Lymph node melanocytic nevi: Pathogenesis and differential diagnoses, with special reference to p16 reactivity

Frequency of naevus cells in lymph nodes of melanoma and breast cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to study the frequency (prevalence) and histology of benign melanocytic naevus cells in regional lymph nodes in relation to age and sex and nodal location.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Histopathology reports of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsies from melanoma patients, 2002 - 2014, and from breast cancer patients, 2010- 2019, were obtained from records of a single hospital in England. All sections were similarly processed and examined. For standardisation, presence of naevus cells was assessed in a single node per patient: the first SLN biopsied (melanoma) or the node nearest the first SLN (breast cancer).

RESULTS

Associations were tested using Fisher's exact test. Naevus cells were found in 10% (60/585) of melanoma patients' index SLNs. Frequency varied significantly by anatomic region: 13% in axillary to 0% cervical SLNs (p = 0.03), but not by sex or age. Within nodes, naevus cells were present in capsular or pericapsular tissue (93%), or trabeculae (7%). In breast cancer patients' index axillary nodes, 6% (11/196) contained naevus cells, all intracapsular. In the predominant 40-69 years age-group, prevalence was similar in breast cancer (7%) and female melanoma (9%) patients, but in those aged 70-100, prevalence was lower in breast cancer (2%) than in female melanoma (15%) patients (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard methods of assessment yielded no clear pattern of naevus cell frequency in lymph nodes by age or sex, but confirmed naevus cell location as mostly intracapsular.

Melanocytic nevi in sentinel lymph nodes: association with cutaneous nevi and clinical relevance in patients with cutaneous melanomas

PURPOSE

Melanocytic nevi in lymph nodes (NNs) are an important histological differential diagnosis of initial sentinel lymph node (SN) metastasis in melanoma. Our aim was to associate NN in SNs with clinicopathologic features and survival rates in 1, 250 patients with SN biopsy for melanoma.

METHODS

To compare patients with present and absent NN, we used Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and multivariate logistic regression models in this retrospective observational study based on a prospectively maintained institutional database.

RESULTS

NN prevalence in axillary, cervical, and groin SNs was 16.5%, 19.4%, and 9.8%, respectively. NN were observed in combination with all growth patterns of melanoma, but more frequently when the primary was histologically associated with a cutaneous nevus. We observed a decreasing NN prevalence with increasing SN metastasis diameter. Multiple logistic regression determined a significantly increased NN probability for SNs of the neck or axilla, for individuals with ≥ 50 cutaneous nevi, midline primary melanomas, and for individuals who reported non-cutaneous malignancies in their parents. Cancer in parents was also significantly more frequently reported by melanoma patients who had more than 50 cutaneous nevi. In SN-negative patients, NN indicated a tendency for slightly lower melanoma-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a highly significant association between NN diagnosis and multiple cutaneous nevi and provided circumstantial evidence that cutaneous nevi in the drainage area of lymph nodes are particularly important. The trend toward lower melanoma-specific survival in SN-negative patients with NN suggests that careful differentiation of SN metastases is important.

The EORTC protocol for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) reveals a high number of nodal nevi and a strong association with nevus-associated melanoma

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of nodal nevi (NN) is challenging as they mimic melanoma metastases (MM), with a detection rate mostly ranging between 1% and 11% in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Herein, we assessed the incidence of NN and the association with the clinical-pathological features of primary melanoma, adopting the updated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) protocol for SLNB.

METHODS

All cases of paired melanoma and SLNB were retrospectively evaluated (April 2019-May 2020). Appropriate statistical tests were adopted, with significant variables included in the logistic regression model.

RESULTS

81 patients and a total of 186 lymph nodes (LNs) were included. Eleven patients had only NN and 4 had both NN and MM (18.5%); 29 LNs (15.6%) showed at least one NN and 12 (6.5%) showed more than one NN (a total amount of 43 NN was detected). All NN and none MM stained for p16. NN were associated with age < 60 years (p: 0.042), no ulceration (p: 0.025) and nevus-associated melanoma (NAM) (p: 0.018), with this latter being the only predictor at the logistic regression model (p: 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

The updated EORTC protocol shows a high number of NN and highlights a strong association with NAM.

