Rehabilitation duration and time of starting sport-related activities associated with return to the previous level of sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Nurse-Assisted Rehabilitation Protocols Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Despite significant advancements in surgical instruments and operation skills, short- and long-term outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remain unsatisfactory, as many patients fail to return to their pre-injury level of sports. Inadequate ACL rehabilitation is the primary cause of poor outcomes. Nurses have become a crucial element in the rehabilitation process. Although there is no consensus regarding the optimal post-operative rehabilitation protocols, restoring muscle strength and neuromuscular control are consistently the primary goals. This literature review presents nurse-assisted rehabilitation protocols aiming at improving muscle strength and neuromuscular control. The review discusses postoperative rehabilitation, including home-based and supervised rehabilitation, open and closed kinetic chain exercises, eccentric and concentric training, blood flow restriction training, and plyometric training. Each training protocol has its benefits and drawbacks, and should be used cautiously in specific stages of rehabilitation. Neuromuscular training, such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation, neuromuscular control exercises, and vibration therapy, is considered crucial in rehabilitation.

The Interruption of Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction due to COVID-19 Restrictions: Association With Return-to-Sport Testing

CONTEXT

Among many unanticipated changes, access to rehabilitation was disrupted during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unclear how the timing of late-stage rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament with surgical reconstruction (ACLR) during the initial months of the pandemic affected outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare physical performance outcome measures in patients following ACLR prior to and following COVID-19-related restrictions.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Data from patients who underwent return-to-sport testing following ACLR were analyzed based on date. December 2018 through March of 2020 (n = 66) was defined as the baseline period, and June through October 2020 (n = 27) was defined as the surveillance period. Outcome measures included single leg hop, triple hop, single leg vertical jump, and the lower-extremity functional test (LEFT). Linear mixed models were used to compare outcome measures before and after the onset of pandemic-related restrictions, clustered by sex and sport. A 1-way analysis of variance was performed to analyze the association between the number of virtual rehabilitation visits and outcome measures for subjects in the surveillance period.

RESULTS

Subjects in the surveillance period performed significantly worse in the LEFT (+7.88 s; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 14.66; P = .02) and single leg vertical jump on the unaffected side (-4.32 cm; 95% confidence interval, -7.44 to -1.19, P < .01), and performed better with single leg vertical jump symmetry (+6.3%; 95% confidence interval, 1.0% to 11.5%; P = .02). There were no other statistically significant differences. There was no significant association between having virtual rehabilitation visits and any of the performance outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a decline in physical performance outcome measures in patients following ACLR who did not attend regular in-person physical therapy sessions in the late-stage rehabilitation due to COVID-19-related restrictions. Other factors during this unique time period, such as access to training facilities or psychosocial stressors, may have also influenced outcomes.

Financial Burden of Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

High costs and lack of price transparency for common pediatric orthopaedic procedures create financial burden for patients. We assessed (1) how patient medical debt after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) correlates with health insurance type; and (2) factors associated with patient financial burden and worry after ACLR.

METHODS

We reviewed records of 122 patients aged below 18 years who underwent ACLR at our US academic hospital from 2016 to 2020. Patients were grouped by health insurance type: private (n=80) or public (n=42). A telephone survey about ACLR-related financial burden and worry was administered to patients' parents (45% response rate). Primary outcomes were patient medical debt and patient-reported financial burden measured by the financial burden composite score (0 to 6, with 6 representing highest burden) and dichotomized worry score (1 to 3, low worry; 4 to 5, high worry). We used univariate analyses to compare financial outcomes and multivariable regressions to determine factors associated with reported financial burden (alpha=0.05).

RESULTS

Debt after ACLR was reported by 10 of 122 patients (8%), all of whom had private insurance ( P =0.045). Of 55 survey respondents, treatment-related financial burden was reported by 32 (58%). Mean±SD financial burden composite scores were higher for privately insured (1.8±2.0) versus publicly insured patients (0.74±1.2) ( P =0.02), but rates of high financial worry were similar (private, 8% vs. public, 21%) ( P =0.22). A higher proportion of patients with private insurance (31%) reported having to use savings after ACLR compared with publicly insured patients (5%) ( P =0.04). The most frequently cited reason for financial burden was the cost of postoperative physical therapy (PT) (n=21). Number of PT visits was independently associated with financial burden composite scores ( P =0.02). Insurance type was not independently associated with financial burden ( P >0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although a small proportion of patients generated medical debt after ACLR (greater for those privately vs. publicly insured), the majority reported treatment-related financial burden primarily driven by PT costs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.