Potential Pitfalls in Diagnostic Digital Image Analysis: Experience with Ki-67 and PHH3 in Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors

[Quantification of Ki-67 in PitNET (pituitary neuroendocrine tumors)/adenomas]

This study is the first to compare the determination of the Ki-67 index in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET)/pituitary adenomas by pathologists with a computerized method (Cognition MasterSuite from VMScope, Berlin, Germany). PitNET/pituitary adenomas often show a low proliferation index. Observer variability is high, especially when estimating in this low percentage range. A more reliable determination would be possible using the four-eyes principle, but this cannot be realized continuously; thus, digital image analysis is a promising solution. In the study, there was clear agreement between the Ki-67 estimate by two experienced pathologists and the determination with the aid of digital image analysis. The digital image analysis system is excellent for determining the proliferation rate of PitNET/pituitary adenomas and can therefore be used to determine the "third" and "fourth eye".

Updates on lung neuroendocrine neoplasm classification

Lung neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of pulmonary neoplasms showing different morphological patterns and clinical and biological characteristics. The World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of lung NENs has been recently updated as part of the broader attempt to uniform the classification of NENs. This much-needed update has come at a time when insights from seminal molecular characterisation studies revolutionised our understanding of the biological and pathological architecture of lung NENs, paving the way for the development of novel diagnostic techniques, prognostic factors and therapeutic approaches. In this challenging and rapidly evolving landscape, the relevance of the 2021 WHO classification has been recently questioned, particularly in terms of its morphology-orientated approach and its prognostic implications. Here, we provide a state-of-the-art review on the contemporary understanding of pulmonary NEN morphology and the potential contribution of artificial intelligence, the advances in NEN molecular profiling with their impact on the classification system and, finally, the key current and upcoming prognostic factors.

All Together Now: Standardization of Nomenclature for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms across Multiple Organs

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) span virtually all organ systems and exhibit a broad spectrum of behavior, from indolent to highly aggressive. Historically, nomenclature and grading practices have varied widely across, and even within, organ systems. However, certain core features are recapitulated across anatomic sites, including characteristic morphology and the crucial role of proliferative activity in prognostication. A recent emphasis on unifying themes has driven an increasingly standardized approach to NEN classification, as delineated in the World Health Organization's Classification of Tumours series. Here, we review recent developments in NEN classification, with a focus on NENs of the pancreas and lungs.

Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring

Ki-67 assessment is a key step in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) from all anatomic locations. Several challenges exist related to quantifying the Ki-67 proliferation index due to lack of method standardization and inter-reader variability. The application of digital pathology coupled with machine learning has been shown to be highly accurate and reproducible for the evaluation of Ki-67 in NENs. We systematically reviewed all published studies on the subject of Ki-67 assessment in pancreatic NENs (PanNENs) employing digital image analysis (DIA). The most common advantages of DIA were improvement in the standardization and reliability of Ki-67 evaluation, as well as its speed and practicality, compared to the current gold standard approach of manual counts from captured images, which is cumbersome and time consuming. The main limitations were attributed to higher costs, lack of widespread availability (as of yet), operator qualification and training issues (if it is not done by pathologists), and most importantly, the drawback of image algorithms counting contaminating non-neoplastic cells and other signals like hemosiderin. However, solutions are rapidly developing for all of these challenging issues. A comparative meta-analysis for DIA versus manual counting shows very high concordance (global coefficient of concordance: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83-0.98) between these two modalities. These findings support the widespread adoption of validated DIA methods for Ki-67 assessment in PanNENs, provided that measures are in place to ensure counting of only tumor cells either by software modifications or education of non-pathologist operators, as well as selection of standard regions of interest for analysis. NENs, being cellular and monotonous neoplasms, are naturally more amenable to Ki-67 assessment. However, lessons of this review may be applicable to other neoplasms where proliferation activity has become an integral part of theranostic evaluation including breast, brain, and hematolymphoid neoplasms.

Automated assessment of Ki-67 proliferation index in neuroendocrine tumors by deep learning

The Ki‐67 proliferation index (PI) is a prognostic factor in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and defines tumor grade. Analysis of Ki‐67 PI requires calculation of Ki‐67‐positive and Ki‐67‐negative tumor cells, which is highly subjective. To overcome this, we developed a deep learning‐based Ki‐67 PI algorithm (KAI) that objectively calculates Ki‐67 PI. Our study material consisted of NETs divided into training (n = 39), testing (n = 124), and validation (n = 60) series. All slides were digitized and processed in the Aiforia^® Create (Aiforia Technologies, Helsinki, Finland) platform. The ICC between the pathologists and the KAI was 0.89. In 46% of the tumors, the Ki‐67 PIs calculated by the pathologists and the KAI were the same. In 12% of the tumors, the Ki‐67 PI calculated by the KAI was 1% lower and in 42% of the tumors on average 3% higher. The DL‐based Ki‐67 PI algorithm yields results similar to human observers. While the algorithm cannot replace the pathologist, it can assist in the laborious Ki‐67 PI assessment of NETs. In the future, this approach could be useful in, for example, multi‐center clinical trials where objective estimation of Ki‐67 PI is crucial.

