Costs of treatment of adult patients with cystic fibrosis in Poland and internationally

Direct healthcare costs in the first 2 years of life: A comparison of screened and clinically diagnosed children with cystic fibrosis - The Irish comparative outcomes study of CF (ICOS)

BACKGROUND

In July 2011, Cystic Fibrosis (CF) was added to the Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programme in Ireland. The Irish Comparative Outcomes Study (ICOS) is a historical cohort study established to compare outcomes between clinically-detected and screen-detected children with CF. Here we present the results of economic analysis comparing direct healthcare costs in the first 2 years of life of children born between mid-2008 and mid-2016, in the pre-CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulator era.

METHODS

Healthcare resource use information was obtained from Cystic Fibrosis Registry of Ireland (CFRI), medical records and parental questionnaire. Hospital admissions, emergency department visits, outpatient appointments, antibiotics and maintenance medications were included. Costs were estimated using the Health Service Executive Casemix, Irish Medicines Formulary and hospital pharmacy data, adjusted for inflation using Consumer Price Index data from the Central Statistics Office. A Negative Binomial regression was used, with time in the study as an offset.

RESULTS

Overall participation was 93 %. After exclusion of those with meconium ileus, data from 139 patients, with follow-up to 2 years of age, were available. 72 (51.8 %) were from the clinically diagnosed cohort. In the final model (n=105), clinically diagnosed children had 2.62-fold higher costs per annum (p<0.0001), when adjusted for confounders, including homozygous ΔF508 or G511D mutation, socio-demographic factors and time between diagnosis and first CFRI interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

There are few studies evaluating economic aspects of newborn screening for CF using routine care data. These results imply that the benefits of newborn screening extend to direct healthcare costs borne by the State.

Measuring the burden of cystic fibrosis: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis (CF) contributes a significant economic burden on individuals, healthcare systems, and society. Understanding the economic impact of CF is crucial for planning resource allocation.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of literature published between 1990 and 2022 that reported the cost of illness, and/or economic burden of CF. Costs were adjusted for inflation and reported as United States dollars.

RESULTS

A total of 39 studies were included. Direct healthcare costs (e.g., medications, inpatient and outpatient care) were the most frequently reported. Most studies estimated the cost of CF using a prevalence-based (n = 18, 46.2 %), bottom-up approach (n = 23, 59 %). Direct non-healthcare costs and indirect costs were seldom included. The most frequently reported direct cost components were medications (n = 34, 87.2 %), inpatient care (n = 33, 84.6 %), and outpatient care (n = 31, 79.5 %). Twenty-eight percent (n = 11) of studies reported the burden of CF from all three perspectives (healthcare system (payer), individual, and society). Indirect costs of CF were reported in approximately 20 % of studies (n = 8). The reported total cost of CF varied widely, ranging from $451 to $160,000 per person per year (2022 US$). The total cost depended on the number of domains and perspectives included in each study.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies only reported costs to the healthcare system (i.e., hospitalizations and healthcare encounters) which likely underestimates the total costs of CF. The wide range of costs reported highlights the importance of standardizing perspectives, domains and costs when estimating the economic burden of CF.

Fat-Soluble Vitamins in Standard vs. Liposomal Form Enriched with Vitamin K2 in Cystic Fibrosis: A Randomized Multi-Center Trial

