Anteromedial versus posterolateral hip musculature strengthening with dose-controlled in women with patellofemoral pain: A randomized controlled trial

Effectiveness of Interventions Aimed at Changing Movement Patterns in People With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the effectiveness of interventions for changing movement during weight-bearing functional tasks in people with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA). LITERATURE SEARCH: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception up to May 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials involving people with PFP and nonsurgical, nonpharmacological interventions on task kinematics were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: NMA was conducted for frontal knee movement data, and pairwise meta-analysis was used to pool data when NMA was not possible. Reduced movements were those changes that indicated movements occurring with less amplitude. The GRADE approach was used to grade the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: Thirty-seven trials were included (n = 1235 participants). Combining knee/hip exercises with internal feedback had the strongest effect on reducing frontal knee movements (standardized mean difference [SMD] from NMA = -2.66; GRADE: moderate evidence). On pairwise comparisons, the same combination of interventions reduced frontal hip movements (SMD = -0.47; GRADE: moderate evidence) and increased sagittal knee movements (SMD = 1.03; GRADE: moderate evidence), with no effects on sagittal hip movements (GRADE: very low evidence), compared to knee/hip exercises alone. There was no effect for single applications of braces on the frontal knee movement (GRADE: very low evidence) and taping on movements of the knee, hip, and ankle (GRADE: very low to low evidence) compared to no intervention. CONCLUSION: Knee/hip exercises combined with internal feedback techniques may change knee and hip movements in people with PFP. The combination of these interventions can reduce frontal knee and hip movements, and can increase sagittal knee movements. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-13. Epub 14 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11956.

Lower-Limb Kinematics and Clinical Outcomes: Correlation Does Not Imply Causality

Letter to the Editor-in-Chief in response to JOSPT article "Are changes in dynamic knee movement control related to changes in pain or function in people with knee disorders?" by Nunes GS, de Moraes WSLA, de Souza Sampaio V, et al. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):1. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0203.

Quadriceps or hip exercises for patellofemoral pain? A randomised controlled equivalence trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess effectiveness equivalence between two commonly prescribed 12-week exercise programmes targeting either the quadriceps or the hip muscles in patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP).

METHODS

This randomised controlled equivalence trial included patients with a clinical diagnosis of PFP. Participants were randomly assigned to either a 12-week quadriceps-focused exercise (QE) or a hip-focused exercise (HE) programme. The primary outcome was the change in Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) (0-100) from baseline to 12-week follow-up. Prespecified equivalence margins of ±8 points on the AKPS were chosen to demonstrate comparable effectiveness. Key secondary outcomes were the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire pain, physical function and knee-related quality of life subscales.

RESULTS

200 participants underwent randomisation; 100 assigned to QE and 100 to HE (mean age 27.2 years (SD 6.4); 69% women). The least squares mean changes in AKPS (primary outcome) were 7.6 for QE and 7.0 for HE (difference 0.6 points, 95% CI -2.0 to 3.2; test for equivalence p<0.0001), although neither programme surpassed the minimal clinically important change threshold. None of the group differences in key secondary outcomes exceeded predefined equivalence margins.

CONCLUSION

The 12-week QE and HE protocols provided equivalent improvements in symptoms and function for patients with PFP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03069547.

Dose-response effect of lower limb resistance training volume on pain and function of women with patellofemoral pain: A systematic review and meta-regression

OBJECTIVE

Analyze whether the effects of lower limb resistance training on pain and self-reported function were associated with the exercise volume prescribed for women with patellofemoral pain (PFP).

METHODS

A systematic search was undertaken in four databases from inception to May 2023. Eligible trials examined the effects of resistance training programs on pain (visual analogue scale or numerical pain scale) and function (Anterior Knee Pain Scale) in women with PFP. Meta-analysis was undertaken with a random-effects model. The association of resistance training volume-related variables with mean difference effects on pain and function were tested by exploratory univariable meta-regression models.

RESULTS

From 1,404 estudies retained for screening after duplicate removals, 16 studies (579 patients) were included. Changes in knee pain were inversely associated with weekly training frequency (β = 0.5 ± 0.2, P = 0.012). No associations were found between the amount of resistance exercise prescribed per session or per week and effects on pain. Changes in function were associated with the number of sets per week (β = 0.1 ± 0.1, P = 0.044) and number of sets per session (β = 0.6 ± 0.2, P < 0.001) over the intervention. Most favorable results were achieved with 17 to 27 sets per session and >45 sets per week.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of prescribed resistance exercise does not seem to be critical for pain reduction in women with PFP. However, our findings support a dose-response effect in terms of improving function.

