1
|
Smith S, Brick A, Johnston B, Ryan K, McQuillan R, O’Hara S, May P, Droog E, Daveson B, Morrison RS, Higginson IJ, Normand C. Place of Death for Adults Receiving Specialist Palliative Care in Their Last 3 Months of Life: Factors Associated With Preferred Place, Actual Place, and Place of Death Congruence. J Palliat Care 2024; 39:184-193. [PMID: 38404130 PMCID: PMC11097611 DOI: 10.1177/08258597241231042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Objectives: Congruence between the preferred and actual place of death is recognised as an important quality indicator in end-of-life care. However, there may be complexities about preferences that are ignored in summary congruence measures. This article examined factors associated with preferred place of death, actual place of death, and congruence for a sample of patients who had received specialist palliative care in the last three months of life in Ireland. Methods: This article analysed merged data from two previously published mortality follow-back surveys: Economic Evaluation of Palliative Care in Ireland (EEPCI); Irish component of International Access, Rights and Empowerment (IARE I). Logistic regression models examined factors associated with (a) preferences for home death versus institutional setting, (b) home death versus hospital death, and (c) congruent versus non-congruent death. Setting: Four regions with differing levels of specialist palliative care development in Ireland. Participants: Mean age 77, 50% female/male, 19% living alone, 64% main diagnosis cancer. Data collected 2011-2015, regression model sample sizes: n = 342-351. Results: Congruence between preferred and actual place of death in the raw merged dataset was 51%. Patients living alone were significantly less likely to prefer home versus institution death (OR 0.389, 95%CI 0.157-0.961), less likely to die at home (OR 0.383, 95%CI 0.274-0.536), but had no significant association with congruence. Conclusions: The findings highlight the value in examining place of death preferences as well as congruence, because preferences may be influenced by what is feasible rather than what patients would like. The analyses also underline the importance of well-resourced community-based supports, including homecare, facilitating hospital discharge, and management of complex (eg, non-cancer) conditions, to facilitate patients to die in their preferred place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Smith
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aoife Brick
- Social Research Division, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Economics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Bridget Johnston
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Karen Ryan
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- St Francis Hospice, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Regina McQuillan
- St Francis Hospice, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Palliative Care, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sinead O’Hara
- Healthcare Pricing Office, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter May
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Elsa Droog
- National Office of Quality & Patient Safety, Health Service Executive, Cork, Ireland
| | - Barbara Daveson
- Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - R. Sean Morrison
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, USA and James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, USA
| | - Irene J. Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Charles Normand
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Murtagh FEM, Okoeki M, Ukoha-kalu BO, Khamis A, Clark J, Boland JW, Pask S, Nwulu U, Elliott-Button H, Folwell A, Harman D, Johnson MJ. A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:6. [PMID: 36604609 PMCID: PMC9813451 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03727-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Integrated care may improve outcomes for older people living with frailty. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service in improving the wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) of older people living with severe frailty.
Methods
A community-based non-randomised controlled study. Participants (≥65 years, electronic Frailty Index ≥0.36) received either the new integrated care service plus usual care, or usual care alone. Data collection was at three time points: baseline, 2-4 weeks, and 10-14 weeks. The primary outcome was patient wellbeing (symptoms and other concerns) at 2-4 weeks, measured using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS); the secondary outcome was QoL, measured using EQ-5D-5L. To test duration of effect and safety, wellbeing and QoL were also measured at 10-14 weeks. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise and compare intervention and control groups (eligible but had not accessed the new service), with t-test, Chi-Square, or Mann-Whitney U tests (as appropriate) to test differences at each time point. Generalised linear modelling, with propensity score matching, was used for further group comparisons. Data were analysed using STATA v17.
Results
199 intervention and 54 control participants were recruited. At baseline, intervention and control groups were similar in age, gender, ethnicity, living status, and body mass index, but not functional status or area deprivation score. At 2-4 weeks, wellbeing had improved in the intervention group but worsened in the control (median IPOS -5 versus 2, p<0.001). QoL improved in the intervention group but was unchanged in the control (median EQ-5D-5L 0.12, versus 0.00, p<0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, and living status, the intervention group had an average total IPOS score reduction at 2-4 weeks of 6.34 (95% CI: -9.01: -4.26, p<0.05); this improvement was sustained, with an average total IPOS score reduction at 10-14 weeks of 6.36 (95% CI: -8.91:-3.80, p<0.05). After propensity score matching based on functional status/area deprivation, modelling showed similar results, with a reduction in IPOS score at 2-4 weeks in the intervention group of 7.88 (95% CI: -12.80: -2.96, p<0.001).
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that the new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service may have improved the overall wellbeing and quality of life of older people living with frailty at 2-4 weeks and the improvement in wellbeing was sustained at three months.
Ethics approval
NHS Research Ethics Committee 18/YH/0470 and IRAS-250981.
Trial registration
The trial was retrospectively registered at the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry (registration date: 01/08/2022, registration number: ISRCTN10613839).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fliss E. M. Murtagh
- grid.9481.40000 0004 0412 8669Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Mabel Okoeki
- grid.9481.40000 0004 0412 8669Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Blessing Onyinye Ukoha-kalu
- grid.9481.40000 0004 0412 8669Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Assem Khamis
- grid.9481.40000 0004 0412 8669Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Joseph Clark
- grid.9481.40000 0004 0412 8669Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Jason W. Boland
- grid.9481.40000 0004 0412 8669Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Sophie Pask
- grid.9481.40000 0004 0412 8669Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Ugochinyere Nwulu
- grid.9481.40000 0004 0412 8669Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Helene Elliott-Button
- grid.9481.40000 0004 0412 8669Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | | | | | - Miriam J. Johnson
- grid.9481.40000 0004 0412 8669Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Nooijer K, Van Den Noortgate N, Pype P, Van den Block L, Pivodic L. Palliative care symptoms, concerns and well-being of older people with frailty and complex care needs upon hospital discharge: a cross-sectional study. Palliat Care 2022; 21:173. [PMID: 36203161 PMCID: PMC9540036 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-01065-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Little is known about the nature and intensity of palliative care needs of hospitalised older people. We aimed to describe the palliative care symptoms, concerns, and well-being of older people with frailty and complex care needs upon discharge from hospital to home, and to examine the relationship between palliative care symptoms and concerns, and well-being. Methods Cross-sectional study using baseline survey data of a pilot randomised controlled trial. Hospital staff identified patients (≥ 70 years) about to be discharged home, with a clinical frailty score of 5 to 7 and complex needs based on physician-assessment. Patients completed structured interviews, using the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS), ICEpop CAPability measure for supportive care (ICECAP-SCM) and IPOS Views on Care quality of life item. We calculated descriptive statistics. Results We assessed 37 older people with complex needs (49% women, mean age 84, standard deviation 6.1). Symptoms rated as causing severe problems were weakness (46%) and poor mobility (40%); 75% reported that their family felt anxious at least occasionally. Of the 17 IPOS items, 41% of patients rated five or more symptoms as causing severe problems, while 14% reported that they were not severely affected by any symptom. 87% expressed feeling supported. There was a negative correlation between symptoms (IPOS) and well-being (ICECAP); r = -0.41. Conclusion We identified a large variety of symptoms experienced by older people identified as having frailty and complex needs upon hospital discharge. Many were severely affected by multiple needs. This population should be considered for palliative care follow-up at home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim de Nooijer
- End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. .,Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Nele Van Den Noortgate
- End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Geriatric Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter Pype
- End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lieve Van den Block
- End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lara Pivodic
- End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|