EGFR and KRAS molecular genotyping for pulmonary carcinomas: Feasibility of a simple and rapid technique implementable in any department of pathology

Ultra-rapid Idylla™ EGFR mutation screening followed by next-generation sequencing: An integrated solution to molecular diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Rapid profiling of the EGFR mutations is crucial to help clinicians choose the optimal treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, current diagnostic techniques, including ARMS-PCR and NGS, generally require several days to deliver final results. This diagnostic delay may lead to treatment delays for patients who are worsening rapidly.

Methods

This study introduced the ultra-rapid Idylla™ system for rapid, sensitive and specific identification of the EGFR mutations among Chinese NSCLC patients. Idylla™ EGFR Assay, an integrated cartridge running on the Idylla™ system, which can detect 51 EGFR mutations directly from Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) samples within 2.5 hours, was used in this study. The sensitivity and specificity of the Idylla™ system were evaluated in comparison with ARMS-PCR or NGS using 95 clinical samples.

Results

The Idylla™ system achieved a sensitivity of 97.6%, a specificity of 100%, and an overall concordance of 97.9% for 95 retrospective samples. When compared to ARMS-PCR, the Idylla™ system demonstrated high accuracy with an overall agreement of 97.1% (34/35), a sensitivity of 95.2% (20/21) (95% CI, 76.2% - 99.9%), and an estimated specificity of 100% (12/12) (95% CI, 76.8% - 100%) for 35 prospective samples.

Conclusions

This Idylla system provides a rapid, accurate and simple approach for screening EGFR mutations, which can guide Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) treatment for NSCLC patients in a timely manner.

Ionescu D, Ma C, Yip S, Melosky B. Improving Time-to-Treatment for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients through Faster Single Gene EGFR Testing Using the Idylla™ EGFR Testing Platform

INTRODUCTION

Patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may benefit from a short time-to-treatment (TTT). Predictive biomarker testing is performed prior to treatment, as recommended by various international expert consensus bodies. Genetic testing is more time-intensive than immunohistochemistry (IHC) and commonly contributes to prolonged TTT. For epidermal growth factor receptor-positive patients (EGFR+), further genetic testing may not be required due to the mutual exclusivity of actionable mutations.

METHODS

The trial cohort (N = 238) received both BC Cancer NGS panel (Oncopanel) and Idylla EGFR testing. Data were also collected for a control cohort (N = 220) that received Oncopanel testing. For each patient, the time that the lab received the sample, the time taken to report the NGS and Idylla tests, the time of first treatment, and the final treatment regimen were recorded.

RESULTS

A concordance frequency of 98.7% (232/235) was observed between the Idylla and NGS panel. The lab turnaround time (TAT) was faster for the Idylla test by an average of 12.4 days (N = 235, p < 0.01). Overall, the average TTT in the trial cohort (N = 114) was 10.1 days faster (p < 0.05) than the control (N = 114), leading to a 25% reduction in TTT. For patients treated based on EGFR positivity, the mean TTT was 16.8 days faster (p < 0.05) in the trial cohort (N = 33) than the control cohort (N = 28), leading to a 48% reduction in TTT.

CONCLUSION

Using the Idylla EGFR test as part of the molecular testing repertoire in advanced-stage NSCLC patients could significantly reduce TTT.

Cost-Effectiveness of Parallel Versus Sequential Testing of Genetic Aberrations for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Netherlands

PURPOSE

A large number of targeted treatment options for stage IV nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer with specific genetic aberrations in tumor DNA is available. It is therefore important to optimize diagnostic testing strategies, such that patients receive adequate personalized treatment that improves survival and quality of life. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy (including diagnostic costs, turnaround time (TAT), unsuccessful tests, percentages of correct findings, therapeutic costs, and therapeutic effectiveness) of parallel next generation sequencing (NGS)–based versus sequential single-gene–based testing strategies routinely used in patients with metastasized non–small-cell lung cancer in the Netherlands.

METHODS

A diagnostic microsimulation model was developed to simulate 100,000 patients with prevalence of genetic aberrations, extracted from real-world data from the Dutch Pathology Registry. These simulated patients were modeled to undergo different testing strategies composed of multiple tests with different test characteristics including single-gene and panel tests, test accuracy, the probability of an unsuccessful test, and TAT. Diagnostic outcomes were linked to a previously developed treatment model, to predict average long-term survival, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and cost-effectiveness of parallel versus sequential testing.

