Clinical outcome associated with the use of different inhalation method with and without humidification in asthmatic mechanically ventilated patients

Inhaled drug delivery: a randomized study in intubated patients with healthy lungs

BACKGROUND

The administration technique for inhaled drug delivery during invasive ventilation remains debated. This study aimed to compare in vivo and in vitro the deposition of a radiolabeled aerosol generated through four configurations during invasive ventilation, including setups optimizing drug delivery.

METHODS

Thirty-one intubated postoperative neurosurgery patients with healthy lungs were randomly assigned to four configurations of aerosol delivery using a vibrating-mesh nebulizer and specific ventilator settings: (1) a specific circuit for aerosol therapy (SCAT) with the nebulizer placed at 30 cm of the wye, (2) a heated-humidified circuit switched off 30 min before the nebulization or (3) left on with the nebulizer at the inlet of the heated-humidifier, (4) a conventional circuit with the nebulizer placed between the heat and moisture exchanger filter and the endotracheal tube. Aerosol deposition was analyzed using planar scintigraphy.

RESULTS

A two to three times greater lung delivery was measured in the SCAT group, reaching 19.7% (14.0-24.5) of the nominal dose in comparison to the three other groups (p < 0.01). Around 50 to 60% of lung doses reached the outer region of both lungs in all groups. Drug doses in inner and outer lung regions were significantly increased in the SCAT group (p < 0.01), except for the outer right lung region in the fourth group due to preferential drug trickling from the endotracheal tube and the trachea to the right bronchi. Similar lung delivery was observed whether the heated humidifier was switched off or left on. Inhaled doses measured in vitro correlated with lung doses (R = 0.768, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Optimizing the administration technique enables a significant increase in inhaled drug delivery to the lungs, including peripheral airways. Before adapting mechanical ventilation, studies are required to continue this optimization and to assess its impact on drug delivery and patient outcome in comparison to more usual settings.

Aerosol therapy in adult critically ill patients: a consensus statement regarding aerosol administration strategies during various modes of respiratory support

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice of aerosol delivery in conjunction with respiratory support devices for critically ill adult patients remains a topic of controversy due to the complexity of the clinical scenarios and limited clinical evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To reach a consensus for guiding the clinical practice of aerosol delivery in patients receiving respiratory support (invasive and noninvasive) and identifying areas for future research.

METHODS

A modified Delphi method was adopted to achieve a consensus on technical aspects of aerosol delivery for adult critically ill patients receiving various forms of respiratory support, including mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, and high-flow nasal cannula. A thorough search and review of the literature were conducted, and 17 international participants with considerable research involvement and publications on aerosol therapy, comprised a multi-professional panel that evaluated the evidence, reviewed, revised, and voted on recommendations to establish this consensus.

RESULTS

We present a comprehensive document with 20 statements, reviewing the evidence, efficacy, and safety of delivering inhaled agents to adults needing respiratory support, and providing guidance for healthcare workers. Most recommendations were based on in-vitro or experimental studies (low-level evidence), emphasizing the need for randomized clinical trials. The panel reached a consensus after 3 rounds anonymous questionnaires and 2 online meetings.

CONCLUSIONS

We offer a multinational expert consensus that provides guidance on the optimal aerosol delivery techniques for patients receiving respiratory support in various real-world clinical scenarios.

Impact of gas humidification and nebulizer position under invasive ventilation: preclinical comparative study of regional aerosol deposition

Successful aerosol therapy in mechanically ventilated patients depends on multiple factors. Among these, position of nebulizer in ventilator circuit and humidification of inhaled gases can strongly influence the amount of drug deposited in airways. Indeed, the main objective was to preclinically evaluate impact of gas humidification and nebulizer position during invasive mechanical ventilation on whole lung and regional aerosol deposition and losses. Ex vivo porcine respiratory tracts were ventilated in controlled volumetric mode. Two conditions of relative humidity and temperature of inhaled gases were investigated. For each condition, four different positions of vibrating mesh nebulizer were studied: (i) next to the ventilator, (ii) right before humidifier, (iii) 15 cm to the Y-piece adapter and (iv) right after the Y-piece. Aerosol size distribution were calculated using cascade impactor. Nebulized dose, lung regional deposition and losses were assessed by scintigraphy using 99mtechnetium-labeled diethylene-triamine-penta-acetic acid. Mean nebulized dose was 95% ± 6%. For dry conditions, the mean respiratory tract deposited fractions reached 18% (± 4%) next to ventilator and 53% (± 4%) for proximal position. For humidified conditions, it reached 25% (± 3%) prior humidifier, 57% (± 8%) before Y-piece and 43% (± 11%) after this latter. Optimal nebulizer position is proximal before the Y-piece adapter showing a more than two-fold higher lung dose than positions next to the ventilator. Dry conditions are more likely to cause peripheral deposition of aerosols in the lungs. But gas humidification appears hard to interrupt efficiently and safely in clinical use. Considering the impact of optimized positioning, this study argues to maintain humidification.

Effect of Nebuliser and Patient Interface Type on Fugitive Medical Aerosol Emissions in Adult and Paediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Open circuit aerosol therapy is associated with the potential for fugitive emissions of medical aerosol. Various nebulisers and interfaces are used in respiratory treatments, including the recent consideration of filtered interfaces. This study aims to quantify fugitive medical aerosols from various nebuliser types, in conjunction with different filtered and non-filtered interfaces.

METHODS

For both simulated adult and paediatric breathing, four nebuliser types were assessed including; a small volume jet nebuliser (SVN), a breath enhanced jet nebuliser (BEN), a breath actuated jet nebuliser (BAN) and a vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN). A combination of different interfaces were used including filtered and unfiltered mouthpieces, as well as open, valved and filtered facemasks. Aerosol mass concentrations were measured using an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer at 0.8 m and 2.0 m. Additionally, inhaled dose was assessed.

