Psychological training to improve psychosocial function in patients with major depressive disorder: A randomised clinical trial

Epigenetic modification related to cognitive changes during a cognitive training intervention in depression

BACKGROUND

DNA methylation as a biomarker is well suited to investigate dynamic processes, such as symptom improvement. For this study we focus on epigenomic state or trait markers as early signatures of cognitive improvement in individuals receiving a cognitive intervention. We performed a first epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) on patients with cognitive dysfunction in depression comparing those with vs without cognitive dysfunction and those cognitively improving vs non-improving following a cognitive intervention.

METHOD

Data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) were used for this analysis, where cognitive function of 112 patients randomly assigned to a personalized cognitive intervention was compared to standard cognitive treatment. Cognition was measured for this study using the four cognitive tasks from the THINC-it battery. We compared individuals with cognitive impairment with individuals without cognitive impairment at baseline and after a cognitive intervention of 8 weeks. Blood for DNA methylation analysis (Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC 850 k BeadChip) was collected at baseline and 8 weeks into the treatment. For the baseline analysis, after quality control, the final sample comprised 90 individuals, and analyses at week 8 were performed on 84 individuals. Data cleaning, quality control, and differential methylation analysis of DNA methylation data was performed using the RnBeads package (R). Analyses were corrected for gender, age, depression score (MADRS), reported years of education, height and weight, as well as surrogate variables estimated by the pipeline used. The within-individual paired longitudinal analysis was performed using Welch's t-test.

RESULTS

Analyses at baseline and at week 8 did not show any genome-wide significant CpGs (p < 5 × 10-8) comparing patients with and without cognitive impairment. The most significant result in the baseline analysis comparing the groups with and without cognitive impairment at baseline is located in an open Sea region with predominantly regulatory qualities (cg10962945; 6.61 × 10-7). The most significant CpG at 8 weeks was also located in open sea, though in exon 13 of the NTRK2-gene, linked to the BDNF pathway (cg13620631, 5.56 × 10-7). Finally, a within-individual paired longitudinal analysis with only patients that show improved cognitive function over time was performed, showing 65 CpGs that overlapped between the 1% most significant of this analysis and the 1% most significant CpGs from the cross-sectional analysis at 8 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Our result suggest that DNA methylation can be suitable to capture early signs of treatment response of a cognitive intervention in depression. In our layered approach we could capture dynamics that can help differentiate between biological trait and state markers of cognitive function in depression. Despite not being genome-wide significant, the CpG locations returned by our analysis comparing patients with and without cognitive impairment, are in line with prior knowledge on pathways and genes relevant for depression treatment and cognition.

Immune gene co-expression signatures implicated in occurence and persistence of cognitive dysfunction in depression

Cognitive dysfunction contributes significantly to the burden caused by Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Yet, while compelling evidence suggests that different biological processes play a part in both MDD aetiology and the development of cognitive decline more generally, we only begin to understand the molecular underpinnings of depression-related cognitive impairment. Developments in psychometric assessments, molecular high-throughput methods and systems biology derived analysis strategies advance this endeavour. Here, we aim to identify gene expression signatures associated with cognitive dysfunction and cognitive improvement following therapy using RNA sequencing to analyze the whole blood-derived transcriptome of altogether 101 MDD patients who enrolled in the CERT-D study. The mRNA(Nova)Seq based transcriptome was analyzed from whole blood taken at baseline assessment, and patients' cognitive performance was measured twice at baseline and following eight weeks of therapy by means of the THINC integrated tool. Thirty-six patients showed comparatively low cognitive performance at baseline assessment, and 32 patients showed comparatively strong cognitive improvement following therapy. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using limma to a significance threshold of 0.05 and a logFC cutoff of |1.2|. Although we observed some indications for expression differences related to low cognitive performance and cognitive therapy response, signals did not withstand adjustment for multiple testing. Applying WGCNA, we retrieved altogether 25 modules of co-expressed genes and we used a combination of correlational and linear analyses to identify modules related to baseline cognitive performance and cognitive improvement following therapy. Three immune modules reflected distinct but interrelated immune processes (the yellow module: neutrophil-mediated immunity, the darkorange module: interferon signaling, the tan module: platelet activation), and higher expression of the yellow (r = -0.21, p < .05), the dark orange (r = 0.2, p < .05), and the tan (r = -0.23, p < .05) module correlated significantly negatively with patients' cognitive baseline performance. Patients' cognitive baseline performance was a significant predictor of the darkorange module (b = -0.039, p < .05) and the tan module's expression (b = 0.02, p < .05) and was close to becoming a significant predictor of the yellow module's expression (b = -0.02, p = .05). Furthermore, patients characterized by comparatively low cognitive performance at baseline showed significantly higher expression of the tan module when compared to all other patients F(1,97) = 4.32, p < .05, η= 0.04. Following eight weeks of treatment, we observed altogether significant improvement in patients' cognitive performance (b = 0.30, p < .001), and patients with comparatively high cognitive gain showed noticeably lower, but not significantly lower F(1,98) = 3.76, p = .058, expression of a dark turquoise module, which reflects complement and B-cell-associated immune processes. Noteworthy, the relation between cognitive performance and module expression remained observable after controlling for symptom severity and BMI, which partly accounted for variance in module expression. As such, our findings provide further evidence for the involvement of immune processes in MDD related cognitive dysfunction and they suggest that different immune processes contribute to the development and long-term persistence of cognitive dysfunction in the context of depression.

