Évaluation des pratiques professionnelles : audit portant sur l’antibioprophylaxie en urologie

Antibiotic use in gastrointestinal surgery patients at a Vietnamese national hospital

BACKGROUND

Invasive gastrointestinal surgery may be performed as an open or endoscopic procedure, such as laparoscopic semi-colon surgery, laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy, and anal surgery, among other such operations. Regardless of the approach, the operative procedure interferes with the patient's gastrointestinal tract, necessitating the rational use of prophylactic antibiotics to improve treatment outcomes and minimize postoperative infections.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prophylactic and postoperative antibiotic usage in patients who underwent invasive gastrointestinal surgery, and to identify factors associated with postoperative infection.

DESIGN

This descriptive, cross-sectional study included 112 patients who underwent invasive gastrointestinal surgery at the Department of Gastroenterology, Thong Nhat Hospital. We conducted a cross-sectional study in all inpatients aged 18 years and older, who underwent invasive gastrointestinal surgery between January 2020 and December 2020. We recorded patient characteristics, the administration and appropriateness of antibiotics, as well as treatment outcomes. The appropriateness of prophylactic and postoperative antibiotic usage was assessed based on 2015 Vietnamese national guideline for antibiotic use. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with postoperative infection.

RESULTS

Patients' mean age was 59.7 ± 17.2 years. Most surgeries (89.3%) were clean-contaminated procedures. The rates of appropriate types of antibiotics selected, doses, and overall rates of appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis were 68.0%, 76.4% and 54.7%, respectively. Of the patients investigated, 34.8% had at least one sign of postoperative infection; the overall appropriate rate of postoperative antibiotic was 38.5%. Old age was associated with postoperative infection and longer length of hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the guidelines recommended for the prophylactic and therapeutic use of antibiotics is essential to improve treatment outcomes.

Adherence to guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: a review

Context and objectives

The appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis in the perioperative period may reduce the rate of infection in the surgical site. The purpose of this review was to evaluate adherence to guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.

Methods

The present systematic review was performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration methodology. The databases selected for this review were: Medline (via PubMed), Scopus and Portal (BVS) with selection of articles published in the 2004–2014 period from the Lilacs and Cochrane databases.

Results

The search recovered 859 articles at the databases, with a total of 18 studies selected for synthesis. The outcomes of interest analyzed in the articles were as follows: appropriate indication of antibiotic prophylaxis (ranging from 70.3% to 95%), inappropriate indication (ranging from 2.3% to 100%), administration of antibiotic at the correct time (ranging from 12.73% to 100%), correct antibiotic choice (ranging from 22% to 95%), adequate discontinuation of antibiotic (ranging from 5.8% to 91.4%), and adequate antibiotic prophylaxis (ranging from 0.3% to 84.5%).

Conclusions

Significant variations were observed in all the outcomes assessed, and all the studies indicated a need for greater adherence to guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.

[Off-label use of recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa) in teaching hospitals in Paris in 2010]

INTRODUCTION

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) (Novoseven(®)) was initially developed as a substitutive treatment in haemophiliacs but has then been used in situations of major haemorrhage in non-haemophiliacs (off-label use). The goal of the present study was to assess the practice patterns when rFVIIa is used in off-label indications in major teaching hospitals of Paris in 2010.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified files of patients in whom rFVIIa had been used. Physicians in charge of these patients (or the most proxy physician available) were contacted and files analysed with one of the authors. Quality of rFVIIa used in these off-label situations was determined based on either French or European guidelines or the available literature when no guidelines could be found. Three categories were defined for indication, dosage, timing, associated biological factors and overall use: adequate, acceptable (mainly adequate but lacking some characteristics of an "ideal" prescription) and inadequate (lacking most of the necessary characteristics of an "ideal" prescription).

RESULTS

Among 59 patients who had an off-label prescription of rFVIIa, 49 prescriptions could be analysed. Indication for use and timing of administration were adequate in 100% of multiple trauma cases and 83% of obstetrical cases. Biological criteria associated with an improved efficacy were found in two thirds of prescriptions analysed. Overall, prescriptions were adequate or acceptable in 82% of cases.

CONCLUSION

In the vast majority of patients who received rFVIIa for off-label indications in teaching hospitals of the Paris area in 2010, prescriptions were in line with recommendations.

[Factors associated with non-compliance to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines during a prospective audit]

OBJECTIVES

To assess physician compliance with guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practices and to identify factors associated with non-compliance.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

In a prospective study of patients admitted for clean or clean contaminated surgery from February 1 to April 28, 2008, we assessed appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis indication (recommended and prescribed or not recommended and not prescribed) and administration (antimicrobial choice, dose, timing and duration). Overall compliance was achieved if all criteria of indication and administration were met. The overall non-compliance rate was estimated and was used as a dependent variable in a multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with non-compliance.

RESULTS

In a total of 481 practices evaluated, appropriateness of indication and administration of surgical prophylaxis were respectively 83% and 56%. The overall compliance rate to guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis was 37%. In a multivariate regression analysis, prescription of antimicrobial prophylaxis by a surgeon (RR: 3.4; CI 95%: 1.6-7.5), clean-contaminated surgery (RR: 2.2; CI 95%: 1.4-3.7), traumatology surgery (1.87; 1.1-3.3), digestive surgery (3.7; 1.8-7.5) and head or neck-related surgery (11.4; 2.3-56.3) were independent factors associated with non-compliance to guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed previous findings on the impact of the type of surgery and the wound class contamination on the overall compliance rate. Furthermore, non-compliance was related to surgeon prescriptions. The compliance should be improved by specific measures after professional feedback.