RESULTS

Highest mass concentrations recorded were 214 (177, 262) µg m^-3 at 0.8 m over 45-minute run. The highest and lowest fugitive emissions were observed for the adult SVN facemask combination, and the adult BAN filtered mouthpiece combination respectively. Fugitive emissions decreased when using breath-actuated (BA) mode compared to continuous (CN) mode on the BAN for the adult and paediatric mouthpiece combination. Lower fugitive emissions were observed when a filtered facemask or mouthpiece was used, compared to unfiltered scenarios. For the simulated adult, highest and lowest inhaled dose were 45.1 (42.6, 45.6)% and 11.0 (10.1,11.9)% for the VMN and SVN respectively. For the simulated paediatric, highest and lowest inhaled dose were 44.0 (42.4, 44.8)% and 6.1 (5.9, 7.0)% for the VMN and BAN CN respectively. Potential inhalation exposure of albuterol was calculated to be up to 0.11 µg and 0.12 µg for a bystander and healthcare worker respectively.

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrates the need for filtered interfaces in clinical and homecare settings to minimise fugitive emissions and to reduce the risk of secondary exposure to care givers.

Not all nebulizers are created equal: Considerations in choosing a nebulizer for aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation

INTRODUCTION

Aerosol therapy is commonly prescribed in the mechanically ventilated patient. Jet nebulizers (JN) and vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMN) are the most common nebulizer types, however, despite VMN's well established superior performance, JN use remains the most commonly used of the two. In this review, we describe the key differentiators between nebulizer types and how considered selection of nebulizer type may enable successful therapy and the optimization of drug/device combination products.

AREAS COVERED

Following a review of the published literature up to February 2023, the current state of the art in relation to JN and VMN is discussed under the headings of in vitro performance of nebulizers during mechanical ventilation, respective compatibility with formulations for inhalation, clinical trials making use of VMN during mechanical ventilation, distribution of nebulized aerosol throughout the lung, measuring the respective performance of nebulizers in the patient and non-drug delivery considerations in nebulizer choice.

EXPERT OPINION

Whether for standard care, or the development of drug/device combination products, the choice of nebulizer type should not be made without consideration of the unique needs of the combination of each of drug, disease and patient types, as well as target site for deposition, and healthcare professional and patient safety.

Effect of oxygen flow on aerosol delivery from a vibrating mesh nebulizer with a holding chamber

Background

A holding chamber (HC) was created to work with a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) to boost the total inhalable dose for patients. In addition to the optional supply of supplemental oxygen, it facilitates intermittent and continuous nebulization. Our goal was to see how well a VMN coupled to a HC with a mouthpiece or valved facemask performed at varied oxygen flows starting at 0–6 L/min. In this study, we used a breathing simulator to simulate adults' spontaneous breathing patterns with a tidal volume of 500 mL and a 1:1 inhalation–exhalation ratio. For the combination of nebulizer and HC adapter with a valved facemask or mouthpiece, five determinations were made. Salbutamol was recovered and evaluated using high-performance liquid chromatography from the inhalation filter connected to the breathing simulator, the nebulizer reservoir chamber, and the HC.

Results

The amount of salbutamol in the nebulizer reservoir chamber and within the HC did not differ significantly when using a mouthpiece or a valved facemask. However, the supplied dose to the inhalation filter was increased until oxygen flow reached 2 and 3 L/min using the mouthpiece and valved facemask as interfaces, respectively. The supplied salbutamol was much higher at this flow than at the other oxygen flows. This was followed by a progressive reduction in the supplied salbutamol until the lowest given dose was reached at 6 L/min oxygen flow, p < 0.005.

Conclusions

The supplied doses of salbutamol to the inhalation filter were variable with the VMN connected to the HC and mouthpiece or valved facemask, with significant improvements until an oxygen flow of 2 L/min with a mouthpiece and 3 L/min with a valved facemask, followed by gradual decreases to lower values at an oxygen flow of 6 L/min. An in vivo investigation is required to further validate the findings.

The efficacy of low-frequency ultrasound as an added treatment for chronic wounds: A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of low-frequency ultrasound as an added treatment for chronic wounds. A systematic literature search up to May 2022 was performed and 838 subjects with chronic wounds at the baseline of the studies; 412 of them were using the low-frequency ultrasound (225 low-frequency high-intensity contact ultrasound for diabetic foot wound ulcers, and 187 low-frequency low-intensity non-contact ultrasound for a venous leg wound ulcers), and 426 were using standard care (233 sharp debridements for diabetic foot wound ulcers and 193 sham treatments for venous leg wound ulcers). Odds ratio (OR), and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of low-frequency ultrasound as an added treatment for chronic wounds using the dichotomous, and contentious methods with a random or fixed-effect model. The low-frequency high-intensity contact ultrasound for diabetic foot wound ulcers had significantly lower non-healed diabetic foot wound ulcers at ≥3 months (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24-0.56, P < .001), a higher percentage of diabetic foot wound ulcers area reduction (MD, 17.18; 95% CI, 6.62-27.85, P = .002) compared with sharp debridement for diabetic foot wound ulcers. The low-frequency low-intensity non-contact ultrasound for a venous leg wound ulcers had a significantly lower non-healed venous leg wound ulcers at ≥3 months (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15-0.62, P = .001), and higher percentage venous leg wound ulcers area reduction (MD, 18.96; 95% CI, 2.36-35.57, P = .03) compared with sham treatments for a venous leg wound ulcers. The low-frequency ultrasound as an added treatment for diabetic foot wound ulcers and venous leg wound ulcers had significantly lower non-healed chronic wound ulcers at ≥3 months, a higher percentage of chronic wound ulcers area reduction compared with standard care. The analysis of outcomes should be with caution because of the low sample size of all the 17 studies in the meta-analysis and a low number of studies in certain comparisons.

