The clinical and prognostic role of ALK in glioblastoma

A tumor-suppressing role of TSPYL2 in thyroid cancer: Through interacting with SIRT1 and repressing SIRT1/AKT pathway

Thyroid cancer is one of the most common endocrine cancers. Testis-specific protein, Y-encoded-like 2 (TSPYL2) belongs to the TSPY family. Studies show that TSPYL2 plays as a cancer suppressor in several cancers. However, the role of TSPYL2 in thyroid cancer remains elusive. In the present study, the expression of TSPYL2 in human central papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) tissues and corresponding para-cancer tissues was detected by qPCR and Western blot. The gain- and loss-of-function studies for TSPYL2 were performed in TPC-1 cells and IHH-4 cells. The results showed that TSPYL2 expression was decreased in PTC tissues, and the low TSPYL2 expression was associated with more lymph node metastasis. Moreover, the results showed that knockdown of TSPYL2 promoted proliferation and enhanced the ability of migration and invasion of TPC-1 cells and IHH-4 cells, while TSPYL2 overexpression reversed it. TSPYL2 overexpression arrested cell cycle. We found that TSPYL2 silencing suppressed cell apoptosis, while overexpression of TSPYL2 reversed it. Co-IP results illustrated that TSPYL2 interacted with SIRT1. Knockdown of TSPYL2 increased the association between SIRT1 and AKT. Moreover, TSPYL2 expression inhibited AKT activation by upregulating the AKT acetylation level. In vivo, tumor xenograft experiments indicated that TSPYL2 suppressed the tumorigenic ability of thyroid cancer cells. Western blot results suggested that knockdown of TSPYL2 enhanced the phosphorylation level of AKT, while TSPYL2 overexpression reversed it. Taken together, our study suggested TSPYL2 could be a tumor suppressor in thyroid cancer by regulating SIRT1/AKT pathway.

ALK fusions in the pan-cancer setting: another tumor-agnostic target?

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations (activating mutations, amplifications, and fusions/rearrangements) occur in ~3.3% of cancers. ALK fusions/rearrangements are discerned in >50% of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) and anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCLs), but only in ~0.2% of other cancers outside of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a rate that may be below the viability threshold of even large-scale treatment trials. Five ALK inhibitors -alectinib, brigatinib, ceritinb, crizotinib, and lorlatinib-are FDA approved for ALK-aberrant NSCLCs, and crizotinib is also approved for ALK-aberrant IMTs and ALCL, including in children. Herein, we review the pharmacologic tractability of ALK alterations, focusing beyond NSCLC. Importantly, the hallmark of approved indications is the presence of ALK fusions/rearrangements, and response rates of ~50-85%. Moreover, there are numerous reports of ALK inhibitor activity in multiple solid and hematologic tumors (e.g., histiocytosis, leiomyosarcoma, lymphoma, myeloma, and colorectal, neuroendocrine, ovarian, pancreatic, renal, and thyroid cancer) bearing ALK fusions/rearrangements. Many reports used crizotinib or alectinib, but each of the approved ALK inhibitors have shown activity. ALK inhibitor activity is also seen in neuroblastoma, which bear ALK mutations (rather than fusions/rearrangements), but response rates are lower (~10-20%). Current data suggests that ALK inhibitors have tissue-agnostic activity in neoplasms bearing ALK fusions/rearrangements.

Expression of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) in glioma and possible clinical correlations. A retrospective institutional study

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is considered the most aggressive primary brain tumor. Recurrence after treatment is a significant problem with a failed response to optimal treatment. The recurrence of GBM is linked to different cellular and molecular pathways. Nationwide, in Egypt, astrocytic tumors are the most commonly diagnosed CNS tumor. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK CD246) is an enzymatic protein (RTK) belonging to the insulin receptors superfamily.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study including sixty cases of astrocytic tumors (males = 40, mean age = 31.5), (females = 20, mean age = 37.77) obtained through collecting archived paraffin blocks of astrocytic tumor from the Pathology Department, Cairo University Faculty of Medicine during the period from January 2015 till January 2019. All cases were evaluated for ALK expression trying to find any clinical correlations with the clinical data.

RESULTS

Correlations were made using a scatterplot matrix correlogram. There was a significant correlation between tumor recurrence and ALK expression (r = 0.8, P < 0.01), and incidence of postoperative seizures (r = 0.8, P < 0.05), and between mean age and score tumor (r = 0.8, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Expression of ALK was found to be abundant among high-grade gliomas and tumor recurrence rate was higher in ALK-positive patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential use of ALK as a prognostic marker in cases of GBM.

Glioblastoma: Emerging Treatments and Novel Trial Designs

Simple Summary

Nowadays, very few systemic agents have shown clinical activity in patients with glioblastoma, making the research of novel therapeutic approaches a critical issue. Fortunately, the availability of novel compounds is increasing thanks to better biological knowledge of the disease. In this review we want to investigate more promising ongoing clinical trials in both primary and recurrent GBM. Furthermore, a great interest of the present work is focused on novel trial design strategies.

Abstract

Management of glioblastoma is a clinical challenge since very few systemic treatments have shown clinical efficacy in recurrent disease. Thanks to an increased knowledge of the biological and molecular mechanisms related to disease progression and growth, promising novel treatment strategies are emerging. The expanding availability of innovative compounds requires the design of a new generation of clinical trials, testing experimental compounds in a short time and tailoring the sample cohort based on molecular and clinical behaviors. In this review, we focused our attention on the assessment of promising novel treatment approaches, discussing novel trial design and possible future fields of development in this setting.