Clear cell papillary neoplasm of the breast with MAML2 gene rearrangement: Clear cell hidradenoma or low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma?

Clear cell hidradenoma of the breast with MAML2 gene rearrangement

Clear cell hidradenoma is a rare benign tumor of the breast, its origin and pathogenesis are controversial. We have experienced a case of breast clear cell hidradenoma with mastermind like transcriptional coactivator 2 (MAML2) gene rearrangement. The patient found a painless mass with a hard texture in the left breast areola without nipple discharge. Microscopically, the tumor was cystic and solid, locally arranged in a glandular structure, covered by single cuboidal cells; it was composed of clear cells, epidermoid cells, and basaloid cells; there were no necrosis or mitotic figures. Immunohistochemical staining showed that the tumor cells positively expressed low-molecular cytokeratin 7, low-molecular cytokeratins (Cam5.2), high-molecular cytokeratin 5/6, cytokeratin 14, CD117, and p63; and did not express calponin, and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain. The cuboidal cells were positive for SOX10 but negative for p63. Additionally, periodic acid-Schiff reaction showed purple-red granules in the tumor cytoplasm, but Alcian blue staining showed no blue mucus in the cytoplasm. The split signals of MAML2 gene were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Subtle histological and immunophenotypical differences may help to distinguish breast clear cell hidradenoma from common breast tumors. Furthermore, the MAML2 gene rearrangement may be a molecular genetic characteristic of breast clear cell hidradenoma.

Molecular pathology in breast disease: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tools

Molecular testing in breast cancer gained increasing attention and importance as specific molecular results can tailor not only oncological decisions on systemic adjuvant or neoadjuvant or in metastatic setting, but increasingly serve in diagnostic routine histopathological services to differentiate between morphologically overlapping or ambiguous histological pictures. Diagnostic tools involve in most cases a broad spectrum of immunohistochemical panels, followed by entity-specific in situ hybridization probes and in given cases NGS-based sequencing. Workflow of which methodology is applied and in which order depends on the specific entity resp. on the given differential diagnosis in question. Regarding prognostic/predictive molecular testing, the choice of assay and the workflow are based on clinical algorithms and on the evidence of targeted therapies following the molecular alterations. In this review paper, we aim to address the use of molecular technics in [1] the histological diagnostic setting (such as subtyping of invasive carcinomas/malignant spindle cell tumors and sarcomas and some B3 lesions) and [2] in the context of adjuvant or neoadjuvant or other clinical settings with special focus of targeted therapies.

Genetic and Immunohistochemical Profiling of Mammary Hidradenoma and Comparison to Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is exceedingly rare in the breast, with <45 cases reported in the literature. Although estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/human epidermal growth factor 2 triple-negative, MEC is characterized as a special subtype of breast carcinoma with significantly better prognosis than conventional basal-type tumors. Cutaneous hidradenoma (HA) is considered a benign adnexal neoplasm showing histomorphologic overlap with MEC. Rare cases of HA have also been reported in the breast, but these are relatively uncharacterized. In this study, we examined the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical (IHC), and genetic features of 8 breast HAs, in comparison to 3 mammary MECs. All cases were positive for MAML2 break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization. Eight cases demonstrated a CRTC1::MAML2 fusion, and one MEC harbored a CRTC3::MAML2 fusion; the latter is a novel finding in the breast. Mutational burden was very low, with only one HA exhibiting a MAP3K1 pathogenic alteration. By IHC, both MEC and HA demonstrated cell type-dependent expression of high- and low-molecular-weight keratins and p63, as well as negative to low-positive estrogen receptor and androgen receptor. Smooth muscle myosin and calponin highlighted an in situ component in the 3 cases of MEC; expression of these myoepithelial markers was negative in HAs. Additional distinguishing characteristics included the growth pattern and tumor architecture, the presence of glandular/luminal cells in HA, and overall higher IHC expression of SOX10, S100 protein, MUC4, and mammaglobin in MEC. Morphologic findings were also compared to a series of 27 cutaneous nonmammary HAs. Mucinous and glandular/luminal cells were identified in significantly more mammary HAs than nonmammary lesions. The findings provide insight into the pathogenesis of MAML2-rearranged neoplasms of the breast, underscore the overlapping genetic features of MEC and HA, and highlight similarities to their extramammary counterparts.

