Corroborative evidence for an association between initial hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis reactivity and subsequent habituation in humans

Exploration of possible sex bias in acute social stress research: a semi-systematic review

Stress can have a significant impact on the daily lives of individuals and can increase vulnerability to a number of medical conditions. This study aims to estimate the ratio of male to female participants in acute social stress research in healthy individuals. We examined original research articles published over the last 20 years. Each article was screened to determine the total number of female and male participants. We extracted data from 124 articles involving a total of 9539 participants. A total of 4221 (44.2%) participants were female, 5056 (53.0%) were male and 262 (2.7%) were unreported. Articles incorporating only females were significantly underrepresented compared to articles incorporating only males. Forty articles (63.5%) which presented data from both females and males, failed to analyse and interpret the results by sex, a significant methodological limitation. In conclusion, in the literature published over the last 20 years, female participants are significantly underrepresented. In the studies where females are represented, severe methodological limitations are apparent. Researchers should be conscious of sexual dimorphism, menstrual phase and use of hormonal contraception, which may impact the interpretation of their results.

Effect of childhood maltreatment on cardiovascular response habitation to repeated psychosocial stress

Childhood maltreatment as an early-life stress leads to cardiovascular stress response dysregulation manifested by either exaggerated or blunted stress responses. However, little is known how childhood maltreatment affects cardiovascular response habituation to recurrent stress, which implicated in the long-term health effects of chronic stress. The scale of Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) was administered to 192 healthy undergraduates who underwent continuous cardiovascular monitoring [heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), cardiac output (CO) and total peripheral resistance (TPR)] while facing two consecutive psychosocial stress exposures (public speaking tasks). Results showed that childhood maltreatment was negatively associated with HR and CO reactivity to the first stress exposure and HR reactivity to the second stress exposure. Even after controlling for depression symptoms, both high and low childhood maltreatment groups (upper and lower 27% of total CTQ scores) exhibited HR and CO response habituation to repeated stress exposures, but high childhood maltreatment group showed blunted HR and CO reactivity to the first stress exposure compared with low childhood maltreatment group. These findings suggest that the observed cardiovascular response habituation to repeated stress following initial blunted (i.e., inadequate) reactivity among individuals with high childhood maltreated experiences might be maladaptive, which would lead to cardiovascular disease risk.

Stability and test-retest reliability of different hormonal stress markers upon exposure to psychosocial stress at a 4-month interval

The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) has been shown to reliably induce physiological stress responses in the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and in the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axis in cross-sectional studies. However, it was also reported that repeated exposure to the TSST might be associated with habituation, mainly of the HPA axis responsivity. Thus, in all longitudinal stress studies involving repeated TSST administration, potential habituation of the HPA axis response complicates the interpretation of results. The goal of the present study was therefore to assess stability and test-retest reliability of a number of different endocrinological stress markers as well as subjective stress responses after two exposures to the TSST four months apart. We assessed salivary and plasma cortisol profiles, plasma ACTH and noradrenaline profiles, as well as subjective stress ratings in healthy volunteers before, during, and after the TSST at six time-points both at test-day 1 (TSST_1, n = 42) and test-day 2 (TSST_2, n = 34) 4-months later. Half of the participants received the TSST in the early, the other half in the late afternoon. Discontinuous growth models were applied to model three phases of the stress response (preTSST, reactivity, recovery) for each marker. Subsequently, the stability of these phases was analyzed. Stability and test-retest reliability of standard physiological stress markers such as Area-under-the-Curve (AUC_G, AUC_I), Absolute Peak Change, and Relative Peak Change (RPC) were analyzed as well. We did not observe strong test-retest effects in any of the endocrinological measures. In contrast, test-retest effects in subjective stress were characterized by a faster drop directly after the second TSST, whereas the initial increase before the test period was the same for both test-days. Regarding test-retest-reliability, AUC_G was the most reliable measure across all endocrinological and subjective stress markers (range: r = .606 to .858), while AUC_I and RPC (range: r = - .146 to .548) were least reliable. A 4-month interval is a sufficient time interval between two repeated TSST exposures to largely reinstate the physiological stress response, which was also true for the initial psychological stress response. Thus, the TSST is well applicable in longitudinal studies.