Clinicopathologic features of unexpectedly HER2 positive breast carcinomas: An institutional experience

Nanoparticle delivery of TFOs is a novel targeted therapy for HER2 amplified breast cancer

PURPOSE

The human EGFR2 (HER2) signaling pathway is one of the most actively studied targets in cancer transformation research. Ttriplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs) activate DNA damage and induce apoptosis. We aim to encapsulate TFO-HER2 with nano-particle ZW-128 to suppress breast cell growth in vitro and in vivo.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We designed a set of TFO fragments targeting HER2 and verified their effectiveness. We encapsulated TFO-HER2 in ZW-128 to form nano-drug TFO@ZW-128. Cell counting kit 8, flow cytometry, and western blotting were used to evaluate the effect of TFO@ZW-128 on cell proliferation and the expressions of related proteins. The ant-itumor effect of TFO@ZW-128 was evaluated in vivo using nude mice breast cancer model.

RESULTS

TFO@ZW-128 had efficient cellular uptake in amplified HER2 breast cancer cells. TFO@ZW-128 showed an 80-fold increase in TFO utilization compared with TFO-HER2 in the nude mouse breast cancer model. Meanwhile, TFO@ZW-128 dramatically inhibited the growth of HER2-overexpressing tumors compared with TFO-HER2 (P < 0.05). Furthermore, TFO@ZW-128-induced cell apoptosis was in a p53-independent manner.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we designed nano-drug TFO@ZW-128, which has proven effective and non-toxic in targeted therapy for ectopic HER2-expressing tumors.

High SURF4 expression is associated with poor prognosis of breast cancer

SURF4 has been suggested as an oncogene in cancer. However, the role of SURF4 in breast cancer has not been demonstrated yet. The data were obtained from TCGA database and 1104 patients were analyzed using bioinformatics analysis. SURF4 is significantly (P < 0.001) highly expressed in tumor. High expression of SURF4 was observed in T4, infiltrating ductal carcinoma, ER negative, PR negative, and HER2 positive, female, patients without lymph node metastasis, HER2 overexpression type, and deceased patients. As for characteristics correlated with high expression of SURF4, gender, histological type, molecular subtype, ER, PR, HER2, and vital status exhibited significant differences. The age (HR: 2.317, P < 0.001), stage (HR: 2.090, P < 0.001), and SURF4 expression (HR: 1.958, P = 0.005) exhibited independent prognostic value for overall survival (OS). Patients with high SURF4 expression, higher age, equivocal HER2, higher stages, or positive margin status had shorter OS. The stage (HR: 1.579, P < 0.001), and margin status (HR: 1.463, P = 0.006) exhibited independent prognostic value for relapse-free survival of breast cancer. High expression of SURF4 was first found in breast cancer. High SURF4 expression was observed in breast cancer tissue and cell. SURF4 promoted the proliferation and migration of 4T1 cells. SURF4 may be a biomarker in diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer.

Biomarker profile of invasive lobular carcinoma: pleomorphic versus classic subtypes, clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis analyses

PURPOSE

To compare the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma (P-ILC) and classic ILC (C-ILC) according to the biomarker profile.

METHODS

A total of 667 C-ILCs and 133 P-ILCs between 2011 and 2021 were included. Clinicopathologic features and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) status were evaluated. P-ILCs were divided into subtypes based on ER/PR and HER2 expression. The overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients were compared among matched P-ILCs, C-ILCs, and invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs) with biomarker subtypes.

RESULTS

Compared to C-ILCs, P-ILCs had greater tumor sizes and stages, fewer ER-positive, more HER2-positive, triple negative (TN), and Ki-67 > 20% tumors (P < 0.05). P-ILCs were subdivided into ER+ (63.1%), HER2+ (21.1%) and TN (15.8%). ER+ P-ILCs were mainly showed trabecular and solid growth patterns. Apocrine and solid features were more strongly associated with HER2+ P-ILCs and TN-P-ILCs, respectively. The prognosis of each biomarker group (ER+, HER2+ and TN) differed by subtype. The P-ILC biomarker subtypes had worse prognosis than the same subtypes in the IDC group, while there was no difference between the P-ILC and the C-ILC counterparts. Solid variants of P-ILC had the worst prognosis. Bone was the most common metastatic site in ER+ P-ILCs and TN-P-ILCs. HER2+ P-ILCs tended to metastasize to the brain and liver. DFS of HER2+ P-ILCs and TN-P-ILCs were worse than that of ER+ P-ILCs. Lacking lobular carcinoma in situ and sTILs ≤ 10% were associated with worse survival of ER+ P-ILCs and TN-P-ILCs, respectively. For HER2+ P-ILCs, Ki-67 > 20% and sTILs ≤ 10% were significant factors for lower DFS.

CONCLUSION

P-ILCs is an aggressive subtype of ILCs. Analyzing the prognostic factors of P-ILCs with heterogeneous morphological and biomarker characteristics is helpful for creating an individualized treatment.