The Spectrum of Mucinous Lesions of the Breast

CONTEXT.—

Mucinous lesions of the breast encompass many entities ranging from benign to malignant and nonneoplastic to neoplastic. Lesions discussed under this category are mucocele-like lesion, mucinous carcinoma, mucinous micropapillary carcinoma, solid papillary carcinoma, mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, invasive lobular carcinoma with extracellular mucin, mucinous ductal carcinoma in situ, and metastasis.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review clinical, pathologic, and molecular features of mucinous lesions of the breast, their differential diagnoses, and challenging features on core needle biopsies.

DATA SOURCES.—

The existing scientific and clinical literature as of December 2021.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The category of mucinous lesions of the breast is vast and the differential diagnosis can be challenging, especially on core needle biopsies. In all cases, clinical, radiologic, and pathologic correlation is necessary to reach a comprehensive diagnosis. Given that the prognosis and management of each entity is different, being aware of these entities and their nuances is critical for a pathologist to guide accurate management.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the breast: A case report and literature review focused on radiological findings

RATIONALE

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the breast is a rare entity, with an estimated incidence of only 0.2% to 0.3% of all primary breast tumors. The radiological features of breast MEC have scarcely been investigated mainly because of its rarity. In this article, we present a case of breast MEC diagnosed at our hospital and review the literature, focusing on radiological findings and radiologic-pathologic correlations that could improve clinical management of this entity. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first review of the literature that focuses on the radiological features of breast MEC.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 47-year-old premenopausal woman presented with a painless palpable mass in the right breast.

DIAGNOSIS

Mammography and ultrasonography revealed a mass with suspicious malignant features, which was categorized as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4c. A 14-gauge core-needle biopsy revealed an intermediate-grade MEC of the breast. The patient underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging and chest computed tomography for preoperative evaluation. Postoperative histopathological examination confirmed a diagnosis of intermediate-grade MEC. The clinical staging was T2N0M0.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent breast-conserving surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy.

OUTCOMES

No evidence of recurrence has been reported over 37 months.

LESSONS

The imaging characteristics of breast MEC were variable, and there were no specific radiological features for diagnosis. The presence of cystic components on radiological imaging is likely to be an indicator of a low-grade tumor and better prognosis, although the number of reported cases is limited.

Diagnostic Value of MAML2 Rearrangements in Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is often seen in salivary glands and can harbor MAML2 translocations (MAML2+). The translocation status has diagnostic utility as an objective confirmation of the MEC diagnosis, for example, when distinction from the more aggressive adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) is not straightforward. To assess the diagnostic relevance of MAML2, we examined our 5-year experience in prospective testing of 8106 solid tumors using RNA-seq panel testing in combinations with a two-round Delphi-based scenario survey. The prevalence of MAML2+ across all tumors was 0.28% (n = 23/8106) and the majority of MAML2+ cases were found in head and neck tumors (78.3%), where the overall prevalence was 5.9% (n = 18/307). The sensitivity of MAML2 for MEC was 60% and most cases (80%) were submitted for diagnostic confirmation; in 24% of cases, the MAML2 results changed the working diagnosis. An independent survey of 15 experts showed relative importance indexes of 0.8 and 0.65 for "confirmatory MAML2 testing" in suspected MEC and ASC, respectively. Real-world evidence confirmed that the added value of MAML2 is a composite of an imperfect confirmation test for MEC and a highly specific exclusion tool for the diagnosis of ASC. Real-world evidence can help move a rare molecular-genetic biomarker from an emerging tool to the clinic.

Low-risk triple-negative breast cancers: Clinico-pathological and molecular features

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) comprise biologically and clinically heterogeneous diseases characterized by the lack of hormone receptors (HR) and HER2 expression. This subset of tumors accounts for 15-20% of all breast cancers and pursues an ominous clinical course. However, there is a spectrum of low-risk TNBCs with no/minimal metastatic potential, including the salivary gland-type tumors, those with extensive apocrine differentiation and/or high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and small-sized, early-stage (pT1a/bN0M0) TNBCs. De-escalating the treatment in low-risk TNBC, however, is not trivial because of the substantial lack of dedicated randomized clinical trials and cancer registries. The development of new diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers based on clinical and molecular aspects of low-risk TNBCs would lead to improved clinical treatment. Here, we sought to provide a portrait of the clinicopathological and molecular features of low-risk TNBC, with a focus on the diagnostic challenges along with the most important biological characteristics underpinning their favorable clinical course.