Relationship between morular metaplasia and squamous differentiation in endometrial carcinoma

Keratinization in atypical glandular cell clusters as a cytological clue to endometrioid carcinoma on cervical cytology

INTRODUCTION

Specific diagnosis of endometrial carcinomas on cervical cytology is difficult with few useful cytomorphological clues reported. This study reviews a cohort of cervical cytology to investigate the presence of keratinization in atypical glandular cells (AGC), an undescribed cytomorphological clue for identifying endometrial endometrioid carcinomas on cervical cytology.

METHODS

Cervical cytology slides from patients with a histologic diagnosis of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma were reviewed for the presence of keratinization associated with AGCs. Corresponding histology slides were reviewed for tumour grading and degree of squamous differentiation.

RESULTS

In total, 42 cases of cervical cytology specimens from 41 patients were retrieved, including 7 (16.7%) with keratinization associated with AGCs seen and 35 (83.3%) without. Comparison of histologic grading did not demonstrate an association with the presence of keratinization on cytology (p = 0.565). Corresponding histology slides were available for 37 cases. Cytologic and histologic keratinization were associated statistically (p = 0.002). Frank keratinization was seen on histologic slides of five cases, with four also showing cytologic keratinization. Area of squamous differentiation, including squamous morule formation, did not correlate with keratinization on cytologic preparation (p = 0.185).

CONCLUSION

Histologic and cytologic keratinization are observed in endometrioid endometrial carcinomas. Such is reflected in cervical cytology by the presence of orangeophilic, rigid and acellular fragments within or associated with AGC clusters. Keratinization, when identified with AGCs, should be regarded as a cytologic clue suggestive of an endometroid carcinoma of endometrial origin.

High-grade Serous Carcinoma can Show Squamoid Morphology Mimicking True Squamous Differentiation

Tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HG-SC) and ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC) can show overlapping morphologic features, such as glandular and solid patterns. The differential diagnosis of these subtypes is thus sometimes difficult. The existence of "squamous differentiation" tends to lead to a diagnosis of EC rather than HG-SC. We noticed that HG-SC can contain a "squamoid component," but its nature has been poorly investigated. This study was thus established to clarify the nature of this "squamoid component" in HG-SC by investigating its frequency and immunohistochemical features. We reviewed hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of 237 primary untreated cases of tubo-ovarian HG-SC and identified 16 cases (6.7%) of HG-SC with "squamoid component." An immunohistochemical staining panel (CK5/6, CK14, CK903, p40, p63, WT1, ER, and PgR) was used to analyze all of these 16 cases. We also selected 14 cases of ovarian EC with "squamous differentiation" as a control. The "squamoid component" in HG-SC was completely p40-negative and showed significantly lower expression of CK5/6, CK14, CK903, and p63 than the "squamous differentiation" in EC. The immunophenotype of the "squamoid component" in HG-SC was concordant with the conventional HG-SC component (WT1-positive/ER-positive). Furthermore, all 16 tumors were confirmed to be truly "HG-SC" by the findings of aberrant p53 staining pattern and/or WT1/p16 positivity, and the lack of mismatch repair deficiency and POLE mutation. In conclusion, HG-SC can on rare occasions show a "squamoid component" mimicking "squamous differentiation." However, the "squamoid component" in HG-SC does not represent true "squamous differentiation." The "squamoid component" is one part of the morphologic spectrum of HG-SC, which should be interpreted carefully for the differential diagnosis of HG-SC and EC. An immunohistochemical panel including p40, p53, p16, and WT1 is a useful adjunct to achieve a correct diagnosis.

Estrogen/Progesterone Receptor Loss, CTNNB1 and KRAS Mutations Are Associated With Local Recurrence or Distant Metastasis in Low-Grade Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma

A subset of endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (EECs) with low-grade histology recur with poor outcomes. Published evidence suggests that poor outcomes may be associated with loss of expression of ER-alpha (ER-α) as well as with β-Catenin-1 ( CTNNB1 ) and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog ( KRAS ) mutations. This study reports on institutional experience with the incidence of recurrence in low-grade EEC and their association with CTNNB1 and KRAS mutations as well as estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) expression. Forty-eight (8.5%) out of 568 cases of low-grade EEC with biopsy-proven recurrence were identified; and were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for ER, PR, p53, MMR protein, and mutation analysis for exon 3 of the CTNNB1 and exon 2 of KRAS in relation to recurrence type, local or distant metastasis/recurrence. Twenty-three patients (4%) developed local, and 25 patients (4.4%) developed distant metastases/recurrence. Decreased expression or loss of ER/PR was found in 17/44 (38.6%) patients with recurrence. Eighty-four percent of patients with low-grade EEC and local recurrence had CTNNB1 mutations. Seventy-three percent of patients with distant metastasis/recurrence had KRAS mutations. The association of these mutations with the type of recurrence was statistically significant for both. Five cases with the morphology of low-grade EEC were reclassified as mesonephric-like carcinoma and were universally characterized by distant metastasis/recurrence, loss of ER/PR expression, large tumor size, absence of CTNNB1 mutations, and the presence of KRAS mutations. In low-grade EEC, CTNNB1 and KRAS mutations are associated with local recurrence and distant metastasis/recurrence, respectively, suggesting that these 2 different progression types may be conditioned by tumor genotype. ER/PR immunohistochemistry may be helpful in identifying poor performers in low-grade EEC. Furthermore, identification of the decreased expression or loss of ER/PR in tumors with low-grade histology should prompt consideration of mesonephric-like carcinoma, which is a more aggressive tumor than the low-grade EEC. KRAS mutations were associated with distant metastasis/recurrence in tumors with and without mesonephric-like phenotype.

