1
|
Nilsson MP, Undseth C, Albertsson P, Eidem M, Havelund BM, Johannsson J, Johnsson A, Radu C, Serup-Hansen E, Spindler KL, Zakrisson B, Guren MG, Kronborg C. Nordic anal cancer (NOAC) group consensus guidelines for risk-adapted delineation of the elective clinical target volume in anal cancer. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:897-906. [PMID: 37504978 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2240490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Background: To date, anal cancer patients are treated with radiotherapy to similar volumes despite a marked difference in risk profile based on tumor location and stage. A more individualized approach to delineation of the elective clinical target volume (CTVe) could potentially provide better oncological outcomes as well as improved quality of life. The aim of the present work was to establish Nordic Anal Cancer (NOAC) group guidelines for delineation of the CTVe in anal cancer.Methods: First, 12 radiation oncologists reviewed the literature in one of the following four areas: (1) previous delineation guidelines; (2) patterns of recurrence; (3) anatomical studies; (4) common iliac and para-aortic recurrences and delineation guidelines. Second, areas of controversy were identified and discussed with the aim of reaching consensus.Results: We present consensus-based recommendations for CTVe delineation in anal cancer regarding (a) which regions to include, and (b) how the regions should be delineated. Some of our recommendations deviate from current international guidelines. For instance, the posterolateral part of the inguinal region is excluded, decreasing the volume of irradiated normal tissue. For the external iliac region and the cranial border of the CTVe, we agreed on specifying two different recommendations, both considered acceptable. One of these recommendations is novel and risk-adapted; the external iliac region is omitted for low-risk patients, and several different cranial borders are used depending on the individual level of risk.Conclusion: We present NOAC consensus guidelines for delineation of the CTVe in anal cancer, including a risk-adapted strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin P Nilsson
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Per Albertsson
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, and Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Monika Eidem
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway
| | - Birgitte Mayland Havelund
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Jakob Johannsson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Calin Radu
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Eva Serup-Hansen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Björn Zakrisson
- Department of radiation sciences - oncology, Umeå University
| | - Marianne G Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Camilla Kronborg
- Danish, Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qin F, Pang H, Yu T, Luo Y, Dong Y. Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer: A Review. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2022; 21:15330338221086403. [PMID: 35341413 PMCID: PMC8966198 DOI: 10.1177/15330338221086403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the fourth most common malignant tumor globally in terms of morbidity and mortality. The presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in cervical cancer patients. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system was revised in 2018. An important revision designates patients with regional LNM as stage IIIC, pelvic LNM only as stage IIIC1, and para-aortic LNM as stage IIIC2. However, the current staging system is only based on the anatomical location of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs). It does not consider other LN status parameters, which may limit its prognostic significance to a certain extent and needs further exploration and confirmation in the future. The purpose of this review is to summarize the choice of treatment for stage IIIC cervical cancer and the effect of different LN status parameters on prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengying Qin
- 74665Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Huiting Pang
- 74665Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Tao Yu
- 74665Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Yahong Luo
- 74665Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Yue Dong
- 74665Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adam JA, Loft A, Chargari C, Delgado Bolton RC, Kidd E, Schöder H, Veit-Haibach P, Vogel WV. EANM/SNMMI practice guideline for [ 18F]FDG PET/CT external beam radiotherapy treatment planning in uterine cervical cancer v1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:1188-1199. [PMID: 33275178 PMCID: PMC8041686 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05112-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this EANM / SNMMI Practice Guideline with ESTRO endorsement is to provide general information and specific considerations about [18F]FDG PET/CT in advanced uterine cervical cancer for external beam radiotherapy planning with emphasis on staging and target definition, mostly in FIGO stages IB3-IVA and IVB, treated with curative intention. METHODS Guidelines from related fields, relevant literature and leading experts have been consulted during the development of this guideline. As this field is rapidly evolving, this guideline cannot be seen as definitive, nor is it a summary of all existing protocols. Local variations should be taken into consideration when applying this guideline. CONCLUSION The background, common clinical indications, qualifications and responsibilities of personnel, procedure / specifications of the examination, documentation / reporting and equipment specifications, quality control and radiation safety in imaging is discussed with an emphasis on the multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judit A Adam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Annika Loft
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Brachytherapy Unit, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Bretigny-sur-Orge, France