Placenta Accreta has a Low Association with Hypertensive Disease During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review Incorporating a Network Meta-analysis

A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the potential relationship between hypertensive disease during pregnancy and placenta accreta. A systematic literature search in OVID, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google scholar up to May 2021 was done, and 4 studies were found including 47,353 pregnant women at the start of the study; 4283 of them had hypertensive disease during pregnancy and 493 had placenta accreta. They were reporting relationships between hypertensive disease during pregnancy and placenta accreta. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated to assess the potential relationship between hypertensive disease during pregnancy and placenta accreta using the dichotomous with a random or fixed-effect model. Hypertensive disease during pregnancy was significantly related to lower prevalence of placenta accreta (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, .38-.94, p = 0.03) compared with control (no hypertensive disease during pregnancy). When looking at the result comparing the prevalence of hypertensive disease during pregnancy in women with placenta accreta compared with control (no placenta accreta), we found that the placenta accreta was significantly related to lower prevalence of hypertensive disease during pregnancy (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.94, p = 0.03) compared with control. Hypertensive disease during pregnancy may have a lower prevalence of placenta accreta. Further studies are required to validate these findings.

Hypertension in pregnancy as a risk factor for placenta accreta spectrum: a systematic review incorporating a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the potential effects of hypertension in pregnancy on the placenta accreta spectrum.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in OVID, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar up to May 2021 was done, and six studies were found including 126,224 pregnant women; 7164 of them had hypertension in pregnancy and 816 had placenta accreta spectrum. They were reporting relationships between the potential effects of hypertension in pregnancy on the placenta accreta spectrum. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated to assess the potential effects of hypertension in pregnancy on the placenta accreta spectrum using the dichotomous with a random- or fixed-effect model.

RESULTS

Pregnancy-induced hypertension was significantly related to lower prevalence of placenta accreta spectrum (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.37-0.84, p = 0.005) with no heterogeneity (I² = 0%) compared to control (no hypertension in pregnancy). When looking at the result comparing the prevalence of hypertension in pregnancy in women with placenta accrete compared to control (no placenta accrete), we found that the placenta accreta spectrum was significantly related to lower prevalence of hypertension in pregnancy (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.43-0.98, p = 0.04) compared to control.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertension in pregnancy may have a lower prevalence of placenta accrete. Further studies are required to validate these findings.

Relationship between Change in Bone Mineral Density of Lumbar Spine and Risk of New Vertebral and Nonvertebral Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

Studies have shown that the change in lumbar spine bone mineral density with different osteoporosis drugs had a beneficial effect on the frequency of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal females, but their results were conflicting. This meta‐analysis was performed to evaluate this relationship. A systematic literature search up to May 2020 was performed and 20 studies with 73,390 postmenopausal females were included; of them, a total of 41,980 were treated with osteoporosis drugs and 31,410 with placebo. They reported relationships between the change in lumbar spine bone mineral density and the frequency of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal females. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated comparing the osteoporosis drugs to placebo effect on the frequency of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal females using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed‐effect model. Treatment with osteoporosis drugs had significantly lower frequency of new vertebral fractures (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.45–0.63, P < 0.001) and nonvertebral fractures (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78–0.87, P < 0.001) compared to placebo in postmenopausal females. Treatment with osteoporosis drugs had a significantly lower frequency of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures compared to placebo in postmenopausal females. This relationship forces us to recommend osteoporosis drugs in postmenopausal females to avoid any possible new fractures. A cost‐effective study is recommended.

Aerosol delivery of inhalation devices with different add-on connections to invasively ventilated COPD subjects: An in-vivo study

Aerosol delivery to mechanically ventilated patients requires add-on connections to place the inhalation device within the ventilation circuit. The study aimed to evaluate the performance of Combihaler in dual limb invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). A ventilator with a humidified dual limb circuit was adjusted to volume-controlled mode to imitate the adult breathing parameters. 24 (12 females) intubated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) subjects had undergone the study. All patients were prescribed inhaled salbutamol dose delivered by either a metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) or vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN). Each subject received salbutamol in four different inhalation device/connection conditions; pMDI+VMN+Combihaler, VMN+Combihaler, VMN+T-piece, and pMDI+T-piece. They were individually placed in the inspiratory limb at Y-piece. 5mg salbutamol was delivered by VMN with and without 2 pMDI puffs of salbutamol (100 µg), and 500µg was delivered by pMDI+T-piece. After aerosol delivery, two urine samples were collected from the patient; 30 min post-inhalation (USAL0.5) and cumulatively 24 h post-inhalation (USAL24) as indexes of lung deposition and systemic absorption, respectively. For the ex-vivo study, a collecting filter was placed before an endotracheal tube (ETT) to collect the delivered inhalable dose. In-vitro aerodynamic characteristics were also investigated. pMDI+VMN+Combihaler delivered more salbutamol to the lung and the ex-vivo filter than VMN+T-piece (p˂0.05, p≤0.01, respectively). VMN delivered a higher salbutamol amount to the lung, systemically, and the ex-vivo filter than pMDI+T-piece (p˂0.001). pMDI+VMN+Combihaler and VMN+Combihaler delivered aerosols with a less mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) and higher fine particle fraction (FPF) compared to VMN+T-piece (p≤0.01 for MMAD, p˂0.01 for FPF) and pMDI+T-piece (p˂0.01 for both MMAD and FPF). Results of the study showed that pMDI+VMN+ Combihaler delivered more salbutamol than VMN+T-piece in IMV and demonstrate that 5 puffs (500-µg) of salbutamol with pMDI+T-piece has a lower aerosol delivering power at the level of USAL0.5, USAL24, and the ex-vivo inhalable dose than 5 mg nebulized salbutamol by VMNs in IMV.

