Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract: A single-institute study of 43 cases

Clinicopathologic and Molecular Characterization of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas and Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

The pathogenesis of neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) in the gastrointestinal tract remains poorly understood. This study aims to characterize the clinicopathologic and molecular features of NEC/MiNEN in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Eighteen surgically resected IBD-associated intestinal carcinomas with a minimum of 30% neuroendocrine component were collected from 6 academic centers and compared with a control group of 12 IBD-associated carcinomas lacking neuroendocrine differentiation. Both groups exhibited a male predominance and similar age distribution. The NEC/MiNEN group was more likely to have a higher percentage of Crohn disease (9/18 vs 1/12; P = .024), occur in the rectum (9/18 vs 3/12) and small intestine (4/18 vs 0/12) (P < .01), be diagnosed on resection without a preceding biopsy (6/18 vs 0/12; P = .057), and have unidentifiable precursor lesions (10/18 vs 1/12; P = .018) than the control group. Synchronous carcinoma, advanced tumor stage (pT3 and pT4), and lymph node metastasis occurred at similar rates; however, the NEC/MiNEN group had a higher incidence of angiovascular invasion (14/18 vs 4/12; P = .024), distant metastasis (8/18 vs 1/12; P = .049), mortality (8/18 vs 2/12; P = .058), and worse survival (Kaplan-Meier; P = .023) than the control group. All tested cases were mismatch repair proficient. A Ki-67 proliferation index ranged from 25% to 100%. Next-generation sequencing in 11 NEC/MiNEN cases revealed low tumor mutational burdens but complex genetic abnormalities commonly involving TP53 (9/11; 82%), FBXW7 (4/11; 36%), and APC (3/11; 27%) genes, with the other genetic alterations randomly occurring in 1 or 2 cases. The neuroendocrine component, which shared similar molecular alterations as the nonneuroendocrine component, was subcategorized into intermediate (G3a) and high grade (G3b); the higher grade correlated with more genetic alterations. In conclusion, IBD-associated NEC/MiNEN shows diverse histologic features, variable precursor lesions, intricate genetic abnormalities, and aggressive biologic behavior. The classification and grading of gastrointestinal NEC/MiNEN may be refined for better clinical management.

Comparison of INSM1 immunostaining with established neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin and chromogranin A in over 14,000 neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors

INSM1 is a transcription factor protein which is increasingly used as an immunohistochemical marker for neuroendocrine differentiation. To determine the prevalence of INSM1 expression in tumors and its expression pattern in normal tissues, tissue microarrays containing 14,908 samples from 117 different tumor types/subtypes as well as 76 different normal tissues were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. INSM1 was positive in 89.2% of 471 neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and in 3.5% of 11,815 non-neuroendocrine neoplasms that were successfully analyzed. At least an occasional weak INSM1 positivity was observed in 59 different non-neuroendocrine tumor entities, of which 15 entities contained at least one case with strong INSM1 staining. A comparison with synaptophysin and chromogranin A staining revealed that in NEN, synaptophysin showed the highest sensitivity (93.3%), followed by INSM1 (89.2%) and chromogranin A (87.5%). In neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), sensitivity was highest for INSM1 (88.0%), followed by synaptophysin (86.5%) and chromogranin A (66.4%). If INSM1 was used as an additional marker, the sensitivity for detecting neuroendocrine differentiation in NEN increased from 96.6% (synaptophysin and chromogranin A) to 97.2% (synaptophysin, chromogranin A and INSM1). Our study shows that INSM1 is a useful additional marker for neuroendocrine differentiation with high sensitivity, particularly in NEC.

INSM1 expression in primary and metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms at distinct locations

BACKGROUND

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been reported as a valuable marker for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The aims of this study were to evaluate any change in INSM1 expression between primary and metastatic NENs in distinct locations, as well as the expression of INSM1 at different differentiation levels. Furthermore, we would also investigate the significance of INSM1 expression in non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (non-NENs).

METHODS

We collected 78 cases with primary NENs and 16 cases with metastatic NENs. An addition 7 cases of non-NENs with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation and 84 cases of other non-NENs, respectively, were included as controls.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 82% of primary NENs and 88% of metastatic NENs expressed INSM1 with no difference between them. There was no difference in the expression of INSM1 in the lung and digestive system, and its staining pattern was independent of tumor differentiation or location. The proportion of INSM1 -positive in non-NENs with NE differentiation was significantly higher than that in other non-NENs. INSM1 sensitivity for primary NENs (82%) was comparable to Chromogranin A (82%), less than that of Synaptophysin (96%) and CD56 (94%); specificity was higher (96% vs 94%, 82%, and 89%, respectively). The sensitivity of INSM1 for well differentiated NENs was significantly higher than that of poorly differentiated NENs (100% vs 79%).

CONCLUSIONS

INSM1 is a useful neuroendocrine marker in primary and metastatic NENs, helping to identify primary NENs with different degrees of differentiation. The expression of INSM1 was independent of tumor location. It should be with caution to interpret the expression of INSM1 in non-NENs that morphologically resemble NENs.