Cognitive improvement in patients with major depressive disorder after personalised multi domain training in the CERT-D study

The CERT-D program offers a new treatment approach addressing disturbed cognitive and psychosocial functioning in major depressive disorder (MDD). The current analysis of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comprises two objectives: Firstly, evaluating the program's efficacy of a personalised versus standard treatment and secondly, assessing the treatment's persistence longitudinally. Participants (N = 112) were randomised into a personalised or standard treatment group. Both groups received 8 weeks of cognitive training, followed by a three-month follow-up without additional training. The type of personalised training was determined by pre-treatment impairments in the domains of cognition, emotion-processing and social-cognition. Standard training addressed all three domains equivalent. Performance in these domains was assessed repeatedly during RCT and follow-up. Treatment comparisons during the RCT-period showed benefits of personalised versus standard treatment in certain aspects of social-cognition. Conversely, no benefits in the remaining domains were found, contradicting a general advantage of personalisation. Exploratory follow-up analysis on persistence of the program's effects indicated sustained intervention outcomes across the entire sample. A subsequent comparison of clinical outcomes between personalised versus standard treatment over a three-month follow-up period showed similar results. First evidence suggests that existing therapies for MDD could benefit from an adjunct administration of the CERT-D program.

Effects of Exercise on Functional Recovery in Patients with Bipolar Depression: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Treatment of bipolar disorder is prone to prolongation despite various treatments, including medication. The efficacy of exercise treatment (i.e., interventions involving physical exercise and sports intervention) for major depressive disorders has been reported for depressive symptoms, cognitive function, and sleep disturbances. However, its efficacy for bipolar disorder has yet to be established. We designed a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial that includes 100 patients with bipolar disorder aged 20-65 years. This will be a cluster-randomized, two-group trial that will be conducted in ten psychiatric hospitals. The hospitals will be randomly assigned to an exercise intervention + treatment as usual (exercise) group or a placebo exercise intervention (stretching) + treatment as usual (control) group. Patients will be assessed using an extensive battery of clinical tests, physical parameters, sleep status, biological parameters (cytokines, neurotrophic factors), and genetic parameters (DNA and RNA) at baseline after a 6-week intervention period, at 10-week follow-up, and at 6-month follow-up. This innovative study may provide important evidence for the effectiveness of exercise in the treatment of bipolar depression based on clinical, biological, genetic, and physiological markers.

Longitudinal early epigenomic signatures inform molecular paths of therapy response and remission in depressed patients

Introduction

The etiology of major depressive disorder (MDD) involves the interaction between genes and environment, including treatment. Early molecular signatures for treatment response and remission are relevant in a context of personalized medicine and stratification and reduce the time-to-decision. Therefore, we focused the analyses on patients that responded or remitted following a cognitive intervention of 8 weeks.

Methods

We used data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with MDD patients (N = 112) receiving a cognitive intervention. At baseline and 8 weeks, blood for DNA methylation (Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC 850k BeadChip) was collected, as well as MADRS. First, responders (N = 24; MADRS-reduction of at least 50%) were compared with non-responders (N = 60). Then, we performed longitudinal within-individual analyses, for response (N = 21) and for remission (N = 18; MADRS smaller or equal to 9 and higher than 9 at baseline), respectively, as well as patients with no change in MADRS over time. At 8 weeks the sample comprised 84 individuals; 73 patients had DNA methylation for both time-points. The RnBeads package (R) was used for data cleaning, quality control, and differential DNA-methylation (limma). The within-individual paired longitudinal analysis was performed using Welch's t-test. Subsequently gene-ontology (GO) pathway analyses were performed.

