Immunohistochemical validation of INI1/SMARCB1 in a spectrum of musculoskeletal tumors: An experience at a Tertiary Cancer Referral Centre

A Rare Case of a Malignant Epithelioid Neoplasm With an Underlying Novel EWSR1::ZBT44 Fusion, Identified on Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)

The clinicopathological spectrum of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas of bone and soft tissues is expanding after the 5th edition of the WHO classification. A 23-year-old male patient presented with a lump in his left thigh of 3 months' duration. Radiological examination revealed a well-defined, solid-cystic lobulated, soft tissue lesion in the proximal medial region of his left thigh, measuring 7.7 cm in the largest dimension. The referring diagnosis was an epithelioid sarcoma. Histopathological review of the tumor sections revealed a cellular tumor composed of malignant epithelioid to focally "rhabdoid-like" cells in a variable hyalinized and myxoid stroma with geographic areas of necrosis. In addition, there were areas reminiscent of hemangiopericytomatous vasculature. By immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells were diffusely positive for CD34, focally and distinctly for pan keratin (AE1/AE3). INI1/SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 (BRG1) were diffusely positive (normal). Next-generation sequencing with a wide sarcoma panel revealed EWSR1exon8::ZBT44exon4 fusion. The present example constitutes the first malignant epithelioid tumor with a hemangiopericytomatous growth pattern, exhibiting this rare fusion. The differential diagnoses of this tumor and their corresponding immunohistochemical profile are discussed. This example highlights the value of NGS in unraveling rare fusions and in differentiating these tumors from their several mimics.

SMARCB1 expression is a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Although weak SWI/SNF related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily B member 1 (SMARCB1) expression is a known diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in several malignancies, its expression and clinical significance in osteosarcoma remain unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate SMARCB1 expression in osteosarcoma and its clinical significance with respect to chemosensitivity and prognosis.

METHODS

We obtained 114 specimens from 70 osteosarcoma patients to construct a tissue microarray (TMA) and assess SMARCB1 protein expression via immunohistochemistry (IHC). The mRNA expression of SMARCB1 was in-silico analyzed using open-access RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) and clinicopathological data provided by the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments on Osteosarcoma (TARGET-OS) project. The correlations between SMARCB1 expression and clinical features were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Weak SMARCB1 expression occurred in 70% of the osteosarcoma patient specimens in the TMA, and significantly correlated with poor neoadjuvant response as well as shorter overall and progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, mRNA in-silico analysis confirmed that SMARCB1 expression correlates with chemotherapeutic response and prognosis in osteosarcoma patients.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, the present study is the first to analyze SMARCB1 expression in osteosarcoma. SMARCB1 may serve as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in osteosarcoma.

A case of retroperitoneal tumor displaying epithelial differentiation, prominent myxoid stroma and loss of INI1/SMARCB1

The clinicopathological spectrum of INI1 deficient tumors is expanding. Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is a rare sarcoma of uncertain differentiation, more often occurring in the extremities and uncommonly in the deep soft tissues. Histopathologically, it manifests in the form of classical, proximal, or hybrid types, the latter two characterized by rhabdoid cytomorphology. Immunohistochemically, ESs display loss of INI1/SMARCB1 and genetically associated with high percentage of SMARCB1 deletions

We report an extremely uncommon case of a retroperitoneal tumor in a 42-year-old male, who presented with abdominal discomfort. Radiologic imaging disclosed a 12 cm-sized retroperitoneal mass without involvement of any organ parenchyma. The patient underwent tumor excision with left-sided nephrectomy at another hospital. A review of the paraffin-embedded tissue sections revealed a multinodular tumor, composed of dyscohesive epithelioid tumor cells and focally arranged in cords, containing moderate to abundant, eosinophilic cytoplasm, vesicular nuclei, containing prominent nucleoli, including cells with rhabdoid cytomorphology, in a conspicuous myxoid stroma. A focal tumor area resembled proximal-type of ES. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells displayed positivity for pan cytokeratin (AE1/AE3), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), vimentin and focally for CA125, while these were negative for CD34, S100 protein, CKIT, DOG1, and INI1/SMARCB1.