RESULTS

NGS-based parallel testing for all actionable genetic aberrations is on average €266 cheaper than single-gene–based sequential testing, and detects additional relevant targetable genetic aberrations in 20.5% of the cases, given a TAT of maximally 2 weeks. Therapeutic costs increased by €8,358, and 0.12 QALYs were gained, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €69,614/QALY for parallel versus sequential testing.

CONCLUSION

NGS-based parallel testing is diagnostically superior over single-gene–based sequential testing, as it is cheaper and more effective than sequential testing. Parallel testing remains cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 69,614 €/QALY upon inclusion of therapeutic costs and long-term outcomes.

Contribution of the IdyllaTM System to Improving the Therapeutic Care of Patients with NSCLC through Early Screening of EGFR Mutations

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genotyping, a critical examen for the treatment decisions of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is commonly assayed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), but this global approach takes time. To determine whether rapid EGFR genotyping tests by the Idylla^TM system guides earlier therapy decisions, EGFR mutations were assayed by both the Idylla^TM system and NGS in 223 patients with NSCLC in a bicentric prospective study. Idylla^TM demonstrated agreement with the NGS method in 187/194 cases (96.4%) and recovered 20 of the 26 (77%) EGFR mutations detected using NGS. Regarding the seven missed EGFR mutations, five were not detected by the Idylla^TM system, one was assayed in a sample with insufficient tumoral cells, and the last was in a sample not validated by the Idylla^TM system (a bone metastasis). Idylla^TM did not detect any false positives. The average time between EGFR genotyping results from Idylla^TM and the NGS method was 9.2 ± 2.2 working days (wd) (12.6 ± 4.0 calendar days (cd)). Subsequently, based on the Idylla^TM method, the timeframe from tumor sampling to the initiation of EGFR-TKI was 7.7 ± 1.2 wd (11.4 ± 3.1 cd), while it was 20.3 ± 6.7 wd (27.2 ± 8.3 cd) with the NGS method (p < 0.001). We thus demonstrated here that the Idylla^TM system contributes to improving the therapeutic care of patients with NSCLC by the early screening of EGFR mutations.

Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation detection turnaround times and concordance among real-time polymerase chain reaction, high-throughput next-generation sequencing and the Biocartis Idylla™ platforms in non-small cell lung carcinomas

OBJECTIVES

Activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene of non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC) can be targeted by the tyrosine kinase inhibitors. A number of molecular diagnostic platforms are used to detect actionable targets in the exon(s) 18, 19, 20, and 21 of the EGFR gene. The Idylla™ system (Biocartis, Mechelen, Belgium) is a relatively novel technique and is unique in integrating both sample processing and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in a single cartridge. We sought to conduct this study to compare the turnaround time (TAT) and concordance of Idylla™ system with the conventional RT-PCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for EGFR mutation detection.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 38 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded NSCLC tissue blocks with known NGS results by Ion Torrent™ S5 NGS platform were retested by the RT-PCR and Idylla™ platforms.

RESULTS

A total of 15 of 38 (39.4 %) tumors that showed various EGFR mutations by NGS and conventional RT-PCR techniques were subjected to the Idylla™testing. These cases satisfied the specimen adequacy criteria of at least 10 % tumor cells for the testing. The mutations detected by the NGS were also detected by the Idylla™ testing. However, NGS identified additional 3 mutations in 3 cases, involving T709 V (exon 18, n = 1) and V774 M (exon 20, n = 2). The tumors with wild type EGFR on NGS did not have any actionable mutation detected by the Idylla™. Average EGFR testing TAT by Idylla™ was only 7.2 h (4-12 hours), as compared to conventional RT-PCR taking 54 h (31-79 hours) and NGS requiring 10.7 days (7.1-14 days). The actual procedure time by conventional RT-PCR was 24 h, NGS was 6.5 days, and Idylla™ was only 3 h.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the Idylla™EGFR testing is an efficient, rapid, and fairly simple tool that can be used in the routine molecular laboratory with limited expertise and infrastructure and using the lowest amount of tissue material.

