Growth abnormalities of the spine after radiation therapy: Respecting the past while moving forward in proton craniospinal irradiation

Risks of Spinal Abnormalities and Growth Impairment After Radiation to the Spine in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review

PURPOSE

A PENTEC (Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic) review was performed to estimate the dose-volume effects of radiation therapy on spine deformities and growth impairment for patients who underwent radiation therapy as children.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic literature search was performed to identify published data for spine deformities and growth stunting. Data were extracted from 12 reports of children irradiated to the spine (N = 603 patients). The extracted data were analyzed to find associations between complication risks and the radiation dose (conventional fractionation throughout) as impacted by exposed volumes and age using the mixed-effects logistic regression model. When appropriate, corrections were made for radiation modality, namely orthovoltage beams.

RESULTS

In the regression analysis, the association between vertebral dose and scoliosis rate was highly significant (P < .001). Additionally, young age at time of radiation was highly predictive of adverse outcomes. Clinically significant scoliosis can occur with doses ≥15 Gy to vertebrae during infancy (<2 years of age). For children irradiated at 2 to 6 years of age, overall scoliosis rates of any grade were >30% with doses >20 Gy; grade 2 or higher scoliosis was correlated with doses ≥30 Gy. Children >6 years of age remain at risk for scoliosis with doses >30 Gy; however, most cases will be mild. There are limited data regarding the effect of dose gradients across the spine on degree of scoliosis. The risk of clinically meaningful height loss was minimal when irradiating small volumes of the spine up to 20 Gy (eg, flank irradiation), except in infants who are more vulnerable to lower doses. Growth stunting was more frequent when larger segments of the spine (eg, the entire spine or craniospinal irradiation) were irradiated before puberty to doses >20 Gy. The effect was modest when patients were irradiated after puberty to doses >20 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce the risk of kyphoscoliosis and growth impairment, the dose to the spine should be kept to <20 Gy for children <6 years of age and to <10 to 15 Gy in infants. The number of vertebral bodies irradiated and dose gradients across the spine should also be limited when possible.

Management of the vertebrae as an organ at risk in paediatric radiotherapy clinical trials: Initial QUARTET experience

Irradiation of the vertebrae in prepubertal patients, if non-homogenous, can result in future growth deformities including kyphoscoliosis. Vertebral delineation and dosimetry were assessed for 101 paediatric cases reviewed within QUARTET-affiliated trials. Despite the availability of published consensus guidelines, a high variability in vertebral delineation was observed, with impact on dosimetry.

Precision based approach to tailoring radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary management of pediatric central nervous system tumors

Modern day survivorship from childhood malignancies is estimated to be over 80%. However, central nervous system tumors remain the leading cause of cancer mortality in children and is the most common solid tumor in this population. Improved survivorship is, in part, a result of improved multidisciplinary care, often with a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy. With improved survival, long term effects of treatment and quality of life impacts have been recognized and pose a challenge to maximize the therapeutic ratio of treatment. It has been increasingly more apparent that precise risk stratification, such as with the inclusion of molecular classification, is instrumental in efforts to tailor radiotherapy for appropriate treatment, generally towards de-intensification for this vulnerable patient population. In addition, advances in radiotherapy techniques have allowed greater conformality and accuracy of treatment for those who do require radiotherapy for tumor control. Ongoing efforts to tailor radiotherapy, including de-escalation, omission, or intensification of radiotherapy, continue to improve as increasing insight into tumor heterogeneity is recognized, coupled with advances in precision medicine employing novel molecularly-targeted therapeutics.

Late Effects of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Electron Spinal Fields for Pediatric Patients With Cancer

PURPOSE

For children, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with photons is associated with significant toxic effects. The use of electrons for spinal fields is hypothesized to spare anterior structures but the long-term effects remain uncertain. We studied late effects of CSI using electrons for spinal radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Records of 84 consecutive patients treated with CSI using electrons for the spine at a single institution between 1983 and 2014 were reviewed. Median age at RT was 5 (range, 1-14) years. The most common histologies were medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (59%) and ependymoma (8%). The median prescribed dose to the entire spine was 30 Gy (range, 6-45). A subset of 48 (57%) patients aged 2 to 14 at RT with clinical follow-up for ≥5 years was analyzed for late effects. Height z scores adjusted for age before and after CSI were assessed using stature-for-age charts and compared with a t test.