To the best of our knowledge, this constitutes the first case of a malignant tumor with epithelioid morphology, displaying myxoid matrix and loss of INI1/SMARCB1, resembling a myxoid variant of an epithelioid sarcoma and myoepithelioma-like tumor of the vulvar tumor, occurring in the retroperitoneum. A review of similar cases, differential diagnosis and treatment-associated implications are presented.

[SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient renal cell carcinoma: medullary and beyond : Evolving concepts]

During the last decades, the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex has received enormous recognition as a major player in the molecular pathogenesis of diverse neoplasms. Accordingly, SWI/SNF defects affecting different subunits of the complex became defining genetic features in the nosology of different neoplastic entities. In the kidney, loss of SMARCB1(INI1) as a major component of the SWI/SNF complex has emerged as the defining genetic marker for renal medullary carcinoma and pediatric malignant rhabdoid tumor. Diagnosis of these two rare entities is based on a set of defined demographic, clinicopathological, immunophenotypic, and genetic (SMARCB1 loss) criteria. Moreover, the sickle cell trait is considered a prerequisite for renal medullary carcinoma. Current knowledge illustrates that SMARCB1 loss is encountered in three major tumor categories in the kidney: (1) histologically defined neoplasms that are primarily driven by de novo SMARCB1 loss (renal medullary carcinoma and malignant rhabdoid tumor); (2) SMRACB1-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with variable non-specific histology ranging from collecting duct-like, papillary high-grade (papillary type 2), or medullary-like (lacking sickle cell trait), to fully undifferentiated; and (3) biphasic (dedifferentiated) RCC showing a variable SMARCB1-deficient undifferentiated component. The latter variant most frequently originates from pre-existing clear cell RCC but may rarely superimpose on papillary or chromophobe RCC. This review summarizes the major defining features of the emerging SMARCB1-deficient renal neoplasms. All SMARCB1-deficient carcinomas have a poor prognosis in common. Therefore, exact diagnosis of these tumors is a prerequisite for studies investigating new therapies.

Histologic and genomic features of breast cancers with alterations affecting the SWI/SNF (SMARC) genes

The SWI/SNF family of proteins is a multisubunit ATPase complex frequently altered in human cancer. Inactivating mutations in SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin (SMARCs) underpin a subset of tumors such as the malignant rhabdoid tumor and small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. Here, we investigated the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of breast cancers harboring somatic genetic alterations affecting genes of the SMARC family. We analyzed a series of 6026 primary and metastatic breast cancers subjected to targeted-capture sequencing. SMARC core subunit (SMARCA4, SMARCB1, and SMARCA2) alterations were identified in <1% of all breast cancers, consisting of 27 primary and 30 recurrent/metastatic tumors. The majority of SMARC alterations were monoallelic mutations (47/57, 82%) and thus categorized into two groups: Class 1 alterations consisting of potentially pathogenic mutations and rearrangements and Class 2 alterations consisting of missense mutations and small in-frame deletions of unknown significance. Biallelic events in a SMARC gene were present in a minority of cases (10/57, 18%). Histologic patterns in the form of rhabdoid, composite rhabdoid, sarcomatoid or anaplastic features were observed in a subset of Class 1 primary and metastatic tumors (7/57, 12%). SMARC protein was preserved in nearly all tumors analyzed with immunohistochemistry (26/30, 87%). Four Class 1 tumors demonstrated altered SMARC protein expression in the form of loss (1/30, 3%) or mosaic pattern (3/30, 10%). Complete loss of SMARCA2 (BRM) was observed in a sole tumor with composite rhabdoid morphology, and biallelic hits in the SMARCA2 gene. The genomic landscape of both primary Class 1 and 2 breast cancers did not reveal any characteristic findings. In summary, SMARC alterations likely contribute to the biology of a rare subset of breast cancers in the form of biallelic or pathogenic alterations in SMARC, as evidenced by SMARC-deficient phenotype or altered expression of SMARC protein.

