The influence of pelvic rotation on clinical measurements of hip flexion and extension range of motion across sex and age

The Impact of Spinopelvic and Hip Mobility on Passive Hip Flexion Range of Motion Assessment

Background

Measuring passive hip flexion range of motion (ROM) is challenging due to compensatory movements. Despite the interest in using functional lateral radiographs for assessing hip mobility, the relationship with passive hip flexion ROM remains unclear. This study aims to elucidate this relationship and clarify spinopelvic parameters and mobility factors influencing variations in passive and radiographic hip flexion ROM.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 154 preoperative patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Passive and radiographic hip flexion ROM were assessed to clarify these relationships, and these differences were classified into 3 groups (O, A and U). Spinopelvic and hip parameters were assessed in standing, relaxed-seated and flexed-seated positions, as well as lumbar, pelvis, and hip mobility between each position to identify factors influencing differences.

Results

There was a moderate correlation between passive and radiographic hip flexion ROM (R2 = 0.48, P < .01). A significant difference was found in pelvic and hip alignment in the flexed-seated position between all groups. In postural changes, the O group, which had more patients with relatively low hip mobility, showed greater lumbar spine and pelvic movement, while the U group, which had more patients with relatively high hip mobility, showed less lumbar spine and pelvic movement.

Conclusions

This study confirmed that passive hip flexion ROM and radiographic hip flexion ROM correlate and that spinopelvic and hip alignment and mobility influence these differences. This result suggests that clinicians should consider lumbar and pelvic alignment and mobility in clinical practice to improve the accuracy of passive hip flexion ROM measurements.

Hip Range of Motion During Passive and 1-Leg Exercises Is Greater in Women: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To summarize sex-related differences in hip range of motion (ROM), including flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation, and external rotation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of 3 databases (PubMed, CINAHL [Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature], and Embase). The search terms were as follows: hip, pelvis, range of motion, kinematic, men, and women. Included studies reported sex-specific data on hip ROM in healthy, uninjured adults. To generate hip ROM mean differences, a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was used. Effect sizes were pooled for each exercise. Subgroup analyses compared hip ROM by physical activity group: passive ROM, 1-leg hop or jump, 2-leg hop or jump, 2-leg drop or landing, 1-leg squat, 2-leg squat, walking, and jogging/running. Positive effect sizes represent greater ROM in women.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies with 3,234 total subjects were included; of these subjects, 1,639 were women (50.1%). The mean age was 25.3 years. An effect difference was considered statistically significant if P < .05 and clinically significant if the mean difference was greater than 4.0°. Women showed statistically and clinically significantly greater hip flexion in passive ROM (mean difference, 6.4°) and during the 1-leg hop or jump exercise (mean difference, 6.5°). Women also showed statistically and clinically significantly greater hip adduction during the 1-leg hop or jump (mean difference, 4.5°) and 1-leg squat (mean difference, 4.4°) exercises, as well as statistically and clinically significantly greater hip internal rotation in passive ROM (mean difference, 8.2°). In contrast, men showed statistically and clinically significantly greater flexion during the 2-leg hop or jump exercise (mean difference, -9.1°). No clinically significant differences in extension, abduction, or external rotation were found between women and men.

CONCLUSIONS

On average, women showed statistically and clinically significantly greater flexion, adduction, and internal rotation during passive and 1-leg exercises whereas men showed statistically and clinically significantly greater flexion during the 2-leg hop or jump exercise.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, meta-analysis and systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

Measurement of the normal contralateral hip flexion angle and posterior pelvic tilt angle using a pelvic guide pin in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We aimed to measure the posterior pelvic tilt angle at maximum hip flexion and hip flexion range of motion at the femoroacetabular joint using a pelvic guide pin and to examine the difference in flexion range of motion when determined by a physical therapist and under anesthesia.

METHODS

Data of 83 consecutive patients undergoing primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty were assessed. Using a pin inserted into the iliac crest to define the cup placement angle under anesthesia before and after total hip arthroplasty, the posterior pelvic tilt angle was determined as the change in pin tilt from the supine position to maximum hip flexion. Flexion range of motion under anesthesia was calculated as the difference in the angle between the trunk and thigh at maximum flexion and the posterior pelvic tilt angle. Flexion range of motion with a fixed pelvis measured preoperatively by a physical therapist was compared to that under anesthesia. A goniometer was used for all measurements and the number of measurements was one.

FINDINGS

Mean posterior pelvic tilt angle of the pin inserted into the pelvis under anesthesia was 15.8° ± 5.3° (3°-26°) preoperatively and 12.1° ± 4.9° (3°-26°) postoperatively. Mean flexion range of motion under anesthesia was 109.4° ± 6.9° (88°-126°) and that measured by a physical therapist was 101.1° ± 8.2° (80°-120°); the difference was significant (9.7°; p < 0.01).

INTERPRETATION

These results highlight the difficulty in accurately determining hip flexion angles without the use of special devices and may help surgeons and physical therapists recognize and address this issue.

Effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on hip range of motion of healthy sedentary women: A crossover study

The improvements in range of motion (ROM) by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCS) were only found in sedentary men and not in females. Thus, the study investigated the effect of c-tDCS on hip flexion range of motion (HFROM) in sedentary women. Ten healthy (27.2 ± 6.4 years for age, 67.9 ± 17.8 kg for body mass, 159.1 ± 7.1 cm for height, and 87.1 ± 3.3° for HFROM) and right-leg-dominant women performed a counterbalanced crossover design in two experimental sessions, separated a week apart: c-tDCS and placebo stimulus (sham). Before and after experimental conditions (Pre-stimulation, Post-stimulation), participants had their HFROM measured. A significant interaction was demonstrated for conditions × time (F_{(1, 9)} = 10.666; ƞ² = 0.542; p = 0.01), indicating an increase in HFROM in the post-condition (89.0 ± 2.6°) compared to pre-condition (86.5° ± 2.9°) only in the c-tDCS. However, the HFROM improvements varied from 0.3 % to 6.5 % following c-tDCS. This study suggests that c-tDCS applied over the sensorimotor cortex of healthy sedentary women can acutely improve HFROM, but with a low percentage increase.

The influence of hip flexion mobility and lumbar spine extensor strength on lumbar spine flexion during a squat lift

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional; Controlled laboratory study.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the associations among available hip flexion motion, lumbar extensor strength and peak lumbar flexion during a squat lift task.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Lumbar spine flexion during lifting can result in increased strain on spinal structures. Although decreased available hip flexion motion and reduced strength of the lumbar extensor muscles has been proposed to contribute to greater lumbar flexion during lifting, direct relationships have not been explored.

METHODS

Fifty healthy young adults participated (23 males and 27 females). Strength of the lumbar extensors was measured using a motor-driven dynamometer. Available hip flexion was assessed using 3D motion capture. Peak lumbar spine flexion and hip flexion were quantified during the descent phase of the squat lifting task.

RESULTS

There was a significant negative association between available hip flexion and peak lumbar spine flexion during squat lifting in females (r = -0.407, p = 0.035) but not males (r = -0.341, p = 0.120). Similarly, peak lumbar spine flexion was negatively associated with lumbar extensor strength in females (r = -0.398, p = 0.040) but not males (r = -0.310, p = 0.161). During the squat lift, peak hip motion was positively associated with available hip flexion for both males and females combined (r = 0.774, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Females with less available hip flexion and lower lumbar extensor strength exhibit greater lumbar flexion when performing a lifting task. Clinicians should be aware of the potential contributions of such impairments when instructing patients into various lifting strategies.

MEASUREMENT OF PELVIC RETROVERSION DURING HIP FLEXION: EVALUATION WITH ACCELEROMETERS

Objective:

To quantify pelvic retroversion during clinical evaluation of hip flexion with accelerometers and to verify the reliability of these sensors to measure hip flexion.

Methods:

An accelerometer was positioned laterally in the pelvis to measure pelvic retroversion. Another accelerometer was positioned anteriorly on the thigh to evaluate hip flexion amplitude. The evaluations were performed with volunteers in supine position by three raters. For evaluation of pelvic retroversion, the mean ± SD (minimum-maximum) was calculated. Reliability of the accelerometer between raters was determined by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The linear correlation coefficient between hip flexion was determined by using goniometer and accelerometer.

Results:

The mean pelvic retroversion was 7.3° ± 0.93° (6°-11°) in the clinical limit of the hip range of motion, which was 106.25° ± 10.46° (93°-130°). The ICC between two raters were 0.60, 0.71 and 0.74 (goniometer) and 0.46, 0.71 and 0.83 (accelerometer). The linear correlation between hip flexion measurements with goniometer and accelerometer was 0.87.

Conclusion:

During clinical evaluation of the final range of hip flexion, there was an associated pelvic movement of approximately 7.3º. Accelerometers have proven to be reliable for measurement of hip flexion. Level of Evidence III, Study of nonconsecutive patients with no gold reference standard applied uniformly.

Strength and range of movement deficits are associated with symptom severity in people scheduled for hip arthroscopy

BACKGROUND

Identifying the physical impairments associated with worse symptoms and greater functional limitations in people with hip pain could enable targeted rehabilitation programmes designed to improve quality of life. The objective of this study was to compare physical characteristics between subgroups of symptoms and functional limitation severity in individuals with hip pain scheduled for arthroscopic surgery.

METHODS

Hip range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength were measured in 114 individuals (48 women; aged 32 ± 8 years) with hip pain scheduled for hip arthroscopy. Pain and disability were measured with the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT33) subscale of Symptoms and Functional Limitation, and a cluster analysis was used to identify mild, moderate and severe subgroups. Between-group differences were then evaluated using multivariate analysis of covariance, including sex as a covariate, followed by post hoc testing. Significance was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

Lesser hip muscle strength in all directions was reported in the severe symptoms and functional limitation group compared to the mild group. Hip flexion ROM differed when comparing the moderate to both the mild and severe subgroups. Hip internal rotation did not differ between subgroups of severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with hip pain and severe scores in the iHOT33 subscale of symptoms and functional limitations present with significantly lesser hip muscle strength and hip flexion ROM than individuals with moderate or mild scores. Targeted programmes to improve hip strength and flexion ROM in more severe patients may help reduce symptoms and improve function.

SIGNIFICANCE

Individuals with severe hip pain and functional limitation possess significantly lesser muscle strength and flexion ROM than individuals with moderate or mild scores.