Analysis of histological and immunohistochemical patterns of benign and malignant adrenocortical tumors by computerized morphometry

Diagnostic Utility of a Modified Reticulin Algorithm in Pediatric Adrenocortical Neoplasms

Pediatric adrenocortical neoplasms (ACNs) are extremely rare tumors in contrast to their adult counterparts. Distinguishing benign from malignant is challenging based on pure morphologic grounds. Previously, 2 scoring systems were proposed in pediatric ACN, including the Wieneke criteria (WC) and its modified version (modified WC [mWC]). In adults, the reticulin algorithm (RA) has proven inexpensive, reliable, predictive, and reproducible; however, it has been validated only recently in children in a limited number of cases. This study aims to assess the RA utility compared with other scoring systems in a series of 92 pediatric ACNs. All cases were individually scored, and mitotic rate cutoffs were recorded. Reticulin alterations were classified as quantitative and qualitative. Outcome data were available in 59/92. The median age was 5 years (0.1 to 18 y) with an M:F of 0.6. Clinical presentation included virilization (39%), Cushing syndrome (21%), other symptoms (4%), and asymptomatic (36%). The reticulin framework was intact in 27% and altered in 73% of cases, showing qualitative (22%), quantitative (73%), and both (5%) alterations. In patients with favorable outcomes, 59% showed either intact reticulin or qualitative alteration compared with the unfavorable outcome group, where 90% showed quantitative alterations. All scoring systems WC ( P < 0.0001), mWC ( P = 0.0003), and the adult/pediatric RA ( P < 0.0001) had predictive value. The RA is comparable to WC and mWC, easier to apply, and is the most sensitive histopathological approach to identifying aggressive behavior in pediatric ACN. Its integration into the WC might be helpful in ACN of uncertain malignant potential and deserves further investigation.

Application of TFE3 Immunophenotypic and TFE3 mRNA Expressions in Diagnosis and Prognostication of Adrenal Cortical Neoplasms and Distinction From Kidney Tumors

We explored the application of TFE3 immunostaining and TFE3 mRNA expression in the differential diagnosis and prognostication of adrenal cortical tumors and distinction of the latter from clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) which show significant morphologic overlap. TFE3 immunostaining was performed on a large cohort of samples including 40 adrenal cortex tissues, 95 adrenocortical adenoma (ACA), 11 adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), 53 ccRCC, and 18 pheochromocytomas. TFE3 was compared with other immunomarkers melan-A, inhibin-α, synaptophysin, chromogranin A, CAIX and CD10. One hundred percent normal adrenal cortices and 94% ACA were strongly and diffusely stained for TFE3 while no ACC showed diffuse staining. TFE3 is thus useful in distinguishing ACA from ACC. TFE3 is also useful in separating ACC from ccRCC as 64% ACC showed partial, while only 7% of ccRCC showed partial TFE3 staining. Only 1 pheochromocytoma showed focal weak TFE3 staining. Results also demonstrated superiority of TFE3 over other commonly used immunomarkers. TFE3 gene rearrangement testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization showed no rearrangement in 6 TFE3 positive adrenal tumors. TFE3 mRNA were analyzed by the Cancer Genome Atlas database and we found TFE3 mRNA expression correlated with overall patient survival in ACC. Our study showed usefulness of TFE3 in distinguishing ACA from ACC, and ACC from ccRCC. TFE3 is superior over other commonly used immunomarkers for adrenal tumors. In addition, decreased TFE3 immunoexpression and TFE3 mRNA expression may carry poor prognostic implication in adrenal tumors.