Reduced sensitivity for EGFR T790M mutations using the Idylla EGFR Mutation Test

AIMS

Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is effective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring the EGFR T790M mutation. The Idylla EGFR Mutation Test is a rapid cartridge-based method for detecting T790M and other EGFR mutations. However, false negative T790M results have been reported, and the sensitivity of the assay for this mutation is uncertain.

METHODS

Eighty NSCLC samples were tested by both Idylla and a next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay; 46 were from patients at disease progression, and 24 of these had known T790M mutations. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to confirm NGS findings in samples with the T790M mutation.

RESULTS

Of 19 samples with T790M variant allele frequencies (VAF) higher than the stated 5% limit of detection, 14 were detected by Idylla (sensitivity 74%, 95% CI 49% to 90%). Where sufficient sample remained, ddPCR was consistent with NGS findings in all samples. False negative T790M results were associated with higher EGFR control Cq values (median 22.8 vs 19.8), presence of the EGFR Q787Q polymorphism in cis (80% vs 44%) and presence of an invalid T790M amplification curve. An EGFR exon 19 indel with VAF >5% was also not detected by the Idylla assay in two samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The Idylla EGFR Mutation Test has reduced sensitivity for the T790M mutation compared with NGS and ddPCR methods. The presence of an invalid T790M amplification curve may indicate a possible false negative result that warrants further testing by an orthogonal method.

Non-small cell lung carcinomas with CTNNB1 (beta-catenin) mutations: A clinicopathological study of 26 cases

Beta-catenin, encoded by the CTNNB1 gene, plays an important role in cell proliferation. Mutations of CTNNB1 are oncogenic in several tumor types and are often associated with a nuclear abnormal expression. However, such mutations have only rarely been reported in non-small cell lung carcinomas and their clinical signification is not well described. Our study was conducted on 26 CTNNB1-mutated non-small cell lung carcinomas. Tumors were routinely tested by next generation sequencing for mutations in exon 3 of CTNNB1 gene. Twenty three cases were from a series of 925 tumors (2.48%). The hospital files and pathological data, from surgical samples (n = 16), small biopsies (n = 5) and trans-bronchial fine needle aspirations (n = 5), were reviewed. Immunohistochemistry was performed with an anti-beta-catenin antibody. There were 10 female and 16 male patients aged 52 to 83. Eleven of 25 patients were no-smoking or light smokers. Three cases were diagnosed while under treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. There were 25 adenocarcinomas and 1 squamous cell carcinoma. Most adenocarcinomas had a papillary component and were TTF1-positive. One case was a well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma. Eleven cases (42%) with CTNNB1 mutations showed associated EGFR mutations. The frequency of CTNNB1 mutations was higher among EGFR mutated carcinomas. Immunohistochemistry showed heterogeneous nuclear or cytoplasmic abnormal expression. Our study shows that CTNNB1 mutations mostly occur in TTF1-positive adenocarcinomas with a papillary pattern. These mutations are often associated with EGFR mutations and possibly interfer in the mechanism of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Our experience suggests that immuno-histochemistry cannot be used for screening.

Rapid EGFR mutation testing in lung cancer tissue samples using a fully automated system and single-use cartridge

Introduction

Activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients predicts response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The Idylla™ system (Biocartis, Mechelen, Belgium) is a fully integrated, cartridge-based platform that provides automated sample processing and real-time PCR-based mutation detection in a single-use cartridge. This study evaluated the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Assay cartridges against next-generation sequencing (NGS) using formalin fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) lung cancer tissue samples.

Methods

Thirty-four FFPE lung adenocarcinoma tissue samples were tested on the Idylla™ system. 21 had at least one mutation in EGFR and 13 had no EGFR mutation as determined by NGS analysis using the Ion AmpliSeq 50-gene Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). One 10 ​μm FFPE tissue section was used for each Idylla™ test and all cases met the Idylla™ minimum tumor content requirement (≥10%).

Results

Idylla™ results were in complete agreement with those obtained by NGS for EGFR mutations targeted by the Idylla™. NGS identified two additional EGFR mutations that are not targeted by the Idylla™ in two samples (E709V and V774M). No EGFR mutations were detected by the Idylla™ in samples determined by NGS as having wild-type EGFR.

