1
|
Ploussard G, Rozet F, Roubaud G, Stanbury T, Sargos P, Roupret M. Chromogranin A: a useful biomarker in castration-resistant prostate cancer. World J Urol 2023; 41:361-369. [PMID: 36527470 PMCID: PMC9947027 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04248-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The natural history of prostate cancer (PC) almost always evolves to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) status, sometimes comprising pure or mixed neuroendocrine prostate cancers (NEPC) differentiation. In CRPC, monitoring using only prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is not optimal since neuroendocrine differentiated cells do not secrete PSA. Thus, monitoring with PSA and chromogranin A (CgA) may be useful. This review aims to evaluate evidence for the usefulness of CgA assessments during the monitoring of prostate cancer. METHOD This review was based on three recent meta-analysis concerning CgA and prostate cancer. Further data were obtained from PubMed and Embase databases by searches using keywords, including chromogranin A and prostate cancer. RESULTS CgA levels remain largely unchanged during the early PC evolution. The development of NEPC is characterised by lower PSA secretion and increased CgA secretion. Data supporting the prognostic value of high CgA baseline levels for survival are contrasting and scarce. However, increasing CgA levels early during treatment of metastatic (m)CRPC suggests resistance to treatment and predicts shorter survival, particularly in men with high baseline levels of CgA levels. In men with mCRPC, the first-line chemotherapy may be more appropriate than other agents when baseline CgA levels are high. Also, increasing CgA levels during treatment may indicate disease progression and may warrant a change of therapy. CONCLUSION CgA monitoring at baseline and regularly during mCRPC management may be useful for monitoring disease evolution. An increased CgA baseline levels and increasing CgA levels may assist physicians with choosing and modifying therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, Clinique La Croix du Sud, Quint-Fonsegrives, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT-O), Toulouse, France.
| | - François Rozet
- grid.418120.e0000 0001 0626 5681Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- grid.476460.70000 0004 0639 0505Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Paul Sargos
- grid.476460.70000 0004 0639 0505Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Morgan Roupret
- grid.462844.80000 0001 2308 1657GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kannan A, Clouston D, Frydenberg M, Ilic D, Karim MN, Evans SM, Toivanen R, Risbridger GP, Taylor RA. Neuroendocrine cells in prostate cancer correlate with poor outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 2021; 130:420-433. [PMID: 34784097 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to understand the variation in the reporting of neuroendocrine staining and determine the influence of reporting neuroendocrine staining at diagnosis on patient outcomes. METHODS Medical databases were searched to identify studies in which adenocarcinoma specimens were stained with any of the following four neuroendocrine markers: chromogranin A (CgA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), synaptophysin and CD56. The prevalence of neuroendocrine staining and correlation of the prevalence of neuroendocrine staining to patient outcomes were analysed using a random-effects model. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Sixty-two studies spanning 7616 patients were analysed. The pooled prevalence for the most common marker, CgA (41%), was similar to that of NSE (39%) and higher than that of synaptophysin (31%). The prevalence of CgA staining was significantly influenced by reporting criteria, where objective thresholds reduced the variation in prevalence to 26%. No correlation was found between CgA prevalence and tumour grade. Patients positive for CgA staining using objective criteria had more rapid biochemical progression (hazard ratio [HR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49 to 2.65) and poorer prostate cancer-specific survival (HR 7.03, 95% CI 2.55 to 19.39) compared to negative patients, even among those with low-risk cancers. CONCLUSION Discrepancies in the reported prevalence of neuroendocrine cells in adenocarcinoma are driven by the inconsistent scoring criteria. This study unequivocally demonstrates that when neuroendocrine cell staining is assessed with objective criteria it identifies patients with poor clinical outcomes. Future studies are needed to determine the exact quantifiable thresholds for use in reporting neuroendocrine cell staining to identify patients at higher risk of progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwini Kannan
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology and Department of Physiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Cancer Program, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | | | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology and Department of Physiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Cancer Program, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Department of Urology, Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Dragan Ilic
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Md Nazmul Karim
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Sue M Evans
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Victorian Cancer Registry, Cancer Council Victorian, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Roxanne Toivanen
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology and Department of Physiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Cancer Program, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Prostate Cancer Research Program, Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum, Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Gail P Risbridger
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology and Department of Physiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Cancer Program, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Prostate Cancer Research Program, Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum, Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Renea A Taylor
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology and Department of Physiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Cancer Program, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Prostate Cancer Research Program, Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum, Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oligometastatic Prostate Adenocarcinoma. Clinical-Pathologic Study of a Histologically Under-Recognized Prostate Cancer. J Pers Med 2020; 10:jpm10040265. [PMID: 33291528 PMCID: PMC7761807 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10040265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The clinical parameters and the histological and immunohistochemical findings of a prospective protocolized series of 27 prostate carcinoma patients with oligometastatic disease followed homogeneously were analyzed. Lymph nodes (81.5%) and bones (18.5%) were the only metastatic sites. Local control after metastatic directed treatment was achieved in 22 (81.5%) patients. A total of 8 (29.6%) patients developed castration-resistant prostate cancer. Seventeen (63%) patients presented with non-organ confined disease. The Gleason index 8-10 was the most frequently observed (12 cases, 44.4%) combined grade. Positive immunostainings were detected with androgen receptor (100%), PGP 9.5 (74%), ERG (40.7%), chromogranin A (29.6%), and synaptophysin (18.5%) antibodies. The Ki-67 index value > 5% was observed in 15% of the cases. L1CAM immunostaining was negative in all cases. Fisher exact test showed that successful local control of metastases was associated to mild inflammation, organ confined disease, Ki-67 index < 5%, and Gleason index 3 + 3. A castration resistant status was associated with severe inflammation, atrophy, a Gleason index higher than 3 + 3, Ki-67 index ≥ 5%, and positive PGP 9.5, chromogranin A, and synaptophysin immunostainings. In conclusion, oligometastatic prostate adenocarcinoma does not have a specific clinical-pathologic profile. However, some histologic and immunohistochemical parameters of routine use may help with making therapeutic decisions.
Collapse
|