Comparison of the strain developed around implants with angled abutments with two reinforced polymeric CAD-CAM superstructure materials: An in vitro comparative study

In vitro damping and strain distribution for implant-supported crowns using 5 different CAD-CAM crowns and 3 different luting cements

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Dental implants are particularly susceptible to occlusal overloading because, unlike natural teeth, they lack a periodontal ligament to help absorb occlusal forces. However, studies evaluating the impact of different crown and luting materials on the damping behavior and strain distribution of implant-supported crowns are lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the damping behavior and strain distribution of peri-implant bone associated with 5 different CAD-CAM implant-supported crowns and 3 luting materials.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A titanium implant was embedded in a plastic tube with epoxy resin and 5 different crown materials (polymethyl methacrylate, resin-infiltrated ceramic, lithium disilicate, titanium, and zirconia) luted to prosthetic abutments with 3 different luting materials (zinc oxide non-eugenol cement, zinc phosphate cement, and adhesive resin cement) and an uncemented condition were tested (n=5). Strain gauges were attached at the crestal and apical levels of the implant model. All specimens were load tested from 0 to 200 N. Slopes of load/time, microstrain/time, and time required to reach the maximum load were examined to represent the damping behavior. Absolute maximum strain (AMS) and its occurrence level were examined to represent the strain distribution. Two-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey HSD test, were used for statistical analysis (α=.05).

RESULTS

All slopes and times to reach the maximum load in each crown material were statistically similar (P>.05), except for the polymethyl methacrylate group, which showed less steepness in all slopes and more time required to reach the maximum load significantly (P<.05). Both the polymethyl methacrylate group (224.5 ±30.2) and the titanium group (224.0 ±24.3) exhibited significantly higher AMS at the crestal level compared with the resin-infiltrated ceramic group (210.6 ±5.0) (P<.05). The lithium disilicate (218.1 ±15.0) and zirconia groups (217.3 ±14.8) demonstrated comparable AMS values with the others (P>.05). The uncemented group demonstrated steeper slopes and less time required to reach the maximum load compared with the adhesive resin group (P<.05), while slopes and times of the zinc phosphate and zinc oxide non-eugenol groups were comparable (P>.05). The uncemented group (242.7 ±25.3) exhibited significantly higher AMS at the crestal level than the other groups (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The crown material significantly affected the damping behavior of peri-implant bone, unlike the luting material. Polymethyl methacrylate with a high damping behavior exhibited high strain at the crestal level. In contrast, resin-modified ceramic with a moderate damping behavior exhibited low strain at the crestal level. Strain at the crestal level could be effectively reduced by approximately 13% through cementation.

Shock Absorption Capacity of High-Performance Polymers for Dental Implant-Supported Restorations: In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND

Restorative materials might significantly affect load transmission in peri-implant bone. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the shock absorption capacity of two different polymeric materials to be used for implant-supported prostheses.

METHODS

A masticatory robot was used to compare the shock absorption capacity of veneered and non-veneered polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), Pekkton®ivory (Cendres+Mètaux), and the glass fiber-reinforced composite (GFRC), TRINIATM (Bicon). Five identical sample crowns for each of the three groups were tested. Forces transmitted at the simulated peri-implant bone were recorded and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The statistical analysis of forces transmitted at the simulated dental implant revealed significant differences between the materials tested and between these materials and zirconia, glass ceramic, composite resin, and acrylic resin. Only differences between PEKK and veneered PEKK and between PEKK and one of the previously tested composite resins were not statistically significant. PEKK samples demonstrated significantly greater shock absorption capacity compared to GFRC.

CONCLUSIONS

PEKK revealed optimal shock absorption capacity. Further studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy in the case of long-span prostheses with reduced prosthetic volume.

Mechanical behaviour of prosthodontic CAD/CAM polymer composites aged in three food-simulating liquids

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the effect of ageing in three food-simulating liquids (FSLs) on mechanical properties of three prosthodontic CAD/CAM polymer composites intended for construction of implant-supported frameworks.

METHODS

Materials investigated were: (i) a carbon fibre-reinforced composite (CarboCAD 3D dream frame; CC), (ii) a glass fibre-reinforced composite (TRINIA; TR), and (iii) a reinforced PEEK (DentoKeep; PK). Filler contents and microstructural arrangements were determined by thermo-gravimetry and tomography (µ-CT), respectively. Flexural properties (FS and E_f) were measured by 3-point bending (3PB) of 1 mm and 2 mm thick beam specimens. Fracture toughness (K_IC) was measured by single-edge-notched-bending (SENB). All measurements were made at baseline (dry) and after 1-day and 7-day storage at 37 ℃ in either water, 70 % ethanol/water (70 % E/W) or methyl ethyl ketone (MEK). Failed specimens were examined microscopically. Statistical analyses included four-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA and multiple Tukey comparison tests (α = 0.05). Multiple independent t-tests were performed regarding thickness effects on FS and E_f (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

At baseline, the mechanical properties increased in the sequence: PK< TR< CC (p < 0.001). FS ranged from 192.9 to 501.5 MPa; E_f from 4.2 to 18.1 GPa; and K_{IC f}rom 4.9-12.4 MPa.m^0.5. Fibre-reinforced composites (CC and TR) were significantly stronger than PK. However, all properties of CC and TR reduced after 1 d storage in 70 % E/W and MEK with FS ranging from 58.6 to 408 MPa; E_f from 1 to 15.4 GPa; K_IC from 6.87 to 10.17 MPa.m^0.5. Greater reductions occurred after 7 d storage. MEK was more detrimental than 70 % E/W and water on fibre-reinforced composites.

SIGNIFICANCE

Mechanical properties of each CAD/CAM composite were strongly dependent upon media and ageing. Although the mechanical properties of PK were initially inferior, it was relatively stable in all FSLs. All three materials exhibited sufficient mechanical properties at 1 mm thickness, but thicker specimens were more tolerant to ageing.

Applications and Clinical Behavior of BioHPP in Prosthetic Dentistry: A Short Review

(1) Background: BioHPP® (Bredent, UK) is a partially crystalline poly ether ether ketone (PEEK) that is strengthened using ceramic. PEEK and its various formulations represent a very interesting alternative, and has been in-depth with its literature in recent years; (2) Methods: A PubMed and Scopus search for the term “BioHPP” yielded 73 results and 42 articles which were included in this short review. Considering the scarce literature on the subject, each article was considered in this review; (3) Results: the articles analyzed are very recent, all published in the last 5 years. Their clinical evaluation of BioHPP® highlights many positive aspects, and few articles have highlighted critical issues in its multiple clinical applications; (4) Conclusions: this material is not only extremely interesting for the future, but possesses characteristics suitable for clinical application today, for endocrowns, small adhesive bridges, temporary prostheses and for immediate loads on implant restorations. The excellent aesthetics and the possibility of simple reprocessing of the restorations made with this material invite its clinical application.