Parkin enhances sensitivity of paclitaxel to NPC by arresting cell cycle

Head and Neck Cancer: A Potential Risk Factor for Parkinson's Disease?

Head and neck cancers (HNC) are frequently associated with neurodegeneration. However, the association between HNC and Parkinson's disease (PD) remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between HNC and subsequent PD. This retrospective study used data from a nationally representative cohort. Patients with HNC were identified based on the presence of corresponding diagnostic codes. Participants without cancer were selected using 4:1 propensity score matching based on sociodemographic factors and year of enrollment; 2296 individuals without HNC and 574 individuals with HNC were included in the study. Hazard ratios (HR) for the incidence of PD in patients with HNC were calculated using 95% confidence intervals (CI). The incidence of PD was 4.17 and 2.18 per 1000 person-years in the HNC and control groups, respectively (adjusted HR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.08-3.33). The HNC group also showed an increased risk of subsequent PD development. The risk of PD was higher in middle-aged (55-69 years) patients with HNC and oral cavity cancer. Our findings suggest that middle-aged patients with HNC have an increased incidence of PD, specifically those with oral cavity cancer. Therefore, our findings provide new insights into the development of PD in patients with HNC.

Parkin enhances sensitivity of paclitaxel to nasopharyngeal carcinoma by activating BNIP3/NIX-mediated mitochondrial autophagy

As a malignant head and neck cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has high morbidity. Parkin expression has been reported to be reduced in NPC tissues and its upregulation could enhance paclitaxel-resistant cell cycle arrest. This study was performed to explore the possible mechanism of Parkin related to B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2)/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa interacting protein 3 (BNIP3)/BNIP3-like (NIX)-mediated mitochondrial autophagy in NPC cells. Initially, after Parkin overexpression or silencing, cell viability and proliferation were evaluated by lactate dehydrogenase and colony formation assays. JC-1 staining was used to assess the mitochondrial membrane potential. In addition, the levels of cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mitochondrial ROS were detected using DCFH-DA staining and mitochondrial ROS (MitoSOX) red staining. The expression of proteins was measured using Western blot. Results showed that Parkin overexpression inhibited, whereas Parkin knockdown promoted the proliferation of paclitaxel-treated NPC cells. Besides, Parkin overexpression induced, whereas Parkin knockdown inhibited mitochondrial apoptosis in paclitaxel-treated NPC cells, as evidenced by the changes of Cytochrome C (mitochondria), Cytochrome C (cytoplasm), BAK, and Bcl-2 expression. Moreover, the levels of ROS, mitochondrial membrane potential, and LC3II/LC3I in paclitaxel-treated C666-1 cells were hugely elevated by Parkin overexpression and were all declined by Parkin knockdown in CNE-3 cells. Furthermore, Parkin upregulation activated, whereas Parkin downregulation inactivated BNIP3/NIX signaling. Further, BNIP3 silencing or overexpression reversed the impacts of Parkin upregulation or downregulation on the proliferation and mitochondrial apoptosis of paclitaxel-treated NPC cells. Particularly, Mdivi-1 (mitophagy inhibitor) or rapamycin (an activator of autophagy) exerted the same effects on NPC cells as BNIP3 silencing or overexpression, respectively. Collectively, Parkin overexpression activated BNIP3/NIX-mediated mitochondrial autophagy to enhance sensitivity to paclitaxel in NPC.

Personalized medicine of non-gene-specific chemotherapies for non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer is recognized as the deadliest cancer across the globe. In some areas, it is more common in women than even breast and cervical cancer. Its rise, vaulted by smoking habits and increasing air pollution, has garnered much attention and resource in the medical field. The first lung cancer treatments were developed more than half a century ago. Unfortunately, many of the earlier chemotherapies often did more harm than good, especially when they were used to treat genetically unsuitable patients. With the introduction of personalized medicine, physicians are increasingly aware of when, how, and in whom, to use certain anti-cancer agents. Drugs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies possess limited utility because they target specific oncogenic mutations, but other drugs that target mechanisms universal to all cancers do not. In this review, we discuss many of these non-oncogene-targeting anti-cancer agents including DNA replication inhibitors (i.e., alkylating agents and topoisomerase inhibitors) and cytoskeletal function inhibitors to highlight their application in the setting of personalized medicine as well as their limitations and resistance factors.

Parkin: A targetable linchpin in human malignancies

Parkin, an E3 ubiquitin ligase has been found to be deregulated in a variety of human cancers. Our current understanding is endowed with strong evidences that Parkin plays crucial role in the pathogenesis of cancer by controlling/interfering with major hallmarks of cancer delineated till today. Consistent with the idea of mitophagy, the existing studies imitates the tumor suppressive potential of Parkin, resolved by its capacity to regulate cell proliferation, cell migration, angiogenesis, apoptosis and overall cellular survival. Dysfunction of Parkin has resulted in the loss of ubiquitination of cell cycle components followed by their accumulation leading to genomic instability, perturbed cell cycle and eventually tumor progression. In this review, we provide an overview of current knowledge about the critical role of Parkin in cancer development and progression and have focussed on its therapeutic implications highlighting the diagnostic and prognostic value of Parkin as a biomarker. We earnestly hope that an in-depth knowledge of Parkin will provide a linchpin to target in various cancers that will open a new door of clinical applications and therapeutics.

Survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy-related strategies compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

The survival benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) compared with those of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients remain uncertain. Meta-analysis was used to compare NAC and CRT.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed up to 9 September 2020. Survival outcomes were analyzed based on event frequency or hazard ratios (HRs). Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression was applied to analyze the effect of regimen variables on survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Analysis based on Cox regression showed that CRT was better than NAC + radical hysterectomy (RT) (HR 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI)) 1.02-1.54; p = 0.034) in terms of overall survival (OS). According to multilevel mixed-effects model analysis comparing NAC + RT and CRT, LACC patients who used cisplatin instead of carboplatin had a better Progression-free survival (PFS) (odds ratio (OR) 1.54; 95% CI 1.08-2.20; p = 0.016). When NAC + CRT and CRT were compared, gemcitabine administration was associated with a decrease in PFS (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.22-0.99; p = 0.047). Increased doses of cisplatin and paclitaxel were associated with survival improvement.

CONCLUSION

Based on traditional meta-analysis, CRT was better than NAC + RT in terms of OS. Carboplatin instead of cisplatin as part of the NAC + RT strategy or gemcitabine use in NAC + CRT may not be a good choice. An increased total dosage of paclitaxel and/or cisplatin as part of NAC + CRT and CRT strategies may improve the survival outcome of LACC patients.