Immunohistochemistry in melanocytic lesions: Updates with a practical review for pathologists

This review provides a summary of the immunohistochemical markers pertinent to the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. There is considerable morphologic overlap between benign and malignant melanocytic lesions, and given the significant differences in clinical management, the diagnostic workup becomes crucial. Immunohistochemistry aids in the distinction between various melanocytic proliferations and recent contributions to the literature have furthered our optimization of panels in the diagnostic workup. In recent years, SOX10 has been considered as the optimal marker for melanocytic lesions given the similar sensitivity but higher specificity than S100. HMB-45 is less sensitive than S100 but demonstrates utility in confirmation of deceptively banal small cell and nevoid melanoma variants where deep nests of melanocytes are highlighted. Melan-A (MART-1) and MiTF show similar sensitivity to S100 however there is a lack of expression in spindle cell and desmoplastic melanomas.

Current concepts of ectopic nodal inclusions with special emphasis on nodal nevi

Nodal inclusions of ectopic tissue within lymph nodes are seen comparatively often in dermatopathology and general pathology. Glandular and nonglandular epithelium, as well as melanocytic nevi can be observed within lymph nodes and represent mostly incidental findings without any relevance. The main challenge in reporting these morphologic features is to differentiate such benign inclusions from metastatic settlements of distinct organ tumors. As sentinel node biopsy and lymph node dissection have become standard procedure in clinical oncology and have an immense clinical impact, the correct evaluation of these nodal inclusions is indispensable to avoid undertreatment or overtreatment of patients. In addition, the genesis of these inclusions has not yet been satisfactorily clarified. Two concepts have been laid out: the theory of benign metastases and the migration arrest theory. However, neither theory has so far been able to answer the following questions: Why do we find more nodal nevi in patients with melanoma who had a sentinel node biopsy than in patients without melanoma, and why do we not find nodal nevi in deep visceral lymph nodes? We present a comprehensive review of the current knowledge on nodal inclusions, proposing a concept for the pathogenesis of nodal nevi, to answer these questions.

Three Types of Nodal Melanocytic Nevi in Sentinel Lymph Nodes of Patients With Melanoma: Pitfalls, Immunohistochemistry, and a Review of the Literature

The presence or absence of metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes often drives melanoma staging, prognosis, and treatment. However, distinguishing between metastatic melanoma cells and clusters of benign melanocytic nevus cells is not always straightforward. When morphologic hematoxylin and eosin interpretation alone is not sufficient, additional hematoxylin and eosin sections and immunohistochemical (IHC) studies may be beneficial. This review and small cases series of 3 diagnostically challenging melanocytic sentinel lymph node cases highlights the IHC approach to evaluate intraparenchymal nodal melanocytic nevi, coexistent metastatic melanoma with adjacent melanocytic nevi cells, and nodal blue nevi. In challenging cases, cytological morphology of the melanocytes, location within the lymph node, and IHC studies may assist in diagnosis. If these tools yield conflicting results, expert opinion is recommended.

Nevus cell aggregates massively occupying parenchyma of an external iliac lymph node: A case report and review of the literature

We report a case of nevus cell aggregates (NCAs) in an external iliac lymph node from a patient with a compound congenital nevus in the corresponding drainage skin. Melanocytes in parenchyma were in band, nest-like or nodular fashion, and partly continuous with those in capsule and trabeculae. The largest nodule in parenchyma measured 6.5 mm. Melanocytes mostly exhibited benign appearance identical to cutaneous nevus. A few regions abundant in cells displayed atypical features, including increased nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio, small nucleoli, and occasional mitotic figures. Immunohistochemistry showed that melanocytes stained positive for p16, but negative for HMB-45 and nestin. Ki-67 labeling was less than 1% and reticulin mainly surrounded individual melanocytes. Besides, Vysis melanoma fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) plus another 2 probes targeting 9p21(CDKN2A) and 8q24(MYC) showed normal results. The patient is alive without malignant tumor after 52-month follow up. Our case provides a new evidence for the existence of intraparenchymal NCAs in deep lymph node and indicates that melanocytes with some atypical features can occur in nodal nevi. Nevus cells in parenchyma connected to those in capsule and trabeculae are a significant clue to distinguish nodal nevi from metastatic melanomas. Additionally, immunohistochemistry and FISH assay are useful in differential diagnosis.

