Vitacca M, Bianchi L, Ceriana P, Gigliotti F, Murgia R, Fumagalli A, Spanevello A, Piana GLA, Forlani S, Aliani M, Beghi G, Maniscalco M, Fiorentino G, Banfi P, Paneroni M, Ambrosino N. Is the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale useful in individuals undergoing in-hospital pulmonary rehabilitation?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2024:S0003-9993(24)01128-6. [PMID:
39047855 DOI:
10.1016/j.apmr.2024.07.009]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To assess validity and responsiveness of the Extended Rehabilitation Complexity Scale (RCS-Ev13) to in-hospital pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in individuals with chronic respiratory diseases (CRD).
DESIGN
cross-sectional multicentric study. Assessments in individuals attending units on two non-consecutive days.
SETTING
14 Italian in-hospital PR units.
PARTICIPANTS
Five hundred forty-seventh individuals (59.2% male, age 72 [65-78] years): 317 with Chronic Respiratory Failure due to various causes (CRF group); 96 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease without CRF (COPD), 39 Tracheostomized and Ventilated (Tx/V), and 95 with other diseases (Miscellaneous).
INTERVENTION
Assessment of RCS-Ev13 before and after the PR program.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
RCS-Ev13 and outcome measures: Barthel Index (BI), Barthel Index Dyspnoea (BiD), Medical Research Council Scale for dyspnoea (MRC), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Six-Minute Walking Test (6MWT).
RESULTS
The highest RCS-Ev13 admission values (median; IQR) were found in TX/V (17; 15-18) as compared to other groups (8; 7-10, 10; 9-12, 8; 8-10 in COPD, CRF and Miscellaneous respectively, p<0.001). At admission and discharge, RCS-Ev13 correlated strongly with BI, 6MWT, and SPPB and moderately with MRC and BiD (r: 0.43 to 0.60). After the program RCS-Ev13 as well as all outcome measures improved significantly in all groups (p< 0.001 for all). The size of improvement was different among groups according to the different variables. In the overall group the effect size was high for changes in RCS-E v13 (Cohen's d = -2.0984), CAT = (-1.1937), MRC (- 1.0505), BiD (- 0.9364) and SPPB (0.9231) while moderate for 6MWT (0.7670) and BI (0.6574).
CONCLUSIONS
RCS-E v13 varies according to different CRDs, is responsive to PR, has good construct and concurrent validity, and correlates with most of the accepted outcome measures of PR. Its scoring may provide useful information on the care burden of individuals undergoing PR.
Collapse