Pilomatrix-like High-Grade Endometrioid Carcinoma of the Ovary: Case Report, Literature Review, and Differential Diagnosis

Pilomatrix-like high-grade endometrioid carcinoma (PiMHEC) has recently been described as an aggressive variant of endometrial carcinoma. Herein, we described a case of ovarian PiMHEC, comparing it to endometrial PiMHEC and assessing previously published cases of putative ovarian PiMHEC. A 65-year-old woman underwent hysterectomy for an ovarian tumor characterized by solid nests of basaloid cells with prominent ghost cell keratinization. Immunohistochemistry showed nuclear β-catenin and CDX2 expression and loss of estrogen and progesterone receptors and PAX8. These features were consistently observed in all previously published cases and may represent diagnostic criteria of PiMHEC. Other frequent features were geographic necrosis and a low-grade endometrioid component. CK7, neuroendocrine, and basal/squamous markers were inconsistently expressed. All cases with available follow-up showed poor prognosis. PiMHEC should be distinguished from mimickers, such as high-grade endometrioid carcinoma with geographic necrosis, low-grade endometrioid carcinoma with ghost cell keratinization, and undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma. In conclusion, PiMHEC can also occur in the ovary and shows several consistent clinical, morphological, and immunophenotypical features. These features support that PiMHEC is a distinct entity requiring an aggressive management.

Current Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers for Endometrial Cancer in Clinical Practice: Recommendations/Proposal from the Italian Study Group

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most common gynecological malignant disease in high-income countries, such as European countries and the USA. The 2020 edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Female Genital Tract underlines the important clinical implications of the proposed new histomolecular classification system for ECs. In view of the substantial genetic and morphological heterogeneity in ECs, both classical pthological parameters and molecular classifiers have to be integrated in the pathology report. This review will focus on the most commonly adopted immunohistochemical and molecular biomarkers in daily clinical characterization of EC, referring to the most recent published recommendations, guidelines, and expert opinions.

New Pathological and Clinical Insights in Endometrial Cancer in View of the Updated ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines

Endometrial carcinoma represents the most common gynecological cancer in Europe and the USA. Histopathological classification based on tumor morphology and tumor grade has played a crucial role in the management of endometrial carcinoma, allowing a prognostic stratification into distinct risk categories, and guiding surgical and adjuvant therapy. In 2013, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network reported a large scale molecular analysis of 373 endometrial carcinomas which demonstrated four categories with distinct clinical, pathologic, and molecular features: POLE/ultramutated (7% of cases) microsatellite instability (MSI)/hypermutated (28%), copy-number low/endometrioid (39%), and copy-number high/serous-like (26%). In the present article, we report a detailed histological and molecular review of all endometrial carcinoma histotypes in light of the current ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines. In particular, we focus on the distribution and prognostic value of the TCGA groups in each histotype.

Does endometrial morular metaplasia represent odontogenic differentiation?

The nature of endometrial morular metaplasia (MorM) is still unknown. The nuclear β-catenin accumulation and the not rare ghost cell keratinization suggest a similarity with hard keratin-producing odontogenic and hair matrix tumors rather than with squamous differentiation. We aimed to compare MorM to hard keratin-producing tumors. Forty-one hard keratin-producing tumors, including 26 hair matrix tumors (20 pilomatrixomas and 6 pilomatrix carcinomas) and 15 odontogenic tumors (adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas), were compared to 15 endometrioid carcinomas with MorM with or without squamous/keratinizing features. Immunohistochemistry for β-catenin, CD10, CDX2, ki67, p63, CK5/6, CK7, CK8/18, CK19, and pan-hard keratin was performed; 10 cases of endometrioid carcinomas with conventional squamous differentiation were used as controls. In adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas, the β-catenin-accumulating cell clusters (whorl-like structures) were morphologically similar to MorM (round syncytial aggregates of bland cells with round-to-spindled nuclei and profuse cytoplasm), with overlapping squamous/keratinizing features (clear cells with prominent membrane, rounded squamous formations, ghost cells). Both MorM and whorl-like structures consistently showed positivity for CD10 and CDX2, with low ki67; cytokeratins pattern was also overlapping, although more variable. Hard keratin was focally/multifocally positive in 8 MorM cases and focally in one conventional squamous differentiation case. Hair matrix tumors showed no morphological or immunophenotypical overlap with MorM. MorM shows wide morphological and immunophenotypical overlap with the whorl-like structures of adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas, which are analogous to enamel knots of tooth development. This suggests that MorM might be an aberrant mimic of odontogenic differentiation.