The CORE system for sub-typing melancholic depression: Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Spanish version

Can the Addition of Maintenance Electroconvulsive Therapy to Pharmacotherapy Improve Relapse Prevention in Severe Major Depressive Disorder? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Few systematic evaluations have been performed of the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) as a relapse prevention strategy in major depressive disorder (MDD). This is a single-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of pharmacotherapy plus maintenance ECT (M-Pharm/ECT) versus pharmacotherapy alone (M-Pharm) in the prevention of MDD relapse. Subjects with MDD who had remitted with bilateral acute ECT (n = 37) were randomly assigned to receive M-Pharm/ECT (n = 19, 14 treatments) or M-Pharm (n = 18) for nine months. The subjects were followed up for 15 months. The main outcome was relapse of depression, defined as a score of 18 or more on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. At nine months, 35% of the subjects treated with M-Pharm/ECT relapsed as compared with 61% of the patients treated with M-Pharm. No statistically significant differences between groups were indicated by either Kaplan–Meier or Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. The subjects without psychotic features were at higher risk of relapse. There were no statistically significant differences in the MMSE scores of the two groups at the end of the study. Further studies are needed to better define the indications for M-ECT in order to improve its efficacy as a relapse prevention strategy.

Similar clinical improvement of depression using 0.5-ms and 1-ms pulse widths in bilateral electroconvulsive therapy

There is a lack of research regarding 0.5-ms pulse width (PW) in bilateral electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and number of treatment sessions between groups receiving 0.5-ms and 1-ms PW ECT. Ninety-four patients with unipolar major depression treated with acute bilateral ECT were analysed retrospectively, grouped as consecutive patients treated with 0.5-ms PW ECT (n = 47), and age- and sex-matched patients treated with 1-ms PW ECT. Clinical and ECT data were extracted from clinical records. Symptom evaluations and global cognitive screening at baseline and post-ECT were administered by trained psychiatrists. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS-21) was rated weekly. Efficacy and number of treatment sessions were compared between groups. PW was explored as a predictor of mean decrease in HDRS and number of treatment sessions by regression models. Group characteristics did not differ at baseline. The mean decrease in HDRS in the 0.5- and 1-ms PW [25.85 (7.79) vs. 24.33 (6.99), respectively], response (95.7% vs. 97.9%), remission (87.2% vs. 80.9%) and mean number of treatment sessions [11.28 (3.85) vs. 11.34 (3.36)] were not significantly different. Episode duration and severity, and previous ECT predicted HDRS decrease. Severity at baseline and the 6th session, the dosing method and the last ECT treatment dose predicted the number of treatment sessions needed. PW was not significant in the regressions models. The results suggest that both PWs perform similarly in bilateral ECT for depression, resulting in equivalent antidepressant efficacy and number of treatment sessions needed.

Early improvement as a predictor of final remission in major depressive disorder: New insights in electroconvulsive therapy

BACKGROUND

Early improvement to antidepressant drugs predicts remission, but the predictive value of early improvement to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is still unclear. The main aim of this study was to determine the optimal definition of early improvement in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) with ECT, by analyzing its value as a predictor of remission.

METHODS

A naturalistic study was conducted in 87 adult MDD patients treated with acute ECT. ROC curves were generated to identify the best time point (week 1 or 2 of treatment) predicted remission. Sensibility, specificity, and predictive values were calculated for several definitions of early improvement previously proposed in the literature (20%, 25%, 30%, and 35%). Complementary, time to remission was analyzed and a logistic regression model was performed to further characterize the impact of the optimal definition of early improvement on remission while adjusting for other clinically relevant variables.

RESULTS

A 30% reduction in the HAM-D score after 2 weeks was identified as the optimal definition of early improvement, with acceptable sensitivity (76%), and specificity (67%). Complementary analyses provided further support for this definition showing a shorter time to remission and a significant effect adjusted for the rest of variables.

LIMITATIONS

Relatively small sample size, ECT restricted to brief bilateral treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Early improvement, defined as a 30% of reduction in the HAM-D₂₁ score at week 2, is a good predictor of remission in MDD patients treated with bilateral ECT, with potential clinical impact. Lack of early improvement could indicate a need for further changes in treatment strategies.

The properties and utility of the CORE measure of melancholia

BACKGROUND

The CORE measure was designed to assess a central feature of melancholia - signs of psychomotor disturbance (PMD) - and so provide an alternate non-symptom based measure of melancholia or of its probability. This review evaluates development and application studies undertaken over the last 25 years to consider how well it has met its original objectives.

METHODS

All studies published using the CORE measure as either the only or an adjunctive measure of melancholia were obtained and are considered in this review.

RESULTS

Findings suggest high reliability in quantifying CORE scores can be achieved and that it has construct validity as a measure of PMD. A number of application studies assessing socio-demographic factors, cognitive and motor impairment, dexamethasone suppression and thyrotropin-releasing hormone, response to psychotherapy and to electroconvulsive therapy support its validity as a measure of melancholia, while functional brain imaging studies suggest that the measure identifies regions of decreased connectivity.

LIMITATIONS

Use of the CORE benefits from rater training and for subjects to be assessed at or near nadir of their depressive episode. There have been insufficient studies evaluating genetic factors, and the treatment response of CORE-defined melancholic patients to antidepressant drugs of differing classes.

CONCLUSIONS

The CORE, either as a proxy or direct measure of melancholia, provides a strategy for assigning depressed subjects a diagnosis or melancholic or non-melancholic depression or for estimating the probability of melancholia.