Effect of age of COVID-19 inpatient on the severity of the disease: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Clinical symptoms of adults and paediatric inpatients with COVID-19 disease are conflicting. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effect of age of COVID-19 inpatient on the severity of the disease.

METHODS

A systematic literature search up to January 2021 was performed and 5 studies included 910 inpatients with COVID-19 disease at the baseline of the study; 773 of them were adult inpatients, and 137 of them were paediatric inpatients. They reported a comparison between adults and children with COVID-19 in the level of symptomatic severity, clinical features, computed tomography (CT) results and laboratory results. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated assessing the effect of age of COVID-19 inpatient on the severity of the disease using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model.

RESULTS

Adults with COVID-19 disease had significantly lower number of mild cases (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.77, P = .02); higher number severe cases (OR, 4.90; 95% CI, 2.03-11.83, P < .001); higher number of cases with fever (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 2.31-7.43, P < .001); and higher number of cases with CT positive COVID-19 disease (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.17-3.55, P = .001) compared with children. However, no significant difference was found between adults and children in number of cases with shortness of breath (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.41-5.04, P = .57); dry cough (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.64-4.93, P = .27); leukopenia (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.47-1.66, P = .71); lymphopenia (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.49-1.88, P = .91); high platelets (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17-1.02, P = .05); and high D-dimer (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.43-1.56, P = .54).

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with COVID-19 disease have a much higher level of symptomatic severity, fever and CT-positive COVID-19 disease than children. However, as shown in our results, the laboratory data were similar in both groups.

Impact of different nebulisers' connections on aerosol therapy

BACKGROUND

Aerosol therapy has the advantage of a higher safety because of the local deposition of inhaled medication to the lung; however, the main drawback is the low and variable amount of delivered drug to patients. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the effect of different accessory connections on aerosol delivery from different nebulisers.

METHOD

This study consisted of 3 main models: in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo models. In vitro model, 6 nebulisers (3 Jet (Dolphin (2030 2001), Philips (SideStream) and Tylenol (TL009002)) and 3 vibrating mesh nebulisers (VMNs) (Aerogen Pro, Solo, an Nivo)) were charged with 5 mg/2 mL salbutamol and connected to 2 different connections (T-piece and Circulaire II Hybrid) with an inhalation filter attached to a breathing simulator. Inhaled amounts of drug (inhalation filter) and that remained inside nebuliser were measured. Concerning ex vivo and in vivo models, 24 subjects were involved in the study and they received 5 mg/2 mL salbutamol from 1 Jet nebuliser and 1 VMNs using both connections. Two urine samples were collected post 30 minutes and pooled 24 hours urine collection. For the ex vivo model, inhaled amounts of salbutamol were collected on filters placed between the subjects and the nebuliser.

RESULTS

Inhaled amounts of salbutamol expressed by the amount of drug detected on inhalation filters (for both in vitro and ex vivo) were significantly higher from both Jet and VMNs connected to the Circulaire II Hybrid connection than that released from nebulisers connected to T-piece. VMNs delivered a higher amount compared with jet nebulisers. The amount released from jet nebulizers were variables, unlike VMNs. Regarding in vivo results, amounts of drug detected in 30 minutes urine samples were consistent with in vitro and ex vivo models reflecting higher and significant amounts of drug delivered to the patient's lung for Circulaire II Hybrid connection compared with T-piece regarding both nebulisers.

CONCLUSION

Using a valved chamber with jet and VMNs significantly improved the inhaled amount of the emitted aerosol. VMNs were more effective than jet nebulisers with both connections.

Advanced counselling using training device and smartphone application on inhalation technique from metered-dose inhaler with spacer equipped with different interfaces in asthmatic children

BACKGROUND

Spacers are equipped with either facemask or mouthpiece as an interface through which patient inhale their dose. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of advanced counselling using training devices and smartphone applications on inhalation techniques from the metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a spacer equipped with different interfaces.

METHODS

100 paediatric asthmatic children (8-18 years) were divided into two groups. Group one was a spacer with a mouthpiece (n = 50) and group two was a spacer with a facemask group (n = 50). Both groups had three visits one month apart. At each visit, patients were asked to show the investigator their inhalation technique using MDI with spacer, and mistakes were recorded and then patients were trained on the proper inhalation technique of using MDI with a spacer. In the spacer with mouthpiece group, Flo-Tone was attached to the mouthpiece to allow the Trainhaler smartphone application to detect the duration of inhalation. In the spacer with facemask group, there was no need to use the Flo-Tone training device since the facemask was equipped with a built-in whistle detected by the Trainhaler smartphone application.

RESULTS

The total number of mistakes in the inhalation technique decreased significantly (P < .05) in visits 2 and 3 for both groups. Duration of inhalation increased significantly (P < .05) in the mouthpiece group at visit 2 and in the facemask group at visit 3. Achieving 5 seconds of slow deep inhalation, breath-holding for 5 seconds after inhalation and the tight fit of facemask represented the major obstacles in most children especially the youngest subjects. Breath out as far as comfortable had the highest number of mistakes in the first visit in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The Flo-Tone with its positive reinforcement whistle and the Trainhaler smartphone application significantly improved the inhalation technique by decreasing the total number of mistakes especially in important steps eg, shaking MDI, maintaining slow inhalation rate, breath-holding after inhalation and appropriate facemask fitting. Also, they increased the duration of inhalation of asthmatic children from MDI with a spacer. Both spacer interfaces are easy to handle once taught well.