Role of immunohistochemistry in gynec oncopathology including specific diagnostic scenarios with associated treatment implications

Over the years, immunohistochemistry has emerged as a powerful tool for a more precise diagnosis of certain tumors in gynecologic oncopathology and resolving certain diagnostic dilemmas with significant treatment implications. Certain specific immunohistochemical (IHC) markers have been useful in the more correct identification of rare tumors, characterized by specific molecular signatures. Immunohistochemistry has also been useful in the identification of underlying genetic events, characterizing various tumors, as well as precancerous lesions. This review will focus upon the judicious application of various IHC antibody markers in gynec oncopathology, including authors' experience during "sign-outs" and especially during interaction with other oncology colleagues within the institutional disease management group. The updated references were retrieved from PubMed.

Clinicopathological and molecular analyses of linearly expanded epithelial cells with β-catenin alterations, "β-catenin signature", in the normal fallopian tube

AIMS

Recent advances in next-generation sequencing have made it clear that clonal expansion of cells harbouring driver gene mutations occurs in physiologically normal epithelium. Molecular analysis of tubal epithelium has been almost exclusively confined to the TP53 pathway, which is involved in serous carcinogenesis. Other oncogenic events have not been explored in detail. Here, we report the linear expansion of fallopian tubal epithelial cells exhibiting an altered β-catenin profile (β-catenin signature). Through molecular analyses, we determined the incidence and clinicopathological significance of β-catenin signatures.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 64 specimens of surgically removed bilateral fallopian tubes. Thirty-three β-catenin signatures were identified in 13 cases (20.3%); these patients were significantly younger than those without β-catenin signatures (median ages of 44 and 57 years, respectively, P = 0.0317). No correlation between β-catenin signature and any clinical factor was observed. CTNNB1 mutations were detected in three of eight β-catenin signatures when tissues were microdissected and subjected to Sanger sequencing in two representative cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of the CTNNB1 mutation in clusters of morphologically bland tubal epithelial cells. The results of this study indicate that β-catenin signatures are common, and they may be a part of diverse molecular alterations occurring in normal tubal epithelium.

Clinicopathologic features of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas of bone & soft tissues: An attempt to unravel the BCOR-CCNB3- & CIC-DUX4-positive sarcomas

Background & objectives:

Certain genetically defined undifferentiated round cell sarcomas, namely BCOR-CCNB3 and CIC-DUX4 positive, have been described. Here we present detailed clinicopathologic features and molecular results in such cases.

Methods:

Fifty one cases of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas, including 32 cases, tested for BCOR-CCNB3 and CIC-DUX4 fusions, by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction technique and 44 tumours, for CCNB3 immunostaining, were analyzed.

Results:

Twenty seven (52.9%) tumours occurred in males and 24 (47%) in females; in soft tissues (38; 74.5%), commonly, trunk and extremities and bones (13; 25.4%), frequently, femur and tibia. Five of 32 (15.6%) tested cases were positive for BCOR-CCNB3 fusion and seven (21.8%) for CIC-DUX4 fusions. Histopathologically, CIC-DUX4-positive sarcomas comprised nodular aggregates of round to polygonal cells, containing hyperchromatic nuclei, prominent nucleoli and moderate cytoplasm, with focal myxoid stroma and variable necrosis, in certain cases. BCOR-CCNB3-positive sarcomas mostly comprised diffusely arranged, round to oval to short spindly cells with angulated nuclei, vesicular chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli and interspersed vessels. Immunohistochemically, tumour cells were positive for MIC2 in 24 of 49 (48.9%) and CCNB3 in 12 of 44 (27.2%) cases. Four of five BCOR-CCNB3-positive sarcomas showed CCNB3 immunostaining and 6 of 7 CIC-DUX4-positive sarcomas displayed WT1 immunostaining. Most patients (27/37) (72.9%) underwent surgical resection and chemotherapy. Median overall survival was 12 months, and disease-free survival was seven months.

