Can evaluation of mismatch repair defect and TILs increase the number of triple-negative breast cancer patients eligible for immunotherapy?

Mismatch repair protein deficiency in triple-negative breast carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer, particularly triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), poses a significant global health burden. Chemotherapy was the mainstay treatment for TNBC patients until immunotherapy was introduced. Studies indicate a noteworthy prevalence (0.2% to 18.6%) of mismatch repair protein (MMRP) deficiency in TNBC, with recent research highlighting the potential of immunotherapy for MMRP-deficient metastatic breast cancer. This study aims to identify MMRP deficiency in TNBC patients using immunohistochemistry.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study design was used and included TNBC patients treated between 2015 and 2021 at King Hussein Cancer Center. Immunohistochemistry was conducted to assess MMRP expression.

RESULTS

Among 152 patients, 14 (9.2%) exhibited deficient MMR (dMMR). Loss of PMS2 expression was observed in 13 patients, 5 of whom showed loss of MLH1 expression. Loss of MSH6 and MSH2 expression was observed in one patient. The median follow-up duration was 44 (3-102) months. Despite the higher survival rate (80.8%, 5 years) of dMMR patients than of proficient MMR patients (62.3%), overall survival did not significantly differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 9% of TNBC patients exhibit dMMR. dMMR could be used to predict outcomes and identify patients with TNBC who may benefit from immunotherapy.

The screening, identification, design and clinical application of tumor-specific neoantigens for TCR-T cells

Recent advances in neoantigen research have accelerated the development of tumor immunotherapies, including adoptive cell therapies (ACTs), cancer vaccines and antibody-based therapies, particularly for solid tumors. With the development of next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics technology, the rapid identification and prediction of tumor-specific antigens (TSAs) has become possible. Compared with tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), highly immunogenic TSAs provide new targets for personalized tumor immunotherapy and can be used as prospective indicators for predicting tumor patient survival, prognosis, and immune checkpoint blockade response. Here, the identification and characterization of neoantigens and the clinical application of neoantigen-based TCR-T immunotherapy strategies are summarized, and the current status, inherent challenges, and clinical translational potential of these strategies are discussed.

Immune Biomarkers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Improving the Predictivity of Current Testing Methods

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) poses a significant challenge in terms of prognosis and disease recurrence. The limited treatment options and the development of resistance to chemotherapy make it particularly difficult to manage these patients. However, recent research has been shifting its focus towards biomarker-based approaches for TNBC, with a particular emphasis on the tumor immune landscape. Immune biomarkers in TNBC are now a subject of great interest due to the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in these tumors. This characteristic often coincides with the presence of PD-L1 expression on both neoplastic cells and immune cells within the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, a subset of TNBC harbor mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) TNBC, which is frequently accompanied by microsatellite instability (MSI). All of these immune biomarkers hold actionable potential for guiding patient selection in immunotherapy. To fully capitalize on these opportunities, the identification of additional or complementary biomarkers and the implementation of highly customized testing strategies are of paramount importance in TNBC. In this regard, this article aims to provide an overview of the current state of the art in immune-related biomarkers for TNBC. Specifically, it focuses on the various testing methodologies available and sheds light on the immediate future perspectives for patient selection. By delving into the advancements made in understanding the immune landscape of TNBC, this study aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge in the field. The ultimate goal is to pave the way for the development of more personalized testing strategies, ultimately improving outcomes for TNBC patients.

PMS2 Expression With Combination of PD-L1 and TILs for Predicting Survival of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (dMMR) has been recognized as an important biomarker for immunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), along with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and/or tumor-infiltrated lymphocytes (TILs). However, in ESCC, MMR protein assessment has not been well studied at present.

Methods

A total of 484 ESCC tissues treated between 2007 and 2010, in our hospital, were enrolled. Immunohistochemical expression of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and PD-L1 on tissue microarray specimens and clinicopathological features, including TILs, were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Out of the 484 studied cases, loss of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 expression were found in 6.8%, 2.1%, 8.7%, and 4.8% patients, respectively. dMMR was found in 65 patients, 37 cases involved in one MMR protein, 17 cases involved in two proteins, 7 cases involved in three proteins, and 4 cases involved in four proteins. There was no significant survival difference between pMMR (MMR-proficient) and dMMR patients (P>0.05). However, 224 patients with low PMS2 expression had better DFS and OS than 260 patients with high PMS2 expression (P=0.006 for DFS and 0.008 for OS), which was identified as an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analyses. Positive PD-L1 expression was detected in 341 (70.5%) samples. In stage I-II disease, patients with PD-L1 expression had better DFS and OS than those without PD-L1 expression(P<0.05), which was not found in stage III-IV disease. With the ITWG system, 40.1% of cases were classified as high TILs. Patients in the high-TILs group tended to have better DFS (P=0.055) and OS (P=0.070) than those in the low-TILs group and the differences were statistically significant in pMMR, high MSH6, or PMS2 expression cases (P<0.05). Also, high PMS2 expression patients with both PD-L1 expression and high TILs, had similar DFS and OS compared with low PMS2 expression patients (P>0.05), which were much better than other high PMS2 expression patients.

Conclusion

The expression level of MMR proteins could also be used as a prognostic factor in ESCC and PMS2 expression outperformed other MMR proteins for predicting survival. The combination of PD-L1 expression and TILs may lead to more efficient risk stratification of ESCC.

Update on prognostic and predictive biomarkers of breast cancer

Breast cancer represents a heterogeneous group of human cancer at both histological and molecular levels. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are the most commonly used biomarkers in clinical practice for making treatment plans for breast cancer patients by oncologists. Recently, PD-L1 testing plays an important role for immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer. With the increased understanding of the molecular characterization of breast cancer and the emergence of novel targeted therapies, more potential biomarkers are needed for the development of more personalized treatments. In this review, we summarized several main prognostic and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer at genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic levels, including hormone receptors, HER2, Ki67, multiple gene expression assays, PD-L1 testing, mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, PIK3CA, ESR1 andNTRK and briefly introduced the roles of digital imaging analysis in breast biomarker evaluation.