Digital Image Analysis of the Proliferation Markers Ki67 and Phosphohistone H3 in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Accuracy of Grading Compared With Routine Manual Hot Spot Evaluation of the Ki67 Index

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are rare epithelial neoplasms. Grading is based on mitotic activity or the percentage of Ki67-positive cells in a hot spot. Routine methods have poor intraobserver and interobserver consistency, and objective measurements are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate digital image analysis (DIA) as an objective assessment of proliferation markers in GEP-NENs. A consecutive cohort of patients with automated DIA measurement of Ki67 (DIA Ki67) and phosphohistone H3 (DIA PHH3) on immunohistochemical slides was analyzed using Visiopharm image analysis software (Hoersholm, Denmark). The results were compared with the Ki67 index from routine pathology reports (pathology Ki67). The study included 159 patients (57% males). The median pathology Ki67 was 2.0% and DIA Ki67 was 4.1%. The interclass correlation coefficient of the DIA Ki67 compared with the pathology Ki67 showed an excellent agreement of 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94-0.96]. The observed kappa value was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81-0.91) when comparing grades based on the same methods. PHH3 was measured in 145 (91.2%) cases. The observed kappa value was 0.74. (95% CI: 0.65-0.83) when comparing grade based on the DIA PHH3 and the pathology Ki67. The DIA Ki67 shows excellent agreement with the pathology Ki67. The DIA PHH3 measurements were more varied and cannot replace other methods for grading GEP-NENs.

A Holistic Appraisal of Stromal Differentiation in Colorectal Cancer: Biology, Histopathology, Computation, and Genomics

Cancer comprises epithelial tumor cells and associated stroma, often times referred to as the "tumoral microenvironment". Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are the most notable components of the tumor mesenchyme. CAFs promote the initiation of cancer through angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis. Histologically, the differentiation of stroma has been reported to correlate with prognostic outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. This review summarizes our current understanding of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), showcasing the functions of CAFs and its role in stromal differentiation (SD). We also review current state-of-the-art biology, histopathology, computation, and genomics in the setting of the stroma. SD is distinctive morphologically, and is easily recognized by a surgical pathologist; we offer a lexicon and guide for discovering the essence of stroma, as well as an incipient vision of the future for computation and molecular genomics. We propose that the mesenchymal phenotype, which encompasses a cancer migratory/metastatic capacity, could occur through the process of SD. Looking forward, pathologists will need to invest time and energy into SD, embracing the concept and propagating its use. For patients with colorectal cancer, stroma is a brave new frontier, one not only rich in biologic diversity, but also potentially critical for therapeutic decision making.

Improving precise counting of mitotic cells in mantle cell lymphoma using phosphohistone H3 (PHH3) antibody

AIMS

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has a highly heterogeneous clinical course ranging from indolent, to aggressive and rapidly progressive disease. Proliferation is a strong predictor for disease outcome. In routine clinical practice, Ki-67 expression is used as a measure of proliferation. However, several studies have documented a high degree of inter-laboratory and inter-observer variation with Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. Phosphorylation of histone H3 occurs specifically during mitosis and hence serves as a specific marker for cells in mitosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We investigated phosphohistone H3 (PHH3) immunohistochemistry as a proliferation maker in 28 tissue biopsies of MCL and compared the PHH3 results (as evaluated by direct microscopic visualisation and image analysis-aided scoring) with morphological subtyping, mitotic counts and Ki-67 index. We found PHH3-mitotic count was about sixfold higher than H&E-mitotic count (mitoses in 10 high power fields). Furthermore, PHH3-mitotic count in aggressive morphological variants of MCL was significantly higher than in usual MCL. The PHH3-mitotic count showed a strong linear correlation with PHH3-mitotic index (percentage positive cells).

CONCLUSIONS

We found PHH3 immunohistochemistry, a reliable mitosis-specific marker, in MCL. Performing precise counts and evaluating precise proliferation indices is easier with PHH3 immunohistochemistry. This contrasts with the conventional estimation of Ki-67 percentages by 'eye-balling'.

Ki-67 proliferation index in neuroendocrine tumors: Can augmented reality microscopy with image analysis improve scoring?

BACKGROUND

The Ki-67 index is important for grading neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in cytology. However, different counting methods exist. Recently, augmented reality microscopy (ARM) has enabled real-time image analysis using glass slides. The objective of the current study was to compare different traditional Ki-67 scoring methods in cell block material with newer methods such as ARM.

METHODS

Ki-67 immunostained slides from 50 NETs of varying grades were retrieved (39 from the pancreas and 11 metastases). Methods with which to quantify the Ki-67 index in up to 3 hot spots included: 1) "eyeball" estimation (EE); 2) printed image manual counting (PIMC); 3) ARM with live image analysis; and 4) image analysis using whole-slide images (WSI) (field of view [FOV] and the entire slide).

RESULTS

The Ki-67 index obtained using the different methods varied. The pairwise kappa results varied from no agreement for image analysis using digital image analysis WSI (FOV) and histology to near-perfect agreement for ARM and PIMC. Using surgical pathology as the gold standard, the EE method was found to have the highest concordance rate (84.2%), followed by WSI analysis of the entire slide (73.7%) and then both the ARM and PIMC methods (63.2% for both). The PIMC method was the most time-consuming whereas image analysis using WSI (FOV) was the fastest method followed by ARM.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ki-67 index for NETs in cell block material varied by the method used for scoring, which may affect grade. PIMC was the most time-consuming method, and EE had the highest concordance rate. Although real-time automated counting using image analysis demonstrated inaccuracies, ARM streamlined and hastened the task of Ki-67 quantification in NETs.