Background: We aimed to assess a liposomal fat-soluble vitamin formulation containing vitamin K2 with standard treatment in cystic fibrosis (CF). Methods: A multi-center randomized controlled trial was carried out in 100 pancreatic-insufficient patients with CF. The liposomal formulation contained vitamin A as retinyl palmitate (2667 IU daily) and beta-carotene (1333 IU), D3 (4000 IU), E (150 IU), K1 (2 mg), and K2 as menaquinone-7 (400 µg). It was compared with the standard vitamin preparations in the closest possible doses (2500 IU, 1428 IU, 4000 IU, 150 IU, 2.14 mg, respectively; no vitamin K2) over 3 months. Results: Forty-two patients finished the trial in the liposomal and 49 in the control group (overall 91 pts: 22.6 ± 7.6 years, 62.6% female, BMI 19.9 ± 2.8 kg/m², FEV1% 70% ± 30%). The main outcome was the change of vitamin status in the serum during the study (liposomal vs. standard): all-trans-retinol (+1.48 ± 95.9 vs. −43.1 ± 121.4 ng/mL, p = 0.054), 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (+9.7 ± 13.4 vs. +2.0 ± 9.8 ng/mL, p = 0.004), α-tocopherol (+1.5 ± 2.5 vs. −0.2 ± 1.6 µg/mL, p < 0.001), %undercarboxylated osteocalcin (−17.2 ± 24.8% vs. −8.3 ± 18.5%, p = 0.061). The secondary outcome was the vitamin status at the trial end: all-trans-retinol (370.0 ± 116.5 vs. 323.1 ± 100.6 ng/mL, p = 0.045), 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (43.2 ± 16.6 vs. 32.7 ± 11.5 ng/mL, p < 0.001), α-tocopherol (9.0 ± 3.1 vs. 7.7 ± 3.0 µg/mL, p = 0.037), %undercarboxylated osteocalcin (13.0 ± 11.2% vs. 22.7 ± 22.0%, p = 0.008). Conclusion: The liposomal fat-soluble vitamin supplement containing vitamin K2 was superior to the standard form in delivering vitamin D3 and E in pancreatic-insufficient patients with CF. The supplement was also more effective in strengthening vitamin K-dependent carboxylation, and could improve vitamin A status.

Temporal trends in healthcare resource use and associated costs of patients with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Better insights into the natural course of cystic fibrosis (CF) have led to treatment approaches that have improved pulmonary health and increased the life expectancy of affected individuals. This study evaluated how the combination of modified demographics and changes in CF management impacted resource consumption and the cost of care.

METHODS

Medical records of CF patients from 2006 to 2016 in the French CF Registry were linked to their corresponding claims data (SNDS). Medications, medical visits, procedures, hospitalisations, and indirect costs were annualized by calendar year from 2006 to 2017.

RESULTS

Of the 7,671 patients included in the French CF Registry, 6,187 patients (80.7%) were linked to the SNDS (51.9% male, mean age = 24.7 years). The average cost per patient was €14,174 in 2006, €21,920 in 2011 and €44,585 in 2017. Costs associated with hospital stays increased from €3,843 per patient in 2006 to €6,741 in 2017. In 2017, the mean cost per CF patient was allocated as follows: 72% for medications (of which 51% for modulator therapies), 15% for hospital stays, 7% for medical visits, 3% for indirect costs, 2% for medical devices, 1% for outpatient medical procedures.

CONCLUSION

There was a strong increase in the mean annual cost per CF patient between 2006 and 2017, mostly due to the cost of therapy after the introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators. The combination of an increase in the number of CF patients - particularly adult patients - and an increase in the annual cost per patient led to a substantial increase in the total cost of CF disease care for the health systems.

Cost-of-illness studies in rare diseases: a scoping review

Objective

The aim of this scoping review was to overview the cost-of-illness studies conducted in rare diseases.

Methods

We searched papers published in English in PubMed from January 2007 to December 2018. We selected cost-of-illness studies on rare diseases defined as those with prevalence lower than 5 per 10,000 cases. Studies were selected by one researcher and verified by a second researcher. Methodological characteristics were extracted to develop a narrative synthesis.

Results

We included 63 cost-of-illness studies on 42 rare diseases conducted in 25 countries, and 9 systematic reviews. Most studies (94%) adopted a prevalence-based estimation, where the predominant design was cross-sectional with a bottom-up approach. Only four studies adopted an incidence-based estimation. Most studies used questionnaires to patients or caregivers to collect resource utilisation data (67%) although an important number of studies used databases or registries as a source of data (48%). Costs of lost productivity, non-medical costs and informal care costs were included in 68%, 60% and 43% of studies, respectively.