Are Changes in Dynamic Knee Movement Control Related to Changes in Pain or Function in People With Knee Disorders? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To study whether changes in dynamic knee valgus or varus were associated with changes in pain or function in people with knee disorders. DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, from inception up to January 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of nonsurgical (including nonpharmacological) interventions for knee disorders on frontal and transverse plane knee and hip movements during functional tasks, which reported pain and/or function outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: The relationship between changes in kinematics and pain/function was analyzed using a 2-stage structural equation modeling approach. RESULTS: From 42 202 records, 48 trials met the eligibility criteria. For people with patellofemoral pain (25 trials, n = 894), there was moderate evidence that changes in the knee and hip movements were significantly correlated with changes in pain and function (r= -0.69 to 0.73), except for the knee transverse plane movements and for the relationship between hip transverse plane movement and function. For people with knee osteoarthritis (15 trials, n = 704) and anterior cruciate ligament injuries (8 trials, n = 198), the evidence was limited and uncertain. CONCLUSION: The relationship between changes in movement control and clinical outcomes was consistent in people with patellofemoral pain. For people with knee osteoarthritis or anterior cruciate ligament injuries, there was a paucity of evidence that precluded a proper evaluation of the relationship between dynamic knee movement control, and pain and function. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(7):1-14. Epub: 18 April 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11628.

Functional tests in women with patellofemoral pain: Which tests make a difference in physical therapy evaluation

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is characterized by anterior knee, which intensifies during functional activities that require the eccentric action of the quadriceps muscle, specially. In ths way, quantitatively measurable functional tests that simulate these activities should be included in the physical therapy evaluation.

OBJECTIVE

To identify which functional tests are most indicated for the evaluation of women with PFD.

METHOD

This study evaluated 100 young women (50 with PFP), during the execution of the following functional performance tests: Triple hop, Vertical Jump, Single leg squat, Step Down, YBalance tests, Lunge test and running. Dynamic valgus was also assessed in the tests. The isometric muscle strength of the following muscle groups: hip abductors, extensors and lateral rotators, knee extensors, evertors, and plantar flexors were evaluated. Functional Perception were evaluated by Anterior Knee Pain Scale and Activities of Daily Living Scale.

RESULTS

PFP group showed lower performance during the Y-Balance, triple hop, vertical jump tests and running. Was observed an increase in dynamic valgus during Triple Hop, Vertical Jump tests and running in PFP group, besides a poorer perception of function. For all lower limb muscle groups, the PFP group showed a reduction in peak isometric force.

CONCLUSION

The YBalance, triple hop, vertical jump tests, and running should be included in the physical therapy evaluation, in addition to aspects of lower limb muscle strength.

Six Treatments Have Positive Effects at 3 Months for People With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of nonsurgical treatments on pain and function in people with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from their inception until May 2022 for interventional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in people with PFP. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs that were scored ≥7 on the PEDro scale. DATA SYNTHESIS: We extracted homogenous pain and function data at short- (≤3 months), medium- (>3 to ≤12 months) and long-term (>12 months) follow-up. Interventions demonstrated primary efficacy if outcomes were superior to sham, placebo, or wait-and-see control. Interventions demonstrated secondary efficacy if outcomes were superior to an intervention with primary efficacy. RESULTS: We included 65 RCTs. Four interventions demonstrated short-term primary efficacy: knee-targeted exercise therapy for pain (standardized mean difference [SMD], 1.16; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.66) and function (SMD, 1.19; 95% CI: 0.51, 1.88), combined interventions for pain (SMD, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.26, 1.29) and function (SMD, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.49), foot orthoses for global rating of change (OR = 4.31; 95% CI: 1.48, 12.56), and lower-quadrant manual therapy for function (SMD, 2.30; 95% CI: 1.60, 3.00). Two interventions demonstrated short-term secondary efficacy compared to knee-targeted exercise therapy: hip-and-knee-targeted exercise therapy for pain (SMD, 1.02; 95% CI: 0.58, 1.46) and function (SMD, 1.03; 95% CI: 0.61, 1.45), and knee-targeted exercise therapy and perineural dextrose injection for pain (SMD, 1.34; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.95) and function (SMD, 1.21; 95% CI: 0.60, 1.82). CONCLUSIONS: Six interventions had positive effects at 3 months for people with PFP, with no intervention adequately tested beyond this time point. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022;52(11):750-768. Epub: 8 September 2022. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.11359.

Hip abductor versus adductor strengthening for clinical outcomes in knee symptomatic osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Hip adductors and abductors are weak in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, most studies have not investigated selective adductor strengthening.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of adding selective hip abductors versus adductors strengthening to lower limb multimodal exercise program for pain, self-reported function, knee-related quality of life, medication ingested and performance-based tests in patients with symptomatic KOA.

DESING

Randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients with KOA were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: hip abductor group (HABG) or hip adductor group (HADG). Both groups performed a lower limb multimodal exercise program. HABG and HADG groups added three hip abduction and three hip adduction exercises, respectively. Intensity of pain through numeric pain scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales, Lequesne questionnaire, global perceived effect scale, medication ingested, performance-based tests were assessed at baseline, after 6 weeks, and 6 months.

RESULTS

No significant between-group differences were found in primary outcomes: pain intensity (mean difference = -1.15, 95%CI -2.44 - 0.12, P = 0.07), KOOS-pain (mean difference = 1.64, 95%CI -6.79 - 10.07, P = 0.70) and KOOS-function in daily living (mean difference = -0.12, 95%CI, -8.78 - 8.54, P = 0.97) in 6 weeks. Groups did not differ in any secondary outcome after 6 weeks or after 6 months (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference between adding hip abductors or adductors strengthening to lower limb multimodal exercise program in improving pain, self-reported function, quality of life, medication ingested and performance-based tests in patients with KOA.