- French Military Health Academy, Ecole du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France
| | - Roberto C Delgado Bolton
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (Radiology) and Nuclear Medicine, San Pedro University Hospital and Centre for Biomedical Research of la Rioja (CIBIR), Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
| | - Elisabeth Kidd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Wouter V Vogel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
D'Cunha P, Pinho DF, Nwachukwu C, Xi Y, Frame R, Albuquerque K. Updating and Optimizing Anatomic Atlases for Elective Radiation of Para-Aortic Lymph Nodes in Cervical Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:e301-e307. [PMID: 33421621 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous studies have proposed 2 different contouring guidelines for the prophylactic radiation of para-aortic lymph nodes (PANs) for locally advanced cervical cancer. Because PAN-mapping atlases in current literature are limited to small patient samples and nodal populations, we updated the PAN atlas with a large data set of positron emission tomography (PET)-positive PANs on PET/computed tomography (CT) from patients with cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified 176 PET-positive PANs on pretreatment PET/CT of 47 patients with diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB to IVA cervical cancer. PANs were classified as left-lateral para-aortic (LPA), aortocaval (AC), or right paracaval (RPC). PAN clinical target volume (CTV) contours were drawn for all patients based on previously published guidelines by Takiar (CTV-T) and Keenan (CTV-K) and nodal volumetric coverage was assessed. RESULTS We identified 94 LPA nodes (54%), 71 AC nodes (40%), and 11 (6%) RPC nodes. CTV-T had improved nodal center coverage of 97.6% compared with 85.0% for CTV-K (P < .001). Nodal center coverage for CTV-K and CTV-T (with corresponding PAN) were 79 (84.0%) and 93 (99.0%) LPA nodes (P = .001), 64 (90.1%) and 68 (95.8%) AC nodes (P = .221), and 5 (45.5%) and 9 (81.8%) RPC nodes (P = .134), respectively. Additionally, our updated PAN atlas identified nodal centers anterior to the aorta and inferior vena cava that are not covered by CTV-T but covered by CTV-K due to the 10 mm anterior aortic expansion of CTV-K. CONCLUSIONS We have updated the PAN anatomic map of 176 PET-positive nodes from 47 patients and demonstrated that CTV-T has significantly better PAN coverage over CTV-K for posterior LPA and retrocaval regions for our data set. Additionally, we suggest a modification that includes a blend of CTV-T and CTV-K to provide optimal coverage for the mapped nodes anterior to the great vessels in our data set.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul D'Cunha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Daniella F Pinho
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Chika Nwachukwu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yin Xi
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Romona Frame
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Kevin Albuquerque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Accuracy of target delineation by positron emission tomography-based auto-segmentation methods after deformable image registration: A phantom study. Phys Med 2020; 76:194-201. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
6
|
Study of novel deformable image registration in myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. Nucl Med Commun 2020; 41:196-205. [DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
7
|
|
8
|
Eifel PJ, Klopp AH. In reply to Keenan et al. Anatomic principles as the basis of target volume definition. Radiother Oncol 2018; 136:198-199. [PMID: 30279048 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
9
|
Chhabra A, Schneider C, Chowdhary M, Diwanji TP, Mohindra P, Mishra MV. How Histopathologic Tumor Extent and Patterns of Recurrence Data Inform the Development of Radiation Therapy Treatment Volumes in Solid Malignancies. Semin Radiat Oncol 2018; 28:218-237. [PMID: 29933882 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2018.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The ability to deliver highly conformal radiation therapy using intensity-modulated radiation therapy and particle therapy provides for new opportunities to improve patient outcomes by reducing treatment-related morbidities following radiation therapy. By reducing the volume of normal tissue exposed to radiation therapy (RT), while also allowing for the opportunity to escalate the dose of RT delivered to the tumor, use of conformal RT delivery should also provide the possibility of expanding the therapeutic index of radiotherapy. However, the ability to safely and confidently deliver conformal RT is largely dependent on our ability to clearly define the clinical target volume for radiation therapy, which requires an in-depth knowledge of histopathologic extent of different tumor types, as well as patterns of recurrence data. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the histopathologic and radiographic data that provide the basis for evidence-based guidelines for clinical tumor volume delineation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpit Chhabra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Craig Schneider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Mudit Chowdhary
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University, Chicago, IL
| | - Tejan P Diwanji
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Mark V Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Viswanathan C, Faria S, Devine C, Patnana M, Sagebiel T, Iyer RB, Bhosale PR. [18F]-2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-glucose-PET Assessment of Cervical Cancer. PET Clin 2018; 13:165-177. [PMID: 29482748 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
This article provides an overview of PET in cervical cancer, primarily with regard to the use of 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-PET/computed tomography. A brief discussion of upcoming technologies, such as PET/MR imaging, is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chitra Viswanathan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030-4008, USA.
