Who are the most vulnerable populations for primary care? Avoidable hospitalizations across individuals with different types of disabilities in South Korea

Disability-related disparities in health outcomes among newly diagnosed diabetic patients: A retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

A distinct gap in the literature persists regarding the health outcome of individuals with Type 2 diabetes who also have disabilities. This study aimed to investigate potential disparities in events occurrence among diabetes patients across various disability stages.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients newly diagnosed with diabetes in 2013 and 2014, aged ≥ 18 years, and followed them until December 2021, using data from the Korean National Health Insurance database. All-cause mortality and hospitalization for diabetes mellitus and cardio-cerebrovascular diseases (CVD) was assessed.

RESULTS

The study included 26,085 patients, encompassing individuals without disabilities and those with physical, visual, hearing and speech, intellectual and developmental, and mental disabilities. After adjustment, individuals with disabilities had a higher risk of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.07-1.48) compared to those without disabilities. In particular, severe disabilities and hearing and speech disabilities showed significantly higher risks of all-cause death (aHR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.06-1.85 and aHR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.17-2.15, respectively), with marginal significance for mild disabilities (aHR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.99-1.45) and mental disorders (aHR: 1.92, 95% CI: 0.98-3.73). Patients with disabilities also had significantly increased risks of CVD-related first admissions (aHR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.07-1.56) and diabetes-related first admissions (aHR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.20-1.43) compared to those without disabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the urgent need for public health policies to prioritize individuals with disabilities and diabetes, addressing the disparities in health outcome.

Preference for primary care in Chinese homebound patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe the preference for primary healthcare (PHC) and investigate associated factors among homebound residents in both rural and urban areas of China. It provides valuable insights to facilitate the rational allocation of healthcare resources and promote the utilization of PHC.

METHODS

In this nationally representative cross-sectional study, we utilized the most recent data (2020) from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). Participants were recruited from 25 provincial-level administrative regions in both rural and urban areas of China. Homebound patients were asked to provide details about their individual characteristics, variables related to family caregiving, and preferences for PHC. Multivariable logistic models were used to analyze potential factors associated with preference for PHC. Estimates of association were reported as odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

The study found that 58.43% of rural patients reported a preference for PHC, while 42.78% of urban patients favored PHC. Compared to rural participants who did not received inpatient care in the past year, those who received inpatient care in the past year had 67% lower odds of choosing PHC (OR:0.33, 95% CI:0.19-0.59); Compared to rural participants who did not received family caregiving when ill, those who received family caregiving when ill had 59% lower odds of choosing PHC (OR: 0.41, 95% CI:0.21-0.77). Correspondingly, Compared to urban participants who did not received inpatient care in the past year, those who had received inpatient care in the past year had 75% lower odds of choosing PHC (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.10-0.56); Compared to urban participants who did not received family caregiving when ill, those who received family caregiving when ill had 73% lower odds of choosing PHC (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.11-0.63); Compared to urban participants who with agricultural Hukou, those with Non-agricultural Hukou had 61% lower odds of choosing PHC (OR: 0.39, 95% CI:0.18-0.83); Compared to urban participants living in the eastern part of mainland China, those living in the central part of China had 188% higher odds of choosing PHC (OR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.14-7.29).

CONCLUSION

Policymakers should focus on tailoring PHC to vulnerable populations and prioritizing family-based public health strategies for enhancing homebound patients' perceptions of PHC. Furthermore, further study is needed on whether the Hukou registration system affects the barriers that homebound patients experience in choosing healthcare providers.