1
|
Nachnani R, Knehans A, Neighbors JD, Kocis PT, Lee T, Tegeler K, Trite T, Raup-Konsavage WM, Vrana KE. Systematic review of drug-drug interactions of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol, and Cannabis. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1282831. [PMID: 38868665 PMCID: PMC11167383 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1282831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The recent exponential increase in legalized medical and recreational cannabis, development of medical cannabis programs, and production of unregulated over-the-counter products (e.g., cannabidiol (CBD) oil, and delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-8-THC)), has the potential to create unintended health consequences. The major cannabinoids (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol) are metabolized by the same cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes that metabolize most prescription medications and xenobiotics (CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C19). As a result, we predict that there will be instances of drug-drug interactions and the potential for adverse outcomes, especially for prescription medications with a narrow therapeutic index. Methods We conducted a systematic review of all years to 2023 to identify real world reports of documented cannabinoid interactions with prescription medications. We limited our search to a set list of medications with predicted narrow therapeutic indices that may produce unintended adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Our team screened 4,600 reports and selected 151 full-text articles to assess for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Our investigation revealed 31 reports for which cannabinoids altered pharmacokinetics and/or produced adverse events. These reports involved 16 different Narrow Therapeutic Index (NTI) medications, under six drug classes, 889 individual subjects and 603 cannabis/cannabinoid users. Interactions between cannabis/cannabinoids and warfarin, valproate, tacrolimus, and sirolimus were the most widely reported and may pose the greatest risk to patients. Common ADRs included bleeding risk, altered mental status, difficulty inducing anesthesia, and gastrointestinal distress. Additionally, we identified 18 instances (58%) in which clinicians uncovered an unexpected serum level of the prescribed drug. The quality of pharmacokinetic evidence for each report was assessed using an internally developed ten-point scale. Conclusion Drug-drug interactions with cannabinoids are likely amongst prescription medications that use common CYP450 systems. Our findings highlight the need for healthcare providers and patients/care-givers to openly communicate about cannabis/cannabinoid use to prevent unintended adverse events. To that end, we have developed a free online tool (www.CANN-DIR.psu.edu) to help identify potential cannabinoid drug-drug interactions with prescription medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Nachnani
- Department of Pharmacology, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States
| | - Amy Knehans
- Department of Library, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States
| | - Jeffrey D. Neighbors
- Department of Pharmacology, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States
| | - Paul T. Kocis
- Department of Pharmacology, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States
- Department of Pharmacy, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States
| | - Tzuo Lee
- PA Options for Wellness, Harrisburg, PA, United States
| | - Kayla Tegeler
- PA Options for Wellness, Harrisburg, PA, United States
| | - Thomas Trite
- PA Options for Wellness, Harrisburg, PA, United States
| | - Wesley M. Raup-Konsavage
- Department of Pharmacology, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States
| | - Kent E. Vrana
- Department of Pharmacology, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Winder GS, Clifton EG, Mellinger JL. Substance use disorders in organ transplantation: perennial challenges and interprofessional opportunities. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2022; 27:495-500. [PMID: 36170560 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The current article examines recent publications regarding ongoing clinical and ethical challenges and opportunities related to substance use disorders (SUD) in solid organ transplantation (SOT) utilizing a lens of interprofessional clinical models and care delivery. RECENT FINDINGS Innovative interprofessional clinician skillsets and care models are increasingly emphasized in the SOT literature as the standard of care for common, complex psychosocial problems like substance use and SUD. Cannabinoids are common among candidates and recipients and present several unique quandaries to SOT teams. Opioid use disorder treatment can often be definitively treated with medications that SOT teams may find unfamiliar, controversial, or aversive. Arguably the quintessential example of SUD in SOT, early liver transplantation for patients with alcohol-related liver disease and short periods of sobriety has become increasingly common and accepted in recent years requiring liver teams to rapidly acquire significant interprofessional psychiatric awareness and expertise. The question of retransplantation in patients who have experienced recurrent SUD remains unsettled. SUMMARY Regardless of substances used or organs transplanted, interprofessional care continues to emerge as a foundational aspect of clinical care and research in SOT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerald S Winder
- Department of Psychiatry
- Department of Surgery
- Department of Neurology
| | | | - Jessica L Mellinger
- Department of Psychiatry
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Graham M, Martin J, Lucas C, Murnion B, Schneider J. Cannabidiol drug interaction considerations for prescribers and pharmacists. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2022; 15:1383-1397. [DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2142114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Myfanwy Graham
- Australian Centre for Cannabinoid Clinical and Research Excellence, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Drug Repurposing & Medicines Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer Martin
- Australian Centre for Cannabinoid Clinical and Research Excellence, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Drug Repurposing & Medicines Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Catherine Lucas
- Australian Centre for Cannabinoid Clinical and Research Excellence, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Drug Repurposing & Medicines Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bridin Murnion
- Discipline of Addiction Medicine, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer Schneider
