P16INK4a overexpression independent of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection in rare subtypes of endometrial carcinomas

The Significance of miR-34a Expression in Endometrial Carcinogenesis: Correlation With Expression of p16 and Ki-67 Proteins in Endometrial Cancers

Background:

A microRNA, miR-34a, plays a key role in inhibiting cellular transformation and carcinogenesis by controlling cell cycle regulation and cell proliferation in various human tumors. However, miR-34a has rarely been reported in endometrial cancer research in Korea. This study was undertaken to analyze miR-34a expression in simple endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer, and to evaluate the relationship between expression of miR-34a and p16 and Ki-67 proteins in endometrial cancers.

Methods:

A retrospective study was carried out on 66 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues with simple endometrial hyperplasia (31 cases) and endometrial cancer (35 cases) patients. These were analyzed for miR-34a expression by quantitative real-time PCR, and the expression of p16 and Ki-67 proteins in endometrial cancers was evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

Results:

The miR-34a expression level was lower in endometrial cancer tissues (−0.71 ± 3.90) than in simple endometrial hyperplasia tissues (2.68 ± 8.62). The endometrial hyperplasia tissues showed underexpression of miR-34a in 13 of the 31 cases (41.9%) while the endometrial cancer tissues showed underexpression of miR-34a in 24 of 35 cases (68.6%). Thus, miR-34a was significantly underexpressed in endometrial cancer tissues when compared endometrial hyperplasia tissues (P = 0.046). Overexpression of p16 was detected in 25 (71.4%) and Ki-67 immunoreactivity was detected in 27 (77.1%) of the 35 endometrial cancers. Although not statistically significant, the frequency of p16 and Ki-67 overexpression tended to be lower in the cases with miR-34a underexpression than in cases with miR-34a overexpression.

Conclusions:

These findings suggest that underexpression of miR-34a might be involved in endometrial carcinogenesis. Further studies are needed to define the relationship between miR-34a expression and tissue specific protein expression.

Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the endometrium unrelated to human papilloma virus: a molecular study

In this paper we report a molecular study of a case of Primary Endometrial Squamous Carcinoma (PESC), in which a Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection had been previously excluded by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). The studies performed in an effort to explain the carcinogenesis included immunohistochemical over-expression of p53 and p16 proteins as previously observed in our own papers, plus microsatellite analysis of D10S1765 at 10q23.3 (PTEN) and TP53 at 17p13.1 (P53) as well as the methylation status of the of BRCA1 and p16 promoters using specific PCRs. In this rare malignancy, we found allelic imbalance (AI) at 17p13.1 (P53). Instead, AI at D10S1765 (PTEN) gene was absent. The genetic alteration of p53, with hyper-expression of p53 protein and an absence of abnormalities in the PTEN gene are consistent with the similarities between Uterine Serous Carcinoma (USC) and our case of PESC. The aberrant methylation of both p16 and BCAR1 promoters was not detected in our case. This finding too could imply that ESC is more similar to Uterine Serous Carcinoma than Uterine Endometrioid Carcinoma (UEC). Moreover, the lack of aberrant methylation of p16, which is in accordance with over-expression of p16 immunoreactivity, in the absence of HPV infection may be related to other unknown genetic alterations. In our opinion, it is hard to reach any definite conclusion concerning the carcinogenesis of PESC, because of its rarity and the very few molecular studies reported in the literature. Further studies with more numerous cases and larger molecular analyses are mandatory for this malignancy, to confirm whether it is more closely related to papillary endometrial cancer than to endometrioid carcinoma.

High-Grade Endometrial Carcinomas

High-grade endometrial carcinomas are a heterogeneous group of clinically aggressive tumors. They include FIGO grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma, serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, and malignant mixed Müllerian tumor (MMMT). Epidemiologic, genetic, biologic prognostic and morphologic differences between these entities are striking in prototypic cases, yet substantial overlap exists and diagnostic criteria and therapeutic approaches that account for the group's diversity are currently insufficient. FIGO grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma demonstrates solid, trabecular or nested growth and may resemble poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Endometrioid glandular differentiation is usually focally present. Serous carcinoma usually displays papillary architecture but glandular and solid patterns may predominate. Tumor cells typically display diffuse and severe atypia. Clear cell carcinoma should be diagnosed by recognizing characteristic papillary or tubulocystic architecture with cuboidal tumor cells showing atypical but uniform nuclei. Cells with clear cytoplasm are frequently but not always present. On the other hand, clear cells may be encountered in endometrioid and serous carcinomas. Immunohistochemical stains for p53, p16, ER, PR, mib-1, hepatocyte nuclear factor 1β and pan-cytokeratin can be helpful in classifying these high-grade carcinomas. They should be used in concert with thorough morphologic examination, as part of a rational panel of markers and only in specific circumstances. Although these tumors may appear clinically and even morphologically similar, demographic and epidemiologic features as well as patterns of spread and treatment modalities differ.