A diagnostically and digitally driven tooth preparation protocol by using a patient monitoring tool with an intraoral scanner

Digital intraoperative evaluation of restorative space and nontemplate-guided tooth preparation when replacing failed anterior restorations: A dental technique

Assessing the correlation between the current restorative space and the target restorative space is important in determining whether additional tooth preparation is required when replacing failed prostheses. However, existing techniques are not always accurate or efficient. This article describes a digital workflow for the accurate chairside evaluation of the current restorative space and nontemplate-guided tooth preparation. Reference data was obtained from an initial scan of the existing restoration with an intraoral scanner. After removing the existing restoration, a second scan of the tooth was made and compared with the reference data to evaluate the current restorative space. Subsequently, the abutment tooth was prepared and rescanned, with the restorative space being re-evaluated until it met the requirements. This workflow enables the immediate and accurate evaluation of the restorative space, facilitating accurate chairside tooth preparation without the need for silicone indices or other templates, thereby saving time and cost.

A modified scan technique for multiple abutment teeth using the trim and lock function

OBJECTIVES

To describe a new protocol for digital scanning of multiple abutment teeth using the trim and lock software tools.

METHODS

A reverse workflow technique was used. Scanning was performed with the interim restoration in position. The abutment teeth were then trimmed from the scan. The retraction cord or interim restoration from either the first mesial or distal abutment tooth was removed and only that tooth was scanned, allowing the dentist to easily manage gingival displacement and keep the tooth dry from crevicular fluid and saliva. Consequently, the preparation margin remained visible and uncontaminated during the scan. The adjacent abutment teeth detected in the scan were deleted from it, and the scan was then locked using a tool of the scanning software. Next, the retraction cord or interim restoration of the next abutment tooth was removed, and only that tooth was scanned. The procedure was repeated until all prepared teeth were individually scanned.

RESULTS

The technique presented here facilitated the scanning of multiple abutment teeth in a simple and predictable way by utilizing the trim and lock surface tools of the scanning software and helped in avoiding closure of the gingival crevice.

CONCLUSIONS

Splitting the scan for a complex case with multiple abutment teeth allows reliable 3D acquisition of the finish line of each abutment tooth. Therefore, this technique simplifies the full-arch intraoral scanning process and can improve treatment efficiency.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The trim and lock tool allows scanning of each prepared abutment tooth separately, transforming a full-arch impression into multiple single scans. This technique helps to easily manage gingival displacement and maintain an uncontaminated and dry preparation margin during the scan.

Influence of the Operator`s Experience, Working Time, and Working Position on the Quality of the Margin Width: In Vitro Study

Background and Objectives: Appropriate tooth preparation is mandatory to obtain a perfect marginal fit of fixed restorations. The heavy chamfer is the most commonly used finish line, especially for minimally invasive tooth preparation. The aim of the study was to compare the width of the finish line obtained during tooth preparation performed by experienced (university lecturers) and inexperienced persons (dental students) in different working times and positions. Materials and Methods: Forty left upper-second molars were prepared on the simulator by each participant, totalizing 160 prepared teeth. A new round-end tapered diamond was used to obtain the 0.5 mm width of the heavy chamfer. The prepared teeth were photographed using a Canon D5300 camera with a macro lens attached to a tripod. The measurements were made with the Image-Pro Insight software selecting the same eight reference points. From these points, perpendicular lines were drawn above the finish line to the axial walls and the distance between the chamfer's outer edge and the axial wall's inner edge was measured. GraphPad Instat and NCSS Dowson Edition software were used. The statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) were calculated. The used tests: one sample t-test, ANOVA test, and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparisons Test. Results: Statistically significant differences were obtained according to the experience of the participant, preparation time, patient's position, and the chamfer width on the prepared tooth different surfaces. Conclusions: Daytime or weeklong tiredness and patient position do not affect the width of the heavy chamfer prepared by experienced and inexperienced persons. The experience and the operator's working position influence the width of the prepared finish line.

Survival analysis up to 7 years of 621 zirconia monolithic single crowns with feather-edge margins fabricated with a cast-free workflow starting from intraoral scans: A multicentric retrospective study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Clinical studies on the fabrication of monolithic zirconia restorations with a feather-edge tooth preparation from digital scans and a cast-free fully digital workflow are lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective multicentric study in private practices was to evaluate the outcomes of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated with feather-edge margins and a cast-free approach.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 621 teeth were prepared with feather-edge margins and restored with monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated with a fully digital cast-free workflow. Data were analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier test and descriptive statistics. The clinical evaluation adopted the California Dental Association-modified criteria after recalling all patients between April and July 2021.

RESULTS

The clinical survival of 619 of 621 crowns, including recemented crowns placed in 427 patients (217 men, 220 women) over 5 years (2014 to 2019 with crowns in service between 12 and 85 months), was analyzed. The 2 excluded crowns were delivered to patients who dropped out of the study. Of the 619 crowns, 5 failed during the follow-up period: 4 teeth were extracted because of fracture and 1 restoration fractured. No other technical or biological failures were observed. The mean overall survival time was 84.4 months (standard error, 0.255; 95% confidence interval for the mean, 83.92 to 84.92). The overall survival probability was 99.1% up to 85 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes of the monolithic zirconia crowns with feather-edge margins evaluated were comparable with outcomes reported using other margin designs and materials.

Effect of defect size and tooth anatomy in the measurements of a 3D patient monitoring tool

Purpose

To assess the influence of defect size and tooth anatomy on the measurements performed by a 3D patient monitoring tool.

Methods

A fully dentate model was scanned to obtain a master digital file. Virtual duplicates received defects created in molars (16, 18, 28) and incisors (11, 12, 22), according to different depths (60, 80, 120 microns) and sizes (small, medium, large) totaling 180 conditions. The surface changes measured by the 3D Patient Monitoring Tool (3Shape TRIOS Patient Monitoring [TPM]) were compared with the reference by 2 calibrated operators. False Positives (FP), and False Negatives (FN) defect were registered. Pearson chi-square test, Multivariate binary logistic regression and Spearman rank correlation were used to evaluate the data (α = 0.05).

Results

A significant association was found between the area and the presence of FP and FN (P < .01). Larger defects had higher chances to present FP or an FN respectively. There was a significant association between the tooth and the presence of a FP value (FP, P = .02; FN, P = .005) specially in molars. No significant association was found between the defect depth and the presence of a FP value. Spearman rank correlation showed a strong association between the presence of an FP and an FN (r = 0.858, P < .01).

Conclusions

The defect size and tooth anatomy significantly affected the virtual follow-up, whereas defect depth did not. Small defects were correctly detected in all cases. An incorrect measurement on one side of the tooth simultaneously resulted in incorrect measurement on the opposite side.

Clinical relevance

The clinician should be aware that different factors related to the characteristics of the defects could affect the quality of the full-arch digital follow-up. Therefore, caution is needed when interpreting the models comparison in cases that a larger area of a tooth has been modified.