Clinical movement assessments do not differ between collegiate athletes with and without chronic ankle instability

Lower limb squat biomechanics and select clinical measures in chronic ankle instability

BACKGROUND

Individuals with chronic ankle instability often present with clinical and biomechanical abnormalities, however squat biomechanics have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to compare select clinical assessments and squat biomechanics between individuals with and without chronic ankle instability.

METHODS

Fifteen individuals with chronic ankle instability and a matched control group were studied. A weight-bearing dorsiflexion lunge test, foot posture, and an in-line half-kneeling motor control test for core stability were assessed. Lower limb 3D bilateral and unilateral squat biomechanics were captured. Groups, limbs and squat tasks were compared using an alpha of 0.05.

FINDINGS

Individuals with chronic ankle instability had less static weight-bearing dorsiflexion and failed the core stability test more frequently, but did not differ in foot morphology compared to the controls. When squatting, those with chronic ankle instability demonstrated reduced peak ankle dorsiflexion angles and moments in the involved limb (p < 0.04) during single limb squats and had interlimb differences in ankle dorsiflexion angle as well as hip and knee kinetics (p < 0.04) during double limb squats. In those with chronic ankle instability, there was less overall motion, but higher kinetic demands in single limb versus double leg squatting (p < 0.03).

INTERPRETATION

Individuals with chronic ankle instability had impaired weight-bearing dorsiflexion and showed impaired core stability more often, which accompanied altered squatting mechanics in both variations. Within the limbs with chronic ankle instability, single limb squats showed lesser kinematic demands but higher kinetic demands than double limb squatting.

The Validity of Wireless Earbud-Type Wearable Sensors for Head Angle Estimation and the Relationships of Head with Trunk, Pelvis, Hip, and Knee during Workouts

The present study was performed to investigate the validity of a wireless earbud-type inertial measurement unit (Ear-IMU) sensor used to estimate head angle during four workouts. In addition, relationships between head angle obtained from the Ear-IMU sensor and the angles of other joints determined with a 3D motion analysis system were investigated. The study population consisted of 20 active volunteers. The Ear-IMU sensor measured the head angle, while a 3D motion analysis system simultaneously measured the angles of the head, trunk, pelvis, hips, and knees during workouts. Comparison with the head angle measured using the 3D motion analysis system indicated that the validity of the Ear-IMU sensor was very strong or moderate in the sagittal and frontal planes. In addition, the trunk angle in the frontal plane showed a fair correlation with the head angle determined with the Ear-IMU sensor during a single-leg squat, reverse lunge, and standing hip abduction; the correlation was poor in the sagittal plane. Our results indicated that the Ear-IMU sensor can be used to directly estimate head motion and indirectly estimate trunk motion.

Lower Extremity Movement Quality and the Internal Training Load Response of Male Collegiate Soccer Athletes

CONTEXT

Training load and movement quality are associated with injury risk in athletes. Given these associations, it is important to understand how movement quality may moderate the training load so that appropriate injury-prevention strategies can be used.

OBJECTIVE

To determine how absolute and relative internal training loads change during a men's National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) soccer season and how movement quality, assessed using the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS), moderates the relative internal training load.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Division I athletics.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

One NCAA Division I male collegiate soccer team was recruited and followed over 2 consecutive seasons. Fifty-two athletes (age = 19.71 ± 1.30 years, height = 1.81 ± 0.06 m, mass = 75.74 ± 6.64 kg) consented to participate, and 46 met the criteria to be included in the final statistical analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Daily absolute internal training load was tracked over 2 seasons using a rated perceived exertion scale and time, which were subsequently used to calculate the absolute and relative internal training loads. Movement quality was assessed using the LESS and participants were categorized as poor movers (LESS score ≥5) or good movers (LESS score ≤4).

RESULTS

The 46 athletes consisted of 29 poor movers and 17 good movers. Absolute (P < .001) and relative (P < .001) internal training loads differed across the weeks of the season. However, movement quality did not moderate the relative internal training load (P = .264).

CONCLUSIONS

Absolute and relative training loads changed across weeks of a male collegiate soccer season. Movement quality did not affect the relative training load, but future researchers need to conduct studies with larger sample sizes to confirm this result.

Ankle Stability and Movement Coordination Impairments: Lateral Ankle Ligament Sprains Revision 2021

This revised clinical practice guideline (CPG) addresses the distinct but related lower extremity impairments of those with a first-time lateral ankle sprain (LAS) and those with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Depending on many factors, impairments may continue following injury. While most individuals experience resolution of symptoms, complaints of instability may continue and are defined as CAI. The aims of the revision were to provide a concise summary of the contemporary evidence since publication of the original guideline and to develop new recommendations or revise previously published recommendations to support evidence-based practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(4):CPG1-CPG80. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.0302.