RESULTS

At median follow-up of 19 years (range, 0-38 years), the median survival was 22 years (95% confidence interval, 12-28 years) after RT, with 47 patients (56%) alive at last follow-up. On subset analysis for late effects, 19 (40%) patients developed hypothyroidism and 5 (10%) developed secondary malignancies. Other complications reported were esophageal stricture and periaortic hemorrhage in 1 and restrictive pulmonary disease in 1 patient. Median height z score before treatment was -0.4 (36th percentile; interquartile range, -1.0 to 0.0) and at last follow-up was -2.2 (first percentile; interquartile range, -3.1 to -1.6; P < .001). Of 44 patients with spinal curvature assessments, 15 (34%) had scoliosis with median Cobb angle 15° (range, 10°-35°) and 1 (2%) required surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequent musculoskeletal toxic effects and predominantly decreased height were seen with long-term follow-up. Scoliosis and hypothyroidism were each seen in at least one-third of long-term survivors. However, clinically evident esophageal, pulmonary, and cardiac toxic effects were infrequent.

Scoliosis in Children Treated With Photon Craniospinal Irradiation for Medulloblastoma

PURPOSE

Scoliosis is a well-recognized complication after abdominal radiation therapy but not reported frequently after craniospinal irradiation (CSI). We examined the incidence and risk factors for scoliosis after CSI in long-term survivors with medulloblastoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The records of patients with medulloblastoma seen at one institution from 1996 to 2006 were analyzed for the use of CSI and development of scoliosis as documented on physical examination and spinal imaging.

RESULTS

We identified 35 children with medulloblastoma who were ≤12 years of age at time of CSI with a median 14.3 years (range, 5.8-19.3 years) of follow-up. Twenty-seven (77.1%) were male, and median age at CSI was 6.8 years (range, 2.8-12 years). The cumulative incidence of scoliosis at 15 years was 34.6%. The median time to develop scoliosis was 7.1 years (range, 5-11.7 years) after CSI. Treatment with high dose CSI (34.2-40 Gy) and presence of hemiplegia or hemiparesis were found to be risk factors for development of scoliosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Scoliosis is an underreported complication of photon craniospinal irradiation.

Practice Patterns Among Radiation Oncologists Treating Pediatric Patients With Proton Craniospinal Irradiation

PURPOSE

Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is an important component of therapy for many pediatric central nervous system malignancies. Proton therapy is increasingly available and used for minimizing radiation exposure to normal tissues. The absence of an exit dose with proton therapy mandates decisions regarding coverage of the vertebral bodies (VB) in non-skeletally mature patients. Although the contents within the thecal sac represent the true clinical target volume (CTV), some physicians target the entire VB in growing children because of concerns over asymmetrical growth. This study aims to assess current practice patterns regarding VB coverage for pediatric patients undergoing CSI.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Pediatric radiation oncologists were identified from the Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group pediatric subcommittee membership or affiliation with US proton centers. Potential participants were contacted by e-mail with a link to an institutional review board-approved, anonymized web-based survey distributed in June 2017 with follow-up in October 2017. The survey used skip logic and included up to 11 questions regarding practice patterns.

RESULTS

Thirty-three physicians responded to the survey (39%), 5 of which were excluded for lack of recent pediatric proton CSI experience. Of the 28 included responses, 23 physicians sometimes treat the entire VB and 5 physicians report always treating the entire VB. Most common responses regarding anterior CTV expansion for uncertainty were no expansion (n = 9) and 3 to 4 mm (n = 8). Most physicians modify the anterior CTV margin to protect normal structures, most commonly esophagus (n = 15), thyroid (n = 6), heart (n = 5), bowel (n = 4), and pharynx (n = 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Vertebral body coverage in proton CSI varies among radiation oncologists in respect to target delineation, CTV expansions, and modifications for organs at risk. These data suggest the radiation oncology community may benefit from a standardized approach to pediatric proton-based CSI.

Clinical experience of craniospinal intensity-modulated spot-scanning proton therapy using large fields for central nervous system medulloblastomas and germ cell tumors in children, adolescents, and young adults

The outcomes of intensity-modulated proton craniospinal irradiation (ipCSI) are unclear. We evaluated the clinical benefit of our newly developed ipCSI system that incorporates two gantry-mounted orthogonal online X-ray imagers with a robotic six-degrees-of-freedom patient table. Nine patients (7-19 years old) were treated with ipCSI. The prescribed dose for CSI ranged from 23.4 to 36.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 13-20 fractions. Four adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients (15 years or older) were treated with vertebral-body-sparing ipCSI (VBSipCSI). Myelosuppression following VBSipCSI was compared with that of eight AYA patients treated with photon CSI at the same institution previously. The mean homogeneity index (HI) in the nine patients was 0.056 (95% confidence interval: 0.044-0.068). The mean time from the start to the end of all beam delivery was 37 min 39 s ± 2 min 24 s (minimum to maximum: 22 min 49 s - 42 min 51 s). The nadir white blood cell, hemoglobin, and platelet levels during the 4 weeks following the end of the CSI were significantly higher in the VBSipCSI group than in the photon CSI group (P = 0.0071, 0.0453, 0.0024, respectively). The levels at 4 weeks after the end of CSI were significantly higher in the VBSipCSI group than in the photon CSI group (P = 0.0023, 0.0414, 0.0061). Image-guided ipCSI was deliverable in a reasonable time with sufficient HI. Using VBSipCSI, AYA patients experienced a lower incidence of serious acute hematological toxicity than AYA patients treated with photon CSI.

