Attentional avoidance increases voice hearing in an analogue task in people with psychosis: An experimental study

Mindfulness for voices: An experimental analogue study of the effect of manipulating response style to simulated voices in a non-clinical population

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the effects of directly manipulating response style to simulated voice hearing on emotional and cognitive outcomes in a non-clinical population.

DESIGN

A between-subjects design with one independent variable, response style (with two levels: mindful acceptance vs attentional avoidance). The dependent variables were subjective distress and anxiety (primary outcomes) and performance on a sustained attention task (secondary outcomes).

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to one of two response styles (mindful acceptance vs. attentional avoidance). They completed a computerised attention task (continuous performance task) whilst listening to a simulation of voice hearing. Participants rated their experience of anxiety and distress before and after completing the sustained attention task which was used to measure their accuracy and response times.

RESULTS

One hundred and one participants took part (mindful acceptance (n = 54); attentional avoidance (n = 47)). There were no statistically significant group differences on post-test distress and anxiety scores, correct response rate or response times on the computerised attention task. Participants reported a range of different response styles along the spectrum of avoidance to acceptance, but this had no association with their assigned experimental condition. Adherence to task instructions was therefore low.

CONCLUSIONS

We are unable to conclude from this study whether experimentally inducing people to respond to voices under cognitively demanding conditions in an avoidant or accepting way has an impact on their emotional or cognitive outcomes. Further research should focus on the development of more robust and reliable procedures for inducing differences in response style under experimental conditions.

A Systematic Review of the experimental induction of auditory perceptual experiences

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Voice-hearing exists on a continuum and research studies have utilised experimental paradigms in an attempt to induce unusual auditory experiences in clinical and non-clinical samples. The aim of the current review was to systematically identify, review and appraise voice-hearing induction paradigms in order to guide researchers.

METHODS

Five databases were searched for studies in which an experimental manipulation was used with the aim of inducing an auditory experience akin to voice-hearing. Papers were assessed for quality and the voice-hearing paradigms critically appraised.

RESULTS

Forty-nine studies, included in 41 papers, were reviewed. Studies were organised into five groups based on the type of voice-hearing paradigm used: sensory deprivation/limitation; hallucination suggestion; combined suggestion and ambiguous stimulus; signal detection and voice detection tasks; and auditory discrimination/transformation. Signal and voice detection tasks were found to be the most robust paradigms. The quality of paradigms was assessed, and their strengths and limitations evaluated, including evidence in relation to their utility, ecological validity and usability.

LIMITATIONS

The current review excluded case studies, grey literature and studies which were not written in the English language, and as such voice-hearing paradigms may have been missed.

CONCLUSIONS

Voice-hearing paradigms vary in their ecological validity and experimental robustness. A challenge for future research is to develop a paradigm in which internally generated material can be attributed externally in a way that more closely represents inner speech and the experience of voice-hearing.

The effect of rumination and distraction on auditory hallucinatory experiences: An analogue experimental study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The cognitive model of voices suggests that negative appraisals of hallucinatory experiences result in responses, such as rumination, which maintain voice-hearing. Our principal aim was to investigate the effect of rumination on the frequency of voice-hearing.

METHODS

A two-group randomised experimental design was employed using a non-clinical sample. A total of 106 participants completed baseline measures of trait rumination, hallucination-proneness, mood and state negative affect, and were presented with a voice-hearing paradigm. False feedback designed to cause a negative interpretation of auditory intrusions was provided and participants were randomly allocated to either a distraction or rumination condition. Participants performed the auditory task for a second time, and the total number of false alarms and distress scores were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A Mann-Whitney U test revealed that the manipulation of rumination was successful (p = 0.007). We did not detect a statistically significant difference between the distraction and rumination groups for total false alarms (p = 0.282) or distress (p = 0.387) scores.

LIMITATIONS

Findings largely relate to a female undergraduate psychology sample.

CONCLUSION

Results of this non-clinical study do not support the hypothesis that rumination leads to an increase in the frequency of voice-hearing on a laboratory task.

Clinical and theoretical relevance of responses to analogues of psychotic experiences in people with psychotic experiences with and without a need-for-care: an experimental study

BACKGROUND

Certain ways of responding to psychotic experiences (PEs) appear more commonly associated with clinical distress (e.g. avoidance) and other ways with benign or positive outcomes (e.g. reappraisal and acceptance). Past research has largely been limited to retrospective self-report. We aimed to compare clinical and non-clinical individuals on experimental analogues of anomalous experiences.

METHOD

Response styles of two groups with persistent PEs (clinical n = 84; non-clinical n = 92) and a control group without PEs (n = 83) were compared following experimental analogues of thought interference (Cards Task, Telepath) and hearing voices (Virtual Acoustic Space Paradigm).

RESULTS

The non-clinical group with PEs were less likely to endorse unhelpful response styles, such as passive responding or attempts to avoid, suppress, worry about or control mental experiences, compared with the clinical group on all three tasks. The clinical group were more likely to endorse unhelpful response styles compared with controls on two out of three tasks (Cards Task and Telepath). The non-clinical group performed similarly to controls on unhelpful responding across all tasks. There were no group differences for helpful response styles, such as cognitive reappraisal or mindful acceptance of experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

In line with cognitive models of psychosis, the findings suggest that the way in which individuals respond to unusual experiences may be an important factor in understanding clinical distress, supporting the therapeutic rationale of targeting potentially unhelpful patterns of response.