Effect of functional principle, delivery technique, and connection used on aerosol delivery from different nebulizers: An in-vitro study

OBJECTIVE

Nebulizers can be divided according to their functional principle into jet, ultrasonic and vibrating mesh nebulizers with intermittent or continuous aerosol delivery and may be used with many different adapters and connections and all can influence their efficiency. The aim of the present work was to evaluate the effect functional principle, delivery technique, and connection used on aerosol delivered from four different nebulizers.

METHODS

Four nebulizers were used in the study; three of them were jet nebulizers (JNs; AeroEclipse, NebuTech, En ful Kit) and one of them was Aerogen Solo vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMN). AeroEclipse and NebuTech are intermittent output nebulizers, while the rest are continuous output nebulizers. Aerogen Solo was used with either a standard T-piece or Aerogen Ultra holding chamber, and En ful Kit was used with a standard T-piece or Circulaire II holding chamber. 2 ml of salbutamol was nebulized to determine the total emitted dose (TED) and aerodynamic droplet characteristics of the emitted aerosol from the 6 different sets (4 nebulizers with T-piece and 2 holding chambers).

RESULTS

The mean ± SD TED from VMN was significantly higher than all the JNs (p < 0.05). Aerogen Ultra with VMN did not show a significant effect on TED compare to T-piece, but it significantly increased (p < 0.05) fine particle dose (FPD; 3091.5 ± 189.4 μg) and fine particle fraction (FPF; 72.7 ± 3.6%). However, the Circulaire II with En ful Kit had significantly higher TED, FPD, and FPF compared to T-piece (p < 0.05). Intermittent JNs (AeroEclipse and NebuTech) had significantly higher TED (p < 0.05) compared to the continuous JNs (En ful Kit) with no significant effect on the other parameters studied. AeroEclipse had the highest MMAD and Aerogen Solo Ultra has the lowest in MMAD.

CONCLUSIONS

The functional principle, delivery technique, and connection used had a significant effect on aerosol delivered from nebulizers. VMNs are significantly better than JNs. Intermittent delivery has significantly better TED than continuous delivery. Holding chamber with both VMNs and JNs improved aerosol delivery compared to standard T-piece.

Effect of different accessory devices on the dose delivered from pressurised metred-dose inhalers

INTRODUCTIONS

Improved aerosol delivery of bronchodilators to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) subjects is a cornerstone in the treatment approach. Drug delivery and response are improved with the use of accessory devices [spacers and valved holding chambers (VHCs)] with metred-dose inhalers (pMDIs). However, different accessory devices are available in the market with different properties that could affect aerosol delivery. Thus, this study aimed to assess the relative lung deposition and systemic bioavailability and compare bronchodilator response of salbutamol delivered using different accessory devices attached to pMDIs.

METHODS

Twelve healthy subjects and twelve COPD subjects inhaled 300 μg salbutamol (3 pMDI puffs) using five different accessory devices with either masks or mouthpieces (Able, Aerochamber plus flow Vu, Dolphin chamber, Tipshaler spacer, and modified Drink bottle spacer). Urine samples were collected thirty minutes post-dosing and cumulatively for the next twenty-four hours, to determine and compare the relative lung deposition [0-0.5 hour excretion of urinary salbutamol (USAL0.5)] and systemic bioavailability [0.5-24 hours excretion of urinary salbutamol (USAL24)] of salbutamol from the selected accessory devices. Also, the difference between pre and post-inhalation forced expiratory volume in one second (ΔFEV₁ %) of predicted was determined for each accessory device.

RESULTS

Urinary excretion of salbutamol (both USAL0.5 and USAL24 samples) in COPD subjects was significantly (P < .05) lower than in healthy subjects for all accessory devices. USAL0.5 and USAL24 in non-antistatic spacers (modified Drink bottle spacer and Dolphin chamber spacers) were significantly lower (P < .05) than that for antistatic spacers (Aerochamber plus flow Vu, Able and Tips-haler). No significant difference in USAL0.5 and USAL24 was observed between facemasks and mouthpieces. There was a significant difference (P < .05) in ΔFEV₁ % of predicted values between COPD subjects and healthy subjects. However, within the COPD group and the healthy group there was no significant difference in ΔFEV₁ % of predicted values between all accessory devices or between with mouthpiece or with a mask.

CONCLUSIONS

COPD subjects had lower aerosol delivered compared with healthy subjects. Anti-static accessory devices delivered a higher amount of aerosol compared with non-antistatic accessory devices. Even though the presence of a significant difference in aerosol delivery between non-antistatic and antistatic accessory devices no significant difference was found in the ΔFEV₁ % between all accessory devices.

Lung deposition and systemic bioavailability of dose delivered to smoker compared with non-smoker COPD subjects

INTRODUCTION

Inhaled drugs are the most commonly used class of medications for COPD subjects. No studies have been performed to assess the influence of smoking on lung deposition of aerosolized medication, especially for the exacerbated COPD subject. The present study aimed to assess the influence of smoking on the lung deposition of the aerosol delivered to exacerbated COPD subjects.

