Élargir les indications de la néphrectomie partielle induit-il un surcroît de morbidité ?

Systematic review on active treatment for urinary fistula after partial nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Urinary fistula is expected to become more frequent in urological practice as a result of expanding indication of partial nephrectomy given it's oncological results equivalent to those of radical nephrectomy but at a lower risk of progression to chronic kidney disease, lower cardiovascular morbidity, and overall mortality.

OBJECTIVES

Review and compare different techniques of contemporary active management for urinary fistula after partial nephrectomy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search on the MEDLINE database was conducted in March 2020, combining the terms: "urine leak", "urine leakage", "urinary leak" and "urinary fistula", with: "partial nephrectomy", "nephron sparing surgery" and "renal sparing surgery". This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Only articles related to active treatment were eligible. Abstracts in English and Spanish from the last two decades were screened. No restriction based on study design nor the length of follow-up.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

1) Leak resolution rate 2) Time course of leak resolution and 3) Number of interventions needed for resolution.

RESULTS

Multiple studies were found. There were no randomized controlled trials. Urinary fistula can be solved in many ways with active treatment, with a high success rate (97.5%), an average of 1.4 intervention-per-patients and a mean time for leak resolution of 11 days (median of 3 days).

CONCLUSION

There is a high risk of bias due to the study's methodology. There is a broad range of effective alternatives and various approaches to solve urinary fistula in an appropriate timing.

[Imperative partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: oncological and functional results]

OBJECTIVES

To study oncological results and functional results after partial nephrectomy in imperative indication for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1990 to December 2009, 65 partial nephrectomies in 61 patients were performed in imperative indication for renal cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 59.3 years. The mean follow-up was 47.4 months. The tumours were asymptomatic in 87.5%. The average tumour diameter was 4.3 cm. Twenty-nine percent of patients relapsed after a mean time of 27.4 months. The morbidity was 38.5%. Preoperative and endpoint serum creatinine and renal clearance were respectively 119 μmol/L and 63.1 mL/min versus 137 μmol/L and 50.9 mL/min (P=0.0003; 0.0002). Overall survival at one, three, five and ten years was 98.4%, 91.2%, 91.2% and 51.9%.

CONCLUSION

Partial nephrectomy in imperative indication for renal cell carcinoma has helped preserve renal function but has a significant morbidity and recurrence rate.

[Nephron-sparing surgery is superior to radical nephrectomy in preserving renal function outcome in tumors larger than 4 cm]

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to analyse whether nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) was superior to radical nephrectomy (RN) in preserving renal function outcome in tumors larger than 4cm.

METHODS

The data from 888 patients who had been operated upon at eight french university hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) pre- and post-surgery was calculated with the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. For a fair comparison between the two techniques, all imperative indications for NSS and all GFR<30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) were excluded from analysis. A shift to a less favorable DFG group following surgery was considered clinically significant.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirty patients were suitable for comparison. Median age at diagnosis was 60 years (19-88). Tumors measuring more than 4cm represented 359 (49.2%) cases. NSS and RN were performed in 384 (52.6%) and 346 (47.4%) patients, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients undergoing NSS had a smaller risk than RN of developing significant GFR change following surgery. This was true for tumors≤4cm (P=0.0001) and for tumors>4cm (P=0.018). In multivariate analysis, the following criteria were independent predictive factors for developing significant postoperative GFR loss: the use of RN (P=0.001), decreased preoperative DFG (P=0.006), increased age at diagnosis (P=0.001) and increased ASA score (P=0.004).

CONCLUSION

The renal function benefit offered by elective NSS over RN persists even when expanding NSS indications beyond the traditional 4 cm cut-off.

[Results of nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma of more than 4 cm in diameter]

To date, radical nephrectomy (RN) remains the gold standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) larger than 4 cm. However, from the early 1990's, improvements in surgical techniques have lead to the development of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for small renal tumours of less than 4 cm in diameter. This surgical procedure avoids nephronic waste with an acceptable morbidity and similar oncological outcomes compared to radical surgery. Recent large published series did not show any difference between NSS and RN in terms of oncological safety. Specific and disease-free five-year survival rates (82% to 97.3% and 81% to 97.3%, respectively) have confirmed the safety of NSS. Regarding laparoscopic NSS, the technique is still under evaluation and only mid-term outcomes are available so far. However, these studies are still limited and longer follow-up is needed before any definitive statement can be made. Current guidelines recommend NSS only in case of RCC of less than 4 cm in diameter in elective indications. In daily practice however, surgical teams are pushing back the limit above the threshold of 4 cm. More and more surgeons are either considering anatomical location or technical expected difficulties rather than just the tumour size. NSS leads to higher risk of bleeding, especially in case of tumours larger than 4 cm. Therefore, it is absolutely necessary to investigate thoroughly the vascularization of the tumour to avoid such complications with exhaustive and accurate preoperative imaging.