Complication rates for various retention types in anterior implant-supported prostheses: A retrospective clinical study

Effect of crown retention systems and loading direction on the stress magnitude of posterior implant-supported restorations: A 3D-FEA

This study aimed to investigate the effect of four retention systems for implant-supported posterior crowns under compressive loading using three-dimensional finite element analysis. A morse-taper dental implant (4.1 × 10 mm) was designed with Computer Aided Design software based on non-uniform rational B-spline surfaces. According to International Organization for Standardization 14,801:2016, the implant was positioned at 3 mm above the crestal level. Then four models were designed with different crown retention systems: screw-retained (A), cement-retained (B), lateral-screw-retained (C), and modified lateral-screw-retained (D). The models were imported to the analysis software and mesh was generated based on the coincident nodes between the juxtaposed lines. For the boundary conditions, two loads (600 N) were applied (axial to the implant fixture and oblique at 30°) totaling 8 conditions according to retention design and loading. The von-Mises stress analysis showed that different retention systems modify the stress magnitude in the implant-supported posterior crown. There is a similar stress pattern in the implant threads. However, models C and D presented higher stress concentrations in the crown margin in comparison with A and B. The oblique loading highly increased the stress magnitude for all models. In the simulated conditions, part of the stress was concentrated at the lateral screw under axial loading for model C and oblique loading for model D. The results indicate a possible new failure origin for crown retained using lateral screws in comparison to conventional cement-retained or screw-retained systems.

Techniques for locating the screw access hole in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Different techniques for retrieving cement-retained implant-supported prostheses have been described to minimize damage to the prostheses. Nevertheless, a classification of the described techniques remains ambiguous.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to review and classify the described techniques for recording and locating the screw access hole in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A bibliographic search was completed on MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. A manual search was also conducted. The articles that described or evaluated techniques for recording and locating the screw access hole of cement-retained implant-supported prostheses were included. Two investigators independently assessed the quality assessment of the studies using the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. A third examiner was consulted to resolve the lack of consensus.

RESULTS

A total of 30 articles were included. The different methods were classified according to whether the screw access hole location was registered before or after cementation. The precementation techniques were classified into 4 subgroups: identification marks, photographic records, digital files, and precementation screw access hole location guides. The postcementation techniques were subdivided into 2 subgroups: radiographic records and postcementation screw access hole location guides.

CONCLUSIONS

Different techniques have been proposed to facilitate the location of the screw access hole in cement-retained implant-supported restorations. Although the evidence is scarce, studies seem to ascertain that some techniques, such as the use of drilling guides, orientation with cone beam computed tomography images, or holes made in the metal framework, can increase the retrievability of cement-retained implant-supported prostheses and decrease complications in the location of the screw access hole. The proposed classification summarizes precementation and postcementation techniques and provides a tool to decide the most suitable for each specific clinical situation.