Marginal and internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated from translucent multicolored zirconia: Framework versus complete contour design

Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Crowns Fabricated with Three Different Zirconia CAD/CAM Materials

BACKGROUND

Marginal and internal adaptation are key factors that determine the clinical success of dental restorations.

AIM

The aim of this study is to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of crowns fabricated with three different CAD-CAM zirconia materials; two monolithic zirconia materials and one veneered zirconia copings in comparison with conventional metal-ceramic crowns.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety-six extracted molars (n = 96) were selected. Teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 24), and the following restorations were fabricated: Metal-ceramic crowns (Control group) (Group CG); monolithic zirconia crowns (GC initial) (Group MZ1); monolithic zirconia crowns (InCoris TZI),(Group MZ2); bilayered zirconia crowns, cores (InCoris ZI) veneered with a low-fusing glass-ceramic (IPS Emax Ceram),(Group BZ). Internal and marginal adaptations were evaluated using the silicone replica technique. A total of 20 points were recorded for every tooth under the light microscope at 20x magnifications. Results were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the posthoc Tukey's test at a significance level of 0.01.

RESULTS

Marginal, marginal-internal, axial, and occlusal gaps between CG, MZ1, MZ2, and BZ crowns showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Monolithic zirconia groups showed better marginal adaptation compared with the veneered zirconia crowns.

Application Effect of New Material after Surface Modification of Zirconia Ceramics and Analysis of Patient Evaluation

Objective

To explore the application effect of new material after surface modification of zirconia ceramics and patient evaluation.

Methods

A total of 60 patients with tooth defect treated in our hospital from April 2020 to April 2021 were selected as the study subjects and randomly divided into the control group and experimental group, with 30 cases each. The patients in the control group were treated with glass-ceramics, and those in the experimental group received LiSi surface treatment, so as to compare the application effect and patients' evaluation between the two groups.

Results

Between the two groups, no obvious differences in surface loss, adhesive strength, and transmittance at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were not observed (P > 0.05); and after intervention, the score on dental aesthetics, hardness value, and occlusal force were obviously higher in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The new material enables forming an acid etchable coating on the zirconia surface, increases the adhesive strength, and achieves an aesthetic degree that is welcomed by the patients; meanwhile, after grinding, the edge is defect free and the tightness is higher. Further research will help to establish a better solution for patients.