A Needle in the Haystack – Mapping Sequences to Morphology Exemplified by the Loricate Choanoflagellate Enibas thessalia sp. nov. (Acanthoecida, Acanthoecidae)

Re-evaluating Loricate Choanoflagellate Phylogenetics: Molecular Evidence Points to the Paraphyly of Tectiform Species

Lorica-bearing choanoflagellates belong to the order Acanthoecida, a taxon which has been consistently recovered as monophyletic in molecular phylogenies. Based upon differences in lorica development and morphology, as well as the presence or absence of a motile dispersal stage, species are labelled as either nudiform or tectiform. Whilst Acanthoecida is robustly resolved in molecular phylogenies, the placement of the root of the clade is less certain with two different positions identified in past studies. One recovered root has been placed between the nudiform family Acanthoecidae and the tectiform family Stephanoecidae. An alternative root placement falls within the tectiform species, recovering the monophyletic Acanthoecidae nested within a paraphyletic Stephanoecidae. Presented here is a 14-gene phylogeny, based upon nucleotide and amino acid sequences, which strongly supports tectiform paraphyly. The horizontal transfer of a ribosomal protein gene, from a possible SAR donor, into a subset of acanthoecid species provides further, independent, support for this root placement. Differing patterns of codon usage bias across the choanoflagellates are proposed as the cause of artefactual phylogenetic signals that lead to the recovery of tectiform monophyly.

Loricate choanoflagellates (Acanthoecida) from warm water seas. IX. Coronoeca gen. nov., Polyfibula Manton and spiny forms of Parvicorbicula Deflandre

The ambition to generate an overview of warm water loricate choanoflagellate biodiversity, based on a classic morphometric approach, is here completed by analyses of a range of tiny forms with anterior spines or projections and in most cases also a posterior pedicel. The warm water study complements previously obtained results from the more extensively studied temperate and polar regions of the world's oceans. It thus contributes to a significantly more balanced approach to global diversity patterns for these organisms. The current survey includes taxa such as Polyfibula elatensis, Parvicorbicula pedicellata, as well as a range of primarily undescribed and taxonomically challenging species, that are in an interim approach allocated to Coronoeca gen. nov. (C. kosmaniae sp. nov., C. conicella sp. nov., C. superpositus (Booth) comb. nov., C. marchantii sp. nov., C. tongiae sp. nov., and C. patongiensis sp. nov.). The analysis of warm water acanthoecid biodiversity has revealed in total 80 species from the six geographic regions sampled, corresponding to approximately 50% of all loricate species described. Nineteen species are previously undescribed forms. The Andaman Sea, Thailand, and West Australia are in a global context the most species-rich regions with 62 and 64 species respectively.

Loricate choanoflagellates (Acanthoecida) from warm water seas. VIII. Crinolina Thomsen and Diaphanoeca Ellis

The loricate choanoflagellate genera Diaphanoeca Ellis and Crinolina Thomsen encompass a total of ten species. The majority of these are recorded from the warm water regions reported on here. A distinct morphological dichotomy characterizes the genus Diaphanoeca as currently circumscribed. The species distribute themselves within a 'D. grandis subgroup' and a 'D. pedicellata subgroup' distinguished on e.g., the position of the protoplast inside the lorica chamber and the elaboration of the anterior projections. We are, while awaiting in particular further molecular evidence, taking a conservative approach and abstain from dealing with the subgroup issue at the generic level. The examination of material from the warm water regions of the world's oceans has resulted in the description of D. sargassoensis sp.n., D. pseudoundulata sp.n., and D. throndsenii sp.n., and a thorough re-examination of D. undulata. Species of Crinolina share multiple features with in particular the D. grandis species subgroup. It is yet relevant, both in a morphological and molecular perspective, to retain the genus Crinolina which remains unambiguously defined based on the posteriorly open lorica. A high level of agreement is found when contrasting morphological and molecular based phylogenetic schemes.