The structure of depressive symptoms and characteristics and their relation to overall severity in major depressive disorder

Nos1+ and Nos1- excitatory neurons in the BLA regulate anxiety- and depression-related behaviors oppositely

BACKGROUND

The basolateral amygdala (BLA) neurons are primarily glutamatergic and have been associated with emotion regulation. However, little is known about the roles of BLA neurons expressing neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS, Nos1) in the regulation of emotional behaviors.

METHODS

Using Nos1-cre mice and chemogenetic and optogenetic manipulations, we specifically silenced or activated Nos1⁺ or Nos1^- neurons in the BLA, or silenced their projections to the anterdorsal bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (adBNST) and ventral hippocampus (vHPC). We measured anxiety behaviors in elevated plus maze (EPM) and open-field test (OFT), and measured depression behaviors in forced swimming test (FST) and tail suspension test (TST).

RESULTS

BLA Nos1⁺ neurons were predominantly glutamatergic, and glutamatergic but not GABAergic Nos1⁺ neurons were involved in controlling anxiety- and depression-related behaviors. Interestingly, by selectively manipulating the activities of BLA Nos1⁺ and Nos1^- excitatory neurons, we found that they had opposing effects on anxiety- and depression-related behaviors. BLA Nos1⁺ excitatory neurons projected to the adBNST, this BLA-adBNST circuit controlled the expression of anxiety- and depression-related behaviors, while BLA Nos1^- excitatory neurons projected to vHPC, this BLA-vHPC circuit contributed to the expression of anxiety- and depression-related behaviors. Moreover, excitatory vHPC-adBNST circuit antagonized the role of BLA-adBNST circuit in regulating anxiety- and depression-related behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

BLA Nos1⁺ and Nos1^- excitatory neuron subpopulations exert different effects on anxiety- and depression-related behaviors through distinct projection circuits, providing a new insight of BLA excitatory neurons in emotional regulation.

LIMITATIONS

We did not perform retrograde labeling from adBNST and vHPC regions.

Investigating genetic variants for treatment response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in syndromal factors and side effects among patients with depression in Taiwanese Han population

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with high heterogeneity in clinical presentation. In addition, response to treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) varies considerably among patients. Therefore, identifying genetic variants that may contribute to SSRI treatment responses in MDD is essential. In this study, we analyzed the syndromal factor structures of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in 479 patients with MDD by using exploratory factor analysis. All patients were followed up biweekly for 8 weeks. Treatment response was defined for all syndromal factors and total scores. In addition, a genome-wide association study was performed to investigate the treatment outcomes at week 4 and repeatedly assess all visits during follow-up by using mixed models adjusted for age, gender, and population substructure. Moreover, the role of genetic variants in suicidal and sexual side effects was explored, and five syndromal factors for depression were derived: core, insomnia, somatic anxiety, psychomotor-insight, and anorexia. Subsequently, several known genes were mapped to suggestive signals for treatment outcomes, including single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in PRF1, UTP20, MGAM, and ENSG00000286536 for psychomotor-insight and in C4orf51 for anorexia. In total, 33 independent SNPs for treatment responses were tested in a mixed model, 12 of which demonstrated a p value <0.05. The most significant SNP was rs2182717 in the ENSR00000803469 gene located on chromosome 6 for the core syndromal factor (β = -0.638, p = 1.8 × 10^-4) in terms of symptom improvement over time. Patients with a GG or GA genotype with the rs2182717 SNP also exhibited a treatment response (β = 0.089, p = 2.0 × 10^-6) at week 4. Moreover, rs1836075352 was associated with sexual side effects (p = 3.2 × 10^-8). Pathway and network analyses using the identified SNPs revealed potential biological functions involved in treatment response, such as neurodevelopment-related functions and immune processes. In conclusion, we identified loci that may affect the clinical response to treatment with antidepressants in the context of empirically defined depressive syndromal factors and side effects among the Taiwanese Han population, thus providing novel biological targets for further investigation.

Sex differences in the association between symptom profiles and cognitive functioning in patients with depressive disorder

OBJECTIVE

Depressive disorder (DD) is a heterogeneous disease with sex differences in symptom profiles and cognitive performance. However, sex differences in cognitive dysfunction associated with different symptom profiles have received little systematic study. This study aimed to explore the association between clinical symptoms and cognitive deficits in patients with DD.

METHODS

A cohort of 222 hospitalized patients with DD (males/females = 114/108) and 173 healthy controls (males/females = 80/93) were enrolled. Cognitive function was measured using a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Depression was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17). According to different genders, the relationship between symptom profiles and cognitive deficits was identified using partial correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with DD performed significantly worse than healthy controls in all cognitive domains investigated (all p < 0.05). Remarkably, female patients scored better than male patients on information processing speed (p < 0.05). Multivariate regression analyses showed that the retardation factor score was independently associated with attention and cognitive flexibility, and the sleep disturbance factor score was independently associated with information processing speed in male patients. Furthermore, the anxiety/somatization factor score was independently associated with working memory in female patients.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, we showed that significant sex differences in the association between symptom profiles and cognitive impairment are present in DD patients. Understanding how DD patients' clinical features and cognitive performance are linked from a sex perspective may have clinical implications for predicting and interfering with the outcome of depression.