METHODS

Twenty-four exacerbated COPD subjects using automatic continuous positive airway pressure (Auto-CPAP), 12 smokers (six females) and 12 non-smokers (six females) were recruited in the study. The subjects participated in the study received four salbutamol study doses; 1200 µg (12 puffs 100 µg/puff) of salbutamol emitted from pMDI canister connected to AeroChamber MV spacer; 1200 µg of salbutamol emitted from pMDI canister connected to Combihaler spacer; 1 mL of salbutamol respirable solution (5000 µg/mL) nebulized by Aerogen Solo connected to its T-piece; and 1 mL of salbutamol respirable solution nebulized by Aerogen Solo connected to Combihaler spacer with 2 puffs salbutamol MDI (200 µg salbutamol) before nebulisation. The subjects were randomised to receive the four selected dose-adaptor combination in a sealed envelope design on days 1, 3, 5 and 7. A washout period of 24 hours was provided between each salbutamol dosing. Auto-CPAP was adjusted at non-invasive ventilation mode with the integrated heated humidifier, as a source of humidity. Urine samples were provided by subjects, 30 minutes and cumulatively 24 hours post inhalation, as an index of the relative and systemic bioavailability, respectively, and aliquots were retained for salbutamol analysis using solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). On day 2 of the study, a collecting filter was placed between the aerosol generator and the subject's mask so that the subjects would not inhale the salbutamol delivered. The same study doses and/or adapters were delivered to each subject, with filters changed with each dose-adapter combination. Salbutamol entrained on the filter was desorbed to be analysed by the HPLC.

RESULTS

Significantly higher lung deposition (30 minutes urinary salbutamol) was detected with the non-smoker compared with smokers (P < .05). Significantly higher systemic bioavailability (pooled 24-hour urinary salbutamol) for smokers compared with non-smokers was found with Aerogen Solo connected to its T-piece and CombiHaler spacer with pMDI (P < .05) only. Significantly higher amount desorbed from the ex-vivo filter were found from pMDI with both spacers in non-smokers (P < .05) compared with the smokers.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that smoking reduced the lung deposition of inhaled salbutamol delivered by nebulizer or pMDI. However, the smoking effect on cytochrome p450 was observed to increase systemic absorption of the ingested portion of the inhaled dose. The lower lung deposition and possible higher systemic absorption should be taken into consideration while prescribing inhaled medication to COPD smokers especially exacerbated patients that need ventilation. Further studies are needed.

The impact of changing patient interfaces on delivering aerosol with titrated oxygen in the high flow system

INTRODUCTION

Despite the widespread oxygen-culture as more is better in prehospital and hospital settings, the use of titrated oxygen-flow within a high-flow system can be beneficial especially when combined with aerosol-delivery and also save the patient from unnecessary-hyperoxia.

METHODS

Forty-five COPD patients were included in this study where they allocated in three-groups (nasal-delivery, oral-delivery, and oronasal-delivery groups). All patients were received their inhaled-salbutamol dose using Aerogen Solo nebuliser by one of the three interfaces, eg, nasal-cannula, mouthpiece, and facemask in two conditions; with oxygen-flow and without any oxygen-flow. Pulmonary and systemic salbutamol deposition was estimated by collecting two urine-samples from the patient; 30 min post-inhalation and cumulatively 24 hr post-inhalation. The quantity of salbutamol in these collected samples was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Lung function measurement was performed pre-bronchodilator inhalation and 30 min post-bronchodilator to estimate the change in pulmonary functions post-inhalation regarding all tested interfaces.

RESULTS

COPD patients showed the highest salbutamol percentage excreted 30 min post-inhalation of 5.7% (1.4) with mouthpiece interface when combined with oxygen at P < .002. While with the same condition using oxygen, valved-facemask showed the highest salbutamol percentage excreted in 24 hr post inhalation samples but the difference is only significantly compared with nasal cannula (P < .006). Moreover, without oxygen delivery, mouthpiece and valved facemask showed approximately the same salbutamol percentage excreted in 30 min post-inhalation samples, higher than that delivered by nasal cannula (P < .001). Of note, salbutamol delivery is significantly increased with oxygen flow for all interfaces (P < .05) except with nasal cannula.

CONCLUSIONS

The nasal cannula is a more comfortable and tolerable interface despite the lower fraction of the delivered drug compared with other tested interfaces. The use of oxygen-flow with aerosol delivery within a high flow system positively affects the delivered drug fraction and the pulmonary deposition of the drug.

Aerosol delivery via invasive ventilation: a narrative review

In comparison with spontaneously breathing non-intubated subjects, intubated, mechanically ventilated patients encounter various challenges, barriers, and opportunities in receiving medical aerosols. Since the introduction of mechanical ventilation as a part of modern critical care medicine during the middle of the last century, aerosolized drug delivery by jet nebulizers has become a common practice. However, early evidence suggested that aerosol generators differed in their efficacies, and the introduction of newer aerosol technology (metered dose inhalers, ultrasonic nebulizer, vibrating mesh nebulizers, and soft moist inhaler) into the ventilator circuit opened up the possibility of optimizing inhaled aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation that could meet or exceed the delivery of the same aerosols in spontaneously breathing patients. This narrative review will catalogue the primary variables associated with this process and provide evidence to guide optimal aerosol delivery and dosing during mechanical ventilation. While gaps exist in relation to the appropriate aerosol drug dose, discrepancies in practice, and cost-effectiveness of the administered aerosol drugs, we also present areas for future research and practice. Clinical practice should expand to incorporate these techniques to improve the consistency of drug delivery and provide safer and more effective care for patients.

Knowledge and current practices of ICU nurses regarding aerosol therapy for patients treated with invasive mechanical ventilation: a nationwide cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Aerosol therapy is a routine operation for intensive care unit (ICU) nurses; however, evidence of the knowledge and current practices of ICU nurses regarding aerosol therapy for patients with invasive mechanical ventilation is insufficient in China.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the knowledge and current practices of ICU nurses regarding aerosol therapy for patients with invasive mechanical ventilation in China.

SETTING

A total of 433 hospitals in 92 cities (including 31 capital cities) in 31 provinces in China participated in the study.

METHODS

A questionnaire was used to investigate the knowledge and current practices of ICU nurses regarding aerosol therapy for patients treated with invasive mechanical ventilation, including 42 questions covering five aspects: sociodemographic information, aerosolization devices, atomised drugs, atomisation operation, and atomisation-related knowledge. Descriptive analyses of the distribution of the sample are reported as percentages and medians. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to detect the factors of the interviewee's atomisation knowledge and practices scores. A STROBE checklist was used to guide the reporting of the research.