The diagnostic utility of PRAME and p16 in distinguishing nodal nevi from nodal metastatic melanoma

The status of the sentinel lymph node is the strongest predictor of recurrence in patients with malignant melanoma, making accurate distinction between nodal metastases and nodal nevi of paramount importance. We explored the utility of p16 and PRAME in differentiating nodal nevi from metastatic melanoma by immunohistochemistry. We searched our institutional database for cases of nodal nevi and nodal metastatic melanoma. p16 and PRAME expression were assessed with immunolabeling quantified by extent of nuclear positivity (0-25 %, >25 %-50 %, >50 %-75 % and >75 %). Sensitivities and specificities were calculated, and discrimination assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Forty-nine cases out of 51 nevi and 56/56 melanoma cases had lesional tissue present for p16, while 44/51 nevi and 54/56 melanoma cases had lesional tissue present for PRAME. 43 nodal nevi (88 %) had >50 % nuclear staining for p16, while none had >50 % staining for PRAME. More than half (55 %) of melanoma cases had complete loss of nuclear staining for p16, while majority (94 %) had >50 % nuclear staining for PRAME. Using a cut-off value of 50 %, higher PRAME expression had a sensitivity and specificity of 94 % and 100 %, respectively, while lower p16 expression had a sensitivity and specificity of 66 % and 88 %, respectively, for detecting metastatic melanoma. PRAME showed significantly better discrimination (AUC = 0.97, 95 % CI 0.94-1.00) than p16 (AUC = 0.77, 95 % CI 0.68-0.86) for differentiating nodal nevi from nodal melanoma (P < 0.001). Our findings suggest that PRAME is more accurate than p16 in discriminating between the two entities, with excellent sensitivity and specificity.

Clinical significance of SLN benign capsular nevi in patients with melanoma

BACKGROUND

Benign capsular nevi (BCN) are not infrequent in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) of patients with melanoma. Their prognostic significance is unknown and the literature is limited. This study evaluated the clinical significance of incidentally found BCN in these patients.

METHODS

A multi-institutional retrospective review of patients undergoing SLN biopsy for cutaneous melanoma between 2000 and 2016. Patients were divided into the following groups: (a) negative SLN and no BCN, (b) negative SLN and presence of BCN, (c) positive SLN seen only on immunohistochemistry (IHC), and (d) positive SLN via hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Outcomes measured were overall survival and any recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 1253 patients were identified (group 1 = 978, group 2 = 56, group 3 = 32, and group 4 = 187). Fifty-seven percent were male and the mean age was 59.3 years. BCN was identified in 77 patients (6.2%), of which the majority was in the node-negative group (72%). Multivariable analysis showed that BCN was associated with lower recurrence rates, though not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.5; P = .06). IHC- and H&E-positive SLNs were associated with a higher risk of recurrence (HR = 2.4; P = .02 and 2.0, P < .0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients with BCN and negative SLN had lower recurrence rates than patients with negative SLN and no BCN. Our data suggest a possible protective effect against recurrence.

Immunohistochemical Expression of p16 in Melanocytic Lesions: An Updated Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

- Making an accurate diagnosis for melanocytic lesions has always been challenging for pathologists, especially when dealing with difficult-to-diagnose cases. Misdiagnosis of melanoma and melanocytic lesions in general has tremendous medical-legal implications, often leading to unnecessary and excessive use of adjunctive tests. Although molecular testing is of much interest and there is great support for its development, currently, for most melanocytic lesions, immunohistochemical studies remain the most practical method for assistance in the routine diagnosis of melanocytic lesions for the average pathologist.

OBJECTIVES

- To review the practical use of p16 immunohistochemistry for evaluating melanocytic lesions, particularly for differentiating benign from malignant tumors, and to perform a meta-analysis of primary studies evaluating p16 immunohistochemistry in melanocytic lesions.

DATA SOURCES

- A PubMed database search for literature reporting melanocytic lesions and p16 immunohistochemistry was performed. Essential information from each study (number of samples, antibody used, collection dates, overall p16 immunohistochemistry results, and general method of interpretation) was tabulated and analyzed. Examples of representative cases showing p16 immunostaining pattern are also illustrated.

CONCLUSIONS

- Incorporation of p16 immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions is of limited use, especially for the purpose of differentiating benign from malignant lesions. Evaluation of multiple studies reveals a wide range of results. However, there appears to be some value for the use of p16 in distinguishing nodal nevi from metastatic melanoma within nodes. The method of interpretation (nuclear versus cytoplasmic staining) also appears to give differing results, as studies considering only nuclear staining appeared to show more consistent results from study to study.

Malignant melanoma: Claims and controversies

Malignant melanoma is a common cancer in young people and its incidence is rising in the UK. The management of the disease is evolving, with new approaches to the treatment of locally advanced and systemic disease in particular being rapidly developed. Sentinel node biopsy is a valuable treatment option for the staging of melanoma, and completion lymphadenectomy in node-positive patients improves local disease control. However, early clearance of occult microscopic nodal disease has not been proven to confer a melanoma-specific survival advantage. Delays in the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma lead to claims being brought in negligence, but establishing causation in such cases can be difficult.