available for use in the cementation of implant prostheses. The selection of a dental cement for proper clinical application can be challenging. This article overviews the commercially available dental cements used in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses. Guidelines for cement selection are presented according to abutment and prosthetic material. Cementation techniques to reduce excess cement in peri-implant tissues are also mentioned.

A Current Perspective on Screw-Retained Single-Implant Restorations: A Review of Pertinent Literature

OBJECTIVE

There is a trend toward increased use of screw-retained single-implant restorations. A comprehensive literature review was undertaken to examine the data related to screw- and cement-retention and to objectively evaluate the innovations in implant dentistry that have led to this resurgence.

OVERVIEW

When comparing the two options, survival and complication rates are similar, bone and soft-tissue levels are comparable, and zirconia offers esthetic advantages for both selections. Zirconia abutments with bonded titanium inserts provide esthetic alternatives to titanium abutments for both choices. Bone- and soft-tissue responses are similar, but residual cement of cement-retained restorations is associated with significant soft- and hard-tissue complications. The potential weakness of ceramic discontinuity of screw-access openings can be lessened by the incorporation of stronger ceramic materials such as zirconia and lithium disilicate. The overriding remaining indication for cement-retained restorations is to compensate for angled implants.

CONCLUSIONS

Screw-retained single-implant crowns should be reconsidered for many clinical situations for the following reasons: Predictable retention and retrievability No potential for the biologic consequences associated with residual cement As with cement-retained restorations, the choice between metal ceramics or all ceramics Only one margin, at the implant/abutment interface A single abutment/crown ceramic margin that can extend gingivally to the implant interface Nearly imperceptible blend of a composite resin in ceramic abutment access openings One component instead of two, which may simplify the restorative process CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Innovations in implant and ceramic technology now give screw-retained prostheses the potential for esthetic, functional, and biologic outcomes that are comparable to those for cement-retained prostheses, while providing the advantages of predictable retrievability and avoidance of residual cement. Angled implants, however, remain a major indication for cement-retained single-implant prostheses. (J Esthet Restor Dent 29:161-171, 2017).

Tensile Strength of Resin Cements Used with Base Metals in a Simulating Passive Cementation Technique for Implant-Supported Prostheses

Abstract The aim of this study was to analyze the tensile strength of two different resin cements used in passive cementation technique for implant-supported prosthesis. Ninety-six plastic cylinders were waxed in standardized forms, cast in commercially pure titanium, nickel-chromium and nickel-chromium-titanium alloys. Specimens were cemented on titanium cylinders using self-adhesive resin cement or conventional dual-cured resin cement. Specimens were divided in 12 groups (n=8) in accordance to metal, cement and ageing process. Specimens were immersed in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and half of them was thermocycled for 5,000 cycles. Specimens were submitted to bond strength test in a universal test machine EMIC-DL2000 at 5 mm/min speed. Statistical analysis evidenced higher tensile strength for self-adhesive resin cement than conventional dual-cured resin cement, whatever the used metal. Self-adhesive resin cement presented higher tensile strength compared to conventional dual-cured resin cement. In conclusion, metal type and ageing process did not influence the tensile strength results.

Retentive strength of implant-supported CAD-CAM lithium disilicate crowns on zirconia custom abutments using 6 different cements

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The optimal retention of implant-supported ceramic crowns on zirconia abutments is a goal of prosthodontic treatment.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the retentive strength of implant-supported IPS e.max CAD-CAM (e.max) crowns bonded to custom zirconia implant abutments with different cements.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An optical scan of a zirconia custom abutment and a complete-coverage modified crown was designed using an intraoral E4D scanner. One hundred twenty lithium disilicate crowns (IPS e.max CAD) were cemented to 120 zirconia abutment replicas with 1 of 6 cements: Panavia 21 (P21), Multilink Hybrid Abutment (MHA), RelyX Unicem 2 (RXU), RelyX Luting Plus (RLP), Ketac Cem (KC), and Premier Implant (PI). The specimens were stored at 37°C in 100% humidity for 24 hours. Half of the specimens were thermocycled for 500 cycles. The retentive force was measured using a pull-out test with a universal testing machine. Mean retentive strengths (MRS) were calculated using 2-way ANOVA and the Tukey-Kramer test (α=.05).

RESULTS

The MRS (MPa) after 24-hour storage were P21 (3.1), MHA (2.5), RXU (2.5), RLP (1.3), KC (0.9), and PI (0.5). The MRS after thermocycling were MHA (2.5), P21 (2.2), RLP (1.8), KC (1.4), RXU (1.1), and PI (0.3). P21 had the highest MRS after 24-hour storage (P<.001), but after thermocycling MHA had the highest MRS (P<.001). RXU showed a significant decrease in MRS after thermocycling (P<.05). Cement residue was mostly retained on the zirconia abutments for P21, while for the other cements' residue was retained on the lithium disilicate crowns.

CONCLUSIONS

The cements tested presented a range of retentive strengths, providing the clinician with a choice of more or less retentive cements. MHA was the most retentive cement after thermocycling. Thermocycling significantly affected the retentive strengths of the P21 and RXU cements.