Early Axial Growth Outcomes of Pediatric Patients Receiving Proton Craniospinal Irradiation

Guidelines on proton craniospinal irradiation (p-CSI) target volume selection in children are lacking. We examined the impact of target volume selection on growth of children receiving p-CSI at a institution. Records of 58 patients who received p-CSI were reviewed. Median age at treatment initiation was 8 years (range, 2 to 18 y). Spinal target volumes included whole vertebral body (WVB) in 67% and partial vertebral body (PVB) in 33%. Height z-scores before and after p-CSI were assessed using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stature-for-age charts. Maximal Cobb angle and height z-score change were compared for WVB versus PVB p-CSI using a t test. Among 93% of patients with detailed data, median follow-up was 19 months (range, 2 to 58 mo) after radiation therapy initiation. Quantitative growth evaluations were available for 64% of patients. Median change in height z-score was -0.5 (range, -2.1 to +0.7) after treatment, representing a decrease (P<0.001) in age-adjusted height. WVB patients had significantly greater reduction in height z-score versus PVB patients (P=0.004) but no difference in Cobb angle change (P>0.05). Despite reluctance surrounding its use in younger patients, PVB p-CSI was associated with similar spinal curvature and less growth suppression as compared with WVB p-CSI; a trial comparing WVB versus PVB in children may be warranted.

Clinical Implementation of Robust Optimization for Craniospinal Irradiation

With robust optimization for spot scanning proton therapy now commercially available, the ability exists to account for setup, range, and interfield uncertainties during optimization. Robust optimization is particularly beneficial for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) where the large target volume lends itself to larger setup uncertainties and the need for robust match lines can all be handled with the uncertainty parameters found inside the optimizer. Suggested robust optimization settings, parameters, and image guidance for CSI patients using proton therapy spot scanning are provided. Useful structures are defined and described. Suggestions are given for perturbations to be entered into the optimizer in order to achieve a plan that provides robust target volume coverage and critical structure sparing as well as a robust match line. Interfield offset effects, a concern when using multifield optimization, can also be addressed within the robust optimizer. A robust optimizer can successfully be employed to produce robust match lines, target volume coverage, and critical structure sparing under specified uncertainties. The robust optimizer can also be used to reduce effects arising from interfield uncertainties. Using robust optimization, a plan robust against setup, range, and interfield uncertainties for craniospinal treatments can be created. Utilizing robust optimization allows one to ensure critical structures are spared and target volumes are covered under the desired uncertainty parameters.

A review of dosimetric and toxicity modeling of proton versus photon craniospinal irradiation for pediatrics medulloblastoma

BACKGROUND

Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is the standard radiation therapy treatment for medulloblastoma. Conventional CSI photon therapy (Photon-CSI) delivers significant dose to surrounding normal tissue (NT). Research into pediatric CSI with proton therapy (Proton-CSI) has increased, with the aim of exploiting the potential to reduce NT dose and associated post-treatment complications. This review aims to compare treatment outcomes of pediatric medulloblastoma patients between Proton- and Photon-CSI treatments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search and review of studies published between 1990 and 2016 comparing pediatric (2-18 years) medulloblastoma Proton- and Photon-CSI in three aspects - normal organ sparing and target coverage; normal organ dysfunction and second malignancy risks - was completed.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were selected for review and the results were directly compared. Proton-CSI reported improved out-of-field organ sparing while target coverage improvements were inconsistent. Normal organ dysfunction risks were predicted to be lower following Proton-CSI. Secondary malignancy risks (SMRs) were generally lower with Proton-CSI based on several different risk models.

CONCLUSIONS

Proton-CSI conferred better treatment outcomes than Photon-CSI for pediatric medulloblastoma patients. This review serves to compare the current literature in the absence of long-term data from prospective studies.