Histopathologic Features of Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma

Adrenal cortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy that poses challenging issues regarding the diagnostic workup. Indeed, no presurgical technique or clinical parameters can reliably distinguish between adrenal cortical adenomas, which are more frequent and have a favorable outcome, and ACC, and the final diagnosis largely relies on histopathologic analysis of the surgical specimen. However, even the pathologic assessment of malignancy in an adrenal cortical lesion is not straightforward and requires a combined evaluation of multiple histopathologic features. Starting from the Weiss score, which was developed in 1984, several histopathologic scoring systems have been designed to tackle the difficulties of ACC diagnosis. Dealing with specific histopathologic variants (eg, Liss-Weiss-Bisceglia scoring system for oncocytic ACC) or patient characteristics (eg, Wieneke index in the pediatric setting), these scores remarkably improved the diagnostic workup of ACC and its subtypes. Nevertheless, cases with misleading features or discordant correlations between pathologic findings and clinical behavior still occur. Owing to multicentric collaborative studies integrating morphologic features with ancillary immunohistochemical markers and molecular analysis, ACC has eventually emerged as a multifaceted, heterogenous malignancy, and, while innovative and promising approaches are currently being tested, the future clinical management of patients with ACC will mainly rely on personalized medicine and target-therapy protocols. At the dawn of the new Fifth World Health Organization classification of endocrine tumors, this review will tackle ACC from the pathologist's perspective, thus focusing on the main available diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive tissue-tethered features and biomarkers and providing relevant clinical and molecular correlates.

The Role of Immunohistochemical Markers for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Adrenocortical Neoplasms

Adrenal cortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer with poor prognosis that needs to be distinguished from adrenocortical adenomas (ACAs). Although, the recently developed transcriptome analysis seems to be a reliable tool for the differential diagnosis of adrenocortical neoplasms, it is not widely available in clinical practice. We aim to evaluate histological and immunohistochemical markers for the distinction of ACCs from ACAs along with assessing their prognostic role. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed from 37 patients; 24 archived, formalin-fixed, and paraffin-embedded ACC samples underwent histochemical analysis of reticulin and immunohistochemical analysis of p27, p53, Ki-67 markers and were compared with 13 ACA samples. Weiss and Helsinki scores were also considered. Kaplan-Meier and univariate Cox regression methods were implemented to identify prognostic effects. Altered reticulin pattern, Ki-67% labelling index and overexpression of p53 protein were found to be useful histopathological markers for distinguishing ACAs from ACCs. Among the studied markers, only pathological p53 nuclear protein expression was found to reach statistically significant association with poor survival and development of metastases, although in a small series of patients. In conclusion, altered reticulin pattern and p53/Ki-67 expression are useful markers for distinguishing ACCs from ACAs. Immunohistopathology alone cannot discriminate ACCs with different prognosis and it should be combined with morphological criteria and transcriptome analysis.

Ki67 in endocrine neoplasms: to count or not to count, this is the question! A systematic review from the English language literature

BACKGROUND

Endocrine neoplasms are generally slow-growing tumors that can show hormonal activity and give metastases. In most cases they are benign and clearly malignant forms are easy to diagnose. However, borderline forms may occur and be, for the pathologists, very difficult to classify. In these cases, there is a strong need to identify factors that may aid. Official classification systems for endocrine neoplasms are based on the evaluation of proliferation and, in most cases, they rely on mitotic count. In support, the study of Ki67 is carried out which, however, has not yet been included in any official classification system, except for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastro-entero-pancreatic tract.

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the proven or unproven role of Ki67 in endocrine neoplasms, in different districts, in order to bring to light the substantial differences, in terms of proliferation, existing between neoplasms so similar, but at the same time, so different.

METHODS

A thorough search of English language literature was performed, looking for articles concerning Ki67 in five endocrine neoplasms (pituitary adenomas, thyroid neoplasms, adrenocortical neoplasms, pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas).

RESULTS

From 2170, 236 articles were selected and it was seen that the endocrine neoplasm in which Ki67 was most studied was the pituitary, where it still shows a controversial role. In other neoplasms different roles were identified.

CONCLUSION

The pathologist should be aware of the contribution that this proliferative marker can give to the diagnosis and, sometimes, to the therapy selection, for the clinician.