Results

No CpG was genome-wide significant CpG (p < 5 × 10-8). The most significant CpG in the differential methylation analysis comparing response versus non-response was in the IQSEC1 gene (cg01601845; p = 1.53 × 10-6), linked to neurotransmission. The most significant GO-terms were linked to telomeres. The longitudinal response analysis returned 67 GO pathways with a p < 0.05. Two of the three most significant pathways were linked to sodium transport. The analysis for remission returned 46 GO terms with a p-value smaller than 0.05 with pathways linked to phosphatase regulation and synaptic functioning. The analysis with stable patients returned mainly GO-terms linked to basic cellular processes.

Discussion

Our result suggest that DNA methylation can be suitable to capture early signs of treatment response and remission following a cognitive intervention in depression. Despite not being genome-wide significant, the CpG locations and GO-terms returned by our analysis comparing patients with and without cognitive impairment, are in line with prior knowledge on pathways and genes relevant for depression treatment and cognition. Our analysis provides new hypotheses for the understanding of how treatment for depression can act through DNA methylation and induce response and remission.

Changes in depression domains as predictors of return to work in common mental disorders

BACKGROUND

Depression highly impairs function and reduces quality of life. Therefore, both symptomatic and functional recovery are important treatment goals. Depression consists of several cognitive, somatic, and affective symptom factors that differently affect function. However, it is unclear whether changes in these domains predict return to work (RTW) after treatment.

METHODS

Data were collected during treatment from patients on full or partial sick leave reporting depression symptoms (N = 300) at an out-patient clinic. Information on work status was assessed pre- and post-treatment and at 6 months follow-up. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate if residualized changes in symptom factors predicted full RTW, controlling for gender, education level, and age.

RESULTS

Changes (as symptom improvement) in the cognitive, somatic, and affective factor scores each significantly predicted full RTW post-treatment and at follow-up for patients on full and partial sick leave, even after controlling for gender, education level, and age. The change in the somatic factor explained the largest proportion of variance for full work post-treatment in patients on full sick-leave, while change in the cognitive factor explained most unique variance for patients on graded sick leave.

LIMITATIONS

The sample consisted of a majority of women with a relatively high level of education. This study should be replicated in more heterogeneous samples.

CONCLUSION

Changes in depression symptom domains are significant predictors for RTW work post-treatment. The change in the somatic factor explained the largest proportion of variance in patients on full sick leave and thus may particularly influence RTW after treatment.

No evidence for clinical efficacy of adjunctive celecoxib with vortioxetine in the treatment of depression: A 6-week double-blind placebo controlled randomized trial

Given the role of low-grade inflammation in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD), anti-inflammatory strategies may improve treatment outcomes in some patients. However, it is controversial whether they can be used as adjunctive treatments and whether pre-treatment levels of inflammation can predict treatment outcomes. This study was conducted to measure the efficacy of anti-inflammatory augmentation of antidepressant treatment in MDD patients; and to investigate whether treatment response was dependent on baseline inflammation levels. This parallel-group randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at the University of Adelaide (Australia). Participants with MDD were randomised to receive vortioxetine with celecoxib or vortioxetine with placebo for six weeks, and baseline blood high sensitivity C reactive protein levels were measured. Primary outcome was change in depressive symptoms (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) and secondary outcomes included change in cognition (THINC-integrated tool - Codebreaker task) and functioning (Functioning Assessment Short Test) over 6 weeks. There was no evidence of superior efficacy of celecoxib augmentation over placebo on depressive symptom severity, response and remission rates, cognition and psychosocial functioning. There was also no evidence that pre-treatment inflammation levels modified the effect of celecoxib augmentation versus placebo. This observed lack of efficacy of celecoxib add-on does not support the use of celecoxib augmentation of antidepressants in the treatment of MDD in a cohort that mostly comprises treatment-resistant individuals. Additionally, C-reactive protein may not be suitable to predict treatment selection and response in MDD. The study was registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617000527369 (www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000527369p).