Detection of residual leukemic blasts in adult patients with acute T-lymphoblastic leukemia using bone marrow trephine biopsies: comparison of fluorescent immunohistochemistry with conventional cytologic and flow-cytometric analysis

Disease detection methodologies in relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Opportunities for improvement

BACKGROUND

Accurate disease detection is integral to risk stratification in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The gold standard used to evaluate response in the United States includes morphologic evaluation and minimal residual disease (MRD) testing of aspirated bone marrow (BM) by flow cytometry (FC). This MRD assessment is usually made on a single aspirate sample that is subject to variability in collection techniques and sampling error. Additionally, central nervous system (CNS) assessments for ALL include evaluations of cytopathology and cell counts, which can miss subclinical involvement.

PROCEDURE

We retrospectively compared BM biopsy, aspirate, and FC samples obtained from children and young adults with relapsed/refractory ALL to identify the frequency and degree of disease discrepancies in this population. We also compared CNS FC and cytopathology techniques.

RESULTS

Sixty of 410 (14.6%) BM samples had discrepant results, 41 (10%) of which were clinically relevant as they resulted in a change in the assignment of marrow status. Discrepant BM results were found in 28 of 89 (31.5%) patients evaluated. Additionally, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) FC identified disease in 9.7% of cases where cytopathology was negative.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support further investigation of the role of concurrent BM biopsy, with aspirate and FC evaluations, and the addition of FC to CSF evaluations, to fully assess disease status and response, particularly in patients with relapsed/refractory ALL. Prospective studies incorporating more comprehensive analysis to evaluate the impact on clinical outcomes are warranted.

Bone Marrow Immunohistochemistry and Flow Cytometry in the Diagnosis of Malignant Hematologic Diseases With Emphasis on Lymphomas: A Comparative Retrospective Study

We aim to evaluate the degree of agreement between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and flow cytometry (FC) in the diagnosis of malignant hematologic diseases, mainly lymphomas. A total of 260 bone marrow biopsies, 255 bone marrow aspirates, and 5 other suspensions of 260 patients used for diagnosis of a hematologic malignancy between 2009 and 2012 with both, IHC and FC, were retrospectively analyzed. Overall there is a substantial degree of agreement (κ=0.69) between IHC and FC. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, mature T-cell neoplasms, acute leukemias, and myelodysplastic syndromes had the highest concurrence rates (>80%). In nonconcordant cases, an IHC provided diagnosis in 25.4%, and an FC in 4.6%. Lymphomas were diagnosed by an IHC only in 51% of the cases. Both methods have good concurrence rates and are complementary. An IHC has the advantage of combining markers, morphology, and tissue immunoarchitecture, which is beneficial in the diagnosis of lymphomas. An FC is required in leukemias as it is faster and plays an important role in minimal residual disease.

Flow-cytometric vs. -morphologic assessment of remission in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group (COG)

Minimal residual disease (MRD) after initial therapy is integral to risk stratification in B-precursor and T-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL, T-ALL). Although MRD determines depth of remission, remission remains defined by morphology. We determined the outcomes of children with discordant assessments of remission by morphology vs. flow cytometry using patients age 1-30.99 years enrolled on Children's Oncology Group ALL trials who underwent bone marrow assessment at the end of induction (N = 9350). Morphologic response was assessed locally as M1 (<5% lymphoblasts; remission), M2 (5-25%), or M3 (>25%). MRD was centrally measured by flow cytometry. Overall, 19.8% of patients with M2/M3 morphology had MRD < 5%. M1 with MRD ≥ 5% was less common in B-ALL (0.9%) than T-ALL (6.9%; p < 0.0001). In B-ALL, M1/MRD ≥ 5% was associated with superior 5-year event-free survival (EFS) than M2/MRD ≥ 5% (59.1% ± 6.5% vs. 39.1% ± 7.9%; p = 0.009), but was inferior to M1/MRD < 5% (87.1% ± 0.4%; p < 0.0001). MRD levels were higher in M2/MRD ≥ 5% than M1/MRD ≥ 5% patients. In T-ALL, EFS was not significantly different between M1/MRD ≥ 5% and M2/MRD ≥ 5%. Patients with morphologic remission but MRD ≥ 5% have outcomes similar to those who fail to achieve morphological remission, and significantly inferior to those with M1 marrows and concordant MRD, suggesting that flow cytometry should augment the definition of remission in ALL.