Histologic factors predicting invasion in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the preoperative core biopsy

Dendritic Cell Subpopulations Are Associated with Morphological Features of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the preinvasive form of breast cancer (BC). It is disputed whether all cases of DCIS require extensive treatment as the overall risk of progression to BC is estimated at 40%. Therefore, the crucial objective for researchers is to identify DCIS with significant risk of transformation into BC. Dendritic cells (DC) are professional antigen presenting cells and as such play a pivotal role in the formation of immune cells that infiltrate in breast tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the density of DCs with different superficial antigens (CD1a, CD123, DC-LAMP, DC-SIGN) and various histopathological characteristics of DCIS. Our evaluation indicated that CD123⁺ and DC-LAMP⁺ cells were strongly associated with maximal tumor size, grading and neoductgenesis. Together with CD1a⁺ cells, they were negatively correlated with hormonal receptors expression. Furthermore, the number of DC-LAMP⁺ cells was higher in DCIS with comedo necrosis, ductal spread, lobular cancerization as well as comedo-type tumors, while CD1a⁺ cells were abundant in cases with Paget disease. We concluded that different subpopulations of DCs relate to various characteristics of DCIS. Of the superficial DCs markers, DC-LAMP seems particularly promising as a target for further research in this area.

Clinicopathological predictors of postoperative upstaging to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study

Background

We conducted a prospective study with the intention to omit surgery for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. We aimed to identify clinicopathological predictors of postoperative upstaging to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in patients preoperatively diagnosed with DCIS.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with DCIS diagnosed through biopsy between April 1, 2010 and December 31, 2014, from 16 institutions. Clinical, radiological, and histological variables were collected from medical records.

Results

We identified 2,293 patients diagnosed with DCIS through biopsy, including 1,663 DCIS (72.5%) cases and 630 IDC (27.5%) cases. In multivariate analysis, the presence of a palpable mass (odds ratio [OR] 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–2.6), mammography findings (≥ category 4; OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2–2.6), mass formations on ultrasonography (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2–2.5), and tumor size on MRI (> 20 mm; OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2–2.4) were independent predictors of IDC. Among patients with a tumor size on MRI of ≤ 20 mm, the possibility of postoperative upstaging to IDC was 22.1%. Among the 258 patients with non-palpable mass, nuclear grade 1/2, and positive for estrogen receptor, the possibility was 18.1%, even if the upper limit of the tumor size on MRI was raised to ≤ 40 mm.

Conclusion

We identified four independent predictive factors of upstaging to IDC after surgery among patients with DCIS diagnosed by biopsy. The combined use of various predictors of IDC reduces the possibility of postoperative upstaging to IDC, even if the tumor size on MRI is larger than 20 mm.

Variability in diagnostic threshold for comedo necrosis among breast pathologists: implications for patient eligibility for active surveillance trials of ductal carcinoma in situ

Active surveillance trials for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are in progress in the United States and Europe. In some of these trials, the presence of comedo necrosis in the DCIS has been an exclusion criterion for trial entry. However, the minimum amount of necrosis required by pathologists for a diagnosis of comedo necrosis is not well-defined. We surveyed 35 experienced breast pathologists to assess their diagnostic threshold for comedo necrosis. Pink circles representing necrosis ranging in extent from 10 to 80% of the duct diameter were superimposed on eight replicate histologic images of a single duct involved by low nuclear grade, solid pattern DCIS. These images were circulated by e-mail to the participating pathologists who were asked to select the image that represents the minimum amount of necrosis that they require for a diagnosis of comedo necrosis. Among the 35 participants, the minimum extent of the duct diameter required for a diagnosis of comedo necrosis was 10% for 4 pathologists, 20% for 5, 30% for 11, 40% for 7, 50% for 6, 60% for 1 and 70% for 1. There was no single threshold about which more than one-third of the pathologists agreed met the minimal criteria for comedo necrosis. We conclude that even among experienced breast pathologists, the threshold for comedo necrosis is highly variable. Our findings highlight the need for a standardized definition of comedo necrosis as a trial criterion, and more generally where it may be used as a marker of increased risk of recurrence for therapeutic decision making.

A retrospective alternative for active surveillance trials for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a nonobligate precursor of invasive breast cancer, accounting for 20 % of screen-detected breast cancers. Little is known about the natural progression of DCIS because most patients undergo surgery upon diagnosis. Many DCIS patients are likely being overtreated, as it is believed that only around 50 % of DCIS will progress to invasive carcinoma. Robust prognostic markers for progression to invasive carcinoma are lacking. In the past, studies have investigated women who developed a recurrence after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and compared them with those who did not. However, where there is no recurrence, the patient has probably been adequately treated. The present narrative review advocates a new research strategy, wherein only those patients with a recurrence are studied. Approximately half of the recurrences are invasive cancers, and half are DCIS. So-called "recurrences" are probably most often the result of residual disease. The new approach allows us to ask: why did some residual DCIS evolve to invasive cancers and others not? This novel strategy compares the group of patients that developed in situ recurrence with the group of patients that developed invasive recurrence after BCS. The differences between these groups could then be used to develop a robust risk stratification tool. This tool should estimate the risk of synchronous and metachronous invasive carcinoma when DCIS is diagnosed in a biopsy. Identification of DCIS patients at low risk for developing invasive carcinoma will individualize future therapy and prevent overtreatment.

Stromal characteristics are adequate prognosticators for recurrence risk in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

BACKGROUND

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast constitutes a heterogeneous group of non-obligate precursors for invasive breast cancer. To date, adequate risk stratification is lacking, which is presumed to result in overtreatment. We previously identified myxoid stromal architecture as a potential prognosticator for loco-regional recurrence. In the present study, we investigated the prognostic potential of stromal characteristics.

METHODS

Hematoxylin and eosin stained slides from 211 DCIS patients were reviewed. The following histological features were dichotomously assessed: nuclear grade, DCIS architecture, presence of necrosis, intraductal calcifications, stromal inflammation and myxoid stromal architecture. Loco-regional recurrences constituted the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Cox regression analysis showed that high nuclear grade, myxoid stromal architecture and moderate to extensive stromal inflammation were significantly associated with decreased recurrence-free survival, independent of radiotherapy. Based on these features, a combined risk score (CRS) was calculated, ranging from zero to three. A high CRS of three was associated with significantly shorter recurrence-free survival. Nineteen patients had a CRS of three, of which three relapsed (15.7%), whereas only one out of 113 patients with a CRS of zero relapsed (0.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to validate our previously reported findings regarding the prognostic potential of myxoid periductal stroma in an independent DCIS patient cohort. A CRS based on nuclear grade, myxoid stromal architecture and stromal inflammation might facilitate discrimination of low risk from high risk patients. Consequently, the CRS may tailor adjuvant therapy. Future research should investigate whether radiotherapy can be safely omitted in patients with a low CRS.