Conclusion

The fully automated Idylla™ system offers rapid and reliable testing for clinically actionable mutations in EGFR directly from FFPE tissue sections. Its simplicity and ease of use compared to other available molecular techniques make it suitable for routine clinical use in a variety of settings.

Rapid clinical mutational testing of KRAS, BRAF and EGFR: a prospective comparative analysis of the Idylla technique with high-throughput next-generation sequencing

AIMS

Precision medicine therapy is remodelling the diagnostic landscape of cancer. The success of these new therapies is often based on the presence or absence of a specific mutation in a tumour. The Idylla platform is designed to determine the mutational status of a tumour as quickly and accurately as possible, as a rapid, accurate diagnosis is of the utmost importance for the treatment of patients. This is the first complete prospective study to investigate the robustness of the Idylla platform for EGFR, KRAS and BRAF mutations in non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer and metastatic melanoma, respectively.

METHODS

We compared prospectively the Idylla platform with the results we obtained from parallel high-throughput next-generation sequencing, which is the current gold standard for mutational testing. Furthermore, we evaluated the benefits and disadvantages of the Idylla platform in clinical practice. Additionally, we reviewed all the published Idylla performance articles.

RESULTS

There was an overall agreement of 100%, 94% and 94% between the next-generation panel and the Idylla BRAF, KRAS and EGFR mutation test. Two interesting discordant findings among 48 cases were observed and will be discussed together with the advantages and shortcoming of both techniques.

CONCLUSION

Our observations demonstrate that the Idylla cartridge for the EGFR, KRAS and BRAF mutations is highly accurate, rapid and has a limited hands-on time compared with next-generation sequencing.

Fully automated real-time PCR for EGFR testing in non-small cell lung carcinoma

Molecular testing for mutations in the EGFR gene is commonplace for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These patients are often very sick and management decisions need to be made urgently. In many cases, the results of molecular testing are needed the same day, in order to start targeted therapy and allow maximum benefit for patients. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test offers rapid results within three hours of requesting. This study aimed to assess the concordance of Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test results with current standard tests. Forty formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded NSCLC tumour cases (20 EGFR mutant and EGFR 20 wild type) were analysed by the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test (CE-IVD) and compared with PCR and NGS methodologies. The overall concordance between Idylla™ and standard testing was 92.5% (95% CI 80.14% to 97.42%) and the specificity of Idylla™ was 100% (95% CI 83.89% to 100%). The sensitivity was affected by loss of tumour content in tissue blocks in a small number of NGS cases; however, comparing Idylla™ with PCR alone, there was 100% concordance (95% CI 89.85% to 100%). The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test shows comparative accuracy to routine PCR testing for the most common EGFR mutations in NSCLC. The Idylla™ also offers significantly reduced turn-around times compared with existing modalities and therefore the platform would be a useful addition to many molecular diagnostics units.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pulmonary carcinomas genotyping: experience with 398 cases including rapid EGFR/KRAS analysis in 43 cases

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) of mediastinal lymph nodes is a minimally invasive and efficient tool for both diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. EBUS-FNA also permits tumor genotyping. However this critical datum for the therapeutic management is often long to obtain for metastatic patients with short life expectancy.

METHODS

From May 2011 to December 2017, 398 lung cancer patients underwent a genetic analysis based on EBUS-FNA samples. EBUS-FNAs were performed with rapid on-site evaluation. Mutations were studied with Sanger or new generation sequencing. Forty-three cases were also tested with a fully automated real-time PCR rapid technique. ALK abnormalities were assessed by immunohistochemistry and/or in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

A genotypic result could be obtained in 316 cases (79.4%) and in 180 of the 198 more recent cases (90.9%). Genetic abnormalities were observed in 191 cases (48.0%). Using the rapid technique, EGFR/KRAS mutational status was obtained within a few hours following the histological diagnosis and on the same day of the EBUS-FNA by analyzing fresh specimens after intra-operative cytological diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In term of molecular diagnosis, EBUS-FNA provides high-quality biological material similar to that of other clinical sampling methods. Furthermore, our study suggests that a rapid molecular diagnostic method could lead to a prompt and appropriate therapeutic management for many advanced stage patients.