| | - Silvana Faria
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030-4008, USA
| | - Catherine Devine
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030-4008, USA
| | - Madhavi Patnana
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030-4008, USA
| | - Tara Sagebiel
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030-4008, USA
| | - Revathy B Iyer
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030-4008, USA
| | - Priya R Bhosale
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030-4008, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ger RB, Yang J, Ding Y, Jacobsen MC, Fuller CD, Howell RM, Li H, Jason Stafford R, Zhou S, Court LE. Accuracy of deformable image registration on magnetic resonance images in digital and physical phantoms. Med Phys 2017. [PMID: 28622410 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate deformable image registration is necessary for longitudinal studies. The error associated with commercial systems has been evaluated using computed tomography (CT). Several in-house algorithms have been evaluated for use with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but there is still relatively little information about MRI deformable image registration. This work presents an evaluation of two deformable image registration systems, one commercial (Velocity) and one in-house (demons-based algorithm), with MRI using two different metrics to quantify the registration error. METHODS The registration error was analyzed with synthetic MR images. These images were generated from interpatient and intrapatient variation models trained on 28 patients. Four synthetic post-treatment images were generated for each of four synthetic pretreatment images, resulting in 16 image registrations for both the T1- and T2-weighted images. The synthetic post-treatment images were registered to their corresponding synthetic pretreatment image. The registration error was calculated between the known deformation vector field and the generated deformation vector field from the image registration system. The registration error was also analyzed using a porcine phantom with ten implanted 0.35-mm diameter gold markers. The markers were visible on CT but not MRI. CT, T1-weighted MR, and T2-weighted MR images were taken in four different positions. The markers were contoured on the CT images and rigidly registered to their corresponding MR images. The MR images were deformably registered and the distance between the projected marker location and true marker location was measured as the registration error. RESULTS The synthetic images were evaluated only on Velocity. Root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 0.76 mm in the left-right (LR) direction, 0.76 mm in the anteroposterior (AP) direction, and 0.69 mm in the superior-inferior (SI) direction were observed for the T1-weighted MR images. RMSEs of 1.1 mm in the LR direction, 0.75 mm in the AP direction, and 0.81 mm in the SI direction were observed for the T2-weighted MR images. The porcine phantom MR images, when evaluated with Velocity, had RMSEs of 1.8, 1.5, and 2.7 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions for the T1-weighted images and 1.3, 1.2, and 1.6 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions for the T2-weighted images. When the porcine phantom images were evaluated with the in-house demons-based algorithm, RMSEs were 1.2, 1.5, and 2.1 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions for the T1-weighted images and 0.81, 1.1, and 1.1 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions for the T2-weighted images. CONCLUSIONS The MRI registration error was low for both Velocity and the in-house demons-based algorithm according to both image evaluation methods, with all RMSEs below 3 mm. This implies that both image registration systems can be used for longitudinal studies using MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel B Ger
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jinzhong Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yao Ding
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Megan C Jacobsen
- UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Rebecca M Howell
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - R Jason Stafford
- UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Shouhao Zhou
- UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Laurence E Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Reddy AV, Christodouleas JP, Wu T, Smith ND, Steinberg GD, Liauw SL. External Validation and Optimization of International Consensus Clinical Target Volumes for Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Bladder Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 97:740-746. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Revised: 11/18/2016] [Accepted: 11/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