Spinal Metastatic Disease: A Review of the Role of the Multidisciplinary Team

Historically, a simple approach centered on palliation was applicable to the majority of patients with metastatic spinal disease. With advances in diagnosis and treatment, a more complicated algorithm has devolved requiring a multidisciplinary approach with institutional commitment and support. We performed a database review including pertinent articles exploring the multidisciplinary management of spinal metastatic disease. The wide variation in clinical presentation and tumor response to treatment necessitates a multidisciplinary approach that integrates the diagnosis and treatment of the cancer, symptom management, and rehabilitation for optimal care of patients with spinal metastases. Advances in the field of radiology have led to earlier and more focused diagnosis of spinal metastasis and acts to guide therapy. Advances in surgical techniques, neurophysiologic monitoring, and anesthetic expertise have allowed surgeons to perform more extensive procedures leading to improved outcomes and reduced morbidity. Radiation oncology input that is essential as external beam radiation therapy can provide significant pain relief. Non-operative measures may include bisphosphonate infusions, management of complications (e.g. hypercalcemia of malignancy), monoclonal antibody infusions, and chemotherapy if indicated in the treatment of the primary malignancy. Input from psychology services is necessary to address the biopsychosocial ramifications of spinal metastasis. Allied health professionals in the form of physiotherapists, social workers, and dieticians also contribute in maximizing patients' quality of life and well-being.

Evaluating Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Relative to Passive Scattering Proton Therapy for Increased Vertebral Column Sparing in Craniospinal Irradiation in Growing Pediatric Patients

PURPOSE

At present, proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) for growing children is delivered to the whole vertebral body (WVB) to avoid asymmetric growth. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and potential clinical benefit of delivering vertebral body sparing (VBS) versus WVB CSI with passively scattered (PS) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in growing children treated for medulloblastoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five plans were generated for medulloblastoma patients, who had been previously treated with CSI PS proton radiation therapy: (1) single posteroanterior (PA) PS field covering the WVB (PS-PA-WVB); (2) single PA PS field that included only the thecal sac in the target volume (PS-PA-VBS); (3) single PA IMPT field covering the WVB (IMPT-PA-WVB); (4) single PA IMPT field, target volume including thecal sac only (IMPT-PA-VBS); and (5) 2 posterior-oblique (-35°, +35°) IMPT fields, with the target volume including the thecal sac only (IMPT2F-VBS). For all cases, 23.4 Gy (relative biologic effectiveness [RBE]) was prescribed to 95% of the spinal canal. The dose, linear energy transfer, and variable-RBE-weighted dose distributions were calculated for all plans using the tool for particle simulation, version 2, Monte Carlo system.

RESULTS

IMPT VBS techniques efficiently spared the anterior vertebral bodies (AVBs), even when accounting for potential higher variable RBE predicted by linear energy transfer distributions. Assuming an RBE of 1.1, the V10 Gy(RBE) decreased from 100% for the WVB techniques to 59.5% to 76.8% for the cervical, 29.9% to 34.6% for the thoracic, and 20.6% to 25.1% for the lumbar AVBs, and the V20 Gy(RBE) decreased from 99.0% to 17.8% to 20.0% for the cervical, 7.2% to 7.6% for the thoracic, and 4.0% to 4.6% for the lumbar AVBs when IMPT VBS techniques were applied. The corresponding percentages for the PS VBS technique were higher.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced proton techniques can sufficiently reduce the dose to the vertebral body and allow for vertebral column growth for children with central nervous system tumors requiring CSI. This was true even when considering variable RBE values. A clinical trial is planned for VBS to the thoracic and lumbosacral spine in growing children.

Radiation therapy at end of life in children

OBJECTIVE

Few data exist on evaluating utilization patterns of radiotherapy (RT) at the end of life (EOL) in children. Metastatic disease in pediatric patients is not pathognomonic for palliative treatment intent; further complicating the issue are complexities surrounding the very select population of children receiving proton therapy (PrT). We compared data for RT and PrT in terms of death rate within 30 days.

METHODS

We performed chart reviews for patients receiving radiation therapy at age ≤21 years treated at Indiana University Health Proton Therapy Center (IUHPTC) between June 2008 and June 2013 and University of Miami Radiation Oncology Department (UM) between June 2000 and June 2013. Included were patients not completing prescribed courses of RT, and those dying within 30 days of therapy. Comparison was made of differences between practice data for PrT and conventional RT.

RESULTS

At IUHPTC, 2 children of 272 did not complete their courses and died within 30 days (0.7%). At UM, data are available for 425 children; 9 did not complete their courses and 7 died within 30 days (1.6%). Neither the number of patients who did not complete treatment nor the 30-day death rates (P=.21) for PrT and RT were significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivery of RT for children at EOL is complex. Frequency of RT at EOL in children occurs in is <2% of cases, and is not significantly less frequent in the proton milieu. This appears to be about an order of magnitude less than in adults.