Prophylactic Extended-Field Irradiation Versus Pelvic Irradiation in Patients With Cervical Cancer With 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC1 Disease

Comparative Analysis of Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix with High-Risk Features for Para-Aortic Recurrence: Prophylactic Extended-Field versus Pelvic Chemoradiotherapy

Purpose

To compare the oncologic outcomes of prophylactic extended-field radiation therapy (EFRT) and whole pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT) in cervical patients at high risk of para-aortic lymph node (PALN) recurrence.

Patients and Methods

From July 1999 to May 2022, a total of 115 patients with cervical cancer and high-risk features of PALN recurrence based on tumor markers, positive LNs and extensive parametrial invasion were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had received EFRT or WPRT at a dose of 39.6-45 Gy and concurrent chemotherapy. In EFRT, coverage was extended to include the para-aortic region below the level of the left renal vein or T12.

Results

Twenty-eight and 87 patients underwent EFRT and WPRT, respectively. For patients who survived, the median follow-up time was 60.8 months (range 9.2-131.6 months) in the EFRT group and 115.9 months (range 16.9-212.1 months) in the WPRT group. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and pelvic, extrapelvic and PALN recurrence rates were 87.7% vs 60.8% (p=0.019), 10.9% vs 25.3% (p=0.119), 18.1% vs 45.8% (p=0.011), and 0% vs 30.4% (p=0.005), respectively, between the EFRT and WPRT groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that EFRT and 2018 FIGO stage IV disease status were significant predictors of OS and extrapelvic recurrence.

Conclusion

Compared to WPRT, EFRT significantly improved OS and reduced extrapelvic and PALN recurrence in patients with cervical cancer with high-risk recurrence features.

Prospects for daily online adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer: Auto-contouring evaluation and dosimetric outcomes

BACKGROUND

Training senior radiation therapists as "adapters" to manage influencers and target editing is critical in daily online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) for cervical cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and dosimetric outcomes of automatic contouring and identify the key areas for modification.

METHODS

A total of 125 oART fractions from five postoperative cervical cancer patients and 140 oART fractions from five uterine cervical cancer patients treated with daily iCBCT-guided oART were enrolled in this prospective study. The same adaptive treatments were replanned using the Ethos automatic contours workflow without manual contouring edits. The clinical target volume (CTV) was subdivided into several separate regions, and the average surface distance dice (ASD), centroid deviation, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and 95% Hausdorff distance (95% HD) were used to evaluate contouring for the above portions. Dosimetric results from automatic oART plans were compared to supervised oART plans to evaluate target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) dose changes.

RESULTS

Overall, the paired CTV had high overlap rates, with an average DSC value greater than 0.75. The uterus had the largest consistency differences, with ASD, centroid deviation, and 95% HD being 2.67 ± 1.79 mm, 17.17 ± 12 mm, and 10.45 ± 5.68 mm, respectively. The consistency differences of the lower nodal CTVleft and nodal CTVright were relatively large, with ASD, centroid deviation, and 95% HD being 0.59 ± 0.53 mm, 3.6 ± 2.67 mm, and 5.41 ± 4.08 mm, and 0.59 ± 0.51 mm, 3.6 ± 2.54 mm, and 4.7 ± 1.57 mm, respectively. The automatic online-adapted plan met the clinical requirements of dosimetric coverage for the target volume and improved the OAR dosimetry.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of automatic contouring from the Ethos adaptive platform is considered clinically acceptable for cervical cancer, and the uterus, upper vaginal cuff, and lower nodal CTV are the areas that need to be focused on in training.