13
|
Eminowicz G, Hall-Craggs M, Diez P, McCormack M. Improving target volume delineation in intact cervical carcinoma: Literature review and step-by-step pictorial atlas to aid contouring. Pract Radiat Oncol 2016; 6:e203-e213. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2015] [Revised: 12/21/2015] [Accepted: 01/08/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
14
|
Gentile MS, Usman AA, Neuschler EI, Sathiaseelan V, Hayes JP, Small W. Contouring Guidelines for the Axillary Lymph Nodes for the Delivery of Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer: Evaluation of the RTOG Breast Cancer Atlas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 93:257-65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2014] [Revised: 04/24/2015] [Accepted: 07/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
15
|
The equivalent dose contribution from high-dose-rate brachytherapy to positive pelvic lymph nodes in locally advanced cervical cancer. Brachytherapy 2013; 12:555-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2013.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2013] [Revised: 05/29/2013] [Accepted: 06/07/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
16
|
Are Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Para-aortic Contouring Guidelines for Pancreatic Neoplasm Applicable to Other Malignancies—Assessment of Nodal Distribution in Gynecological Malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 87:106-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2013] [Revised: 05/14/2013] [Accepted: 05/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
17
|
Takiar V, Fontanilla HP, Eifel PJ, Jhingran A, Kelly P, Iyer RB, Levenback CF, Zhang Y, Dong L, Klopp A. Anatomic distribution of fluorodeoxyglucose-avid para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 85:1045-50. [PMID: 23332221 PMCID: PMC4709024 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2012] [Revised: 11/18/2012] [Accepted: 11/21/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Conformal treatment of para-aortic lymph nodes (PAN) in cervical cancer allows dose escalation and reduces normal tissue toxicity. Currently, data documenting the precise location of involved PAN are lacking. We define the spatial distribution of this high-risk nodal volume by analyzing fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid lymph nodes (LNs) on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified 72 PANs on pretreatment PET/CT of 30 patients with newly diagnosed stage IB-IVA cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation. LNs were classified as left-lateral para-aortic (LPA), aortocaval (AC), or right paracaval (RPC). Distances from the LN center to the closest vessel and adjacent vertebral body were calculated. Using deformable image registration, nodes were mapped to a template computed tomogram to provide a visual impression of nodal frequencies and anatomic distribution. RESULTS We identified 72 PET-positive para-aortic lymph nodes (37 LPA, 32 AC, 3 RPC). All RPC lymph nodes were in the inferior third of the para-aortic region. The mean distance from aorta for all lymph nodes was 8.3 mm (range, 3-17 mm), and from the inferior vena cava was 5.6 mm (range, 2-10 mm). Of the 72 lymph nodes, 60% were in the inferior third, 36% were in the middle third, and 4% were in the upper third of the para-aortic region. In all, 29 of 30 patients also had FDG-avid pelvic lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS A total of 96% of PET positive nodes were adjacent to the aorta; PET positive nodes to the right of the IVC were rare and were all located distally, within 3 cm of the aortic bifurcation. Our findings suggest that circumferential margins around the vessels do not accurately define the nodal region at risk. Instead, the anatomical extent of the nodal basin should be contoured on each axial image to provide optimal coverage of the para-aortic nodal compartment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinita Takiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hiral P. Fontanilla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Patricia J. Eifel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Patrick Kelly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Revathy B. Iyer
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Charles F. Levenback
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yongbin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ann Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|