- Australian Centre for Cannabinoid Clinical and Research Excellence, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Drug Repurposing & Medicines Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Winder GS, Andrews SR, Banerjee AG, Hussain F, Ivkovic A, Kuntz K, Omary L, Shenoy A, Thant T, VandenBerg A, Zimbrean P. Cannabinoids and solid organ transplantation: Psychiatric perspectives and recommendations. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2022; 36:100715. [PMID: 35853383 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2022.100715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Cannabinoid use in patients seeking solid organ transplantation (SOT) is an important and unsettled matter which all transplantation clinicians regularly encounter. It is also a multifaceted, interprofessional issue, difficult for any specialty alone to adequately address in a research article or during clinical care. Such uncertainty lends itself to bias for or against cannabinoid use accompanied by inconsistent policies and procedures. Scientific literature in SOT regarding cannabinoids often narrowly examines the issue and exists mostly in liver and kidney transplantation. Published recommendations from professional societies are mosaics of vagueness and specificity mirroring the ongoing dilemma. The cannabinoid information SOT clinicians need for clinical care may require data and perspectives from diverse medical literature which are rarely synthesized. SOT teams may not be adequately staffed or trained to address various neuropsychiatric cannabinoid effects and risks in patients. In this article, authors from US transplantation centers conduct a systematized review of the few existing studies regarding clinician perceptions, use rates, and clinical impact of cannabinoid use in SOT patients; collate representative professional society guidance on the topic; draw from diverse medical literature bases to detail facets of cannabinoid use in psychiatry and addiction pertinent to all transplantation clinicians; provide basic clinical and policy recommendations; and indicate areas of future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah R Andrews
- Johns Hopkins Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Filza Hussain
- Stanford University Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Ana Ivkovic
- Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Psychiatry, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kristin Kuntz
- Ohio State University Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Lesley Omary
- Vanderbilt University Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Akhil Shenoy
- Columbia University Department of Psychiatry, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Thida Thant
- University of Colorado Department of Psychiatry, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Amy VandenBerg
- University of Michigan Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Paula Zimbrean
- Yale University Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gitau K, Howe HS, Ginsberg L, Perl J, Ailon J. Therapeutic Cannabis Use in Kidney Disease: A Survey of Canadian Nephrologists. Kidney Med 2022; 4:100453. [PMID: 35518836 PMCID: PMC9065896 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Cannabis use may be helpful for symptom management in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Knowledge, attitudes, and comfort with use of medical cannabis among kidney care providers may be limiting more widespread evaluation and use. We surveyed Canadian nephrologists regarding current prescribing habits, attitudes, and overall comfort level with cannabis products. Study Design We carried out a nationwide, mail-in survey focused on capturing general and practice demographics, current cannabis prescribing status, and knowledge and attitudes regarding therapeutic cannabis use in patients with CKD. Setting & Population This survey was distributed to every registered nephrologist in Canada. Analytical Approach The results of this survey are reported descriptively. Results Responses were received from 208 of 723 (29%) nephrologists. Only 21 (10.1%) respondents currently prescribe cannabis, with chronic pain syndromes being the most frequent reason for cannabis prescription (95.2%). Overall, 116 (55.5%) participants reported that changes in legality of cannabis did not influence their decision to prescribe cannabis. The majority of respondents (n = 123; 59%) indicated that they were uncomfortable with their knowledge of the medical cannabis literature. Most respondents (n=188; 91%) indicated that further studies exploring the efficacy and safety of cannabis would likely influence their prescribing habits. Limitations Limitations of this study include possible nonresponse bias and a lack of specific data on practice considerations for specific subpopulations, such as transplant patients. Conclusions Only a small minority of Canadian nephrologists currently prescribe cannabis, with relatively little practice change after legalization. There is broad support amongst Canadian nephrologists for encouraging their patients to enroll in efficacy/safety studies of cannabis in the CKD population. Ultimately, given limited therapeutic options available for symptom control in CKD, this survey demonstrates the potential for nationwide practice change if cannabis efficacy and safety can be demonstrated in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Gitau
- Division of General Internal Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Holly S. Howe
- Department of Marketing, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lydia Ginsberg
- Division of Internal Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Perl
- Division of Nephrology, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Keenan Research Center in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jonathan Ailon
- Division of General Internal Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jowsey-Gregoire S, Jannetto PJ, Jesse MT, Fleming J, Winder GS, Balliet W, Kuntz K, Vasquez A, Weinland S, Hussain F, Weinrieb R, Fireman M, Nickels MW, Peipert JD, Thomas C, Zimbrean PC. Substance use screening in transplant populations: Recommendations from a consensus workgroup. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2022; 36:100694. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2022.100694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
7
|
Zhou F, Costa AF, McLeod M. Late presentation of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome following liver transplantation in the setting of tacrolimus and cannabis use. CANADIAN LIVER JOURNAL 2022; 5:91-95. [PMID: 35990782 PMCID: PMC9231424 DOI: 10.3138/canlivj-2021-0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