RESULTS

Of the 1,995 questionnaires that were returned, 1,978 were analysed. Bronchodilators and glucocorticoids were the most frequently administered drugs. Seventy-four percent of the total respondents reported placing a filter on the expiratory limb during aerosol therapy, and 47% of these reported that the filter was changed once a day. Only 13% of the respondents reported always turning the heating humidifier off during aerosol therapy, and 48% never did. Knowledge about the optimal droplet size or atomisation yield was poor. Work experience in the ICU and frequency of atomisation training were the independent influencing factors for atomisation knowledge and practice scores (F=279.653, P<0.001; F=120.556, P<0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The knowledge of ICU nurses about the optimal implementation of aerosol therapy is poor, and the current scientific knowledge about optimal implementation seemed to be applied infrequently. Atomisation-related training should be strengthened, especially for nurses with junior titles and with less work experience.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Improving the level of ICU nurses' atomization practice ability is helpful to ensure patient safety. In clinical work, atomization expert consensus can be used to carry out relevant training and standardize atomization operation.

The utilization of aerosol therapy in mechanical ventilation patients: a prospective multicenter observational cohort study and a review of the current evidence

Background

Aerosol delivery via mechanical ventilation has been reported to vary significantly among different intensive care units (ICU). The optimal technique for using each aerosol generator may need to be updated with the available evidence.

Methods

A 2-week prospective multicenter observational cohort study was implemented to record aerosol delivery for mechanically ventilated adult patients in Chinese ICUs. Our data included the type of aerosol device and its placement, ventilator type, humidification, and aerosolized medication administered. A guide for the optimal technique for aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation was summarized after a thorough literature review.

Results

A total of 160 patients (105 males) from 28 ICUs were enrolled, of whom 125 (78.1%) received aerosol therapy via invasive ventilation. Among these 125 patients, 53 received ventilator-integrated jet nebulizer, with 64% (34/53) of them placed the nebulizer close to Y piece in the inspiratory limb. Further, 56 patients used continuous nebulizers, with 84% (47/56) of them placed the nebulizer close to the Y piece in the inspiratory limb. Of the 35 patients who received aerosol therapy via noninvasive ventilation, 30 received single limb ventilators and continuous nebulizers, with 70% (21/30) of them placed between the mask and exhalation port. Only 36% (58/160) of the patients received aerosol treatments consistent with optimal practice.

Conclusions

Aerosol delivery via mechanical ventilation varied between ICUs, and only 36% of the patients received aerosol treatments consistent with optimal practice. ICU clinicians should be educated on the best practices for aerosol therapy, and quality improvement projects aim to improve the quality and outcome of patients with the optimal technique for aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation are warranted.

Future Trends in Nebulized Therapies for Pulmonary Disease

Aerosol therapy is a key modality for drug delivery to the lungs of respiratory disease patients. Aerosol therapy improves therapeutic effects by directly targeting diseased lung regions for rapid onset of action, requiring smaller doses than oral or intravenous delivery and minimizing systemic side effects. In order to optimize treatment of critically ill patients, the efficacy of aerosol therapy depends on lung morphology, breathing patterns, aerosol droplet characteristics, disease, mechanical ventilation, pharmacokinetics, and the pharmacodynamics of cell-drug interactions. While aerosol characteristics are influenced by drug formulations and device mechanisms, most other factors are reliant on individual patient variables. This has led to increased efforts towards more personalized therapeutic approaches to optimize pulmonary drug delivery and improve selection of effective drug types for individual patients. Vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMN) are the dominant device in clinical trials involving mechanical ventilation and emerging drugs. In this review, we consider the use of VMN during mechanical ventilation in intensive care units. We aim to link VMN fundamentals to applications in mechanically ventilated patients and look to the future use of VMN in emerging personalized therapeutic drugs.

Aerosol Delivery to a Critically Ill Patient: A Big Issue Easily Solved by Developing Guidelines

Nowadays, therapeutic aerosols are commonly delivered to mechanically ventilated patients by nebulizers and pressurized metered dose inhaler attached to an adapter or a spacer. Studies with asthmatics and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients have confirmed that aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation is feasible. They have also reported that the inhaled drugs administered during mechanical ventilation provide greater and faster clinical outcomes than when delivering during spontaneous unassisted breathing. Researchers studied factors that would affect aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation. Even with the tremendous amount of publications in this area, there have still been no recommendations or guidelines released to help respiratory therapists in their decision as to when to deliver aerosol to ventilated patients. Mostly, respiratory therapists read the literature and decide accordingly what to do and which device to use for their patients. This puts the patients at risk of receiving a sub-therapeutic or toxic dose of the inhaled aerosol. Some studies raise an alarm of physician decision upon reading any released publication related to aerosol delivery in mechanical ventilation without a trusted recommendation and guidelines. This increases the need for the development of recommendations and guidelines, by a trusted board or society, for aerosol delivery to such critically ill patients. To summarize, inhaled drugs administered to critically ill patients is of benefit compared to taking the patient off the ventilator and delivering during spontaneous unassisted breathing. However, dependable guidelines are needed to optimize aerosol delivery.

Modeling and optimization of nebulizers' performance in non-invasive ventilation using different fill volumes: Comparative study between vibrating mesh and jet nebulizers

BACKGROUNDS

Substituting nebulisers by another, especially in non-invasive ventilation (NIV), involves many process-variables, e.g. nebulizer-type and fill-volume of respirable-dose, which might affect patient optimum-therapy. The aim of the present work was to use neural-networks and genetic-algorithms to develop performance-models for two different nebulizers.