Interpretation & conclusions:

Undifferentiated round cell sarcomas are rare; mostly occur in soft tissues of extremities, with CIC-DUX4 positive, as these are relatively more frequent than BCOR-CCNB3 positive sarcomas. CCNB3 and WT1 are useful immunostains for triaging such cases for BCOR-CCNB3 and CIC-DUX4 fusion testing, respectively. Overall, these are relatively aggressive tumours, especially CIC-DUX4-positive sarcomas.

SWI/SNF Complex-Deficient Soft Tissue Neoplasms: A Pattern-Based Approach to Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis

Loss of different components of the Switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex has been increasingly recognized as a central molecular event driving the initiation and/or dedifferentiation of mostly lethal but histogenetically diverse neoplasms in different body organs. This review summarizes and discusses the morphologic and phenotypic diversity of primary soft tissue neoplasms characterized by SWI/SNF complex deficiency with an emphasis on convergent and divergent cytoarchitectural patterns.

Clinicopathologic features of 300 rhabdomyosarcomas with emphasis upon differential expression of skeletal muscle specific markers in the various subtypes: A single institutional experience

The present study was aimed at evaluating clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) features of 300 rhabdomyosarcomas (RMSs), including differential IHC expression and prognostic value of myogenin and MyoD1 across various subtypes of RMSs. IHC expression of myogenin and MyoD1 was graded on the basis of percentage of tumor cells displaying positive intranuclear immunostaining i.e. grade 1 (1-25%); grade 2 (26-50%); grade 3 (51-76%) and grade 4 (76-100%).Clinical follow-up was available in 238 (79.3%) patients. Various clinicopathologic parameters were correlated with 3-year disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). There were 140 cases (46.7%) of alveolar RMS (ARMS), 90 of embryonal RMS (ERMS) (30%), 61 (20.3%) of spindle cell/sclerosing RMS and 9 cases (3%) of pleomorphic RMS. Most cases, barring pleomorphic RMSs, occurred in the first two decades (228 cases) (76%), frequently in males, in the head and neck region (126) (42%). By immunohistochemistry, desmin was positive in 292/299 (97.6%) tumors; myogenin in 238/267 (89.1%) and MyoD1 in 192/266 (72.2%) tumors. High myogenin expression (in ≥51% positive tumor cells) was significantly associated with ARMSs (95/121, 78.5%), as compared to other subtypes (48/117, 41%) (p value < 0.001). High MyoD1 expression (≥51% tumor cells) was seen in more cases of pure sclerosing, combined with spindle cell/sclerosing RMSs (10/10, 100%), as compared to the other subtypes (91/141, 67.4%) (p = 0.032). There was no significant difference between high myogenin expression and clinical outcomes. Patients without metastasis and harbouring tumors, measuring ≤5 cm showed a significant increase in OS, with p values = 0.01 and <0.001, respectively. ARMS was the most frequent subtype. There was a significant association between high myogenin expression and ARMSs and high MyoD1 expression and spindle cell/sclerosing RMSs. High myogenin expression did not correlate with clinical outcomes. Patients with smaller sized tumors and without metastasis had significantly better clinical outcomes.

Poorly Differentiated Chordomas Showing Loss of INI1/SMARCB1: A Report of 2 Rare Cases With Diagnostic Implications

Poorly differentiated chordomas are rare musculoskeletal tumors. Case 1. A 42-year-old lady presented with quadriparesis of 2 months' duration. Radiologic imaging disclosed a soft tissue mass in her left prevertebral- and paravertebral cervical region. Case 2. A 4-year-old male child presented with neck pain and restricted head movements of 1-year duration. Radiologic imaging revealed a contrast enhancing, paraspinal soft tissue mass in his cervical region. Microscopic examination in both the cases revealed a cellular malignant tumor composed of moderate to markedly pleomorphic cells with interspersed mitotic figures, along with focal myxoid change and necrosis. By immunohistochemistry, tumor cells in both cases were diffusely positive for pan cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) and brachyury, whereas these were negative for INI1/SMARCB1. Tumor cells in the second case were also positive for glypican3. The first case developed pulmonary metastasis, while the second case developed recurrence. Poorly differentiated chordomas are uncommon tumors, invariably characterized by loss of INI1. These tumors can be rarely seen in adults and need to be differentiated from their diagnostic mimics, in view of treatment implications and their relatively aggressive clinical outcomes.

