Changes in humeral retrotorsion and the development of little league shoulder: A case study

A narrative review of little league shoulder: proximal humeral physis widening is only one piece of the puzzle, it is time to consider posterior glenoid dysplasia

Baseball athletes across all levels of play are at an increased risk for upper extremity injury due to the supraphysiologic demands on the shoulder and elbow during overhead throwing. Little league baseball players present with a unique subset of injuries that can affect the growth plate, commonly at the shoulder or the elbow. Ascertaining a diagnosis and plan of care for little league shoulder (LLS) historically focuses on the proximal humeral physis in skeletally immature throwing athletes presenting with shoulder pain. However, while not a current standard of care, posterior glenoid dysplasia is often present in youth baseball athletes presenting with LLS, warranting a shift in the way clinicians evaluate for and treat the youth baseball athlete's pathologic shoulder. Therefore, purpose of this narrative review is 2-fold: first, to describe the current standard of care as it relates to a diagnosis of LLS, and second, to critically describe a comprehensive evaluation process for youth throwing athletes with shoulder pain that includes screening for evidence of posterior glenoid dysplasia. This paper summarizes the current state of the available evidence for anatomic considerations of LLS in the baseball athletes throwing shoulder. Additionally, we provide a framework for clinical evaluation using a multidisciplinary approach to evaluate the entire kinetic chain of the youth baseball athlete presenting with LLS and posterior glenoid dysplasia. A case study is presented to describe common presentations, clinical and objective examinations, and a plan of care from time of evaluation to return to throwing.

Diagnosis and Management of Little League Shoulder: A Systematic Review

Background:

Little League shoulder (LLS) is an overuse injury characterized by throwing-related pain that commonly presents in adolescent male athletes. Investigations into the optimal duration of rest from throwing and protocols for graduated return to sports (RTS) are lacking.

Purpose:

To summarize the current literature with respect to the diagnosis, management, RTS, and return to throwing for LLS.

Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

The databases EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched between inception and April 22, 2020. References of retrieved records were reviewed for potentially eligible studies. English-language studies that reported the diagnosis and/or management of LLS in children or adolescents were included. Studies of animals or cadavers, review articles, and non—peer reviewed records were excluded. Data were summarized narratively using descriptive statistics.

Results:

Overall, 23 studies (21 level 4 studies, 2 level 3 studies) met the criteria for a total of 266 participants with a weighted mean age of 12.8 years (range, 7.4-17 years). Treatment recommendations evolved from prolonged rest and complete cessation of throwing to shorter periods of rest and graduated RTS. Less than half (11/23) of studies reported specific criteria to RTS; 1 case report discussed a coaching strategy to resume throwing, and 1 case report discussed a regimented throwing program. The proportion of participants returning to any sport participation was 94.0% (n = 157/167). The proportion returning to their preinjury level of sport was 92.5% (n = 123/133). Upon RTS, 18.7% (n = 35/187) of participants experienced a recurrence of symptoms. Premature closure of the epiphysis was reported in 1 participant.

Conclusion:

Young athletes with LLS may return to play after a period of rest, and a high proportion return to their preinjury level of sport. Further prospective studies are warranted to develop evidence-based, graduated RTS protocols and to better capture any long-term sequelae of the condition.