Sinha A, Kar S, Chauhan C, Yadav CP, Kori L. Meta-analysis on Plasmodium falciparum sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance-conferring mutations in India identifies hot spots for genetic surveillance.
Int J Antimicrob Agents 2024;
63:107071. [PMID:
38154659 DOI:
10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.107071]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
India is on track to eliminate malaria by 2030 but emerging resistance to first-line antimalarials is a recognised threat. Two instances of rapid development, spread, and natural selection of drug-resistant mutant parasites in India (chloroquine across the country and artesunate + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine [AS+SP] in the northeastern states) translated into drug policy changes for Plasmodium falciparum malaria in 2010 and 2013, respectively. Considering these rapid changes in the SP drug resistance-conferring mutation profile of P. falciparum, there is a need to systematically monitor the validated mutations in Pfdhfr and Pfdhps genes across India alongside AS+SP therapeutic efficacy studies. There has been no robust, systematic countrywide surveillance reported for these parameters in India, hence the current study was undertaken.
METHODS
Studies that reported data on WHO-validated SP resistance markers in P. falciparum across India from 2008 to January 2023 were included. Five major databases, PubMedⓇ, Web of ScienceTM, ScopusⓇ, EmbaseⓇ, and Google Scholar, were exhaustively searched. Individual and pooled prevalence estimates of mutations were obtained through random- and fixed-effect models. Data were depicted using forest plots created with a 95% confidence interval. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021236012).
RESULTS
A total of 37 publications, and 533 Pfdhfr and 134 Pfdhps National Centre of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) DNA sequences were included from >4000 samples. The study included information from 80 districts, 21 states and 3 union territories (UTs) from India. The two PfDHFR mutations, C59R (62%) and S108N (74%), were the most prevalent mutations (pooled estimates 61% and 71%, respectively) and appeared to be stabilised/fixed. Although rarest overall, the prevalence of I164L was observed to be as high as 32%. The PfDHFR double mutants were the most prevalent overall (51%; pooled 42%). The prevalence of triple and quadruple mutations was 6% and 5%, respectively, and is an immediate concern for some states. The most prevalent PfDHPS mutation was A437G (39%), followed by K540E (25%) and A581G (12%). There was a low overall prevalence of PfDHFR/PfDHPS quintuple and sextuple mutations but surveillance for these mutations is critical for some areas.
CONCLUSION
The analyses span the two critical policy changes, highlight the areas of concern, and guide policymakers in strategising and refining the anti-malaria drug policy for malaria elimination. The results of the analyses also highlight the SP-resistance hot spots, critical gaps and challenges, and indicate that focal and local malaria genetic surveillance (including drug-resistance markers) is needed until malaria is successfully eliminated.
Collapse