Clinicopathologic and Molecular Characterization of Anorectal Neuroendocrine Carcinomas Reveals Human Papillomavirus, p53, and c-Myc as Alternative Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis

Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are rare malignant neoplasms with aggressive behavior. The diagnosis remains challenging due to ever-changing terminologies and morphologic overlaps with other disease entities. Herein, we seek to better define anorectal NECs by high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) status and molecular profiling. Fourteen cases, including 3 men and 11 women with a median age of 63 years, were included. High-risk HPV RNA in situ hybridization was diffusely positive (+) in 7 cases, focal rarely positive (+/-) in 2 cases, and completely negative (-) in 5 cases. By morphology, all HPV(-) NECs were large-cell type, 3 mixed with a tubular adenoma/dysplasia or invasive adenocarcinoma. HPV-related (+ or +/-) NECs were mostly small-cell type, 3 mixed with squamous dysplasia and/or squamous cell carcinoma. Immunohistochemically, all NECs were positive for at least 2 neuroendocrine markers. The HPV(-) NECs were also positive for CDX2, whereas all HPV-related NECs were negative or only focally positive for CDX2, p40, and p63. Overexpression of p53 was found in 3 HPV(-) and 2 HPV(+/-) NECs but not in any HPV(+) NECs. Molecular analysis revealed MYC gene amplification in 4 cases: 2 HPV(-), 1 HPV(+/-), and 1 HPV(+). This was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization in all but 1 HPV(-) NEC, which showed polysomy 8 but no true MYC amplification. Interestingly, only 2 of the 4 MYC amplification-bearing cases, both p53 normal/wild-type, expressed c-Myc protein by immunohistochemistry. The other 2 cases, both p53 overexpressed, did not show c-Myc expression despite true MYC amplification. Our study demonstrates that anorectal NECs arise in HPV-dependent or -independent pathways, with heterogeneous expression of other lineage markers and different molecular signatures. Expressions of p53 and c-Myc proteins appear to be mutually exclusive regardless of HPV status, likely mediating alternative mechanisms of NEC carcinogenesis.

Tumor Microenvironment in Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Interaction between Tumors and Immune Cells, and Potential Effects of Neuroendocrine Differentiation on the Tumor Microenvironment

The tumor microenvironment is considered to play a pivotal role in various human malignancies. Neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine neoplasms are considered to have different tumor microenvironments. However, owing to differences in the systemic and/or local immune statuses, tumor microenvironments in different patients may be difficult to compare. Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs), although rare, could be useful for exploring the effects of neuroendocrine differentiation on the tumor microenvironment, because both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components are present in the same tumor. Here, we examined 33 cases of histologically confirmed MiNENs and evaluated the influence of neuroendocrine differentiation on the tumor microenvironment by comparing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-associated macrophages, and other relevant factors in the two components the same tumor. The immunoreactivity of those examined above was evaluated quantitatively. The values of vasohibin-1-positive density (p < 0.0001) and immunoreactivity (p < 0.0001) (representing the neoangiogenesis status) were significantly higher in neuroendocrine as compared to non-neuroendocrine areas of the same tumors. In addition, the Foxp3/CD8 (p = 0.0717) and the PD-1/CD8 ratios (p = 0.0176) (representing tumor immunity suppression) tend to increase in neuroendocrine carcinomas. Immunoreactivity of CD163, a marker of M2-like macrophages, was also higher in the neuroendocrine areas. Our findings indicate that neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors differ from each other with respect to the characteristics of both tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment.

Tumor Microenvironment in Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Interaction between Tumors and Immune Cells, and Potential Effects of Neuroendocrine Differentiation on the Tumor Microenvironment

The tumor microenvironment is considered to play a pivotal role in various human malignancies. Neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine neoplasms are considered to have different tumor microenvironments. However, owing to differences in the systemic and/or local immune statuses, tumor microenvironments in different patients may be difficult to compare. Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs), although rare, could be useful for exploring the effects of neuroendocrine differentiation on the tumor microenvironment, because both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components are present in the same tumor. Here, we examined 33 cases of histologically confirmed MiNENs and evaluated the influence of neuroendocrine differentiation on the tumor microenvironment by comparing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-associated macrophages, and other relevant factors in the two components the same tumor. The immunoreactivity of those examined above was evaluated quantitatively. The values of vasohibin-1-positive density (p < 0.0001) and immunoreactivity (p < 0.0001) (representing the neoangiogenesis status) were significantly higher in neuroendocrine as compared to non-neuroendocrine areas of the same tumors. In addition, the Foxp3/CD8 (p = 0.0717) and the PD-1/CD8 ratios (p = 0.0176) (representing tumor immunity suppression) tend to increase in neuroendocrine carcinomas. Immunoreactivity of CD163, a marker of M2-like macrophages, was also higher in the neuroendocrine areas. Our findings indicate that neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors differ from each other with respect to the characteristics of both tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection combined with adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus: A case report

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the esophagus is rare and highly aggressive, and lacks biological features. Currently, there are no established standard treatments for this cancer. In this report, we describe a patient with large-cell NEC of the esophagus who was successfully treated using endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) combined with adjuvant chemotherapy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 55-year-old woman presented with intermittent mild dysphagia for 2 mo. Gastroscopy revealed a disc-shaped protruding lesion about 18 mm × 18 mm in size on the upper esophagus. Endoscopic ultrasonography demonstrated that the bulged lesion originated from the muscularis mucosa. We assessed en bloc resections using ESD for therapeutic diagnosis to devise a safe and appropriate treatment. Histopathological examination revealed a poorly differentiated neoplasm comprising of large cells with marked nuclear atypia and multifocal necrosis. In addition, the specimens had a negative horizontal margin and vertical margins. Depth of invasion was classified as submucosa 2 (SM2) without lymphovascular invasion. These histopathological results were consistent with a diagnosis of esophageal NEC, large cell type. Adjuvant therapy has been considered for ESD patients with SM2/SM3 lesions and patients with poorly differentiated lesions. After comprehensive consideration, we initiated combination treatment, i.e., ESD plus adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient remained disease-free at the 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

En bloc resection approach using ESD may play a vital role as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality for esophageal NEC.