METHODS

In-vitro, ex-vivo and in-vivo models were developed using input-variables including nebulizer-type [jet nebulizer (JN) and vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN)] fill-volumes of respirable dose placed in the nebulization chamber with an output-variable e.g. average amount reaching NIV patient. Produced models were tested and validated to ensure effective predictivity and validity in further optimization of nebulization process.

RESULTS

Data-mining produced models showed excellent training, testing and validation correlation-coefficients. VMN showed high nebulization efficacy than JN. JN was affected more by increasing the fill-volume. The optimization process and contour-lines obtained for in-vivo model showed increase in pulmonary-bioavailability and systemic-absorption with VMN and 2 mL fill-volumes.

CONCLUSIONS

Modeling of aerosol-delivery by JN and VMN using different fill-volumes in NIV circuit was successful in demonstrating the effect of different variable on dose-delivery to NIV patient. Artificial neural networks model showed that VMN increased pulmonary-bioavailability and systemic-absorption compared to JN. VMN was less affected by fill-volume change compared to JN which should be diluted to increase delivery.

Vibrating Mesh Nebulisers – Can Greater Drug Delivery to the Airways and Lungs Improve Respiratory Outcomes?

Aerosols are an increasingly important mode of delivery of drugs, particularly bronchodilators, for the treatment of respiratory diseases, notably asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The most common type of nebuliser is the jet nebuliser (JN); they have been in use for more than a century but these devices can be cumbersome to use and may sometimes deliver insufficient amounts of drug. A more recent development in aerosol therapy is the vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) which is very user friendly and is more efficient than the JNs due to an extremely low residual volume. Scintigraphy images from studies of volunteer subjects using radio-labelled aerosol treatment show that VMN-generated aerosols deliver more drug to patients in a shorter period of time than JN-generated aerosols. Various bench, animal model and small clinical studies have shown that VMNs are more efficient than JNs in drug delivery, potentially improving clinical outcomes. These studies have included various breathing circuits used in mechanical ventilation (MV), non-invasive ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula systems and devices for spontaneously breathing patients. The efficiency of drug delivery was affected by factors including the position of the nebuliser in the circuit and humidity. Some studies have shown potential substantial savings by hospitals in the cost of MV treatments after switching from metered dose inhalers to VMNs. VMNs have also been shown to be effective for the administration of inhaled antibiotics, corticosteroids and other drugs. Larger studies of the effects of VMNs on patient outcomes are needed but they are likely to be an increasingly important means of administering therapies to a burgeoning population with respiratory disease.

Lung deposition and systemic bioavailability of different aerosol devices with and without humidification in mechanically ventilated patients

BACKGROUND

During mechanical ventilation medical aerosol delivery has been reported to be upto two fold greater with dry inhaled gas than with heated humidity. Urine levels at 0.5 h post dose (URSAL0.5%) has been confirmed as an index of lung deposition and 24 h (URSAL24%) as index of systemic absorption. Our aim was to determine the effect of humidification and aerosol device type on drug delivery to ventilated patients using urine levels.

METHODS

In a randomized crossover design, 36 (18female) mechanically ventilated patients were assigned to one of three groups. Groups 1 and 2 received 5000 μg salbutamol using vibrating mesh (VM) and jet nebulizers (JN), respectively, while group 3 received 1600 μg (16 puffs) of salbutamol via metered dose inhaler with AeroChamber Vent (MDI-AV). All devices were placed in the inspiratory limb of ventilator downstream from the humidifier. Each subject received aerosol with and without humidity at >24 h intervals with >12 h washout periods between salbutamol doses. Patients voided urine 15 min before each study dose and urine samples were collected at 0.5 h post dosing and pooled for the next 24 h.

RESULTS

The MDI-AV and VM resulted in a higher percentage of urinary salbutamol levels compared to the JN (p < 0.05). Urine levels were similar between humidity and dry conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that in-vitro reports overestimate the impact of dry vs. heated humidified conditions on the delivery of aerosol during invasive mechanical ventilation.

Inhaled salbutamol dose delivered by jet nebulizer, vibrating mesh nebulizer and metered dose inhaler with spacer during invasive mechanical ventilation

BACKGROUND

Patient receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) may benefit from medical aerosol, but guidance on dosing with different aerosol devices is limited to in-vitro studies. The study was designed to compare aerosol delivery with five different types of aerosol generators during IMV.

METHOD

In randomized design, 60 (30 female) mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients were assigned to one of 5 groups. Groups 1-4 received 5000 μg salbutamol using Aerogen Pro (PRO), Aerogen Solo (SOLO), NIVO vibrating mesh and jet nebulizers (JN), respectively, while group 5 received 800 μg (8 puffs) of salbutamol via metered dose inhaler with AeroChamber-MV (MDI-AC). All devices were place in the inspiratory limb of ventilator downstream from humidifier which was switched off while delivery. Patients received the inhaled dose on day 1 and provided urine 30 post dosing. They also recived the same inhaled dose with a filter before the endotracheal tube on day 2. Amount of salbutamol excreted in urine 30 min post inhalation and the amount deposited on the filter from all the COPD patients were determined as indeces of pulmonary deposition and systemic absorption, respectively.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the 3 vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMNs). The in-vivo and ex-vivo testing showed that all the VMNs resulted in better aerosol delivery compared to JN (p < 0.01). However, MDI-AC resulted in better aerosol delivery to VMNs but must be accompanied with careful attention and proper delivery of MDI-AC doses by healthcare provider.

CONCLUSIONS

VMNs can be exchanged with each other, with no dose adjustment. However, dose adjustment is a must when replacing VMNs by JN or MDI-AC. This similarity and difference between the 5 aerosol delivery methods suggest that for IMV patients, aerosol delivery methods should be chosen or substituted with care.