The diagnostic utility of reduced immunohistochemical expression of SMARCB1 in synovial sarcomas: a validation study

Synovial sarcoma is a malignant mesenchymal neoplasm of uncertain histogenesis, characterized by a specific SS18-SSX fusion. The diagnosis of synovial sarcoma can be challenging based on morphology and conventional immunohistochemistry alone, and identification of the fusion gene by molecular genetics may be necessary for diagnosis. Several recent studies have demonstrated the diagnostic utility of the reduced expression of SMARCB1 in synovial sarcomas as measured using immunohistochemistry. Therefore, we undertook a validation study using synovial sarcomas and other spindle or round cell tumors that could enter differential diagnosis of monophasic or poorly differentiated synovial sarcomas. Among 36 synovial sarcomas that were successfully evaluated, the expression of SMARCB1 was diffusely reduced in 33 cases (92%) at variable degrees. In contrast, the expression of SMARCB1 was not reduced in any of the 93 evaluable non-synovial sarcoma tumors (5 thymomas, 5 sarcomatoid mesotheliomas, 10 schwannomas, 9 mesenchymal chondrosarcomas, 20 solitary fibrous tumors, 19 Ewing sarcomas, and 25 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors). A few schwannomas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors showed mosaic or complete loss of SMARCB1 expression. Reduced expression of SMARCB1 immunoreactivity was therefore found to be highly sensitive and specific for synovial sarcoma, and can be useful for rapidly and accurately confirming the diagnosis of synovial sarcoma. This reduction in SMARCB1 expression likely reflects the BAF47 ejection mechanism of the SS18-SSX fusion product and can therefore be viewed as an indirect visualization of this fusion product.

Immunohistochemistry as potential diagnostic pitfall in the most common solid tumors of children and adolescents

Making a correct diagnosis when dealing with a small round blue cell tumor (SRBCT) of children and adolescents may be relatively straightforward if the tumor arises in the typical clinical setting and the classic pathologic features are all recognizable. However it is widely known that diagnostic difficulties may arise because of: (i) many tumors share overlapping morphological and/or immunohistochemical features; (ii) considerable clinical, pathologic, and immunohistochemical variations do exist; (iii) the increasing use of small biopsies in daily practice makes the diagnosis of these neoplasms more challenging. Accordingly, immunohistochemical analyses are currently mandatory in establishing the correct diagnosis. In this regard there is the need to identify more sensitive and specific immunomarkers useful in the distinction of the several tumor entities. Over the last decades, several markers, such as CD99, WT1 protein, desmin, myogenin, NB84, and INI1 have been identified, providing a considerable help in recognition of the most common solid tumors (ESW/pPNET, rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma, Wilms' tumor, desmoplastic small round cell tumor; malignant rhabdoid tumor) in children and adolescents. However, at the same time, their unusual, unexpected expression can result in a misinterpretation of the immunohistochemical results, especially by pathologists who are not familiar with oncologic pediatric pathology. Therefore the present review focuses on the potential immunohistochemical pitfalls which should be kept in mind by pathologists to prevent diagnostic errors when dealing with SRBCTs.

Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome

Rhabdoid tumors (RT), or malignant rhabdoid tumors, are among the most aggressive and lethal forms of human cancer. They can arise in any location in the body but are most commonly observed in the brain, where they are called atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT), and in the kidneys, where they are called rhabdoid tumors of the kidney. The vast majority of rhabdoid tumors present with a loss of function in the SMARCB1 gene, also known as INI1, BAF47, and hSNF5, a core member of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex. Recently, mutations in a 2nd locus of the SWI/SNF complex, the SMARCA4 gene, also known as BRG1, were found in rhabdoid tumors with retention of SMARCB1 expression. Familial cases may occur in a condition known as rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome (RTPS). In RTPS, germline inactivation of 1 allele of a gene occurs. When the mutation occurs in the SMARCB1 gene, the syndrome is called RTPS1, and when the mutation occurs in the SMARCA4 gene it is called RTPS2. Children presenting with RTPS tend to develop tumors at a younger age, but the impact that germline mutation has on survival remains unclear. Adults who carry the mutation tend to develop multiple schwannomas. The diagnosis of RTPS should be considered in patients with RT, especially if they have multiple primary tumors, and/or in individuals with a family history of RT. Because germline mutations result in an increased risk of carriers developing RT, genetic counseling for families with this condition is recommended.

The expanding family of SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient neoplasia: implications of phenotypic, biological, and molecular heterogeneity

Since the description of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors of the central nervous system and renal/extrarenal malignant rhabdoid tumors in children, the clinicopathologic spectrum of neoplasms having in common a highly variable rhabdoid cell component (0% to 100%) and consistent loss of nuclear SMARCB1 (INI1) expression has been steadily expanding to include cribriform neuroepithelial tumor of the ventricle, renal medullary carcinoma and a subset of collecting duct carcinoma, epithelioid sarcoma, subsets of miscellaneous benign and malignant soft tissue tumors, and rare rhabdoid carcinoma variants of gastroenteropancreatic, sinonasal, and genitourinary tract origin. Although a majority of SMARCB1-deficient neoplasms arise de novo, the origin of SMARCB1-deficient neoplasia in the background of a phenotypically or genetically definable differentiated SMARCB1-intact "parent neoplasm" has been convincingly demonstrated, highlighting the rare occurrence of rhabdoid tumors as "double-hit neoplasia." As a group, SMARCB1-deficient neoplasms occur over a wide age range (0 to 80 y), may be devoid of rhabdoid cells or display uniform rhabdoid morphology, and follow a clinical course that varies from benign to highly aggressive causing death within a few months irrespective of aggressive multimodality therapy. Generally applicable criteria that would permit easy recognition of these uncommon neoplasms do not exist. Diagnosis is based on site-specific and entity-specific sets of clinicopathologic, immunophenotypic, and/or molecular criteria. SMARCB1 immunohistochemistry has emerged as a valuable tool in confirming or screening for SMARCB1-deficient neoplasms. This review summarizes the different phenotypic and topographic subgroups of SMARCB1-deficient neoplasms including sporadic and familial, benign and malignant, and rhabdoid and nonrhabdoid variants, highlighting their phenotypic heterogeneity and molecular complexity.

The utility of ERG, CD31 and CD34 in the cytological diagnosis of angiosarcoma: an analysis of 25 cases

AIMS

Erythroblast transformation specific related gene (ERG), a proto-oncogene member of the erythroblast transformation specific transcription factor family, is a sensitive marker of endothelial differentiation and is expressed in vascular tumours, including angiosarcomas (AS). Immunohistochemistry is necessary for the diagnosis of AS in fine needle aspirates where low cellularity and lack of preserved tissue architecture impedes diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of an ERG-enriched immunohistochemistry panel in the cytological diagnosis of AS.

METHODS

25 AS diagnosed on fine needle aspirates were stained for ERG, CD31, CD34, and AE1/AE3. Staining intensity and percentage tumour cell positivity were evaluated. Spearman's correlation was assessed for significant correlations between antibodies.

RESULTS

Sensitivities for ERG, CD31, CD34 and AE1/AE3 were 100%, 100%, 60% and 21%, respectively. Spearman's analysis revealed that ERG and CD31 staining correlated significantly; there was no significant correlation between CD31 and CD34 staining.

CONCLUSIONS

With equal sensitivity to, and strong correlation with CD31, ERG staining is highly suitable for the cytological diagnosis of AS. ERG and CD31 are more sensitive vascular markers than CD34. ERG, a nuclear stain, complements the cytoplasmic/membranous staining of CD31. Used in conjunction with CD31, ERG can corroborate the diagnosis of AS.