Association of MDM2 gene SNP 309 polymorphism and human non-small cell lung cancer susceptibility: A meta-analysis

Implications of ubiquitination and the maintenance of replication fork stability in cancer therapy

DNA replication forks are subject to intricate surveillance and strict regulation by sophisticated cellular machinery. Such close regulation is necessary to ensure the accurate duplication of genetic information and to tackle the diverse endogenous and exogenous stresses that impede this process. Stalled replication forks are vulnerable to collapse, which is a major cause of genomic instability and carcinogenesis. Replication stress responses, which are organized via a series of coordinated molecular events, stabilize stalled replication forks and carry out fork reversal and restoration. DNA damage tolerance and repair pathways such as homologous recombination and Fanconi anemia also contribute to replication fork stabilization. The signaling network that mediates the transduction and interplay of these pathways is regulated by a series of post-translational modifications, including ubiquitination, which affects the activity, stability, and interactome of substrates. In particular, the ubiquitination of replication protein A and proliferating cell nuclear antigen at stalled replication forks promotes the recruitment of downstream regulators. In this review, we describe the ubiquitination-mediated signaling cascades that regulate replication fork progression and stabilization. In addition, we discuss the targeting of replication fork stability and ubiquitination system components as a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of cancer.

Cancer and Tumour Suppressor p53 Encounters at the Juncture of Sex Disparity

There are many differences in cancer manifestation between men and women. New understanding of the origin of these point to fundamental distinctions in the genetic code and its demise. Tumour suppressor protein p53 is the chief operating officer of cancer defence and critically acts to safeguard against sustained DNA damaged. P53 cannot be ignored in cancer sex disparity. In this review we discuss the greater prevalence and associated death rates for non-reproductive cancers in males. The major tumour suppressor protein p53, encoded in the TP53 gene is our chosen context. It is fitting to ask why somatic TP53 mutation incidence is estimated to be disproportionately higher among males in the population for these types of cancers compared with females? We scrutinised the literature for evidence of predisposing genetic and epigenetic alterations that may explain this sex bias. Our second approach was to explore whether redox activity, either externally imposed or inherent to males and females, may define distinct risks that could contribute to the clear cancer sex disparities.

Interaction between common variants of MDM2 and PPP1R13L and CD3EAP and TP53 SNPs in relation to lung cancer risk among Chinese

Background

Lung cancer is a complex disease that diagnosed the most common cancer and led cause of cancer death. MDM2 (MDM2 proto-oncogene) encodes a nuclear-localized E3 ubiquitin ligase. The encoded protein can promote tumor formation by targeting tumor suppressor proteins, such as TP53, for proteasomal degradation. Epidemiology studies have investigated the association of MDM2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and interaction between genetic and environmental factors with lung cancer.

Methods

This Chinese case-control study comprised 627 cases and 633 controls explored the role of MDM2 five htSNPs (rs1690924, rs1846402, rs2291857, rs3730581 and rs3730635, haplotype-tagging SNP) tagging 95% of the common haplotypes across the gene and the interactions of MDM2, PPP1R13L, CD3EAP and TP53 in the same pathological pathway on lung cancer risk, together with smoking-duration.

Results

None of the htSNPs in MDM2 were associated with lung cancer risk in co-dominant, dominant, recessive, and log-additive models (adjusted for smoking-duration). Haplotype analysis showed that global haplotype association was statistically significant (P=0.0036, adjusted for smoking-duration) and haplotype5 (rs1690924^A-rs1846402^G-rs2291857^C-rs3730581^G-rs3730635^A) was associated with reduced risk of lung cancer [OR (95%) =0.52 (0.33–0.82), P=0.0053, adjusted for smoking-duration]. MDR interaction analysis showed that two the best significant models and strong synergy between MDM2 and TP53.

Conclusions

MDM2 five-htSNPs haplotype exhibited association with lung cancer susceptibility, interaction of MDM2 and TP53 htSNPs and smoking-duration contributed to lung cancer risk and strong synergy between MDM2 and TP53 htSNPs influenced lung cancer predisposition. Our results suggest that MDM2, TP53 and smoking-duration interact in relation to lung carcinogenesis.

