The Portuguese version of Rhinitis and Asthma Patient's Perspective (RAPP): Validation and assessment

Rhinitis and Asthma Patient Perspective (RAPP): Clinical Utility and Predictive Value

BACKGROUND

RhinAsthma Patient Perspective (RAPP) is the only validated tool for assessing of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) related to asthma and rhinitis in individual patients.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the HRQoL burden among countries and explore the usefulness of RAPP as a complementary measure in disease management.

METHODS

In this post hoc analysis of the RAPP International Study, the enrolled population was clustered into patients with controlled rhinitis and controlled asthma (CA/CR), uncontrolled rhinitis and controlled asthma (CA/UR), controlled rhinitis and uncontrolled asthma (UA/CR), and uncontrolled rhinitis and uncontrolled asthma (UA/UR).

RESULTS

We recruited 575 adult patients. Significant differences among countries were observed in the mean RAPP score (from 15.7 in Spain to 18.7 in the Philippines) although the percentage of subjects with an optimal HRQoL (RAPP <15) was not significantly different. Compared with patients with AR and asthma disease control, those with UR/CA, CR/UA, and UR/UA had significantly higher RAPP scores (4.7, 5, and 9.8, respectively). The best cutoffs for detecting uncontrolled diseases were RAPP of 15 or greater (SE = 75%; specificity = 69%; and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.78) for AR; RAPP of 16 or greater (SE = 78%; specificity = 76%; and AUC = 0.83) for asthma; and RAPP of 18 or greater (SE = 86%; specificity = 87%; and AUC = 0.92) for both AR and asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide a better understanding of the individual burden of HRQoL related to asthma and rhinitis in daily practice. In addition, the RAPP estimates how much of the risk for uncontrolled disease depends on uncontrolled AR and asthma, allowing its use as a clinical support tool in clinical management.

Prevalence of aspergillus skin hypersensitivity in allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic allergen specific, IgE-mediated hypersensitivity disorder which significantly impairs the quality of life in affected patients. Many aeroallergens and molds are responsible for AR. This study was  conducted to find prevalence of Aspergillus fumigatus skin hypersensitivity in patients of AR by skin prick test (SPT).  150 clinically diagnosed AR patients visiting our OPD were enrolled. Skin hypersensitivity for Aspergillus f. was done by SPT in all the enrolled patients. Chi square test and Student’s t-test were applied for statistical analysis. Out of 150 patients, 60 (40%) were positive for Aspergillus fumigatus SPT. Majority of the positive patients had persistent AR and among those 39/60 (65%) had moderate to severe persistent AR and 12/60 (20%) had mild persistent AR.  Our study concluded that there is high (40%) prevalence of Aspergillus f. skin hypersensitivity among AR patients. The hypersensitivity to Aspergillus f. was found more in severe AR patients and it was statistically significant.

Reducing oral corticosteroids in severe asthma (ROSA Project): a nationwide Portuguese consensus

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

We aimed to build a national consensus to optimize the use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) in severe asthma in Portugal.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A modified 3-round Delphi including 65 statements (topics on chronic systemic corticotherapy, therapeutic schemes, asthma safety and monitoring) was performed via online platform (October-November 2019). A five-point Likert-type scale was used (1-'strongly disagree'; 5-'strongly agree'). Consensus threshold was established as a percentage of agreement among participants ≥90% in the 1st round and ≥85% in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. The level of consensus achieved by the panel was discussed with the participants (face-to-face meeting).

RESULTS

Forty-eight expert physicians in severe asthma (specialists in allergology and pulmonology) participated in the study. Almost half of the statements (28/65; 43.1%) obtained positive consensus by the end of round one. By the end of the exercise, 12 (18.5%) statements did not achieve consensus. Overall, 87% of physicians agree that further actions for OCS cumulative risk assessment in acute asthma exacerbations are needed. The vast majority (91.7%) demonstrated a favorable perception for using biological agents whenever patients are eligible. Most participants (95.8%) are more willing to accept some degree of lung function deterioration compared to other outcomes (worsening of symptoms, quality of life) when reducing OCS dose. Monitoring patients' comorbidities was rated as imperative by all experts.

CONCLUSIONS

These results can guide an update on asthma management in Portugal and should be supplemented by studies on therapy access, patients' adherence, and costs.

RAPP-children: A new tool for assessing quality of life in patients with asthma and rhinitis

BACKGROUND

RhinAsthma Patient Perspective (RAPP) is a short, validated questionnaire for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adult patients with comorbid asthma and rhinitis, while a paediatric version is still not available.

OBJECTIVE

The current study aimed to develop and validate the RAPP-children questionnaire.

METHODS

RAPP-children was derived by combining RhinAsthma-children subscales into five unique items. At baseline (T0) and after 30 days (T1), 150 children (6-11 years) with comorbid asthma (predominantly intermittent or mild persistent) and rhinitis were given the following: RAPP-children, RhinAsthma-children, Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ, age >6 years), Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ), Childhood Asthma Control Test (CACT), KiddyKindl^® (age 6 years) or KidKindl^® (age >6 years), and a Visual Analogue Scale for nasal symptoms (VAS). At the final visit, a Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale was administered. The approved study was registered on the central registration system ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03276416).

RESULTS

RAPP-children fairly reproduced RhinAsthma-children scores (concordance correlation coefficients between 0.91 and 0.95). RAPP-children showed adequate convergent validity (absolute Spearman's rho larger than 0.5 with PAQLQ, PRQLQ, CACT, KiddyKindl/KidKindl, and VAS), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.70), repeatability (intra-cluster correlation coefficient between 0.61 and 0.8) in the presence of clinical stability (GRC = 0), discriminant validity (sensitivity to asthma control status and rhinitis severity), and sensitivity to symptom improvements (GRC > 1). The minimal important difference (MID) was -20. Floor and ceiling effects were minimal. RAPP-children showed fair usability also in younger children (6-8 years).

CONCLUSION & CLINICAL RELEVANCE

RAPP-children is a valid, five-item questionnaire for assessing HRQoL in children aged 6 to 11 years with concomitant asthma and rhinitis. Although further investigation is required in moderate and severe asthmatics, this tool can be useful in clinical trials and in routine medical practice for improving the management of respiratory allergy in children.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the RhinAsthma Patient Perspective (RAPP) in the Polish population

Introduction

The RhinAsthma Patient Perspective (RAPP) was developed in Italian to assess the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) impairment in patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) in daily practice.

Aim

To cross-culturally validate the Polish version.

Material and methods

The Polish version was administered to patients suffering from asthma and rhinitis in a prospective observational study. Polish RAPP, along with SF-12, ACT, and a Symptomatologic VAS was filled in twice, with a 4-week interval between visits. At visit 2, a Global Rating Scale (GRS) was completed to assess any change in health status. Internal consistency, validity, reliability, discriminant ability and responsiveness to change as well as Minimal Important Difference were determined.

Results

The factor and confirmatory analysis revealed a unidimensional structure of RAPP. Internal consistency was satisfactory with Cronbach’s α (visit 1 = 0.85, visit 2 = 0.89). High reliability (ICC = 0.89 and a CCC = 0.94) was found. Validity analyses showed good correlations of the Polish RAPP with Physical and Mental Component Scores of SF-12. In addition, RAPP adequately discriminated patients on the basis of the asthma control level and rhinitis severity (p < 0.03 for all the analyses), and demonstrated to be sensitive to change. MID value was 1 point.

Conclusions

The study confirmed the reliability and validity of the Polish version of RAPP demonstrating that it is a useful tool in the assessment of HRQoL in patients with asthma and comorbid allergic rhinitis, in clinical practice.