Conclusion

This review found a paucity of cost-of-illness studies in rare diseases. However, the analysis shows that the cost-of-illness studies of rare diseases are feasible, although the main issue is the lack of primary and/or aggregated data that often prevents a reliable estimation of the economic burden.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-021-01815-3.

Cost-of-illness studies in rare diseases: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this scoping review was to overview the cost-of-illness studies conducted in rare diseases.

METHODS

We searched papers published in English in PubMed from January 2007 to December 2018. We selected cost-of-illness studies on rare diseases defined as those with prevalence lower than 5 per 10,000 cases. Studies were selected by one researcher and verified by a second researcher. Methodological characteristics were extracted to develop a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

We included 63 cost-of-illness studies on 42 rare diseases conducted in 25 countries, and 9 systematic reviews. Most studies (94%) adopted a prevalence-based estimation, where the predominant design was cross-sectional with a bottom-up approach. Only four studies adopted an incidence-based estimation. Most studies used questionnaires to patients or caregivers to collect resource utilisation data (67%) although an important number of studies used databases or registries as a source of data (48%). Costs of lost productivity, non-medical costs and informal care costs were included in 68%, 60% and 43% of studies, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This review found a paucity of cost-of-illness studies in rare diseases. However, the analysis shows that the cost-of-illness studies of rare diseases are feasible, although the main issue is the lack of primary and/or aggregated data that often prevents a reliable estimation of the economic burden.

Reflections on the Importance of Cost of Illness Analysis in Rare Diseases: A Proposal

In the field of rare diseases (RDs), the evidence standard is often lower than that required by health technology assessment (HTA) and payer authorities. In this commentary, we propose that appropriate economic evaluation for rare disease treatments should be initially informed by cost-of-illness (COI) studies conducted using a societal perspective. Such an approach contributes to improving countries' understanding of RDs in their entirety as societal and not merely clinical, or product-specific issues. In order to exemplify how the disease burden's distribution has changed over the last fifteen years, key COI studies for Hemophilia, Fragile X Syndrome, Cystic Fibrosis, and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis are examined. Evidence shows that, besides methodological variability and cross-country differences, the disease burden's share represented by direct costs generally grows over time as novel treatments become available. Hence, to support effective decision-making processes, it seems necessary to assess the re-allocation of the burden produced by new medicinal products, and this approach requires identifying cost drivers through COI studies with robust design and standardized methodology.

The Economic Burden of Cystic Fibrosis in Germany from a Payer Perspective

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disorder that is most common in white children and young adults. Long-term survival has improved steadily and will likely increase with the recent introduction of neonatal screening and causative treatment. However, these advances have substantial economic consequences for healthcare systems and payers.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine the economic burden of CF and to elucidate the structure of costs and the distribution of resources for different subpopulations, treatment strategies and sites of care for CF in Germany.

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study to evaluate the economic burden of CF and the costs of treatment within different CF substrata from a payer perspective. Using claims data from a large German sickness fund, we identify the causal effect of CF on costs, service utilisation, and premature mortality. We compare the outcomes of a CF and a control group using entropy balancing and regression techniques, conduct further analyses for the CF group to gain insight into the economic burden associated with different levels of disease severity, and analyse pharmaceutical expenditures by collecting all CF-related expenses on outpatient drug treatment from the sickness fund database.

RESULTS

Direct medical costs caused by CF in Germany in 2016 average €17,551 per patient-year and appear to be mainly driven by the cost of outpatient drug prescriptions (€12,869). We estimate that the national burden of disease totals €159 million. Costs increase with disease severity and related complications. If all eligible CF patients in the German population were to receive CF mutation-specific drugs, the economic burden of disease would more than triple to €594 million.

CONCLUSION

CF has a constant and wide-ranging economic impact on payers, with considerable differences in the distribution of costs and service utilisation between younger and older patients as well as mild vs. severe patients. Pharmaceutical expenses will increase in the future as causative treatment gains importance. We encourage the use of a control group approach for burden-of-disease studies to be able to identify causal effects and thus to obtain more precise estimates.