Lappaconitine sulfate induces apoptosis and G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest by PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells

Lappaconitine sulfate (LS) has good solubility and bioavailability. We have previously studied the anti-proliferative activity of LS on colon cancer HT-29 cell, but its anti-proliferative activity and molecular mechanism on human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells are still unclear. This study was to investigate the effects of LS on proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells, and its possible molecular mechanisms. Cell proliferation activity was measured by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and 5-Ethynyl-2'- deoxyuridine (EdU) cell proliferation kit. Cell cycle was detected by propidium iodide (PI) flow cytometry. Apoptosis was detected by Annexin-V-FITC/PI method. Western blot was used to detect cycle and apoptosis-related proteins expression. These results showed that the proliferation activity of LS was significantly decreased in A549 cells, showing a dose- and time-dependent manner (p < 0.05). LS could increase the proportion of G0/G1 phase cells and decrease the proportion of cells in S phase, showing obvious G0/G1 phase arrest. LS significantly inhibited the expression of p-PI3K/PI3K, p-AKT/AKT, Cyclin D1 and Bcl-2 proteins (p < 0.05), and increased the expression of p53, p21, Bax, caspase 3 and caspase 9 (p < 0.05). Moreover, PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) significantly decreased A549 cell viability rate induced by LS, abrogated the activation of p-PI3K/PI3K and p-AKT/AKT in the presence of LS. These results indicated that LS could block A549 cells in the G0/G1 phase, induce apoptosis, and inhibit cell proliferation through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.

Genetic Polymorphisms and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicities in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Platinum-based agents, including cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin, are indispensable for the treatment of lung cancer. The development of toxicity frequently necessitates dose reduction or discontinuation of therapy, despite the clinical response. Pharmacogenomics studies were reviewed to identify the possible genetic variants that underlie individual susceptibility to platinum-related toxicities. Method: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed and Embase for pharmacogenomics reports that focused on commonly reported platinum-induced toxicities, such as gastrointestinal (GI), hematological, neurological, and other toxicities, in patients diagnosed with lung cancer. Meta-analyses were conducted to determine the association between genetic polymorphisms and platinum-induced toxicity by checking the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using random or fixed-effects models as appropriate. Results: Twenty eligible studies that met the inclusion criteria with sufficient data were extracted and presented comprehensively. A total of 16 polymorphisms from 11 genes were included in the meta-analysis. MTHFR rs1801131 and MDM2 rs1690924 were significantly correlated with platinum-induced GI toxicity (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively). Patients with the MTHFR rs1801131AA and MDM2 rs1690924TC/CC genotype tended to have a higher risk of GI toxicity than patients with other genotypes did (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 0.86-2.18; and OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.29-0.88, respectively). Compared to carriers of the MTHFR rs1801133CC genotype, carriers of the CT/TT genotype had a significantly increased risk of hematological toxicity (P = 0.01, OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.12-2.52). Conclusion: In the future, physicians should pay careful attention to MTHFR and MDM2 for personalized chemotherapy treatment among patients with lung cancer.

Correlation between MDM2 T309G single nucleotide polymorphism and esophageal cancer susceptibility: An updated meta-analysis

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between MDM2 T309G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and esophageal cancer susceptibility through pooling the open published data.

Methods

By systematic searching the databases of Medline, EMBASE, CBM and CNKI, the case‐control or cohort studies related to MDM2 T309G single nucleotide polymorphism and esophageal cancer risk were screened. Genetic phenotype data of T309G single nucleotide was extracted from the original included studies. The correlation between MDM2 T309G single nucleotide polymorphism and esophageal cancer susceptibility was demonstrated by the odds ratio (OR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Publication bias was investigated by Egger's line regression test and begg's funnel plot.

Results

After systematic searching of the relevant database, nine publications were finally included in the present study. The combined data demonstrated that the subjects with the G genotype had an increased risk of developing esophageal cancer in dominant (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00–1.27, P = 0.043), recessive (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12–1.45, P = 0.000) and homozygous (OR = 1.34, 95% CI:1.04–1.74, P = 0.024) genetic model through random or fixed data pooling method. Both begg's and Egger's line regression test indicated no significant publication bias.

Conclusion

Based on the present data, there was a significant correlation between MDM2 T309G single nucleotide polymorphism and esophageal cancer susceptibility. Individuals with G genotype may have an increased risk of developing esophageal cancer.