Changing Landscape of Radiation Therapy for Advanced Cervical Cancer With a Focus on Interstitial Brachytherapy: A Canadian Practice Patterns Survey

Clinical Outcomes of 3 Versus 4 Fractions of Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance image-guided brachytherapy is essential in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer. This study compares disease and toxicity outcomes in cervical cancer patients treated with 24 Gy/3 fractions (Fr) versus the conventional 28 Gy/4 Fr.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective study included 241 consecutive patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage IB to IVA cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation between April 2014 and March 2021. Disease-free survival (DFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cumulative incidence of local failure (LF), distant failure (DF), and G2+ gastrointestinal (GI), urinary and vaginal toxicity were estimated using the cumulative incidence function with death as a competing risk and compared using Gray's test.

RESULTS

Of the 241 patients, 42% received 24 Gy/3 Fr and 58% received 28 Gy/4 Fr. With a median follow-up of 3.2 (range, 0.2-9.2) years, there were 14 local, 41 regional nodal, and 51 distant failures in 63 (26%) patients. No significant differences were found between the 24 Gy/3 Fr and 28 Gy/4 Fr groups in 3-year DFS (77% vs 68%, P = .21), the 3-year cumulative incidence of LF (5% vs 7%, P = .57), DF (22% vs 25%, P = .86), G2+ GI toxicity (11% vs 20%, P = .13), or G2+ vaginal toxicity (14% vs 17%, P = .48), respectively. The 3-year cumulative G2+ urinary toxicity rate was lower in the 24 Gy/3 Fr group (9% vs 23%, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cervical cancer treated with 24 Gy/3 Fr had similar DFS, LF, DF, GI, and vaginal toxicity rates and a trend toward a lower G2+ urinary toxicity rate compared with those treated with 28 Gy/4 Fr. A less resource-intensive brachytherapy fractionation schedule of 24 Gy/3 Fr is a safe alternative to 28 Gy/4 Fr for definitive treatment of cervical cancer.

Prospective validation of a machine learning model for applicator and hybrid interstitial needle selection in high-dose-rate (HDR) cervical brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To Demonstrate the clinical validation of a machine learning (ML) model for applicator and interstitial needle prediction in gynecologic brachytherapy through a prospective clinical study in a single institution.

METHODS

The study included cervical cancer patients receiving high-dose-rate brachytherapy using intracavitary (IC) or hybrid interstitial (IC/IS) applicators. For each patient, the primary radiation oncologist contoured the high-risk clinical target volume on a pre-brachytherapy MRI, indicated the approximate applicator location, and made a clinical determination of the first fraction applicator. A pre-trained ML model predicted the applicator and IC/IS needle arrangement using tumor geometry. Following the first fraction, ML and radiation oncologist predictions were compared and a replanning study determined the applicator providing optimal organ-at-risk (OAR) dosimetry. The ML-predicted applicator and needle arrangement and the clinical determination were compared to this dosimetric ground truth.

RESULTS

Ten patients were accrued from December 2020 to October 2022. Compared to the dosimetrically optimal applicator, both the radiation oncologist and ML had an accuracy of 70%. ML demonstrated better identification of patients requiring IC/IS applicators and provided balanced IC and IC/IS predictions. The needle selection model achieved an average accuracy of 82.5%. ML-predicted needle arrangements matched or improved plan quality when compared to clinically selected arrangements. Overall, ML predictions led to an average total improvement of 2.0 Gy to OAR doses over three treatment fractions when compared to clinical predictions.

CONCLUSION

In the context of a single institution study, the presented ML model demonstrates valuable decision-support for the applicator and needle selection process with the potential to provide improved dosimetry. Future work will include a multi-center study to assess generalizability.

Design approach and benefits of the 3D-printed vaginal individualized applicator (VIA)

PURPOSE

Interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy necessitates precise needle placement, requiring time and expertise. We aimed to simplify interstitial procedures and facilitate optimal needle distribution with individualized vaginal templates to guide interstitial needles.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We developed the 3D-printed vaginal individualized applicator (VIA), a cylindrical template containing individualized internal channels that guide interstitial needles to cover the tumor extent. Eight patients underwent VIA only interstitial implants (VIA only), and five intact cervical cases were treated using tandem and customized VIA (VIA + T). Procedure length, number of needles utilized and dosimetric measures were evaluated.

RESULTS

VIA was successfully designed and used clinically for 24 procedures (8 VIA only, 16 VIA + T). Average procedure needle insertion time reduced from 80.9 min for traditional interstitial to 42.9 min for VIA only, approximately 47% shorter with a similar mean high risk CTV volume (28.3 cc VIA only vs. 32.4 cc) and excellent dosimetry with average CTV V100% (94.3% and 94.4%). VIA + T was particularly useful in patients with small vaginal canals and large tumor size. For the five VIA + T patients average tumor size was 68.0cc (range 26.6-143.5 cc). VIA + T procedures were approximately 20% shorter than hybrid procedures with other applicators with mean length of 20.1 min and an average of 6.8 needles (range 3-12).

CONCLUSION

Our novel 3D-printed VIA facilitates gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy by simplifying needle placement, reducing procedure time, and maintaining excellent dosimetry. VIA can be customized for various clinical scenarios, particularly beneficial for large tumors or small vaginal canals.