A 45-year-old female presented to hospital with confusion and visual disturbances. She had undergone a liver transplant 3 years prior for cirrhosis secondary to primary biliary cholangitis. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed features consistent with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Her medications included tacrolimus, sirolimus, and prednisone. She reported smoking 4 grams of cannabis per day. Following cessation of tacrolimus, the patient's encephalopathy and visual disturbances resolved. To our knowledge, this case represents the longest time elapsed from liver transplantation to the development of tacrolimus-associated posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in the literature. This case highlights the potential danger of cannabis use in transplant recipients who are on immunosuppressants such as tacrolimus. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in post-transplant patients presenting with altered mental status, even years after liver transplantation, and be familiar with potential interactions between cannabis and immunosuppressants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Zhou
- Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Andreu F Costa
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Magnus McLeod
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yan K, Forman L. Cannabinoid Use Among Liver Transplant Recipients. Liver Transpl 2021; 27:1623-1632. [PMID: 34018308 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The effect of cannabinoids on liver transplant outcomes is an area of active research. We aimed to investigate marijuana (MJ) and cannabidiol (CBD) use among liver transplant recipients at the University of Colorado Hospital (UCH), specifically prevalence, habits, and predictors of use. Liver transplant recipients followed at UCH with valid email addresses were sent an informed consent postcard and survey invitation. This exploratory survey was conducted using REDCap. IBM SPSS Statistics software was used for statistical analysis. Of 1227 recipients who were sent surveys, 538 people responded. On average, respondents were 59 years old, with 63.7% male and 81.7% White. Hepatitis C virus (HCV; 30.4%) and alcohol use (17.7%) were the most common etiologies of liver disease. Among respondents, 23.8% reported current MJ use. Methods of use included smoking (72.4%), ingestion (55.3%), and vaporization (31.7%). Top reasons for MJ use were recreation (56.5%), anxiety (54.8%), and pain (53.2%). Among respondents, 21.0% currently used CBD, usually in the form of creams or lotions (58.9%) and to relieve pain (84.9%) and anxiety (31.1%). In multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio [OR], 0.941; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.923-0.959; P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR, 0.357; 95% CI, 0.171-0.746; P = 0.01), HCV cirrhosis (OR, 3.949; 95% CI, 2.281-6.835; P < 0.001), alcohol-related cirrhosis (OR, 2.101; 95% CI, 1.202-3.671; P = 0.01), and current tobacco use (OR, 2.918; 95% CI, 1.065-7.990; P = 0.04) were significant predictors of MJ use. Our study shows that cannabinoid use after liver transplant is common. MJ use is associated with decreasing age, alcohol-related and HCV cirrhosis, and tobacco use. Anxiety, pain, and recreation were top reasons for its use. Transplant teams should address reasons why their patients use MJ and CBD and develop programs to mitigate anxiety and pain after transplant. Further studies are needed to examine effects of cannabinoids on liver transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Yan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Lisa Forman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Likhitsup A, Saeed N, Winder GS, Hassan A, Sonnenday CJ, Fontana RJ. Marijuana use among adult liver transplant candidates and recipients. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14312. [PMID: 33829569 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data regarding marijuana (MJ) use among liver transplant (LT) candidates are limited. We set out to determine the incidence and pre- and post-LT outcomes of adult LT candidates with a self-reported history of MJ use. METHODS Baseline clinical characteristics, waitlist, and post-LT outcomes of adult LT candidates from January 2010 to March 2017 were compared. RESULTS Among 2690 LT candidates, 630(23%) and 298(11%) reported a history of MJ use and use within the past 12 months, respectively. Although the proportion of MJ users increased over time(β = .76, p = .03), the proportion listed and transplanted did not change. Listing for LT increased with male (OR 1.24, 95% CI 11.01-1.52), MELD score (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15), HCC (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.39-2.41) but decreased among MJ users (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.91, p = .01). The median time to listing was longer among MJ users compared to non-users (115 vs. 87 days, p < .0005). Post-LT survival was similar in 83 MJ users and 306 non-users. CONCLUSION The proportion of MJ users among LT candidates is increasing. MJ users have a greater burden of psychosocial issues which may contribute to longer evaluations and lower rate of LT listing. Post-LT survival was not impacted by self-reported MJ use history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alisa Likhitsup
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Naba Saeed
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Gerald Scott Winder
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ammar Hassan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Robert J Fontana
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cannabis (marijuana, weed, pot, ganja, Mary Jane) is the most commonly used federally illicit drug in the United States. The present review provides an overview of cannabis and cannabinoids with relevance to the practice of nephrology so that clinicians can best take care of patients. RECENT FINDINGS Cannabis may have medicinal benefits for treating symptoms of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease including as a pain adjuvant potentially reducing the need for opioids. Cannabis does not seem to affect kidney function in healthy individuals. However, renal function should be closely monitored in those with CKD, the lowest effective dose should be used, and smoking should be avoided. Cannabis use may delay transplant candidate listing or contribute to ineligibility. Cannabidiol (CBD) has recently exploded in popularity. Although generally well tolerated, safe without significant side effects, and effective for a variety of neurological and psychiatric conditions, consumers have easy access to a wide range of unregulated CBD products, some with inaccurate labeling and false health claims. Importantly, CBD may raise tacrolimus levels. SUMMARY Patients and healthcare professionals have little guidance or evidence regarding the impact of cannabis use on people with kidney disease. This knowledge gap will remain as long as federal regulations remain prohibitively restrictive towards prospective research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua L Rein
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|