Symptoms of anxiety and depression in type 2 diabetes: Associations with clinical diabetes measures and self-management outcomes in the norwegian HUNT study

Validation of Chinese version of the 5-item WHO well-being index in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

BACKGROUND

For better disease management and improved prognosis, early identification of co-morbid depression in diabetic patients is warranted. the WHO-5 well-being index (WHO-5) has been used to screen for depression in diabetic patients, and its Chinese version (WHO-5-C) has been validated. However, its psychometric properties remain to be further validated in the type 2 diabetes patient population. The aim of our study was to examine the reliability and validity of the WHO-5-C in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study was conducted on 200 patients from July 2014 to March 2015. All patients should complete the WHO-5-C, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the 20-item Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID-20), the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I), and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Internal consistency of WHO-5 was revealed by Cronbach's alpha, and constructive validity by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Relationship with PHQ-9, HAM-D, and PAID-20 was examined for concurrent validity, and ROC analysis was performed for criterion validity.

RESULTS

The WHO-5-C presented satisfactory reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88). CFA confirmed the unidimensional factor structure of WHO-5-C. The WHO-5-C had significant negative correlation with HAM-D (r = -0.610), PHQ-9 (r = -0.694) and PAID-20 (r = -0.466), confirming good concurrent validity. Using M.I.N.I as the gold standard, the cut-off value of WHO-5-C was 42, with a sensitivity of 0.83 and specificity of 0.75.

CONCLUSION

The WHO-5-C holds satisfactory reliability and validity that is suitable for depression screening in type 2 diabetes patients as a short and convenient instrument.

Anxiety and depression in diabetes care: longitudinal associations with health-related quality of life

Anxiety and depression are commonly found in patients with diabetes, but little is known about how the anxiety and depression symptoms of diabetes patients and the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over time influence each other. Therefore, we conducted a survey among patients with diabetes (T1) and repeated the survey after 3 months (T2). Linear regression models and cross-lagged structural equation models were used to analyze the associations between anxiety and depression symptoms and HRQoL within and across time intervals. Correcting for baseline index and potential confounders, the HRQoL index at T2 reflected the change in anxiety/depression between T1 and T2 more than anxiety/depression at T1 (P < 0.05). Similarly, anxiety and depression at T2 reflected the change in the EQ-5D index over time more than the index at baseline (P < 0.05). Our longitudinal data fitted well in a cross-lagged model with bi-directional pathways of associations between anxiety and HRQoL, as well as depression and HRQoL, among adult patients with diabetes (x²/df = 1.102, P = 0.256; CFI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.030). Our findings support early detection of anxiety and depression, as well as comprehensive efforts improving HRQoL for patients with diabetes.

Depression predicts the risk of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Depression is correlated with poor prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The goal of this meta-analysis was to assess the influence of depression on the risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Cohort studies were obtained by searching PubMed and Embase databases. Cohort studies regarding the association between depression and risks of MACEs and mortality after PCI were included. Heterogeneity was determined using the Cochrane's Q test and calculated using I². A fixed-effect model was used if no significant heterogeneity was detected; otherwise a random-effect model was applied. The adjusted risk ratio [RR] for the incidences of MACEs and all-cause mortality in patients with depression were compared to those without depression.

RESULTS

Nine cohorts including 4,555 CAD patients who underwent PCI were included in this meta-analysis, and 1,108 of these patients were diagnosed with depression. There were no significant differences among studies evaluating MACEs and mortality risks (I² = 25% and 0%, respectively). Pooled results showed that depression was associated with higher risk of MACEs (RR: 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.59 to 2.77, p <  0.001) and all-cause mortality (RR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.45 to 2.13, p < 0.001) during follow-up after PCI.

LIMITATIONS

Available full text peer reviewed studies were limited and only studies in English were included in this analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Depressive symptoms were independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients who received PCI. Psychological therapy that does not increase cardiac burden or induce pharmacological side effects may be a better strategy to treat depression associated with PCI.