Analysis of behavior of the wear coefficient in different layers of acrylic resin teeth

Clinical wear of different types of denture teeth after one year in service: A clinical study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Worn denture teeth are a common reason for replacing complete dentures. However, clinical studies on the amount of denture tooth wear are lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the clinical wear of denture teeth made from double cross-linked (DCL) versus highly cross-linked (HCL) materials after 1 year in service.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fourteen participants received maxillary and mandibular removable complete dentures (RCDs). The participants randomly received either DCL or HCL teeth. Each RCD was scanned with an intraoral scanner 1 week after finishing any occlusal adjustment and after 1 year. Occlusal contact marks were recorded using articulating paper, and photographs were made in centric and eccentric movements. The generated 1-week and 1-year standard tessellation language (STL) files of the scans were obtained and trimmed using the Geomagic X software program. After merging the files, the depth of the wear facets was measured using the software program tool that measures the vertical gap distance in micrometers at 100 points distributed on the contact areas. These areas were identified by using the segment tools in the software program. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the differences between the collected data (α=.05).

RESULTS

The DCL had higher mean ±standard deviation wear (62.7 ±40 µm) than the HCL (37 ±31 µm) after 1 year in service (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both DCL and HCL denture teeth showed acceptable clinical wear after 1 year of clinical use. HCL denture teeth showed more resistance to occlusal wear than DCL denture teeth.

2D and 3D Wear Analysis of 3D Printed and Prefabricated Artificial Teeth

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the 3-body wear of prefabricated and 3D-printed artificial denture teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four groups of artificial teeth were used; 3D-printed polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) teeth (PR) and 3 prefabricated commercially available denture teeth: PMMA (Gnathostar, GN), PMMA (SR Orthotyp PE, SR), and Nanohybrid composite (SR Phonares NHC, PH). The 3-body wear test was performed using a steatite ceramic antagonist in a chewing simulator with 750,000 cycles, temperature 23 ± 2 ˚C, and force of 50 N. The abrasive medium was composed of ground millet seeds and white rice mixed with distilled water. The teeth were 3D-scanned before and after the wear test. The 3D images were assessed for teeth wear by measuring the volumetric (3D wear) and the vertical (2D wear) substance loss. The one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey post hoc test was used to statistically obtain the data analysis.

RESULTS

Maximum 3D wear was observed in the PR (51.05 ± 4.53 mm³), followed by GN (20.22 ± 6.29 mm³) and SR (12.12 ± 6.29 mm³) artificial teeth. Minimum wear occurred in the PH teeth (6.24 ± 0.87 mm³). The analytical differences amongst the groups were statistically significant (P < .05) except between PH and SR teeth. For 2D wear measurement, the maximum was seen in the GN teeth (6.29 ± 1.64 mm), followed by PR (5.04 ± 0.83 mm) and then SR (4.53 ± 0.87 mm). The PH teeth (3.09 ± 0.68 mm) again showed minimum wear. Statistically, amongst the groups, the major observable differences (P < .05) were between PH and GN, PH and PR, and SR and GN.

CONCLUSIONS

Composite resin teeth had a greater wear resistance than acrylic resin teeth and 3D-printed resin teeth, both of which were comparable. Due to the advancement of digital workflows, manufacturers should devote effort to enhancing 3D-printed teeth.